Conclusion

Bread Winner ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 295-301
Author(s):  
Emma Griffin
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Theory ◽  
Working Class ◽  
Industrial Capitalism ◽  
Modern Economic

This concluding chapter returns to the ‘enigma’ raised at the beginning of the chapter — whether or not this study of six hundred-odd autobiographies has shed any light on why decades of robust economic growth failed to lift all out of poverty. It explores the survival of poverty in an increasingly prosperous society through a new lens — the working-class autobiographies. These sources are not often used by economic historians, but the chapter proposes a mingling of life and social histories with statistical records and modern economic theory to better explain how the economy grew and who benefited from it. After all, there can be no denying that Victorian economic growth had vastly increased the wealth of the nation by the outbreak of war in 1914. Yet whilst industrial capitalism could create wealth, it was itself unable to distribute it in such a way that most of society could benefit from it.

In Search of Institutional Characteristics of Economic Growth (New Approaches on the Border-line of XX-XXI Centuries)

2008 ◽  
pp. 4-27
Author(s):  
A. Radygin ◽  
R. Entov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Theory ◽  
Institutional Environment ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Institutional Characteristics ◽  
Border Line ◽  
New Approaches ◽  
Modern Economic

The article considers new approaches and studies of economic, political and legal interrelations which are directly linked with institutional characteristics of economic growth and have gained recognition in modern economic theory. The authors also analyze the most important from their point of view issues and contradictions that appear in the course of discussion of long-term prospects of the innovative institutional environment formation in present-day Russia.

Methodological Principles of Keynes’ Theory and His «Strife over Method» with Tinbergen

2007 ◽  
pp. 25-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Rozmainsky
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
Critical View ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
Methodological Principles

The author analyzes Keynes-Tinbergen controversy in the context of Keynes’ methodological ideas, which he thinks are fully opposite to the methodology of modern economic theory. Using different Keynes’ papers the author considers this difference in detail and shows its links to the critical view held by Keynes towards econometrics

Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare. Part I

2012 ◽  
pp. 67-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fleurbaey
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
Social Welfare ◽  
Well Being ◽  
National Product ◽  
Future Generations ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
Aggregate Wealth ◽  
Net National Product ◽  
Sustainability Policy ◽  
Beyond Gdp

The first part of the paper is devoted to the monetary indicators of social welfare. It is shown which methods of quantitative estimating the aggregate wealth and well-being are available in the modern economic theory apart from the traditional GDP measure. The limitations of the methods are also discussed. The author shows which measures of welfare are adequate in the dynamic context: he considers the problems of intertemporal welfare analysis using the Net National Product (NNP) for the sustainability policy and in the context of concern for well-being of the future generations.

Some Developments in Economic Theory Since 1940: An Eyewitness Account

2010 ◽  
pp. 4-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Arrow
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
General Equilibrium ◽  
Equilibrium Theory ◽  
General Equilibrium Theory ◽  
Economics Of Information ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
Eyewitness Account ◽  
Theory Uncertainty ◽  
Professional Formation

The article considers the evolution of some branches of modern economic theory from the perspective of the authors biography as a scientist and his professional formation. It describes problems of econometrics, general equilibrium theory, uncertainty, economics of information, and growth. It is shown how different authors representing various fields came to similar conclusions simultaneously and independently, what were the problems, in response to which economists of the second half of last century developed their theories, and what were the contexts of such development.

B is for Bias

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-47
Author(s):  
Calin Valsan
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
Rational Expectations ◽  
Economic Environment ◽  
Rational Agents ◽  
Economic Agents ◽  
Behavioral Biases ◽  
The Social ◽  
Modern Economic

Standard economic theory assumes rational agents. Individuals are expected to have rational expectations and constantly optimize their choices. Modern economic and financial theory is build under the assumption of rationality. There is plenty of evidence from psychology, however, that individuals are biased and rely heavily on heuristics in order to make decisions. Yet, this is not a mere fluke, a behavioral oddity. Because the social and economic environment in which individuals evolve is complex, behavioral biases represent evolutionary adaptations allowing economic agents to deal with undecidability and computational irreducibility.

Mexico's Pre-Revolutionary Reckoning with Railroads

1985 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Randall
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Theory ◽  
Transportation Network ◽  
Underdeveloped Country ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
Economic Interpretation ◽  
Short Run ◽  
Railway System ◽  
Economic Considerations

Economic considerations all but dominate recent historical writing in this country about the railroads of Mexico. Technical matters of construction and operation, as well as the role of the state in both, are touched upon, but economic interpretation, whether of the development of a railway system or of its impact on the nation, is the watchword if not catchword of most writing. Probably the leading example of the dominant approach is Growth against Development: The Economic Impact of Railroads in Porfirian Mexico (Northern Illinois University Press, 1981), by John H. Coatsworth, in which the author concludes that, while “the short run contribution of railroads to economic growth was large,” their longrun impact helped “to create the underdeveloped country Mexico has become.” Applying economic theory and measuring, Coatsworth in essence proves with numbers a case argued more elegantly in straight prose early in this century: that the application of a modern transportation network to a staple producing economy will do little more than extend and intensify the production system so as to increase the staple output.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document