Design of Ultra-high Pressure Vessels (Minor Issue of Strength of Material (Pressure Vessel))

1964 ◽  
Vol 67 (548) ◽  
pp. 1422-1429
Author(s):  
Shinsaku ONODERA ◽  
Masamitu KASAHARA
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Ultra High Pressure

Technical Progress in Chinese Standard of Ultra-High Pressure Vessels

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiwei Chen ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
Guoyi Yang ◽  
Jinyang Zheng ◽  
Guide Deng
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Nondestructive Testing ◽  
Technical Progress ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
National Standard ◽  
High Pressure Vessel ◽  
Ultra High Pressure ◽  
Chinese Standard ◽  
Design Pressure

Abstract GB/T 34019-2017 “Ultra High Pressure Vessels” is the most important national standard that applies to pressure vessel which design pressure value is greater than or equal to 100MPa (14.5ksi). There is no standard for Ultra-high Pressure Vessel, Then this standard fills the gap in the standard system of pressure equipment in China. This paper mainly introduces the concept and main content of the new national standard, including the materials, design methods and nondestructive testing of ultra-high pressure vessel.

Fitness-for-Service Assessment for Pressure Equipment in Japan

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayasu Tahara
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
The Other ◽  
Task Group ◽  
Assessment Procedure ◽  
Storage Tanks ◽  
Task Groups ◽  
Petrochemical Industries

Pressure equipment in refinery and petrochemical industries in Japan has been getting old, mostly more than 30 years in operation. Currently, the Japanese regulations for pressure equipment in service are the same as those in existence during the fabrication of the pressure equipment. Accordingly, there is an immediate need for an up to date more advanced “Fitness For Service” (FFS) evaluation requirements for pressure equipment. In order to introduce the latest FFS methodologies to Japanese industries, the High Pressure Institute of Japan (HPI) has organized two task groups. One is a working group for development of a maintenance standard for non-nuclear industries. Its prescribed code “Assessment procedure for crack-like flaws in pressure equipment” is for conducting quantitative safety evaluations of flaws detected in common pressure equipment such as pressure vessels, piping, storage tanks. The other is a special task group to study of API RP579 from its drafting stage as a member of TG579. The FFS Handbook, especially for refinery and petrochemical industries, has been developed based on API RP579 with several modifications to meet Japanese pressure vessel regulations on April 2001. [1] It is expected that both the Standard and FFS handbook will be used as an exemplified standard with Japanese regulations for practical maintenance. This paper presents concepts of “Assessment procedure for crack-like flaws in pressure equipment” HPIS Z101, 2001 [2].

Modeling and Optimization of Ultra High Pressure Vessel With Self-Protective Flat Steel Ribbons Wound and Tooth-Locked Quick-Actuating End Closure

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Ma ◽  
Zhongpei Ning ◽  
Honggang Chen ◽  
Jinyang Zheng
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Structural Parameters ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Peak Stress ◽  
High Pressure Vessel ◽  
Ultra High Pressure ◽  
Flat Steel

Ultra-High Pressure Vessel (UHPV) with self-protective Flat Steel Ribbons (FSR) wound and Tooth-Locked Quick-Actuating (TLQA) end closure is a new type of vessel developed in recent years. When the structural parameters of its TLQA and Buttress Thread (BT) end closure are determined using the ordinary engineering design method, Design by Analysis (DBA) shows that the requirement on fatigue life of this unique UHPV could hardly be satisfied. To solve the above problem, an integrated FE modeling method has been proposed in this paper. To investigate the fatigue life of TLQA and BT end closures of a full-scale unique UHPV, a three-dimensional (3-D) Finite Element (FE) solid model and a two-dimensional (2-D) FE axisymmetric model are built in FE software ANSYS, respectively., Nonlinear FE analysis and orthogonal testing are both conducted to obtain the optimum structure strength, in which the peak stress in the TLQA or BT end closure of the unique UHPV is taken as an optimal target. The important parameters, such as root structure of teeth, contact pressure between the pre-stressed collar and the cylinder end, the knuckle radius, the buttress thread profile and the local structure of the cylinder, are optimized. As a result, both the stress distribution at the root of teeth and the axial load carried by each thread are improved. Therefore, the load-carrying capacity of the end closure has been reinforced and the fatigue life of unique UHPV has been extended.

Square Root 3: Background to the New Design Margin for High Pressure Vessels

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Keltjens ◽  
Philip Cornelissen ◽  
Peter Koerner ◽  
Waldemar Hiller ◽  
Rolf Wink
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Design Code ◽  
Code Change ◽  
Section Viii ◽  
Background Material ◽  
Practical Information ◽  
High Pressure Equipment ◽  
Design Margin

The ASME Section VIII Division 3 Pressure Vessel Design Code adopted in its 2004 edition a significant change of the design margin against plastic collapse. There are several reasons and justifications for this code change, in particular the comparison with design margins used for high pressure equipment in Europe. Also, the ASME Pressure Vessel Code books themselves are not always consistent with respect to design margin. This paper discusses not only the background material for the code change, but also gives some practical information on when pressure vessels could be designed to a thinner wall.

Investigation on the Strength of Ultra High Pressure Vessel Cylinder With Self-Protective Flat Steel Ribbons Wound

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Ma ◽  
Jinyang Zheng ◽  
Zhongpei Ning ◽  
Honggang Chen
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Ultimate Load ◽  
Design Criterion ◽  
Potential Hazard ◽  
Unique Type ◽  
High Pressure Vessel ◽  
Ultra High Pressure ◽  
Load Carrying ◽  
Flat Steel

A unique type of self-protective Ultra-High Pressure Vessel (UHPV) cylinder with helically wound Flat Steel Ribbons (FSR) is proposed. The shielding properties of its self-protection in the hoop and axial directions of a FSR cylinder in the case of fracture failure, as well as quick-actuating of the tooth-locked end closure of this new vessel structure are both expounded. Based on its axial strength, a formula of the ultimate load-carrying capability of FSR layers is derived. The shielding function and self-protective capability of FSR layers to the UHPV cylinder are analyzed quantitatively in detail, and a design criterion is also defined. According to the formula and the design criterion defined in this paper, the predicted ultimate load-carrying capability of the FSR layers is 48.3% higher than that in previous references. Results from burst tests of 6 model vessels show that the brittle failure morphology of UHPV cylinders are changed with FSR layers and the potential hazard of failure of the UHPV is reduced. In addition, the cross fracture of the UHPV cylinder is shielded effectively and the derived formulation on the ultimate load-carrying capability of FSR layers is reasonable. UHPV cylinders designed according to the formula and the criterion can use much fewer FSR layers with the same shielding capability.

Submerged Pressure Vessel Testing Hazards

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Montoya ◽  
Donald Ketchum ◽  
Matthew Edel
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
High Speed Photography ◽  
Gas Release ◽  
Test Program ◽  
Projectile Motion ◽  
Leak Testing ◽  
Test Failure

It is common practice to proof test high pressure vessels prior to their use in the field. One technique for leak testing these vessels is submersion in water. A test failure at high pneumatic pressure and can pose several hazards to nearby personnel, such as projectile launch and blast loads. Submerged underwater testing can provide some level of protection from these hazards. However, it is largely unknown how much water cover is needed to prevent a projectile from escaping. The purpose of this test program was to record the mitigating effects of water on hazards caused by a sudden pressure vessel failure. The test program entails submerging a pressure vessel underwater inside a tank. The vessel is then pressurized to failure, releasing a blast wave and launching a projectile. The event is recorded using high speed photography which is used to observe the effects of the gas release and the projectile motion. A discussion of the test events and associated physics is provided.

Advanced High Strength Martensitic Stainless Steels for High Pressure Equipment

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Lardon ◽  
T. Poulain
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Yield Strength ◽  
Stress Corrosion ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Martensitic Stainless Steels ◽  
Ultra High Pressure ◽  
Resistance To Stress ◽  
High Pressure Equipment

Maraging stainless steels offer a large panel of high strength materials with good ductility and stress corrosion cracking resistance. Their mechanical properties compared to conventional 15-5 PH and 17-4 PH martensitic stainless steels show much better yield strength / toughness compromise for yield strength exceeding 1300 MPa. In the same time, fatigue resistance is significantly increased at high strength stress levels and material keeps good resistance to stress corrosion. These properties make them particularly suitable for ultra-high pressure equipment or high pressure rotating components submitted to high cyclic stresses. Their application for Pascalisation pressure vessels and ultra-high pressure compressors for ethylene gas is briefly presented.

Comparison Between the ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 3 and the Chinese Regulation TSG 21-2016 With Regard to the Design of High Pressure Vessels

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Fuenmayor ◽  
Rolf Wink ◽  
Matthias Bortz
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Chinese Economy ◽  
High Pressure Vessel ◽  
Safety Technology ◽  
Section Viii ◽  
Design Construction

There are numerous codes covering the design, manufacturing, inspection, testing, and operation of pressure vessels. These national or international codes aim at providing assurance regarding the safety and quality of pressure vessels. The development of the Chinese economy has led to a significant increase in the number of installed high-pressure vessels which in turn required a revision of the existing regulations. The Supervision Regulation on Safety Technology for Stationary Pressure Vessel TSG 21-2016 superseded the existing Super-High Pressure Vessel Safety and Technical Supervision Regulation TSG R0002-2005 in October of 2016. This new regulation covers, among others, the design, construction, and inspection of pressure vessels with design pressures above 100 MPa. This paper provides a technical comparison between the provisions given in TSG 21-2016 for super-high pressure vessels and the requirements in ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 3.

Overview of Revisions to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 3 for the 2017 Edition and Near Future

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peters ◽  
Gregory Mital ◽  
Adam P. Maslowski
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Central Area ◽  
Local Strain ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Conformity Assessment ◽  
Inspection Planning ◽  
Section Viii ◽  
American Society ◽  
Rules Changes

This paper provides an overview of the significant revisions pending for the upcoming 2017 edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) Section VIII Division 3, Alternative Rules for Construction of High Pressure Vessels, as well as potential changes to future editions under consideration of the Subgroup on High Pressure Vessels (SG-HPV). Changes to the 2017 edition include the removal of material information used in the construction of composite reinforced pressure vessels (CRPV); this information has been consolidated to the newly-developed Appendix 10 of ASME BPVC Section X, Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Pressure Vessels. Similarly, the development of the ASME CA-1, Conformity Assessment Requirements standard necessitated removal of associated conformity assessment information from Section VIII Division 3. Additionally, requirements for the assembly of pressure vessels at a location other than that listed on the Certificate of Authorization have been clarified with the definitions of “field” and “intermediate” sites. Furthermore, certain design related issues have been addressed and incorporated into the current edition, including changes to the fracture mechanics rules, changes to wires stress limits in wire-wound vessels, and clarification on bolting and end closure requirements. Finally, the removal of Appendix B, Suggested Practice Regarding Post-Construction Requalification for High Pressure Vessels, will be discussed, including a short discussion of the new appendix incorporated into the updated edition of ASME PCC-3, Inspection Planning Using Risk Based Methods. Additionally, this paper discusses some areas in Section VIII Division 3 under consideration for improvement. One such area involves consolidation of material models presented in the book into a central area for easier reference. Another is the clarification of local strain limit analysis and the intended number and types of evaluations needed for the non-linear finite element analyses. The requirements for test locations in prolongations on forgings are also being examined as well as other material that can be used in testing for vessel construction. Finally, a discussion is presented on an ongoing debate regarding “occasional loads” and “abnormal loads”, their current evaluation, and proposed changes to design margins regarding these loads.

Fracture Assessments of High Pressure Vessel Components Having Longitudinal Holes

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Xu ◽  
Kuao-John Young
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Stress Concentration ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
High Stress ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Crack Face ◽  
High Pressure Vessel ◽  
High Stress Concentration ◽  
Critical Locations

Small size longitudinal holes are common in components of high pressure vessels. In fracture mechanics evaluation, longitudinal holes have not drawn as much attention as cross-bores. However, longitudinal holes become critical at certain locations for such assessments because of high stress concentration and short distance to vessel component wall. The high stress concentration can be attributed to three parts: global hoop stress that is magnified by the existence of the hole, local stresses due to pressure in the hole, and crack face pressure. In high pressure vessel design, axisymmetric models are used extensively in stress analyses, and their results are subsequently employed to identify critical locations for fracture mechanics evaluation. However, axisymmetric models ignore longitudinal holes and therefore cannot be used to identify the critical location inside the holes. This paper is intended to highlight the importance of including longitudinal holes in fracture mechanics evaluation, and to present a quick and effective way of evaluating high stress concentration at a longitudinal hole using the combined analytical solutions and axisymmetric stress analysis results, identifying critical locations and conducting fracture mechanics evaluation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document