Future Convenience Store Based on Intelligent Space

Author(s):  
Shinnosuke KATO ◽  
Masahiro ITO ◽  
Motoaki SHIRATSU ◽  
Jumpei OKIMOTO ◽  
Koji SAKOTANI ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 111 (9) ◽  
pp. A86
Author(s):  
R.L. Fliszar ◽  
R.F. Pereira ◽  
J. Boucher ◽  
C. Osterhaus

1982 ◽  
Vol 51 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1219-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Terris ◽  
John Jones

Four studies are presented that examine various aspects of theft in the convenience store industry. Study 1 was a survey of both managers' ( n = 24) and retail clerks' ( n = 54) opinions on how and why convenience store employees steal. Results showed that the most frequently used theft techniques involved various ways of stealing cash from a register. Major reasons for employees' theft included financial need, low wages, revenge, and thrill-seeking. Major perceptions about why some employees never steal included fear of apprehension and personal honesty. Study 2 ( N = 61) showed that convenience store employees with more tolerant attitudes toward theft and violence, as measured by a pre-employment psychological test, the Personnel Selection Inventory, were more likely to engage in theft and other types of counterproductive behavior. Study 3 showed that the use of the inventory for 19 months by a 30-unit convenience store chain, for the purpose of screening out potential employee thieves and other counterproductive employees, was reliably more effective in reducing company shrinkage than a pre-employment polygraph procedure that was used for 23 months. Finally, Study 4 showed that the inventory had no adverse impact upon any protected group. Implications of these findings are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document