Diagnostic accuracy of serum inflammatory markers in late fracture-related infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1542-1550 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. van den Kieboom ◽  
P. Bosch ◽  
J. D. J. Plate ◽  
F. F. A. IJpma ◽  
R. Kuehl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Mixed Effects Models ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Erythrocyte Sedimentation ◽  
Serum Inflammatory Markers

Aims To assess the diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP), leucocyte count (LC), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in late fracture-related infection (FRI). Materials and Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched focusing on the diagnostic value of CRP, LC, and ESR in late FRI. Sensitivity and specificity combinations were extracted for each marker. Average estimates were obtained using bivariate mixed effects models. Results A total of 8284 articles were identified but only six were suitable for inclusion. Sensitivity of CRP ranged from 60.0% to 100.0% and specificity from 34.3% to 85.7% in all publications considered. Five articles were pooled for meta-analysis, showing a sensitivity and specificity of 77.0% and 67.9%, respectively. For LC, this was 22.9% to 72.6%, and 73.5% to 85.7%, respectively, in five articles. Four articles were pooled for meta-analysis, resulting in a 51.7% sensitivity and 67.1% specificity. For ESR, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 37.1% to 100.0% and 59.0% to 85.0%, respectively, in five articles. Three articles were pooled in meta-analysis, showing a 45.1% sensitivity and 79.3% specificity. Four articles analyzed the value of combined inflammatory markers, reporting an increased diagnostic accuracy. These results could not be pooled due to heterogeneity. Conclusion The serum inflammatory markers CRP, LC, and ESR are insufficiently accurate to diagnose late FRI, but they may be used as a suggestive sign in its diagnosis.

scholarly journals The diagnostic value of white cell count, C-reactive protein and bilirubin in acute appendicitis and its complications

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
I G Panagiotopoulou ◽  
D Parashar ◽  
R Lin ◽  
S Antonowicz ◽  
AD Wells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Cell Count ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
White Cell Count ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
White Cell ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein

Introduction Inflammatory markers such as white cell count (WCC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) and, more recently, bilirubin have been used as adjuncts in the diagnosis of appendicitis. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the above markers in acute and perforated appendicitis as well as their value in excluding the condition. Methods A retrospective analysis of 1,169 appendicectomies was performed. Patients were grouped according to histological examination of appendicectomy specimens (normal appendix = NA, acute appendicitis = AA, perforated appendicitis = PA) and preoperative laboratory test results were correlated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve area analysis (area under the curve [AUC]) was performed to examine diagnostic accuracy. Results ROC analysis of all laboratory variables showed that no independent variable was diagnostic for AA. Good diagnostic accuracy was seen for AA when all variables were combined (WCC/CRP/bilirubin combined AUC: 0.8173). In PA, the median CRP level was significantly higher than that of AA (158mg/l vs 30mg, p<0.0001). CRP also showed the highest sensitivity (100%) and negative predictive value (100%) for PA. CRP had the highest diagnostic accuracy in PA (AUC: 0.9322) and this was increased when it was combined with WCC (AUC: 0.9388). Bilirubin added no diagnostic value in PA. Normal levels of WCC, CRP and bilirubin could not rule out appendicitis. Conclusions CRP provides the highest diagnostic accuracy for PA. Bilirubin did not provide any discriminatory value for AA and its complications. Normal inflammatory markers cannot exclude appendicitis, which remains a clinical diagnosis.

scholarly journals The Inflammatory Markers of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in children (MIS-C) and Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhao ◽  
Li-juan Yin ◽  
Jenil Patel ◽  
Lei Tang ◽  
Ying Huang
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Absolute Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Older Children ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Erythrocyte Sedimentation ◽  
Quality Check ◽  
Inflammatory Syndrome ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract As per the indicated need in literature, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize inflammatory markers of MIS-C patients with COVID-19, Kawasaki disease (KD), and coronary artery abnormalities. We searched nine databases for studies on inflammatory markers of MIS-C. After quality check, data were pooled using a fixed- or random-effects model. Inflammatory markers included white blood cell count (WBC) or leukocytes, absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet count (PLT), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), ferritin, D-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), fibrinogen and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for comparisons by severity and age. Twenty studies with 2,990 participants yielded 684 MIS-C patients. Compared to non-severe COVID-19 patients, MIS-C patients had lower ALC and higher ANC, CRP and D-dimer levels. Compared to severe COVID-19 patients, MIS-C patients had lower LDH and PLT counts and higher ESR levels. Compared to KD patients, MIS-C patients had lower ALC and PLT, and higher CRP and ferritin levels. Severe MIS-C patients had higher levels of WBC, CRP, D-dimer and ferritin. For MIS-C, younger children had lower CRP and ferritin levels than medium-aged/older children. Measurement of inflammatory markers might assist clinicians in accurate evaluation and diagnosis of MIS-C and the associated disorders.

scholarly journals Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein in Acute Inflammation

2019 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Lapić ◽  
Andrea Padoan ◽  
Dania Bozzato ◽  
Mario Plebani
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate ◽  
Sedimentation Rate ◽  
Acute Inflammation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Erythrocyte Sedimentation ◽  
Methodologic Quality

Abstract Objectives To assess the diagnostic accuracy of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in acute inflammation. Methods PubMed and Scopus were searched and eligible articles were screened for methodologic quality using the Quality Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–Revised. Meta-analysis with calculation of pooled sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and summary area under the curve (SAUC) was performed. Results Twenty-nine studies were eligible. Se and Sp were 0.78 and 0.68 (SAUC = 0.80) for ESR in orthopedic infections and 0.79 and 0.70 (SAUC = 0.81) for CRP. For the diagnosis of other various inflammatory conditions, CRP had a superior diagnostic accuracy, with a Se of 0.86, Sp of 0.67, and SAUC of 0.86 compared with a Se of 0.77, Sp of 0.59, and SAUC of 0.75 for ESR. Heterogeneity among studies was elevated. Combined use of ESR and CRP yielded higher diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions Despite observed heterogeneity among studies, ESR and CRP have a similar diagnostic accuracy in assessment of inflammation, especially in orthopedic conditions.

scholarly journals Inferior performance of established and novel serum inflammatory markers in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Katharina Sigmund ◽  
Johannes Holinka ◽  
Kevin Staats ◽  
Florian Sevelda ◽  
Richard Lass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Volume Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Platelet Volume ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Serum Crp ◽  
Serum Inflammatory Markers

Abstract Purpose Besides other diagnostic test methods, established serum inflammatory markers such as serum C-reactive protein or leukocyte count are widely used preoperatively to aid in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Although low accuracies were reported, these parameters are easily accessible and routinely available. Novel biomarkers with promising results in diagnosing PJI (platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio) or other infectious conditions (percentage of neutrophils, neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio) were described. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of established and novel serum inflammatory biomarkers for the diagnosis of PJI so as to compare the results to find the serum inflammatory marker with the best performance. Methods In 177 patients with a previous total hip (n = 91) or knee (n = 86) arthroplasty and indicated revision surgery, the diagnostic value of the routinely available serum inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), percentage of neutrophils (%N), neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR), fibrinogen and platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PC/mPV) were examined retrospectively via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (AUC). The curves were compared using the z-test. Results Sensitivities of serum CRP, WBC, %N, NLR, fibrinogen and PC/mPV were calculated with 68%, 36%, 66%, 63%, 69% and 43%, respectively. Specificities were 87%, 89%, 67%, 73%, 89% and 81%, respectively. Serum CRP (0.78) and fibrinogen (0.79) showed significantly better AUCs compared with serum WBC (0.63), %N (0.67), NLR (0.68) and PC/mPV (0.62) (p < 0.0001). Patients with PJI caused by a low-virulent microorganism (median CRP: 17.6 mg/L) obtained lower CRP levels compared with infections caused by high-virulent microorganisms (median CRP: 49.2 mg/L; p = 0.044). The combination of CRP and fibrinogen showed a better sensitivity (77%) with similar specificity (83%) than one method alone but not at a significant level (CRP (p = 0.200); fibrinogen (p = 0.437)). Conclusion Serum CRP and fibrinogen showed the best accuracies among these widely available serum inflammatory parameters. However, due to the insufficient performance, these biomarkers can only be recommended as suggestive criteria in diagnosing PJI. The preoperative workup should always be complemented by more specific tests such as synovial fluid analysis.

scholarly journals Role of Procalcitonin and C-reactive Protein as Marker of Sepsis in Major Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (F) ◽  
pp. 197-203
Author(s):  
A. A. I. Yulan Permatasari ◽  
I. G. P. Hendra Sanjaya ◽  
I. Gde Raka Widiana ◽  
I. Wayan Niryana ◽  
A. A. G. Ngurah Asmarajaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Microbial Culture ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Major Burn

AIM: Although absolute values for C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) are well known to predict sepsis, it remains unclear how their diagnostic value in major burn patients as metabolic changes in burn patient mimic signs and symptoms for sepsis. This paper attempts to clarify these points for both of the markers. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, DOAJ, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases for studies published up to June 1, 2020, that evaluated PCT and/or CRP as a marker for diagnosing sepsis in burn patients was conducted. Review Manager 5.3 was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 11 literatures were obtained. The combined sensitivity and specificity for PCT as assessed by meta-analysis were 88% and 89%, respectively. The combined sensitivity and specificity of CRP were described as 85.5% and 57.5%, respectively. Meta-analysis cannot be performed for CRP parameters because there are only two literatures that include CRP diagnostic test values. DISCUSSION: PCT and CRP have additional diagnostic value for sepsis in patients with major burns. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PCT are excellent. Although the difference in sensitivity between PCT and CRP is not very large, there are distinct differences in specificity. A low CRP specificity value will show many “false positives” when CRP is used as a biomarker. CONCLUSION: PCT provides a better diagnostic value than CRP in cases of sepsis in major burn patients. More study on combination of biomarker, clinical presentation, and microbial culture for diagnosing sepsis are needed. Further large-scale research with cohort or case control design should be done.

Diagnostic value of procalcitonin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), quantitative C-reactive protein (CRP) and clinical findings associated with osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic foot

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Zahra Soleimani ◽  
Fatemeh Amighi ◽  
Zarichehr Vakili ◽  
Mansooreh Momen-Heravi ◽  
Seyyed Alireza Moravveji
Keyword(s):  
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate ◽  
Sedimentation Rate ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Erythrocyte Sedimentation

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of osteomyelitis is a key step of diabetic foot management. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a novel infection marker. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of procalcitonin and other conventional infection markers and clinical findings in diagnosis of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This diagnostic value study was carried out on ninety patients with diabetic infected foot ulcers admitted in Kashan Beheshti Hospital, 2016. After obtaining consent, 10 cc blood sample was taken for measuring serum PCT, CBC, ESR, CRP and FBS. Clinical characteristics of the wounds were noted. Magnetic resonance imaging of the foot was performed in all patients to diagnose osteomyelitis. All statistical analyses were done with the use of SPSS-16. RESULTS: PCT levels were 0.13 ± 0.02 ng/mili patients with osteomyelitis (n= 45) and 0.04 ± 0.02 ng/ml in patients without osteomyelitis (n= 45). PCT, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein was found significantly higher in patients with osteomyelitis (p< 0.001). The ROC curve was calculated for PCT. The area under the ROC curve for infection identification was 1 (p< 0.001). The best cut-off value for PCT was 0.085 ng/ml. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 97.8%,97.8% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this group of patients, PCT was useful to discriminate patients with bone infection. Also, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein can be used as a marker of osteomyelitis in diabetic patients.

scholarly journals Interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and risk of recurrence after ischaemic stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 239698732098400
Author(s):  
JJ McCabe ◽  
E O’Reilly ◽  
S Coveney ◽  
R Collins ◽  
L Healy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Randomised Trials ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Reactive Protein

Background Recent randomised trials showed benefit for anti-inflammatory therapies in coronary disease but excluded stroke. The prognostic value of blood inflammatory markers after stroke is uncertain and guidelines do not recommend their routine measurement for risk stratification. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the association of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and fibrinogen and risk of recurrent stroke or major vascular events (MVEs). We searched EMBASE and Ovid Medline until 10/1/19. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting comparable effect measures. Results Of 2,515 reports identified, 39 met eligibility criteria (IL-6, n = 10; CRP, n = 33; fibrinogen, n = 16). An association with recurrent stroke was reported in 12/26 studies (CRP), 2/11 (fibrinogen) and 3/6 (IL-6). On random-effects meta-analysis of comparable studies, CRP was associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke [pooled hazard ratio (HR) per 1 standard-deviation (SD) increase in loge-CRP (1.14, 95% CI 1.06–1.22, p < 0.01)] and MVEs (pooled HR 1.21, CI 1.10–1.34, p < 0.01). Fibrinogen was also associated with recurrent stroke (HR 1.26, CI 1.07–1.47, p < 0.01) and MVEs (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15–1.49, p < 0.01). Trends were identified for IL-6 for recurrent stroke (HR per 1-SD increase 1.17, CI 0.97–1.41, p = 0.10) and MVEs (HR 1.22, CI 0.96–1.55, p = 0.10). Conclusion Despite evidence suggesting an association between inflammatory markers and post-stroke vascular recurrence, substantial methodological heterogeneity was apparent between studies. Individual-patient pooled analysis and standardisation of methods are needed to determine the prognostic role of blood inflammatory markers and to improve patient selection for randomised trials of inflammatory therapies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document