Ultraviolet Photodissociation of Gas-Phase Alcohols, Amines, and Nitroalkanes

1996 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 608-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip L. Ross ◽  
Scott E. Van Bramer ◽  
Murray V. Johnston

The 193-nm photochemistry of alcohols, amines, and nitroalkanes in the C3-C6 size range is presented. The photolysis products are photoionized with coherent vacuum ultraviolet radiation and analyzed by time-of-flight mass spectrometry. For alcohols and amines, C-C bond dissociation competes with dissociations involving the heteroatom (C-O, O-H, C-N, N-H). Dissociation of the α(C-C) bond is preferred over other locations. Dissociation of a C-C bond is suppressed when a methyl radical would be produced. This behavior is similar to that observed for other substituted alkanes. Nitroalkanes exhibit both C-N and N-O bond dissociation pathways. Their low bond energies cause a substantial amount of internal energy to be partitioned among the primary photodissociation products. Under collision-free conditions, the alkyl radicals produced from these molecules undergo extensive secondary fragmentation. If the photodissociation step is performed in a free jet expansion, collisional cooling stabilizes the primary products and allows large species, such as intact pentyl and hexyl radicals, to be detected.

1998 ◽  
Vol 70 (21) ◽  
pp. 4534-4539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. J. Shi ◽  
X. K. Hu ◽  
D. M. Mao ◽  
S. S. Dimov ◽  
R. H. Lipson

1996 ◽  
Vol 263 (6) ◽  
pp. 817-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Jäger ◽  
Horst Heydtmann ◽  
Cornelius Zetzsch

1984 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 1850-1859 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Martin de P. Nicholas ◽  
Donald R. Arnold

The relationship between radical stability and bond dissociation enthalpy (BDH) is reexamined. It is shown that relative stabilization energies of radicals are not equal to relative BDH values. Net stabilization energies of radicals, SE0[R•, RX] are defined relative to the R components of closed shell species RX (R(RX)). These components are chosen such that they contain the same (or, approximately the same) net charge as that of the radical (R•). The following results, relative to R = C2H5, were obtained: R•, SE0[R•, RX](kJ mol−1) for X = R (i.e., the dimer RR), CH3, and H; CH3•, 23, 32, 37; n-C3H7•, −2, −2, −3; i-C3H7•, −9, −14, −19; t-C4H9•, −25, −32, −38. These results show that the methyl radical is more destabilized and the n-propyl-, i-propyl-, and tert-butyl radicals are more stabilized than is predicted from the corresponding relative BDH (R—X) values. The intrinsic C—H bond strengths of chosen alkanes are considered. Relative to the C—H bond in ethane, the bond in methane is found to be weaker by 8.12 kJ mol−1 and the primary and secondary bonds in propane and the tertiary bond in methyl propane are stronger by 2.56, 7.98, and 17.12 kJ mol−1 respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document