scholarly journals Burst control: Synaptic conditions for burst generation in cortical layer 5 pyramidal neurons

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. e1009558
Author(s):  
Eilam Goldenberg Leleo ◽  
Idan Segev

The output of neocortical layer 5 pyramidal cells (L5PCs) is expressed by a train of single spikes with intermittent bursts of multiple spikes at high frequencies. The bursts are the result of nonlinear dendritic properties, including Na+, Ca2+, and NMDA spikes, that interact with the ~10,000 synapses impinging on the neuron’s dendrites. Output spike bursts are thought to implement key dendritic computations, such as coincidence detection of bottom-up inputs (arriving mostly at the basal tree) and top-down inputs (arriving mostly at the apical tree). In this study we used a detailed nonlinear model of L5PC receiving excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to explore the conditions for generating bursts and for modulating their properties. We established the excitatory input conditions on the basal versus the apical tree that favor burst and show that there are two distinct types of bursts. Bursts consisting of 3 or more spikes firing at < 200 Hz, which are generated by stronger excitatory input to the basal versus the apical tree, and bursts of ~2-spikes at ~250 Hz, generated by prominent apical tuft excitation. Localized and well-timed dendritic inhibition on the apical tree differentially modulates Na+, Ca2+, and NMDA spikes and, consequently, finely controls the burst output. Finally, we explored the implications of different burst classes and respective dendritic inhibition for regulating synaptic plasticity.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eilam Goldenberg Leleo ◽  
Idan Segev

AbstractThe output of neocortical layer 5 pyramidal cells (L5PCs) is expressed by a train of single spikes with intermittent bursts of multiple spikes at high frequencies. The bursts are the result of nonlinear dendritic properties, including Na+, Ca2+, and NMDA spikes, that interact with the ∼10,000 synapses impinging on the neuron’s dendrites. Output spike bursts are thought to implement key dendritic computations, such as coincidence detection of bottom-up inputs (arriving mostly at the basal tree) and top-down inputs (arriving mostly at the apical tree). In this study we used a detailed nonlinear model of L5PC receiving excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to explore the conditions for generating bursts and for modulating their properties. We established the excitatory input conditions on the basal versus the apical tree that favor burst and show that there are two distinct types of bursts. Bursts consisting of 3 or more spikes firing at < 200 Hz, which are generated by stronger excitatory input to the basal versus the apical tree, and bursts of ∼2-spikes at ∼250 Hz, generated by prominent apical tuft excitation. Localized and well-timed dendritic inhibition on the apical tree differentially modulates Na+, Ca2+, and NMDA spikes and, consequently, finely controls the burst output. Finally, we explored the implications of different burst classes and respective dendritic inhibition for regulating synaptic plasticity.


1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 1549-1566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Jing Wang

Wang, Xiao-Jing. Calcium coding and adaptive temporal computation in cortical pyramidal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 1549–1566, 1998. In this work, we present a quantitative theory of temporal spike-frequency adaptation in cortical pyramidal cells. Our model pyramidal neuron has two-compartments (a “soma” and a “dendrite”) with a voltage-gated Ca2+ conductance ( g Ca) and a Ca2+-dependent K+ conductance ( g AHP) located at the dendrite or at both compartments. Its frequency-current relations are comparable with data from cortical pyramidal cells, and the properties of spike-evoked intracellular [Ca2+] transients are matched with recent dendritic [Ca2+] imaging measurements. Spike-frequency adaptation in response to a current pulse is characterized by an adaptation time constant τadap and percentage adaptation of spike frequency F adap [% (peak − steady state)/peak]. We show how τadap and F adap can be derived in terms of the biophysical parameters of the neural membrane and [Ca2+] dynamics. Two simple, experimentally testable, relations between τadap and F adap are predicted. The dependence of τadap and F adap on current pulse intensity, electrotonic coupling between the two compartments, g AHP as well the [Ca2+] decay time constant τCa, is assessed quantitatively. In addition, we demonstrate that the intracellular [Ca2+] signal can encode the instantaneous neuronal firing rate and that the conductance-based model can be reduced to a simple calcium-model of neuronal activity that faithfully predicts the neuronal firing output even when the input varies relatively rapidly in time (tens to hundreds of milliseconds). Extensive simulations have been carried out for the model neuron with random excitatory synaptic inputs mimicked by a Poisson process. Our findings include 1) the instantaneous firing frequency (averaged over trials) shows strong adaptation similar to the case with current pulses; 2) when the g AHP is blocked, the dendritic g Ca could produce a hysteresis phenomenon where the neuron is driven to switch randomly between a quiescent state and a repetitive firing state. The firing pattern is very irregular with a large coefficient of variation of the interspike intervals (ISI CV > 1). The ISI distribution shows a long tail but is not bimodal. 3) By contrast, in an intrinsically bursting regime (with different parameter values), the model neuron displays a random temporal mixture of single action potentials and brief bursts of spikes. Its ISI distribution is often bimodal and its power spectrum has a peak. 4) The spike-adapting current I AHP, as delayed inhibition through intracellular Ca2+ accumulation, generates a “forward masking” effect, where a masking input dramatically reduces or completely suppresses the neuronal response to a subsequent test input. When two inputs are presented repetitively in time, this mechanism greatly enhances the ratio of the responses to the stronger and weaker inputs, fulfilling a cellular form of lateral inhibition in time. 5) The [Ca2+]-dependent I AHP provides a mechanism by which the neuron unceasingly adapts to the stochastic synaptic inputs, even in the stationary state following the input onset. This creates strong negative correlations between output ISIs in a frequency-dependent manner, while the Poisson input is totally uncorrelated in time. Possible functional implications of these results are discussed.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeon Seo ◽  
Natalie Schaworonkow ◽  
Sung Chan Jun ◽  
Jochen Triesch

AbstractThe detailed biophysical mechanisms through which transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) activates cortical circuits are still not fully understood. Here we present a multi-scale computational model to describe and explain the activation of different cell types in motor cortex due to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Our model determines precise electric fields based on an individual head model derived from magnetic resonance imaging and calculates how these electric fields activate morphologically detailed models of different neuron types. We predict detailed neural activation patterns for different coil orientations consistent with experimental findings. Beyond this, our model allows us to predict activation thresholds for individual neurons and precise initiation sites of individual action potentials on the neurons’ complex morphologies. Specifically, our model predicts that cortical layer 3 pyramidal neurons are generally easier to stimulate than layer 5 pyramidal neurons, thereby explaining the lower stimulation thresholds observed for I-waves compared to D-waves. It also predicts differences in the regions of activated cortical layer 5 and layer 3 pyramidal cells depending on coil orientation. Finally, it predicts that under standard stimulation conditions, action potentials are mostly generated at the axon initial segment of corctial pyramidal cells, with a much less important activation site being the part of a layer 5 pyramidal cell axon where it crosses the boundary between grey matter and white matter. In conclusion, our computational model offers a detailed account of the mechanisms through which TMS activates different cortical cell types, paving the way for more targeted application of TMS based on individual brain morphology in clinical and basic research settings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 951-964
Author(s):  
Marvin Ruiter ◽  
Lotte J. Herstel ◽  
Corette J. Wierenga

Background: In an early stage of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), before the formation of amyloid plaques, neuronal network hyperactivity has been reported in both patients and animal models. This suggests an underlying disturbance of the balance between excitation and inhibition. Several studies have highlighted the role of somatic inhibition in early AD, while less is known about dendritic inhibition. Objective: In this study we investigated how inhibitory synaptic currents are affected by elevated Aβ levels. Methods: We performed whole-cell patch clamp recordings of CA1 pyramidal neurons in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures after treatment with Aβ-oligomers and in hippocampal brain slices from AppNL-F-G mice (APP-KI). Results: We found a reduction of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) in CA1 pyramidal neurons in organotypic slices after 24 h Aβ treatment. sIPSCs with slow rise times were reduced, suggesting a specific loss of dendritic inhibitory inputs. As miniature IPSCs and synaptic density were unaffected, these results suggest a decrease in activity-dependent transmission after Aβ treatment. We observed a similar, although weaker, reduction in sIPSCs in CA1 pyramidal neurons from APP-KI mice compared to control. When separated by sex, the strongest reduction in sIPSC frequency was found in slices from male APP-KI mice. Consistent with hyperexcitability in pyramidal cells, dendritically targeting interneurons received slightly more excitatory input. GABAergic action potentials had faster kinetics in APP-KI slices. Conclusion: Our results show that Aβ affects dendritic inhibition via impaired action potential driven release, possibly due to altered kinetics of GABAergic action potentials. Reduced dendritic inhibition may contribute to neuronal hyperactivity in early AD.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Ledderose ◽  
Timothy A Zolnik ◽  
Maria Toumazou ◽  
Thorsten Trimbuch ◽  
Christian Rosenmund ◽  
...  

Neocortical layer (L) 1 is a locus for interactions between long-range inputs, L1 interneurons and apical tuft dendrites of pyramidal neurons. Even though we have a wealth of information about L1, the level and effect of local input to this layer have not been quantified. Here we characterized the input to L1 of mouse somatosensory cortex with fast blue, monosynaptic rabies and optogenetics. Our work shows that most of the input to L1 is local, and that both local and long-range inputs to this layer arise predominantly from L2/3 and L5 neurons. Subtypes of L5 and L6b neurons project to the overlying L1 with different probabilities. VIP and SST interneurons in L2/3 and L5 also innervate L1. A subset of local L5, the intratelencephalic, pyramidal neurons, drive L1 interneurons but have no effect on L5 apical tuft dendrites. Monosynaptic rabies-based retrograde labelling reveals presynaptic boutons covering the entire somato-dendritic axis of pyramidal neurons, including in L1. When fast blue application was combined with rabies virus, we found that only a fraction of local and long-range neurons was both presynaptic to L5 neurons and projected to L1. These results demonstrate that L1 receives a large proportion of its input from local neurons, and that some of these inputs specifically target interneurons. We conclude that L1 is not just a site for interaction between long-range feedback and apical tuft dendrites of pyramidal cells, it is also a site for complex modulation of pyramidal neurons and interneurons by local inputs.


2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 855-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Berger ◽  
Matthew E. Larkum ◽  
Hans-R. Lüscher

Despite the wealth of recent research on active signal propagation along the dendrites of layer V neocortical pyramidal neurons, there is still little known regarding the traffic of subthreshold synaptic signals. We present a study using three simultaneous whole cell recordings on the apical dendrites of these cells in acute rat brain slices to examine the spread and attenuation of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic potentials (sEPSPs). Equal current injections at each of a pair of sites separated by ∼500 μm on the apical dendrite resulted in equal voltage transients at the other site (“reciprocity”), thus disclosing linear behavior of the neuron. The mean apparent “length constants” of the apical dendrite were 273 and 446 μm for somatopetal and somatofugal sEPSPs, respectively. Trains of artificial EPSPs did not show temporal summation. Blockade of the hyperpolarization-activated cation current ( I h) resulted in less attenuation by 17% for somatopetal and by 47% for somatofugal sEPSPs. A pronounced location-dependent temporal summation of EPSP trains was seen. The subcellular distribution and biophysical properties of I h were studied in cell-attached patches. Within less than ∼400 μm of the soma, a low density of ∼3 pA/μm2 was found, which increased to ∼40 pA/μm2 in the apical distal dendrite. I h showed activation and deactivation kinetics with time constants faster than 40 ms and half-maximal activation at −95 mV. These findings suggest that integration of synaptic input to the apical tuft and the basal dendrites occurs spatially independently. This is due to a high I h channel density in the apical tuft that increases the electrotonic distance between these two compartments in comparison to a passive dendrite.


2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (45) ◽  
pp. 14072-14077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Egger ◽  
Arno C. Schmitt ◽  
Damian J. Wallace ◽  
Bert Sakmann ◽  
Marcel Oberlaender ◽  
...  

Cortical inhibitory interneurons (INs) are subdivided into a variety of morphologically and functionally specialized cell types. How the respective specific properties translate into mechanisms that regulate sensory-evoked responses of pyramidal neurons (PNs) remains unknown. Here, we investigated how INs located in cortical layer 1 (L1) of rat barrel cortex affect whisker-evoked responses of L2 PNs. To do so we combined in vivo electrophysiology and morphological reconstructions with computational modeling. We show that whisker-evoked membrane depolarization in L2 PNs arises from highly specialized spatiotemporal synaptic input patterns. Temporally L1 INs and L2–5 PNs provide near synchronous synaptic input. Spatially synaptic contacts from L1 INs target distal apical tuft dendrites, whereas PNs primarily innervate basal and proximal apical dendrites. Simulations of such constrained synaptic input patterns predicted that inactivation of L1 INs increases trial-to-trial variability of whisker-evoked responses in L2 PNs. The in silico predictions were confirmed in vivo by L1-specific pharmacological manipulations. We present a mechanism—consistent with the theory of distal dendritic shunting—that can regulate the robustness of sensory-evoked responses in PNs without affecting response amplitude or latency.


2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 687-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. M. Jacobs ◽  
D. A. Prince

Developmental cortical malformations are common in patients with intractable epilepsy; however, mechanisms contributing to this epileptogenesis are currently poorly understood. We previously characterized hyperexcitability in a rat model that mimics the histopathology of human 4-layered microgyria. Here we examined inhibitory and excitatory postsynaptic currents in this model to identify functional alterations that might contribute to epileptogenesis associated with microgyria. We recorded isolated whole cell excitatory postsynaptic currents and GABAA receptor-mediated inhibitory currents (EPSCs and IPSCs) from layer V pyramidal neurons in the region previously shown to be epileptogenic (paramicrogyral area) and in homotopic control cortex. Epileptiform-like activity could be evoked in 60% of paramicrogyral (PMG) cells by local stimulation. The peak conductance of both spontaneous and evoked IPSCs was significantly larger in all PMG cells compared with controls. This difference in amplitude was not present after blockade of ionotropic glutamatergic currents or for miniature (m)IPSCs, suggesting that it was due to the excitatory afferent activity driving inhibitory neurons. This conclusion was supported by the finding that glutamate receptor antagonist application resulted in a significantly greater reduction in spontaneous IPSC frequency in one PMG cell group (PMGE) compared with control cells. The frequency of both spontaneous and miniature EPSCs was significantly greater in all PMG cells, suggesting that pyramidal neurons adjacent to a microgyrus receive more excitatory input than do those in control cortex. These findings suggest that there is an increase in numbers of functional excitatory synapses on both interneurons and pyramidal cells in the PMG cortex perhaps due to hyperinnervation by cortical afferents originally destined for the microgyrus proper.


F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 1945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeon Seo ◽  
Natalie Schaworonkow ◽  
Sung Chan Jun ◽  
Jochen Triesch

The detailed biophysical mechanisms through which transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) activates cortical circuits are still not fully understood. Here we present a multi-scale computational model to describe and explain the activation of different pyramidal cell types in motor cortex due to TMS. Our model determines precise electric fields based on an individual head model derived from magnetic resonance imaging and calculates how these electric fields activate morphologically detailed models of different neuron types. We predict neural activation patterns for different coil orientations consistent with experimental findings. Beyond this, our model allows us to calculate activation thresholds for individual neurons and precise initiation sites of individual action potentials on the neurons’ complex morphologies. Specifically, our model predicts that cortical layer 3 pyramidal neurons are generally easier to stimulate than layer 5 pyramidal neurons, thereby explaining the lower stimulation thresholds observed for I-waves compared to D-waves. It also shows differences in the regions of activated cortical layer 5 and layer 3 pyramidal cells depending on coil orientation. Finally, it predicts that under standard stimulation conditions, action potentials are mostly generated at the axon initial segment of cortical pyramidal cells, with a much less important activation site being the part of a layer 5 pyramidal cell axon where it crosses the boundary between grey matter and white matter. In conclusion, our computational model offers a detailed account of the mechanisms through which TMS activates different cortical pyramidal cell types, paving the way for more targeted application of TMS based on individual brain morphology in clinical and basic research settings.


F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 1945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeon Seo ◽  
Natalie Schaworonkow ◽  
Sung Chan Jun ◽  
Jochen Triesch

The detailed biophysical mechanisms through which transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) activates cortical circuits are still not fully understood. Here we present a multi-scale computational model to describe and explain the activation of different cell types in motor cortex due to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Our model determines precise electric fields based on an individual head model derived from magnetic resonance imaging and calculates how these electric fields activate morphologically detailed models of different neuron types. We predict detailed neural activation patterns for different coil orientations consistent with experimental findings. Beyond this, our model allows us to predict activation thresholds for individual neurons and precise initiation sites of individual action potentials on the neurons’ complex morphologies. Specifically, our model predicts that cortical layer 3 pyramidal neurons are generally easier to stimulate than layer 5 pyramidal neurons, thereby explaining the lower stimulation thresholds observed for I-waves compared to D-waves. It also predicts differences in the regions of activated cortical layer 5 and layer 3 pyramidal cells depending on coil orientation. Finally, it predicts that under standard stimulation conditions, action potentials are mostly generated at the axon initial segment of corctial pyramidal cells, with a much less important activation site being the part of a layer 5 pyramidal cell axon where it crosses the boundary between grey matter and white matter. In conclusion, our computational model offers a detailed account of the mechanisms through which TMS activates different cortical cell types, paving the way for more targeted application of TMS based on individual brain morphology in clinical and basic research settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document