Abdominal ultrasound in the diagnostic work-up of visceral leishmaniasis and for detection of complications of spleen aspiration

Introduction Abdominal ultrasound (US) is increasingly used in the diagnostic work-up of infectious diseases, but studies on its diagnostic value in visceral leishmaniasis (VL) are lacking. US could help to identify complications of spleen aspiration (SA). We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of US and the evolution of findings after VL treatment; the incidence and degree of splenic injury; and the pain perceived during SA. Methodology/result We conducted a cross-sectional prospective study at the Leishmaniasis Research and Treatment Center, Gondar, Ethiopia between Oct 2017 and Dec 2018. We enrolled VL suspects undergoing tissue aspiration; US were conducted before and after SA, and at the end of VL treatment. Splenic injury was graded using the American association of surgery trauma injury scale (grade 1–4). The pain perceived during SA was graded using a visual analogue scale. Out of 392 VL suspects, 192 (49%) were confirmed VL cases. The median age was 25 years (IQR 21–30). Massive splenomegaly and hepatomegaly were the most common US findings. Splenic nodules were seen in 3.7% of the 190 VL cases and 1.5% of the 197 non-VL cases. Ascites was more common in VL (16.4%) than in non-VL cases (9.1%). The frequency of US abnormalities decreased with treatment. None of the US findings had sufficient sensitivity and specificity to justify its use as a diagnostic test. US detected splenic injury in four of the 318 patients who had post-SA US. All four patients remained clinically stable. Pain was perceived as moderate or severe in 51% of patients. Conclusion The diagnostic value of abdominal US for VL was low but found useful to detect subclinical splenic injury. SA caries a risk of splenic injury and was perceived painful by most. Further research on less invasive diagnostic tools is needed.

Download Full-text

Toward Flow Cytometry Based Platelet Function Diagnostics

Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis ◽

10.1055/s-0038-1636901 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 44 (03) ◽

pp. 197-205 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Ivar van Asten ◽

Roger Schutgens ◽

Rolf Urbanus

Keyword(s):

Flow Cytometry ◽

Platelet Function ◽

Platelet Reactivity ◽

Diagnostic Tools ◽

Laboratory Diagnostics ◽

Main Challenge ◽

Platelet Function Disorders ◽

Diagnostic Work ◽

Work Up ◽

Diagnostic Work Up

AbstractThe laboratory diagnostics of (inherited) platelet function disorders mainly comprises aggregation and secretion assays, which may be suitable for diagnosing some specific severe platelet function disorders, but are not reliable enough for diagnosing mild platelet function disorders or disorders associated with low platelet count. Flow cytometric assessment of platelet reactivity will expectedly provide additional value during the diagnostic work-up of platelet function disorders because it only requires a small volume of whole blood and allows the measurement of platelet function in thrombocytopenic samples. Flow cytometry has frequently been used to evaluate platelet function in the research setting, and therefore, these assays will require clinical validation before they can be used as routine diagnostic tools. The main challenge in the validation of innovative platelet function diagnostic tests is the lack of a gold standard test for mild platelet function disorders. This review aims to address the many applications of flow cytometry in the current diagnostic work-up of platelet function testing and to discuss the challenges in introducing new tools for diagnosing platelet function disorders.

Download Full-text

PET-PANC: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy and health economic analysis study of the impact of combined modality 18fluorine-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography scanning in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer

Health Technology Assessment ◽

10.3310/hta22070 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 22 (7) ◽

pp. 1-114 ◽

Cited By ~ 31

Author(s):

Paula Ghaneh ◽

Robert Hanson ◽

Andrew Titman ◽

Gill Lancaster ◽

Catrin Plumpton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Chronic Pancreatitis ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Diagnostic Value ◽

Pet Ct ◽

Diagnostic Work ◽

Work Up ◽

Diagnostic Work Up

Background Pancreatic cancer diagnosis and staging can be difficult in 10–20% of patients. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) adds precise anatomical localisation to functional data. The use of PET/CT may add further value to the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Objective To determine the incremental diagnostic accuracy and impact of PET/CT in addition to standard diagnostic work-up in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer. Design A multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy and clinical value study of PET/CT in suspected pancreatic malignancy. Participants Patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy. Interventions All patients to undergo PET/CT following standard diagnostic work-up. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the incremental diagnostic value of PET/CT in addition to standard diagnostic work-up with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Secondary outcomes were (1) changes in patients’ diagnosis, staging and management as a result of PET/CT; (2) changes in the costs and effectiveness of patient management as a result of PET/CT; (3) the incremental diagnostic value of PET/CT in chronic pancreatitis; (4) the identification of groups of patients who would benefit most from PET/CT; and (5) the incremental diagnostic value of PET/CT in other pancreatic tumours. Results Between 2011 and 2013, 589 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer underwent MDCT and PET/CT, with 550 patients having complete data and in-range PET/CT. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were 88.5% and 70.6%, respectively, for MDCT and 92.7% and 75.8%, respectively, for PET/CT. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax.) for a pancreatic cancer diagnosis was 7.5. PET/CT demonstrated a significant improvement in relative sensitivity (p = 0.01) and specificity (p = 0.023) compared with MDCT. Incremental likelihood ratios demonstrated that PET/CT significantly improved diagnostic accuracy in all scenarios (p < 0.0002). PET/CT correctly changed the staging of pancreatic cancer in 56 patients (p = 0.001). PET/CT influenced management in 250 (45%) patients. PET/CT stopped resection in 58 (20%) patients who were due to have surgery. The benefit of PET/CT was limited in patients with chronic pancreatitis or other pancreatic tumours. PET/CT was associated with a gain in quality-adjusted life-years of 0.0157 (95% confidence interval –0.0101 to 0.0430). In the base-case model PET/CT was seen to dominate MDCT alone and is thus highly likely to be cost-effective for the UK NHS. PET/CT was seen to be most cost-effective for the subgroup of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer who were thought to be resectable. Conclusion PET/CT provided a significant incremental diagnostic benefit in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and significantly influenced the staging and management of patients. PET/CT had limited utility in chronic pancreatitis and other pancreatic tumours. PET/CT is likely to be cost-effective at current reimbursement rates for PET/CT to the UK NHS. This was not a randomised controlled trial and therefore we do not have any information from patients who would have undergone MDCT only for comparison. In addition, there were issues in estimating costs for PET/CT. Future work should evaluate the role of PET/CT in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and prognosis and response to therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer. Study registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73852054 and UKCRN 8166. Funding The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic yield and safety of transbronchial cryobiopsy in sarcoidosis

ERJ Open Research ◽

10.1183/23120541.00203-2019 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 00203-2019 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Maria Jacob ◽

Hélder Novais Bastos ◽

Patrícia Caetano Mota ◽

Natália Melo ◽

Rui Cunha ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis ◽

Diagnostic Yield ◽

Tertiary Hospital ◽

Definitive Diagnosis ◽

Diagnostic Tools ◽

Histological Features ◽

Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy ◽

Diagnostic Work ◽

Work Up ◽

Diagnostic Work Up

IntroductionTransbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is an endoscopic technique proven to be useful in diagnostic approach to interstitial lung disease (ILD), but its role in sarcoidosis is not fully established. The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic yield of TBLC in sarcoidosis and its safety profile.MethodsRetrospective analysis of patients, evaluated in a tertiary hospital ILD outpatient clinic, who underwent TBLC in the diagnostic work-up. TBLC was performed in accordance with the 2018 expert statement from the Cryobiopsy Working Group.Results32 patients were included (mean±sd age 47.7±12.6 years, 59.4% male) and divided into three groups: highly likely sarcoidosis (n=21), possible sarcoidosis (n=6) and unlikely sarcoidosis (n=5). A mean of 2.8±0.8 TBLCs were performed. The definitive diagnosis was established by TBLC in 20 out of 27 patients with suspected sarcoidosis. Two patients were diagnosed with sarcoidosis by other methods performed afterwards. TBLC leaded to other diagnosis as well, such as fungal infection (n=1), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (n=1) and silicosis (n=3), making the diagnostic yield for suspected sarcoidosis of TBLC of 92.6%. TBLC was also able to show compatible histological features in five patients whom sarcoidosis was not previously considered. The complications reported overall were pneumothorax in five (15.6%) patients and moderate bleeding in one (3.1%) case.ConclusionIn this cohort, TBLC was a safe, reliable and useful procedure in sarcoidosis diagnosis. These results suggest that TBLC can be used successfully in those cases where a definitive diagnosis could not be reached with the usual and less-invasive diagnostic tools.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic value of lymphopaenia and elevated serum ACE in patients with uveitis

British Journal of Ophthalmology ◽

10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316563 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. bjophthalmol-2020-316563

Author(s):

Philippine Cotte ◽

Pierre Pradat ◽

Laurent Kodjikian ◽

Yvan Jamilloux ◽

Pascal Seve

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Elevated Serum ◽

Diagnostic Value ◽

Granulomatous Uveitis ◽

Registration Number ◽

The Mean ◽

Diagnostic Work ◽

Work Up ◽

Diagnostic Work Up

AimTo evaluate the diagnostic worth of elevated serum ACE (sACE) and lymphopaenia, singly or combined, in diagnosing sarcoid uveitis.MethodsMonocentric retrospective study, on a cohort of 996 adult patients referred to our department between March 2001 and December 2018 for a diagnostic work-up of uveitis. The sensitivity (SE), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the two biomarkers were calculated in different contexts.ResultsEight hundred and sixty-eight patient cases were reviewed. The mean age at uveitis onset was 49.4 (±18.6) years. Of them, 144 patients had a diagnosis of sarcoid uveitis. An elevated sACE had SE of 45.8%, Sp of 88.8%, PPV of 44.9% and NPV of 89.2% in diagnosing sarcoid uveitis. For lymphopaenia, SE was 15.3%, Sp was 96.7%, PPV was 47.8% and NPV was 85.2%. For the combination of elevated sACE and lymphopaenia, SE was 18.9%, Sp was 99.0%, PPV was 73.9% and NPV was 89.5%. The value of this combination varied according to patient age at diagnosis plus anatomoclinical entities: for patients aged ≤50 years, SE was 31.3%, Sp was 99.7%, PPV was 90.9% and NPV was 94.3%. For granulomatous uveitis, SE was 26.2%, Sp was 97.3%, PPV was 73.3% and NPV was 82.5%.ConclusionA combination of elevated serum ACE and lymphopaenia more convincingly suggests sarcoid uveitis than these investigational tests used alone, especially in patients with granulomatous uveitis, while a lack of these markers corresponds to a high NPV.Trial registration numberNCT03863782.

Download Full-text

Use of Ultrasound in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Adult Intussusception – A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound ◽

10.1055/a-0604-2676 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 41 (04) ◽

pp. 418-427

Author(s):

Christoph Klinger ◽

Bettina Riecken ◽

Christoph Frank Dietrich ◽

Klaus Dirks ◽

Karel Caca ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Imaging Modality ◽

Basic Skills ◽

Adult Intussusception ◽

Ultrasound Computed Tomography ◽

Line Imaging ◽

Us Findings ◽

Diagnostic Work ◽

The Impact ◽

Work Up ◽

Diagnostic Work Up

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the use of ultrasound (US) in the diagnostic work-up of adult intussusception (AI). Methods This multicenter study includes 26 consecutive patients diagnosed with AI between January 2010 and November 2017. A retrospective chart analysis was conducted with a focus on abdominal US findings and diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities (ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging). If available, surgical and pathological findings served as the gold standard (76.9 %). US examiners certified according to DEGUM grade 2 or 3 were classified as experts. Otherwise, they were regarded to have basic skills. Results During diagnostic work-up, 92.3 % underwent abdominal US. US was the first-line imaging modality in 88.5 % of cases. The accuracy regarding the detection of AI (85 %), correct localization (95 %) and detection of complications (100 %) was excellent and comparable with CT (81 %, 90.5 %, and 91.7 %) when performed by experts. 72.7 % of tumorous lead points were detected by experienced examiners. In contrast, AI was detected in only 45.5 % of cases by examiners with basic skills. AI was diagnosed prior to surgery in all patients. Conclusion US is reliable in the diagnostic work-up of AI when performed by experienced examiners with high-quality equipment. US, CT and MRI should be used in a complementary fashion since combination provides excellent sensitivity regarding the detection and correct localization of AI as well as the detection of complications. The impact of real-time imaging is illustrated by supplementary videos.

Download Full-text