scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of ESR1 Gene Amplification, mRNA/Protein Expression and Functional Profiles in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: A Translational Study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e70634 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Pentheroudakis ◽  
Vassiliki Kotoula ◽  
Anastasia G. Eleftheraki ◽  
Eleftheria Tsolaki ◽  
Ralph M. Wirtz ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1422-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Psyrri ◽  
K.T. Kalogeras ◽  
R. Kronenwett ◽  
R.M. Wirtz ◽  
A. Batistatou ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 592-592
Author(s):  
George E. Pentheroudakis ◽  
Anna Batistatou ◽  
Urania Dafni ◽  
Mattheos Bobos ◽  
Eleftheria Tsolaki ◽  
...  

592 Background: Discrepant data have been reported on the incidence of ESR1 gene amplification in breast cancer, its correlation to clinicopathologic characteristics and its impact on prognosis. Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue samples from 946 patients participating in two adjuvant chemotherapy phase III trials (HE10/97 and HE10/00) were centrally assessed in tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). FISH was also performed for HER2, TOP2A and ESR1 using commercially available dual (for ESR1) and triple (for HER2 and TOP2A) hybridization probes. Results: The majority of patients had >T2 (69%), node-positive, ER-positive (>1% stained cells, 73%) tumors managed with resection, chemotherapy and hormonotherapy (76%). Only 38 tumors (4.0%) had ESR1 gene amplification (ESR1/CEN6 ratio >2) and 514 (54.3%) ESR1 gene gain (1<ratio<2). The number of ESR1 gene copies was 3-4 in 251 (26.5%) and 5-10 in 42 (4.4%) of cases. HER2 and TOP2A gene amplification was seen in 234 (25.3%) and 101 (10.9%) of tumors, respectively. We studied the immunohistochemical expression of ER protein by evaluating the percentage of stained cells, the Allred score (0-2, 26.8%; 3-6, 62.5%; 7-8, 10.7% of tumors) and the semiquantitative H-Score (50-100, 13.8%; 101-200, 36.8%; 201-300, 15% of tumors). ESR1 gene amplification was significantly associated with taxane therapy, age >50, postmenopausal status, grade III-IV, absence of HER2 amplification and ER protein expression (p<0.05). At a median follow-up of 92 months, univariate Cox regression analysis showed that ER protein expression, but not ESR1 gene status, was a predictor of favorable outcome. In multivariate analysis, tumor size >5 cm, >4 involved nodes and negative/low ER protein expression by Allred score were independent adverse prognostic factors. Conclusions: Our data showed a rather low incidence of ESR1 gene amplification and failed to confirm its prognostic/predictive utility. ESR1 mRNA expression data will be presented at the meeting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Lee ◽  
Mi Jeong Kwon ◽  
Beom-Mo Koo ◽  
Hee Geon Park ◽  
Jinil Han ◽  
...  

AbstractThe prognostic value of current multigene assays for breast cancer is limited to hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer. Despite the prognostic significance of immune response-related genes in breast cancer, immune gene signatures have not been incorporated into most multigene assays. Here, using public gene expression microarray datasets, we classified breast cancer patients into three risk groups according to clinical risk and proliferation risk. We then developed the immune prognostic index based on expression of five immune response-related genes (TRAT1, IL2RB, CTLA4, IGHM and IL21R) and lymph node status to predict the risk of recurrence in the clinical and proliferation high-risk (CPH) group. The 10-year probability of disease-free survival (DFS) or distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) of patients classified as high risk according to the immune prognostic index was significantly lower than those of patients classified as intermediate or low risk. Multivariate analysis revealed that the index is an independent prognostic factor for DFS or DMFS. Moreover, the C-index revealed that it is superior to clinicopathological variables for predicting prognosis. Its prognostic significance was also validated in independent datasets. The immune prognostic index identified low-risk patients among patients classified as CPH, regardless of the molecular subtype of breast cancer, and may overcome the limitations of current multigene assays.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e0164013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flora Stavridi ◽  
Konstantine T. Kalogeras ◽  
Kyriaki Pliarchopoulou ◽  
Ralph M. Wirtz ◽  
Zoi Alexopoulou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document