scholarly journals Dietary Restriction Extends Lifespan in Wild-Derived Populations of Drosophila melanogaster

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e74681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanasios Metaxakis ◽  
Linda Partridge
Evolution ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eevi Savola ◽  
Clara Montgomery ◽  
Fergal M. Waldron ◽  
Katy M. Monteith ◽  
Pedro Vale ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 1011-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Mair ◽  
Carla M Sgrò ◽  
Alice P Johnson ◽  
Tracey Chapman ◽  
Linda Partridge

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhash D. Katewa ◽  
Fabio Demontis ◽  
Marysia Kolipinski ◽  
Alan Hubbard ◽  
Matthew S. Gill ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 1071-1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Bass ◽  
Richard C. Grandison ◽  
Richard Wong ◽  
Pedro Martinez ◽  
Linda Partridge ◽  
...  

Abstract Dietary restriction (DR) extends life span in many organisms, through unknown mechanisms that may or may not be evolutionarily conserved. Because different laboratories use different diets and techniques for implementing DR, the outcomes may not be strictly comparable. This complicates intra- and interspecific comparisons of the mechanisms of DR and is therefore central to the use of model organisms to research this topic. Drosophila melanogaster is an important model for the study of DR, but the nutritional content of its diet is typically poorly defined. We have compared fly diets composed of different yeasts for their effect on life span and fecundity. We found that only one diet was appropriate for DR experiments, indicating that much of the published work on fly “DR” may have included adverse effects of food composition. We propose procedures to ensure that diets are suitable for the study of DR in Drosophila.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e4067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Grandison ◽  
Richard Wong ◽  
Timothy M. Bass ◽  
Linda Partridge ◽  
Matthew D. W. Piper

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 1542-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Zajitschek ◽  
Grigorios Georgolopoulos ◽  
Anna Vourlou ◽  
Maja Ericsson ◽  
Susanne R K Zajitschek ◽  
...  

Abstract One of the key tenets of life-history theory is that reproduction and survival are linked and that they trade-off with each other. When dietary resources are limited, reduced reproduction with a concomitant increase in survival is commonly observed. It is often hypothesized that this dietary restriction effect results from strategically reduced investment in reproduction in favor of somatic maintenance to survive starvation periods until resources become plentiful again. We used experimental evolution to test this “waiting-for-the-good-times” hypothesis, which predicts that selection under sustained dietary restriction will favor increased investment in reproduction at the cost of survival because “good-times” never come. We assayed fecundity and survival of female Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies that had evolved for 50 generations on three different diets varying in protein content—low (classic dietary restriction diet), standard, and high—in a full-factorial design. High-diet females evolved overall increased fecundity but showed reduced survival on low and standard diets. Low-diet females evolved reduced survival on low diet without corresponding increase in reproduction. In general, there was little correspondence between the evolution of survival and fecundity across all dietary regimes. Our results contradict the hypothesis that resource reallocation between fecundity and somatic maintenance underpins life span extension under dietary restriction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 283 (1825) ◽  
pp. 20152726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Zajitschek ◽  
Susanne R. K. Zajitschek ◽  
Cindy Canton ◽  
Grigorios Georgolopoulos ◽  
Urban Friberg ◽  
...  

Dietary restriction (DR), a reduction in nutrient intake without malnutrition, is the most reproducible way to extend lifespan in a wide range of organisms across the tree of life, yet the evolutionary underpinnings of the DR effect on lifespan are still widely debated. The leading theory suggests that this effect is adaptive and results from reallocation of resources from reproduction to somatic maintenance, in order to survive periods of famine in nature. However, such response would cease to be adaptive when DR is chronic and animals are selected to allocate more resources to reproduction. Nevertheless, chronic DR can also increase the strength of selection resulting in the evolution of more robust genotypes. We evolved Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies on ‘DR’, ‘standard’ and ‘high’ adult diets in replicate populations with overlapping generations. After approximately 25 generations of experimental evolution, male ‘DR’ flies had higher fitness than males from ‘standard’ and ‘high’ populations. Strikingly, this increase in reproductive success did not come at a cost to survival. Our results suggest that sustained DR selects for more robust male genotypes that are overall better in converting resources into energy, which they allocate mostly to reproduction.


Aging Cell ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joep M.S. Burger ◽  
Séverine D. Buechel ◽  
Tadeusz J. Kawecki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document