scholarly journals The Molecular Basis of Conformational Instability of the Ecdysone Receptor DNA Binding Domain Studied by In Silico and In Vitro Experiments

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e86052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Szamborska-Gbur ◽  
Grzegorz Rymarczyk ◽  
Marek Orłowski ◽  
Tomasz Kuzynowski ◽  
Michał Jakób ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
In Silico ◽  
Molecular Basis ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
In Vitro Experiments ◽  
Ecdysone Receptor

Reconstitution of transcriptional activation domains by reiteration of short peptide segments reveals the modular organization of a glutamine-rich activation domain

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6056-6067
Author(s):  
M Tanaka ◽  
W Herr
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Pou Domain

The POU domain activator Oct-2 contains an N-terminal glutamine-rich transcriptional activation domain. An 18-amino-acid segment (Q18III) from this region reconstituted a fully functional activation domain when tandemly reiterated and fused to either the Oct-2 or GAL4 DNA-binding domain. A minimal transcriptional activation domain likely requires three tandem Q18III segments, because one or two tandem Q18III segments displayed little activity, whereas three to five tandem segments were active and displayed increasing activity with increasing copy number. As with natural Oct-2 activation domains, in our assay a reiterated activation domain required a second homologous or heterologous activation domain to stimulate transcription effectively when fused to the Oct-2 POU domain. These results suggest that there are different levels of synergy within and among activation domains. Analysis of reiterated activation domains containing mutated Q18III segments revealed that leucines and glutamines, but not serines or threonines, are critical for activity in vivo. Curiously, several reiterated activation domains that were inactive in vivo were active in vitro, suggesting that there are significant functional differences in our in vivo and in vitro assays. Reiteration of a second 18-amino-acid segment from the Oct-2 glutamine-rich activation domain (Q18II) was also active, but its activity was DNA-binding domain specific, because it was active when fused to the GAL4 than to the Oct-2 DNA-binding domain. The ability of separate short peptide segments derived from a single transcriptional activation domain to activate transcription after tandem reiteration emphasizes the flexible and modular nature of a transcriptional activation domain.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle Localization, Dimerization, and Binding Domain Architecture of the Telomere Protein cPot1

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 2091-2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Wei ◽  
Carolyn M. Price
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Domain Architecture ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Telomere Protein ◽  
Ob Fold

ABSTRACT Pot1 is a single-stranded-DNA-binding protein that recognizes telomeric G-strand DNA. It is essential for telomere capping in Saccharomyces pombe and regulates telomere length in humans. Human Pot1 also interacts with proteins that bind the duplex region of the telomeric tract. Thus, like Cdc13 from S. cerevisiae, Pot 1 may have multiple roles at the telomere. We show here that endogenous chicken Pot1 (cPot1) is present at telomeres during periods of the cell cycle when t loops are thought to be present. Since cPot1 can bind internal loops and directly adjacent DNA-binding sites, it is likely to fully coat and protect both G-strand overhangs and the displaced G strand of a t loop. The minimum binding site of cPot1 is double that of the S. pombe DNA-binding domain. Although cPot can self associate, dimerization is not required for DNA binding and hence does not explain the binding-site duplication. Instead, the DNA-binding domain appears to be extended to contain a second binding motif in addition to the conserved oligonucleotide-oligosaccharide (OB) fold present in other G-strand-binding proteins. This second motif could be another OB fold. Although dimerization is inefficient in vitro, it may be regulated in vivo and could promote association with other telomere proteins and/or telomere compaction.

scholarly journals Transcriptional activation of the fra-1 gene by AP-1 is mediated by regulatory sequences in the first intron.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3748-3758 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Bergers ◽  
P Graninger ◽  
S Braselmann ◽  
C Wrighton ◽  
M Busslinger
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cellular Transformation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Early Gene ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
In Vitro Mutagenesis ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
First Intron ◽  
Rat Fibroblasts

Constitutive expression of c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1, or c-Jun in rat fibroblasts leads to up-regulation of the immediate-early gene fra-1. Using the posttranslational FosER induction system, we demonstrate that this AP-1-dependent stimulation of fra-1 expression is rapid, depends on a functional DNA-binding domain of FosER, and is a general phenomenon observed in different cell types. In vitro mutagenesis and functional analysis of the rat fra-1 gene in stably transfected Rat-1A-FosER fibroblasts indicated that basal and AP-1-regulated expression of the fra-1 gene depends on regulatory sequences in the first intron which comprise a consensus AP-1 site and two AP-1-like elements. We have also investigated the transactivating and transforming properties of the Fra-1 protein to address the significance of fra-1 up-regulation. The entire Fra-1 protein fused to the DNA-binding domain of Ga14 is shown to lack any transactivation function, and yet it possesses oncogenic potential, as overexpression of Fra-1 in established rat fibroblasts results in anchorage-independent growth in vitro and tumor development in athymic mice, fra-1 is therefore not only induced by members of the Fos family, but its gene product may also contribute to cellular transformation by these proteins. Together, these data identify fra-1 as a unique member of the fos gene family which is under positive control by AP-1 activity.

scholarly journals Mad proteins contain a dominant transcription repression domain.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 5772-5781 ◽  
Author(s):  
D E Ayer ◽  
C D Laherty ◽  
Q A Lawrence ◽  
A P Armstrong ◽  
R N Eisenman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Interaction Domain ◽  
Transcription Repression ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Repression Domain

Transcription repression by the basic region-helix-loop-helix-zipper (bHLHZip) protein Mad1 requires DNA binding as a ternary complex with Max and mSin3A or mSin3B, the mammalian orthologs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptional corepressor SIN3. The interaction between Mad1 and mSin3 is mediated by three potential amphipathic alpha-helices: one in the N terminus of Mad (mSin interaction domain, or SID) and two within the second paired amphipathic helix domain (PAH2) of mSin3A. Mutations that alter the structure of the SID inhibit in vitro interaction between Mad and mSin3 and inactivate Mad's transcriptional repression activity. Here we show that a 35-residue region containing the SID represents a dominant repression domain whose activity can be transferred to a heterologous DNA binding region. A fusion protein comprising the Mad1 SID linked to a Ga14 DNA binding domain mediates repression of minimal as well as complex promoters dependent on Ga14 DNA binding sites. In addition, the SID represses the transcriptional activity of linked VP16 and c-Myc transactivation domains. When fused to a full-length c-Myc protein, the Mad1 SID specifically represses both c-Myc's transcriptional and transforming activities. Fusions between the GAL DNA binding domain and full-length mSin3 were also capable of repression. We show that the association between Mad1 and mSin3 is not only dependent on the helical SID but is also dependent on both putative helices of the mSin3 PAH2 region, suggesting that stable interaction requires all three helices. Our results indicate that the SID is necessary and sufficient for transcriptional repression mediated by the Mad protein family and that SID repression is dominant over several distinct transcriptional activators.

Methylation of RUNX1 by the Nuclear PRMT5/COPR5 Complex Regulates Its Cellular Location in Leukemia Cells,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3403-3403
Author(s):  
Xinyang Zhao ◽  
Ly P. Vu ◽  
Fabiana Perna ◽  
Fan Liu ◽  
Hao Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Arginine Methylation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Differentiation Potential ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Abstract 3403 RUNX1 is a transcription factor that is required for definitive hematopoietic development, and helps regulate long term hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal, platelet production, and lymphocyte development during adult hematopoiesis. RUNX1 is known to be modified via phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination and methylation, for example on R208 and R210 by PRMT1, which activates its activating function. We continue to investigate how the methylation of RUNX1 by other protein arginine methyl transferases (PRMTs) regulates its function. Loop 9 of the DNA binding domain (the Runt domain) of RUNX1 contains an SGRGK sequence that is also present on the tails of histone H2A and H4. The histone tails of H4 and H2A can be methylated by a purified PRMT5 complex in vitro. An enzymatically active in vitro PRMT5 complex capable of methylating histones and SM proteins requires two subunits: both PRMT5 and MEP50, a WD 40 repeat domain protein. Nevertheless, this purified PRMT5/MEP50 complex cannot methylate the DNA binding domain of the RUNX1 protein in vitro. We show that RUNX1 also can be symmetrically methylated at R142 within the SGRGK motif in vitro by a nuclear PRMT5/MEP50 complex which also contains COPR5. We show after RUNX1 is methylated on R142 within the nucleus of HEL cells, RUNX1 is exported to the cytoplasm in a CRM1 dependent manner, as the export of methylated RUNX1 is blocked by lemptomycin B. CRM1 interacts with PRMT5, supporting that PRMT5 mediated arginine methylation tags protein for nuclear export. Therefore, PRMT5 not only involves in epigenetic regulation by methylation of histones but also it can directly controls the level of transcription factor proteins within the nucleus. Polycytocemia Vera patients who express the Jak2V617F mutation have low PRMT5 activity due to JAK2V617F mediated PRMT5 phosphorylation (Liu et al 2011). How Jak2 signaling affects RUNX1 methylation and RUNX1 localization within the nucleus is still under investigation. By controlling the amount of RUNX1 available within the cell nucleus, PRMT5 may regulate lineage differentiation potential and growth potential of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. The nuclear localization of RUNX1 can be changed through post translational modification such as arginine methylation in addition to point mutations and translocations involving RUNX1 found patients with leukemia and pre-leukemic diseases. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 C-Terminal Variants of the Origin Binding Protein (OBP), OBPC-1 and OBPC-2, Cooperatively Regulate Viral DNA Levels In Vitro, and OBPC-2 Affects Mortality in Mice

2007 ◽  
Vol 81 (19) ◽  
pp. 10699-10711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malen A. Link ◽  
Priscilla A. Schaffer
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Viral Dna ◽  
Viral Dna Replication ◽  
Origin Binding Protein ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Two in-frame, C-terminal isoforms of the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) origin binding protein (OBP), OBPC-1 and OBPC-2, and a unique C-terminal transcript, UL8.5, are specified by HSV-1 DNA. As the first isoform identified, OBPC-1 was initially assumed to be the product of the UL8.5 transcript. Recent evidence has demonstrated, however, that OBPC-1 is a cathepsin B-mediated cleavage product of OBP, suggesting that OBPC-2 is the product of the UL8.5 transcript. Because both OBPC-1 and -2 contain the majority of the OBP DNA binding domain, we hypothesized that both may be involved in regulating origin-dependent, OBP-mediated viral DNA replication. In this paper, we demonstrate that OBPC-2 is, indeed, the product of the UL8.5 transcript. The translational start site of OBPC-2 was mapped, and a virus (M571A) that does not express this protein efficiently was constructed. Using M571A, we have shown that OBPC-2 is able to bind origin DNA, even though it lacks seven N-terminal amino acid residues of the previously mapped OBP DNA binding domain, resulting in a revision of the limits of the OBP DNA binding domain. Consistent with their proposed roles in regulating viral DNA replication, OBPC-1 and -2 act together to down-regulate viral DNA replication in vitro. During functional studies in vivo, OBPC-2 was identified as a factor that increases mortality in the mouse ocular model of HSV-1 infection.

scholarly journals Expression of qa-1F activator protein: identification of upstream binding sites in the qa gene cluster and localization of the DNA-binding domain.

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 1256-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Baum ◽  
R Geever ◽  
N H Giles
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Gene Cluster ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Protein Identification ◽  
Regulatory Gene ◽  
Quinic Acid ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activator Protein

The qa-1F regulatory gene of Neurospora crassa encodes an activator protein required for quinic acid induction of transcription in the qa gene cluster. This activator protein was expressed in insect cell culture with a baculovirus expression vector. The activator binds to 13 sites in the gene cluster that are characterized by a conserved 16-base-pair sequence of partial dyad symmetry. One site is located between the divergently transcribed qa-1F and qa-1S regulatory genes, corroborating prior evidence that qa-1F is autoregulated and controls expression of the qa-1S repressor. Multiple upstream sites located at variable positions 5' to the qa structural genes appear to allow for greater transcriptional control by qa-1F. Full-length and truncated activator peptides were synthesized in vitro, and the DNA-binding domain was localized to the first 183 amino acids. A 28-amino acid sequence within this region shows striking homology to N-terminal sequences from other lower-eucaryotic activator proteins. A qa-1F(Ts) mutation is located within this putative DNA-binding domain.

scholarly journals Phosphorylation of BATF regulates DNA binding: a novel mechanism for AP-1 (activator protein-1) regulation

2003 ◽  
Vol 374 (2) ◽  
pp. 423-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. DEPPMANN ◽  
Tina M. THORNTON ◽  
Fransiscus E. UTAMA ◽  
Elizabeth J. TAPAROWSKY
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activator Protein 1 ◽  
Basic Leucine Zipper ◽  
Activator Protein

BATF is a member of the AP-1 (activator protein-1) family of bZIP (basic leucine zipper) transcription factors that form transcriptionally inhibitory, DNA binding heterodimers with Jun proteins. In the present study, we demonstrate that BATF is phosphorylated in vivo on multiple serine and threonine residues and at least one tyrosine residue. Reverse-polarity PAGE revealed that serine-43 and threonine-48 within the DNA binding domain of BATF are phosphorylated. To model phosphorylation of the BATF DNA binding domain, serine-43 was replaced by an aspartate residue. BATF(S43D) retains the ability to dimerize with Jun proteins in vitro and in vivo, and the BATF(S43D):Jun heterodimer localizes properly to the nucleus of cells. Interestingly, BATF(S43D) functions like wild-type BATF to reduce AP-1-mediated gene transcription, despite the observed inability of the BATF(S43D):Jun heterodimer to bind DNA. These data demonstrate that phosphorylation of serine-43 converts BATF from a DNA binding into a non-DNA binding inhibitor of AP-1 activity. Given that 40% of mammalian bZIP transcription factors contain a residue analogous to serine-43 of BATF in their DNA binding domains, the phosphorylation event described here represents a mechanism that is potentially applicable to the regulation of many bZIP proteins.

scholarly journals Properties of the DNA-binding domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae STE12 protein.

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5910-5918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y L Yuan ◽  
S Fields
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Amino Acids ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Affinity ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Upstream Region ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dnase I Footprinting

The STE12 protein of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae binds to the pheromone response element (PRE) present in the upstream region of genes whose transcription is induced by pheromone. Using DNase I footprinting assays with bacterially made STE12 fragments, we localized the DNA-binding domain to 164 amino acids near the amino terminus. Footprinting of oligonucleotide-derived sequences containing one PRE, or two PREs in head-to-tail or tail-to-tail orientation, showed that the N-terminal 215 amino acids of STE12 has similar binding affinity to either of the dimer sites and a binding affinity 5- to 10-fold lower for the monomer site. This binding cooperativity was also evident on a fragment from the MFA2 gene, which encodes the a-factor pheromone. On this fragment, the 215-amino-acid STE12 fragment protected both a consensus PRE as well as a degenerate PRE containing an additional residue. Mutation of the degenerate site led to a 5- to 10-fold decrease in binding; mutation of the consensus site led to a 25-fold decrease in binding. The ability of PREs to function as pheromone-inducible upstream activation sequences in yeast correlated with their ability to bind the STE12 domain in vitro. The sequence of the STE12 DNA-binding domain contains similarities to the homeodomain, although it is highly diverged from other known examples of this motif. Moreover, the alignment between STE12 and the homeodomain postulates loops after both the putative helix 1 and helix 2 of the STE12 sequence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document