scholarly journals Intra-Myocardial Injection of Both Growth Factors and Heart Derived Sca-1+/CD31− Cells Attenuates Post-MI LV Remodeling More Than Does Cell Transplantation Alone: Neither Intervention Enhances Functionally Significant Cardiomyocyte Regeneration

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e95247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohong Wang ◽  
Qinglu Li ◽  
Qingsong Hu ◽  
Piradeep Suntharalingam ◽  
Arthur H. L. From ◽  
...  
Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 4333
Author(s):  
Wojciech Strojny ◽  
Wojciech Czogała ◽  
Przemysław Tomasik ◽  
Mirosław Bik-Multanowski ◽  
Małgorzata Wójcik ◽  
...  

Insulin-like growth factors (IGF-1 and IGF-2) and insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBP-1 to -7) are involved in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation and may be associated with various metabolic parameters. The aim of our study was to compare levels of IGFs and IGFBPs and the expressions of their genes in children before and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to assess their potential as markers of late metabolic complications of HSCT. We also conducted additional comparisons with healthy controls and of correlations of IGF and IGFBP levels with anthropometric and biochemical parameters. We analyzed 19 children treated with HSCT and 21 healthy controls. We found no significant differences in the levels of IGFs and IGFBPs and expressions of their genes before and after HSCT, while IGF and IGFBP levels were significantly lower in children treated with HSCT compared with controls. We conclude that our results did not reveal significant differences between the levels of IGFs and IGFBPs before and after HSCT, which would make them obvious candidates for markers of late complications of the procedure in children. However, due to the very low number of patients this conclusion must be taken with caution and may be altered by further research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 372-383
Author(s):  
Ryo Mitsui ◽  
Makoto Matsukawa ◽  
Kiyoko Nakagawa ◽  
Emiko Isomura ◽  
Toshie Kuwahara ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth S. Zuckerman

Understanding the concepts of normal hematopoiesis and the mechanisms of both disease- and treatment-related cytopenias assists in the proper management of patients and rational uses of hematopoietic growth factors, particularly in those cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with or without stem and progenitor cell transplantation.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2192-2192
Author(s):  
Graeme A.M. Fraser ◽  
Ahmed Al-Sagheir ◽  
Donald M. Arnold ◽  
C. Tom Kouroukis ◽  
Ronan Foley ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND. Myeloid growth factors (G-CSF, GM-CSF) are often administered following autologous stem cell transplantation to reduce the duration of neutropenia and limit infection-related morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES. (1) To determine if prophylactic myeloid growth factors (GF) administered to adult patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation for a hematological malignancy improve clinical outcomes post-transplant, and (2) to determine the optimal dose and schedule for the administration of GF post-transplantation. METHODS. Computerized databases were searched for reports from 1966 to March 2004. Reference lists from published reports were hand searched and published abstracts were also considered. Randomized trials comparing different GF regimens were selected by two independent assessors based on explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria; disagreement was resolved by consensus. Two independent reviewers blinded to authors, institution, journal name, and results used a validated scale to assess study quality. When possible, study results were pooled using a random effects model to obtain a pooled relative risk. RESULTS. Of 985 citations identified, 27 studies evaluating 2268 patients were included. Studies were grouped and analyzed according to their control and experimental arms: (1) early administration of growth factor (< day +3 post-transplant) compared with placebo or no growth factor (N=18 studies), (2) early administration of growth factor compared with delayed growth factor (> day +3, N=8 studies), and (3) high doses of GF (> 5ug/kg/d) compared to standard/low doses of GF (<5ug/kg/d, N=5 studies). Compared to no GF support, early administration of GF resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the median days to neutrophil engraftment (>0.5x109/L) in 14 of 15 studies (range 2–13 days). The magnitude of this benefit was diminished when only studies of higher methodologic quality and optimal transplant conditions (peripheral blood stem cells) were considered (range 2–3 days). A significant decrease in duration of hospitalization was reported in 8 of 15 studies; however no consistent benefit was observed for median days of i.v. antibiotics (3 of 10 studies), median days of fever (1 of 10 studies), or in the rate of microbiologically documented infections (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.29). Compared to delayed administration of GF, early administration of GF was not associated with a significant difference in median duration of neutropenia any of 5 studies. Only 1 study reported a significant difference in the median duration of hospitalization and median days of i.v. antibiotics and it was of lower methodological quality. No difference in the rate of microbiologically documented infections was detected (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.83–2.03). Compared to standard doses of GF, no study evaluating high dose GF reported a statistically significant improvement in any reported outcome but treatment was more costly owing to an increase in total GF administered. CONCLUSION. The administration of GF post-autologous stem cell transplant reduces the time to neutrophil engraftment and may reduce length of hospital stay. The effectiveness of delayed administration of standard dose GF (5 ug/kg/d) appears similar to strategies that initiate GF support immediately post-transplant or utilize high doses.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2559-2559
Author(s):  
A. E. Lyons ◽  
L. Balasubramanian ◽  
L. A. Andritsos ◽  
A. Evens ◽  
T. Kuzel ◽  
...  

2559 Background: Pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHu-MGDF aka MGDF) and recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) promote the maturation of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Healthy volunteers/donors have received MGDF in phase I/II clinical trials and G-CSF in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation procedures. Herein, we review clinical findings for five previously healthy volunteers/donors who developed hematologic malignancies after the use of MGDF or G-CSF. Methods: Clinical information related to hematologic malignancies were reviewed for three volunteers who had participated in a phase I/II clinical trial with MGDF and two donors who underwent G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cell harvesting procedures for sibling allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia. Results: Mantle cell, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia were diagnosed three to five years after exposure among three volunteers who received MGDF. For one of these patients, autoimmune thrombocytopenia and antibodies to MGDF that cross-reacted with endogenous thrombopoietin had developed shortly after MGDF administration and persisted until lymphoma chemotherapy was administered. Following chemotherapy, all three achieved complete remission, although one patient subsequently relapsed. Acute myelogenous leukemia was diagnosed four to five years after exposure in two donors who underwent G-CSF primed stem cell harvests prior to their siblings’ allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Following intensive chemotherapy, one of these patients died from acute leukemia and the second is now in complete remission. Conclusion: Controversy exists over the appropriateness of administering hematopoietic growth factors to healthy individuals. While a causal relationship with hematologic malignancies is uncertain, long-term follow-up among healthy individuals who receive hematopoietic growth factors is needed. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1315-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Herbst ◽  
Frauke Naumann ◽  
Olaf Herbst ◽  
Julia Bohlius ◽  
Peter Jüni ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Infectious complications such as febrile neutropenia belong to the most serious complications of chemotherapy including stem cell transplantation for cancer. The mortality rate associated with febrile neutropenia is approximately 10%. Meta-analyses have shown that both hematological growth factors (CSFs) and antibiotics prevent infections. A comparison of these two agents or their combination has not been examined in systematic reviews. We therefore conducted a network analysis to determine the role of antibiotics and CSFs for the prophylaxis of infections in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy or hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Methods: The network analysis included all randomized controlled trials that compared two or more of the following prophylaxis options: no prophylaxis, prophylaxis with antibiotics alone, prophylaxis using CSFs alone or prophylaxis using combinations of both, CSFs and antibiotics. Trails that did report overall survival, on study mortality, infection-related mortality, clinically documented infections, microbiologically documented infections or fever/febrile neutropenia were excluded. A Bayesian network analysis with four treatment options was performed; results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% credibility intervals (CI). Results: The best prophylaxis in the network with regard to preventing infections and infection-related mortality is the combination of antibiotics and CSFs. Comparing antibiotics alone to CSFs alone yields an OR of 1.00 (95% CI 0.69–1.52) for clinically documented infections. For the combination of both antibiotics and CSFs compared to only antibiotics or only CSFs, the incidence of clinically documented infections was also reduced (OR=0.61, 95% CI (0.46–0.77)). This is also true for the subgroup of patients receiving SCT or patients with acute leukemia. Conclusions: For patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, antibiotics and CSFs are similarly efficient in reducing infections. The choice of agent can therefore be based on preferences of the treating physician and the adverse events expected. The best prophylactic regimen however is the prophylaxis using both, antibiotics and CSFs. The combination should be considered for patients at high risk of developing infections such as those receiving SCT or patients with acute leukemia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document