scholarly journals Comparison of Combined General-Epidural Anesthesia with General Anesthesia Effects on Survival and Cancer Recurrence: A Meta-Analysis of Retrospective and Prospective Studies

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e114667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijian Pei ◽  
Gang Tan ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Wenjuan Guo ◽  
Bo Xiao ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesna Svircevic ◽  
Diederik van Dijk ◽  
Arno P. Nierich ◽  
Martijn P. Passier ◽  
Cor J. Kalkman ◽  
...  

Background A combination of general anesthesia (GA) with thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) may have a beneficial effect on clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery. We have performed a meta-analysis to compare mortality and cardiac, respiratory, and neurologic complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with GA alone or a combination of GA with TEA. Methods Randomized studies comparing outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with either GA alone or GA in combination with TEA were retrieved from PubMed, Science Citation index, EMBASE, CINHAL, and Central Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases. Results The search strategy yielded 1,390 studies; 28 studies that included 2,731 patients met the selection criteria. Compared with GA alone, the combined risk ratio for patients receiving GA with TEA was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.40-1.64) for mortality, 0.80 (95% CI: 0.52-1.24) for myocardial infarction, and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.24-1.46) for stroke. The risk ratios for the respiratory complications and supraventricular arrhythmias were 0.53 (95% CI: 0.40-0.69) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.50-0.93), respectively. Conclusions This meta-analysis showed that the use of TEA in patients undergoing cardiac surgery reduces the risk of postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias and respiratory complications. The sparsity of events precludes conclusions about mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke, but the estimates suggest a reduced risk after TEA. The risk of side effects of TEA, including epidural hematoma, could not be assessed with the current dataset, and therefore TEA should be used with caution until its benefit-harm profile is further elucidated.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16534-e16534
Author(s):  
Dominique Koensgen ◽  
Alexander Mustea ◽  
Barbara Rosanowski ◽  
Bianca Leutzow ◽  
Thomas Hesse ◽  
...  

e16534 Background: Current experimental and clinical data suggest that perioperative factors may influence the long-term outcome after cancer surgery. Recent retrospective analyses have shown the reduction of cancer recurrence and metastatic spread in patients after tumor surgery receiving perioperative regional and neuraxial analgesia. The aim was to investigate whether perioperative epidural anesthesia is associated with the decreased disease recurrence and increased survival after primary tumor debulking in patients with ovarian cancer. Methods: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with primary ovarian cancer who underwent radical multivisceral surgery between 01/2003 and 12/2010 under either general anesthesia plus opioid analgesia (group A) or general anesthesia plus epidural anesthesia (group B), was performed. Cancer recurrence-free survival and total survival times after surgery were compared between the groups using Mann-Whitney test. The analysis was strengthened by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for each group with comparison using the log-rank test. Results: Data of 105 (88%) of patients (group A: 33; group B: 72) were available for analysis. The median (interquartile range-IQR) follow-up time 27 (17-58) months. The groups were comparable regarding age, body-mass index, ASA physiological status, FIGO staging, tumor residual and use of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The median (IQR) time to recurrence of cancer was 31 (15-63) months in group A vs. 18 (10-35) months in group B (p = 0.017). Longer recurrence-free survival was associated with general anesthesia and opioid analgesia (hazard ratio 1.52; 95% confidence interval 1.4-1.56; p = 0.008). Conclusions: In contrast to previous investigations, perioperative epidural anesthesia was associated with decreased survival in patients after ovarian cancer surgery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuo-Teng Wang ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
Hui-Fu Wang ◽  
Lin Tan ◽  
Chen-Chen Tan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 232-237
Author(s):  
Mir Hadi Musavi ◽  
Behzad Jodeiri ◽  
Keyvan Mirnia ◽  
Morteza Ghojazadeh ◽  
Zeinab Nikniaz

Background: Although, some clinical trials investigated the maternal and neonatal effect of fentanyl as a premedication before induction of general anesthesia in cesarean section, to the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic review to summarize these results. Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the maternal and neonatal effect of intravenous fentanyl as a premedication before induction of general anesthesia in cesarean section. Methods: The databases of Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane library were searched till July 2017 to identify randomized clinical trials which evaluated the effects of intravenous fentanyl as a premedication before induction of general anesthesia compared with placebo on neonate first and fifth minute Apgar score and maternal heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in cesarean section. Standard Mean difference (SMD) was calculated and I-square statistic test was used for heterogeneity analysis. Results: The present systematic review and meta-analysis consisted of three clinical trials including 180 women in labor. Considering the results of meta-analysis, there is no significant differences between fentanyl and placebo in the case of Apgar score at 1 minute; however, the Apgar score of 5 minutes was significantly lower in fentanyl group compared with placebo (SMD -0.68, 95%CI: - 0.98, -0.38, p<0.001). In the term of maternal hemodynamics, the heart rate (SMD -0.43, 95%CI: - 0.72, -0.13, p=0.004) and MAP (SMD -0.78, 95% CI: -1.09, -0.48, p<0.001) in fentanyl group were significantly lower compared with placebo group. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis showed that using intravenous fentanyl as a premedication before induction of general anesthesia had adverse effects on neonate Apgar score. However, it had positive effects on preventing adverse consequences of intubation on maternal hemodynamics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document