scholarly journals Older adult fall prevention practices among primary care providers at accountable care organizations: A pilot study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e0205279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Howland ◽  
Holly Hackman ◽  
Alyssa Taylor ◽  
Kathleen O’Hara ◽  
James Liu ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 178 (2) ◽  
pp. e248-e254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Tong ◽  
Jason Lane ◽  
Patrick McCleskey ◽  
Brian Montenegro ◽  
Katherine Mansalis

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 906-906
Author(s):  
Lori Armistead ◽  
Jan Busby-Whitehead ◽  
Stefanie Ferreri ◽  
Cristine Henage ◽  
Tamera Hughes ◽  
...  

Abstract The United States spends $50 billion each year on 2.8 million injuries and 800,000 hospitalizations older adults (age 65 years and older) incur as the result of falls. Chronic use of central nervous system (CNS)-active medications, such as opioid and/or benzodiazepine (BZD) medications, increases the risk of falls and falls-related injuries in this older adult population. This Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-funded randomized control trial uses electronic health record (EHR) data from primary care outpatient clinics to identify older adult patients at risk for falls due to chronic opioid or BZD use. The primary program aim is to test the efficacy of a targeted consultant pharmacist service to reduce the dose burden of these medications in the targeted population. Impact of this intervention on the risk of falls in this population will also be assessed. Licensed clinical pharmacists will review at-risk patients’ medical records weekly and make recommendations through the EHR to primary care providers for opioid or BZD dose adjustments, alternate medications, and/or adjunctive therapies to support deprescribing for approximately 1265 patients in the first two cohorts of intervention clinics. One thousand three hundred eighty four patients in the control clinics will receive usual care. Outcome measures will include reduction or discontinuation of opioids and BZDs and falls risk reduction as measured by the Stop Elderly Accidents, Death and Injuries (STEADI) Questionnaire. Primary care provider adoption of pharmacists’ recommendations and satisfaction with the consult service will also be reported.


2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 310-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Josea Kramer ◽  
David A. Ganz ◽  
Rebecca L. Vivrette ◽  
Judith O. Harker ◽  
Karen R. Josephson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Victoria E. Orfaly ◽  
Elizabeth G. Berry ◽  
Elizabeth R. Stoos ◽  
Emile Latour ◽  
Mirna Becevic ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy A. Stevens ◽  
Matthew Lee Smith ◽  
Erin M. Parker ◽  
Luohua Jiang ◽  
Frank D. Floyd

Introduction. Among people aged 65 and older, falls are the leading cause of both fatal and nonfatal injuries. The burden of falls is expected to increase as the US population ages. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) initiative to help primary care providers incorporate fall risk screening, assessment of patients’ modifiable risk factors, and implementation of evidence-based treatment strategies. Methods. In 2010, CDC funded the New York State Department of Health to implement STEADI in primary care sites in selected communities. The Medical Director of United Health Services championed integrating fall prevention into clinical practice and oversaw staff training. Components of STEADI were integrated into the health system’s electronic health record (EHR), and fall risk screening questions were added to the nursing staff’s patient intake forms. Results. In the first 12 months, 14 practices saw 10 702 patients aged 65 and older. Of these, 8457 patients (79.0%) were screened for fall risk and 1534 (18.1%) screened positive. About 52% of positive patients completed the Timed Up and Go gait and balance assessment. Screening declined to 49% in the second 12 months, with 21% of the patients screening positive. Conclusions. Fall prevention can be successfully integrated into primary care when it is supported by a clinical champion, coupled with timely staff training/retraining, incorporated into the EHR, and adapted to fit into the practice workflow.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Brcic ◽  
Caroline Eberdt ◽  
Janusz Kaczorowski

Objective. The goal of this pilot study was to develop and field-test questions for use as a poverty case-finding tool to assist primary care providers in identifying poverty in clinical practice. Methods. 156 questionnaires were completed by a convenience sample of urban and rural primary care patients presenting to four family practices in British Columbia, Canada. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses compared questionnaire responses with low-income cut-off (LICO) levels calculated for each respondent. Results. 35% of respondents were below the “poverty line” (LICO). The question “Do you (ever) have difficulty making ends meet at the end of the month?” was identified as a good predictor of poverty (sensitivity 98%; specificity 60%; OR 32.3, 95% CI 5.4–191.5). Multivariate analysis identified a 3-item case-finding tool including 2 additional questions about food and housing security (sensitivity 64.3%; specificity 94.4%; OR 30.2, 95% CI 10.3–88.1). 85% of below-LICO respondents felt that poverty screening was important and 67% felt comfortable speaking to their family physician about poverty. Conclusions. Asking patients directly about poverty may help identify patients with increased needs in primary care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document