scholarly journals Development of a Tool to Identify Poverty in a Family Practice Setting: A Pilot Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Brcic ◽  
Caroline Eberdt ◽  
Janusz Kaczorowski
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Poverty Line ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Case Finding ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Rural Primary Care ◽  
Housing Security

Objective. The goal of this pilot study was to develop and field-test questions for use as a poverty case-finding tool to assist primary care providers in identifying poverty in clinical practice. Methods. 156 questionnaires were completed by a convenience sample of urban and rural primary care patients presenting to four family practices in British Columbia, Canada. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses compared questionnaire responses with low-income cut-off (LICO) levels calculated for each respondent. Results. 35% of respondents were below the “poverty line” (LICO). The question “Do you (ever) have difficulty making ends meet at the end of the month?” was identified as a good predictor of poverty (sensitivity 98%; specificity 60%; OR 32.3, 95% CI 5.4–191.5). Multivariate analysis identified a 3-item case-finding tool including 2 additional questions about food and housing security (sensitivity 64.3%; specificity 94.4%; OR 30.2, 95% CI 10.3–88.1). 85% of below-LICO respondents felt that poverty screening was important and 67% felt comfortable speaking to their family physician about poverty. Conclusions. Asking patients directly about poverty may help identify patients with increased needs in primary care.

A Comparison of Perceptions of Reassurance in Patients with Nontraumatic Neck Pain and Whiplash-Associated Disorders in Consultations with Primary Care Practitioners—An Online Survey

Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3377-3386
Author(s):  
Alma Viviana Silva Guerrero ◽  
Jenny Setchell ◽  
Annick Maujean ◽  
Michele Sterling
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Primary Care Practitioners ◽  
Pain Symptoms

Abstract Objectives Neck pain remains highly prevalent and costly worldwide. Although reassurance has been recommended as a first line of treatment, specific advice on the best ways to provide reassurance has not been provided due to lack of evidence. Pain symptoms and experiences differ between patients with whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) and those with nontraumatic neck pain (NTNP). The aims of this study were to 1) identify and compare the concerns, fears, and worries of patients with WAD and NTNP; and 2) determine if patients believe their concerns are addressed by primary care providers. Methods These questions were investigated through an online survey, with a convenience sample of 30 participants with NTNP and 20 with WAD. Results A thematic analysis of survey responses resulted in the following seven themes related to common concerns, and two regarding how well concerns were addressed. Common concerns expressed by both groups shared four themes: 1) further structural damage, 2) psychological distress, 3) concerns about the future, and 4) hardships that eventuate. Theme 5), pain/disability is long term, was specific to WAD. Themes 6), pain is current or reoccurring, and 7), interference with daily life, were specific to NTNP. Regarding how well patient concerns were addressed, two overarching themes were common to both conditions: 1) concerns were addressed, with both groups sharing the subthemes “successful treatment,” “reassurance,” and “trust”; and 2) concerns were not addressed, where all subthemes were shared with the exception of two unique to NTNP. Conclusions This detailed comparison provides information about neck pain patients’ concerns and fears, while providing health practitioners support for selecting strategies to promote reassurance appropriately for individual patient needs. Our findings from patients’ perspectives enhance the understanding for providing reassurance for neck pain as proposed by our analysis.

scholarly journals A Pilot Study Describing Knowledge and Practices in the Health Care of Men Who Have Sex With Men by U.S. Air Force Primary Care Providers

2013 ◽  
Vol 178 (2) ◽  
pp. e248-e254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Tong ◽  
Jason Lane ◽  
Patrick McCleskey ◽  
Brian Montenegro ◽  
Katherine Mansalis
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Air Force ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Sex With Men

To reduce the average age of autism diagnosis, screen preschoolers in primary care

Autism ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 136236132096897
Author(s):  
Katharine E Zuckerman ◽  
Sarabeth Broder-Fingert ◽  
R Christopher Sheldrick
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Autism Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Minority Children

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends autism spectrum disorder screening at the 18- and 24-month well-child visits. However, despite widespread toddler screening, many children are not diagnosed until school age, and delayed diagnosis is more common among low-income and minority children. Offering autism spectrum disorder screening at preschool well-child checks might reduce disparities and lower the overall age of diagnosis and service initiation. However, screening tools that span the preschool ages and are tailored for primary care are needed. Lay abstract Pediatric primary care providers check for autism signs, usually using a standard checklist, at 18- and 24-month well-child visits. When the checklist shows possible autism, children should be referred for additional treatment and evaluation with an autism specialist. However, many children with autism spectrum disorder are not detected as toddlers. Low-income and minority children are particularly likely to have a late autism spectrum disorder diagnosis. Checking for autism at preschool-aged well-child visits might be one way to identify autism spectrum disorder earlier, especially for low-income and minority children.

Factors influencing the use of electronic health record systems to provide follow-up care to cancer survivors.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 182-182
Author(s):  
Guadalupe R. Palos ◽  
Maria Alma Rodriguez ◽  
Paula A. Lewis-Patterson ◽  
Rachel Harris ◽  
Lewis E. Foxhall
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Electronic Health

182 Background: One of the expected benefits of electronic health records (EHRs) is their interoperability to remotely access and exchange clinical information across systems and clinicians. Cancer survivors’ treatment summaries (TSs) and care plans (CPs) are documents that can be electronically transferred from oncologists to primary care providers. We conducted a needs assessment to identify factors which influenced EHRs in meeting these expectations in rural and underserved primary care settings. Methods: Clinicians from 2 family practice health care systems, located in central and northeast Texas were surveyed. REDCap, a web-based system, was used to develop, manage, and distribute the survey to a convenience sample of clinical staff from both settings. Survey questions focused on respondents’ demographic and clinical practice characteristics, current experience with TSs and CPs, and type of EHR used. Results: A total of 26 surveys were included in this analysis. Respondents were primarily physicians (73%). Overall 61.5% reported that ≤ 25% of their patients were diagnosed with cancer or currently had cancer. A patient’s self-report was the primary method used by majority of respondents to determine if a patient had a history of cancer. 80.8% indicated they would be interested in learning more about the use and development of TSs and CPs. Barriers reported towards the use of EHRs to deliver TSs and CPs included: EHRs interference with workflow (60%); limited knowledge on how to develop TSs and CPs (48%), inadequate access to IT resources (48%), and inefficient EHR systems (44%). In these settings, EHRs used were: Epic (61.6%), Aria (30.8%), and Medit (7.7%). Respondents’ comments on EHRs weaknesses included: “the two systems…do not completely communicate with each other” or “no place where a cancer treatment summary or survivorship plan is documented”. Conclusions: Primary care providers identified limitations in EHR operability as a major barrier to retrieving health information required for TSs and CPs. Clinicians in rural or underserved regions may benefit from education and retraining in EHR systems.

Rural primary care providers’ attitudes about depression.

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-18
Author(s):  
Carolyn M. Pepper ◽  
Jason A. Nieuwsma ◽  
Vanessa M. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Rural Primary Care

327 STRATEGIES TO INCREASE CAPACITY TO CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS C AMONG RURAL PRIMARY CARE PROVIDERS

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1268
Author(s):  
Norah Terrault ◽  
Rachel Kanner ◽  
Souvik Sarkar ◽  
Jennifer Slepin ◽  
Lisa Catalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Rural Primary Care
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document