scholarly journals A systematic review of ethnic minority women’s experiences of perinatal mental health conditions and services in Europe

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e0210587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Watson ◽  
Deborah Harrop ◽  
Elizabeth Walton ◽  
Andy Young ◽  
Hora Soltani
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ethnic Minority ◽  
Perinatal Mental Health ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Mental Health Conditions ◽  
Women’S Experiences ◽  
Women's Experiences

scholarly journals Systematic review of healthcare costs related to mental health conditions among cancer survivors

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 505-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya S. Khushalani ◽  
Jin Qin ◽  
John Cyrus ◽  
Natasha Buchanan Lunsford ◽  
Sun Hee Rim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Mental Health Conditions

scholarly journals ‘Global mental health’: systematic review of the term and its implicit priorities

BJPsych Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriya Misra ◽  
Anne Stevenson ◽  
Emily E. Haroz ◽  
Victoria de Menil ◽  
Karestan C. Koenen
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Global Mental Health ◽  
Contextual Information ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Mental Health Conditions ◽  
Sub Saharan

Background The term ‘global mental health’ came to the fore in 2007, when the Lancet published a series by that name. Aims To review all peer-reviewed articles using the term ‘global mental health’ and determine the implicit priorities of scientific literature that self-identifies with this term. Method We conducted a systematic review to quantify all peer-reviewed articles using the English term ‘global mental health’ in their text published between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016, including by geographic regions and by mental health conditions. Results A total of 467 articles met criteria. Use of the term ‘global mental health’ increased from 12 articles in 2007 to 114 articles in 2016. For the 111 empirical studies (23.8% of articles), the majority (78.4%) took place in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with the most in Sub-Saharan Africa (28.4%) and South Asia (25.5%) and none from Central Asia. The most commonly studied mental health conditions were depression (29.7%), psychoses (12.6%) and conditions specifically related to stress (12.6%), with fewer studies on epilepsy (2.7%), self-harm and suicide (1.8%) and dementia (0.9%). The majority of studies lacked contextual information, including specific region(s) within countries where studies took place (20.7% missing), specific language(s) in which studies were conducted (36.9% missing), and details on ethnic identities such as ethnicity, caste and/or tribe (79.6% missing) and on socioeconomic status (85.4% missing). Conclusions Research identifying itself as ‘global mental health’ has focused predominantly on depression in LMICs and lacked contextual and sociodemographic data that limit interpretation and application of findings. Declaration of interest None.

scholarly journals UT3 The Validity Of The EQ-5D, SF-6D, SF-36 and SF-12 In Mental Health Conditions: A Systematic Review

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. A239
Author(s):  
D. Papaioannou ◽  
T. Peasgood ◽  
J. Brazier ◽  
G. Parry
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Mental Health Conditions ◽  
Sf 36

scholarly journals Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for reducing mental health conditions in employees: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. e0189904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Stratton ◽  
Amit Lampit ◽  
Isabella Choi ◽  
Rafael A. Calvo ◽  
Samuel B. Harvey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Mental Health Conditions

scholarly journals A systematic review and meta-analysis of group peer support interventions for people experiencing mental health conditions

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Lyons ◽  
Chris Cooper ◽  
Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Peer Support ◽  
Support Groups ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Mental Health Conditions ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Peer support is being integrated within mental health services to further the development of a recovery approach. However, the most effective models and formats of intervention delivery are unknown. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of peer support for improving outcomes for people with lived experience of mental health conditions, when delivered as group interventions. Methods Studies reporting randomised controlled trials of group peer support interventions for people experiencing mental health conditions were identified by searching MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL, from inception until July 12th 2019 and undertaking supplementary searches. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias and meta-analyses were conducted if three or more trials provided usable data. Results Eight trials met eligibility criteria, providing data from 2131 participants. Six trials had either high or unclear risk of bias. Interventions were categorised as mutual support groups, or peer support groups, sub-categorised as anti-stigma or self-management interventions. Meta-analyses were only possible for peer support groups and five outcomes. We found evidence that group peer support may make small improvements to overall recovery but not hope or empowerment individually, or to clinical symptoms. Evidence for effectiveness for outcomes which could not be meta-analysed was mixed. Conclusions Findings from the few eligible trials suggest group peer support interventions may be specifically effective for supporting personal recovery and have a limited impact on other outcomes, though there were some risks of bias to study findings. Interventions were heterogeneous and most social outcomes were absent in the literature, highlighting further limitations to the current evidence-base. There is insufficient evidence available from trials of group peer support torecommend the routine implementation of these interventions across mainstream mental health services at present. More high-quality trials of peer-developed, group peer support interventions are needed in order tomake firm conclusions about intervention effectiveness.

The Prevalence of Mental Health Conditions Among High School and Collegiate Student-Athletes: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
James E. Kaishian ◽  
Regina M. Kaishian
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
High School ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Depressive Disorders ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Athletic Departments ◽  
Addictive Disorders ◽  
Mental Health Conditions

The physical impacts of overtraining, sport specification, and burnout are well documented in the literature; however, the state of the student-athlete’s (SA’s) mental health is something that needs to be investigated more comprehensively. Literature on SA mental health has gained prevalence within the last 5 years. The combination of pressure from sport and academics, as well as the stigmatization of clinical mental health treatment, can have a significant effect on the SA’s psyche. This review explores the prevalence of mental health conditions (MHCs) in high school and collegiate SAs. This includes signs and symptoms of mental health diagnoses to include substance- and alcohol-related addictive disorders and risk factors of such. A systematic review of the CINAHL, ERIC, SPORTDiscus, APA PsycINFO, and Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine resource databases was conducted. The initial search yielded 855 results. Following double screening, 22 studies were included, all of which were deemed medium to high quality. The findings indicate an alarming presence of MHCs ranging from risk factors of alcohol use and major depressive disorders among SAs. There was a high prevalence of mental health issues among SAs who are Black, Indigenous, people of color (BIPOC), and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer (LGBTQ). In most cases, participation in competitive athletics (varsity) did not contribute to additional MHCs for SAs. Sport psychologists should play a role in mental health programming within athletic departments. Athletic departments should develop proactive, targeted strategies to address MHCs for SAs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document