scholarly journals Health technology reassessment in the Brazilian public health system: Analysis of the current status

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. e0220131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viviane Cássia Pereira ◽  
Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto ◽  
Francisco Assis da Rocha Neves
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Health Technology Reassessment

VP214 Criteria That Influence The Brazilian Public Decision-Making

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 248-248
Author(s):  
Andrea Brígida de Souza ◽  
Marisa Santos
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Bipolar Affective Disorder ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Emission Computed Tomography ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Health Technologies

INTRODUCTION:In Brazil, the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation in the public health system (CONITEC) advises the Ministry of Health about incorporation, exclusion and alteration of health technologies in Brazilian public health system (SUS). Decision making considers multiple criteria, included or not in legislation. This analysis was the first step for a multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) building. This study aims to identify criteria that influence Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for SUS.METHODS:Five real cases of controversial recommendations of technology incorporation made by CONITEC were reviewed by listening to the plenary recordings and reviewing committee minutes. The choice was guided by convenience, with prioritization according to CONITEC's members, using a pre-defined standardized form. Weight in decision making was also raised and identified. Selected technologies judgments were: Trastuzumab for metastatic/advanced Breast Cancer; Fingolimod for Multiple Sclerosis; Clozapine, Lamotrigine, Olanzapine, Quetiapine and Risperidone for Bipolar Affective Disorder; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease; and Positron Emission Computed Tomography (PET-CT) for Lung Cancer and for hepatic metastasis from Colorectal Cancer.RESULTS:The choice of different technologies allowed verifying specific criteria used for the incorporation of each type of technology, as well as the similar criteria discussed and used by all these technology types. In addition, some identified criteria were specific to the Brazilian reality, such as: “Incorporation by other countries”, “Potential technologies without registration in Brazil” and “Off-label use”. These criteria were not previously identified in studies conducted in other countries. Some criteria have been identified in all decisions, such as: efficacy, disease severity, quality and confidence in the evidences, logistic challenges for implementation, unmet needs, budget impact and treatment costs. Relative impact of cost-effectiveness was considered low.CONCLUSIONS:CONITEC's recordings are an important source to understand the Brazilian decision-making process. To identify the important criteria can help to standardize and improve the HTA process.

PP155 The Impact Of Lawsuits In The Brazilian Public Health System

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 141-141
Author(s):  
Carla Biella ◽  
Viviane Pereira ◽  
Fabiana Raynal ◽  
Jorge Barreto ◽  
Vania Canuto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

INTRODUCTION:The increase of litigation in Brazil on the right to health, and the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS) targets of litigation, are phenomena that generate discussions both in the judiciary, and among researchers and managers of health. The lawsuits are based on the integrality that includes the right to any health technology. Our aim was to gather information on the use of scientific evidence by judges and other law professionals to support their decisions in lawsuits involving health care in Brazil.METHODS:A narrative review by literature search using key terms of legalization in specific databases was conducted.RESULTS:Twenty-five studies showed litigation matters relating to health care which were focused on legal claims about drugs. In general, law operators used the scientific evidences in a limited way when making decisions, by considering the medical report and medication label indications and disregarding therapeutic alternatives contemplated in the SUS list. The access to health technologies, by litigation, reveals that the gap between scientific knowledge and legal practice are similar to those found between science and decision-making in the formulation and implementation of health policies. The Health Technology Assessment studies have high potential for use by the judiciary as a reference source to support technical and scientific decisions in lawsuits on health care.CONCLUSIONS:For the judiciary to ensure not only access to health technologies, but also the efficacy and safety of technologies to system users, their decisions must be substantiated by scientific evidence. The National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) in SUS has established actions in conjunction with law operators and society, such as a communication using e-mail, aiding the decision for the injunction and elaboration of technical reports and a policy brief, with the intention that the decisions are taken with the greatest possible knowledge about technologies provided by SUS, and based on scientific evidence.

scholarly journals BARIATRIC SURGERY IN BRAZILIAN PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM: THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY, OR A LONG WAY TO GO. YELLOW SIGN!

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoninho José TONATTO-FILHO ◽  
Felipe Melloto GALLOTTI ◽  
Marcio Fernandes CHEDID ◽  
Tomaz de Jesus Maria GREZZANA-FILHO ◽  
Ana Maria Stapasolla Vargas GARCIA
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Current Status ◽  
The Public ◽  
Health Registry

ABSTRACT Background: In Brazil, there has been a significant increase in obesity rates in all age groups. Data from 2017 show that obesity affects 19% of the population. Due to the magnitude of the problem, public health policies have aimed to prevent complications related to obesity by increasing the offerfor bariatric surgeries. Aim: To analyze the current status of bariatric surgery performed in the Brazilian public health system, including data from macroregions and also the effect of digestive surgery training on the number of procedures. Methods: The database of the public health registry (DATASUS) was assessedbetween 2008 and 2018 for descriptive analysis of data and evaluation of the selected parameters. The main surgical techniques, comorbidities, mortality and the costs profile of the system were evaluated. Results: There was a 339% increase in the number of bariatric surgeries in the period evaluated. Gastric bypass was performed in 94% of cases whereas sleeve in 2.4%. Other techniques were used in 3.6%. There were discrepancies in the number of surgeries performed in different regions of the country. Conclusion: There was a considerable advance in the number of bariatric surgeries performed by the public health system between 2008 and 2018. However, there is a need to increase the offer of this service and alsospecialized training, as well as a correction in the distribution of these procedures in the national territory to achieve integrality among its users.

OP158 Overview Of Technology Assessment For Multiple Sclerosis In The Brazilian Public Health System

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 57-58
Author(s):  
Kathiaja Souza ◽  
Flavia Salomon ◽  
Artur Felipe de Brito
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health System ◽  
Clinical Practice Guideline ◽  
Practice Guideline ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
National Committee ◽  
Health Technologies

Introduction:The National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) has a structured process for the incorporation, disinvestment, or alteration of different health technologies in the Brazilian public health system and provides technical support for the decision-making process. Since its creation, CONITEC has received several submissions for the incorporation of medicines and the update of clinical practice guidelines for multiple sclerosis (MS). Nowadays, more than twelve different therapies are currently available to treat MS and the Brazilian clinical practice guideline, which was last updated in 2015, offers six medicines to treat MS that are divided into first, second, and third line treatments. The purpose of this study was to describe CONITEC's assessments of applications for incorporation, disinvestment, or alteration of medicines for MS.Methods:A case study method was used to evaluate information, retrieved from CONITEC's database, about the health technology reports developed by CONITEC's Executive Secretariat in response to applications received in the period from 2012 to 2017.Results:Ten technical reports on health technologies for MS were produced by CONITEC during the study period. This number represented four percent of the external submissions for incorporation of technologies for several clinical conditions in the public health system. Six medicines were evaluated. The highest number of submissions were for incorporation (n = 6), followed by alteration of treatment lines (n = 3), and disinvestment (n = 1); fifty percent of the submissions were not recommended. The main reasons for rejection were low or unproven efficacy, high budget impact, and inadequacy of the proposal based on the evidence presented. CONITEC's favorable recommendations caused a profound change in the current clinical practice guideline and had a significant impact on the health system.Conclusions:MS is considered a rare disease in Brazil, but there is significant pressure from society to provide better treatment options that will impact the MS scenario in the health system. The recent CONITEC assessments have led to a revolution in the treatment of MS in Brazil, which is now in the process of being updated.

scholarly journals Public health system - current status and world experience.

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 70-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
І. А. Andreyeva ◽  
О. V. Lugova ◽  
О. V. Nashyvanko ◽  
Yu. S. Chernyak ◽  
О. А. Shevchenko
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Current Status

Managing the effectiveness of the regional health system

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 698-720
Author(s):  
E.V. Lobkova ◽  
A.S. Petrichenko
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Health Indicators ◽  
Krasnoyarsk Krai ◽  
Regional Health ◽  
Luenberger Observer ◽  
Efficiency Assessment ◽  
Public Health Indicators

Subject. This article studies the mechanism of State health regulation and methods of management of efficiency of regional healthcare institutions. Objectives. The article aims to analyze the territorial health system in the context of the urgent need to optimize budget expenditures and address public health problems, as well as develop directions to improve the effectiveness of the regional health system of the Krasnoyarsk Krai. Methods. For the study, we used the method of index numbers and calculation of dynamics indicators using official statistics data. Results. We have developed and now present a system of indicators of regional health efficiency assessment, focused mainly on public health indicators and quality of medical services. We also offer our own version of the Luenberger observer modification adapted to the objectives of the regional health system analysis. Conclusions and Relevance. The article concludes that it is necessary to optimize the regional health system using the parameters of medical and social efficiency of the system. The proposed approach to assessing the effectiveness of regional health system can be used as a mechanism to develop recommendations for the management of the network of medical and prophylactic institutions of the region.

India as a Pioneer of Innovation

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health System ◽  
Informal Economy ◽  
Urban Poor ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Social Enterprises ◽  
Specific Context ◽  
Innovation Project ◽  
Context Specific

What does innovation mean to and in India? What are the predominant areas of innovation for India, and under what situations do they succeed or fail? This book addresses these all-important questions arising within diverse Indian contexts: informal economy, low-cost settings, large business groups, entertainment and copyright-based industries, an evolving pharma sector, a poorly organized and appallingly underfunded public health system, social enterprises for the urban poor, and innovations for the millions. It explores the issues that promote and those that hinder the country’s rise as an innovation leader. The book’s balanced perspective on India’s promises and failings makes it a valuable addition for those who believe that India’s future banks heavily on its ability to leapfrog using innovation, as well as those sceptical of the Indian state’s belief in the potential of private enterprise and innovation. It also provides critical insights on innovation in general, the most important of which being the highly context-specific, context-driven character of the innovation project.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document