VP214 Criteria That Influence The Brazilian Public Decision-Making

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 248-248
Author(s):  
Andrea Brígida de Souza ◽  
Marisa Santos
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Bipolar Affective Disorder ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Emission Computed Tomography ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Health Technologies

INTRODUCTION:In Brazil, the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation in the public health system (CONITEC) advises the Ministry of Health about incorporation, exclusion and alteration of health technologies in Brazilian public health system (SUS). Decision making considers multiple criteria, included or not in legislation. This analysis was the first step for a multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) building. This study aims to identify criteria that influence Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for SUS.METHODS:Five real cases of controversial recommendations of technology incorporation made by CONITEC were reviewed by listening to the plenary recordings and reviewing committee minutes. The choice was guided by convenience, with prioritization according to CONITEC's members, using a pre-defined standardized form. Weight in decision making was also raised and identified. Selected technologies judgments were: Trastuzumab for metastatic/advanced Breast Cancer; Fingolimod for Multiple Sclerosis; Clozapine, Lamotrigine, Olanzapine, Quetiapine and Risperidone for Bipolar Affective Disorder; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease; and Positron Emission Computed Tomography (PET-CT) for Lung Cancer and for hepatic metastasis from Colorectal Cancer.RESULTS:The choice of different technologies allowed verifying specific criteria used for the incorporation of each type of technology, as well as the similar criteria discussed and used by all these technology types. In addition, some identified criteria were specific to the Brazilian reality, such as: “Incorporation by other countries”, “Potential technologies without registration in Brazil” and “Off-label use”. These criteria were not previously identified in studies conducted in other countries. Some criteria have been identified in all decisions, such as: efficacy, disease severity, quality and confidence in the evidences, logistic challenges for implementation, unmet needs, budget impact and treatment costs. Relative impact of cost-effectiveness was considered low.CONCLUSIONS:CONITEC's recordings are an important source to understand the Brazilian decision-making process. To identify the important criteria can help to standardize and improve the HTA process.

PP155 The Impact Of Lawsuits In The Brazilian Public Health System

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 141-141
Author(s):  
Carla Biella ◽  
Viviane Pereira ◽  
Fabiana Raynal ◽  
Jorge Barreto ◽  
Vania Canuto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

INTRODUCTION:The increase of litigation in Brazil on the right to health, and the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS) targets of litigation, are phenomena that generate discussions both in the judiciary, and among researchers and managers of health. The lawsuits are based on the integrality that includes the right to any health technology. Our aim was to gather information on the use of scientific evidence by judges and other law professionals to support their decisions in lawsuits involving health care in Brazil.METHODS:A narrative review by literature search using key terms of legalization in specific databases was conducted.RESULTS:Twenty-five studies showed litigation matters relating to health care which were focused on legal claims about drugs. In general, law operators used the scientific evidences in a limited way when making decisions, by considering the medical report and medication label indications and disregarding therapeutic alternatives contemplated in the SUS list. The access to health technologies, by litigation, reveals that the gap between scientific knowledge and legal practice are similar to those found between science and decision-making in the formulation and implementation of health policies. The Health Technology Assessment studies have high potential for use by the judiciary as a reference source to support technical and scientific decisions in lawsuits on health care.CONCLUSIONS:For the judiciary to ensure not only access to health technologies, but also the efficacy and safety of technologies to system users, their decisions must be substantiated by scientific evidence. The National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) in SUS has established actions in conjunction with law operators and society, such as a communication using e-mail, aiding the decision for the injunction and elaboration of technical reports and a policy brief, with the intention that the decisions are taken with the greatest possible knowledge about technologies provided by SUS, and based on scientific evidence.

OP158 Overview Of Technology Assessment For Multiple Sclerosis In The Brazilian Public Health System

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 57-58
Author(s):  
Kathiaja Souza ◽  
Flavia Salomon ◽  
Artur Felipe de Brito
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health System ◽  
Clinical Practice Guideline ◽  
Practice Guideline ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
National Committee ◽  
Health Technologies

Introduction:The National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) has a structured process for the incorporation, disinvestment, or alteration of different health technologies in the Brazilian public health system and provides technical support for the decision-making process. Since its creation, CONITEC has received several submissions for the incorporation of medicines and the update of clinical practice guidelines for multiple sclerosis (MS). Nowadays, more than twelve different therapies are currently available to treat MS and the Brazilian clinical practice guideline, which was last updated in 2015, offers six medicines to treat MS that are divided into first, second, and third line treatments. The purpose of this study was to describe CONITEC's assessments of applications for incorporation, disinvestment, or alteration of medicines for MS.Methods:A case study method was used to evaluate information, retrieved from CONITEC's database, about the health technology reports developed by CONITEC's Executive Secretariat in response to applications received in the period from 2012 to 2017.Results:Ten technical reports on health technologies for MS were produced by CONITEC during the study period. This number represented four percent of the external submissions for incorporation of technologies for several clinical conditions in the public health system. Six medicines were evaluated. The highest number of submissions were for incorporation (n = 6), followed by alteration of treatment lines (n = 3), and disinvestment (n = 1); fifty percent of the submissions were not recommended. The main reasons for rejection were low or unproven efficacy, high budget impact, and inadequacy of the proposal based on the evidence presented. CONITEC's favorable recommendations caused a profound change in the current clinical practice guideline and had a significant impact on the health system.Conclusions:MS is considered a rare disease in Brazil, but there is significant pressure from society to provide better treatment options that will impact the MS scenario in the health system. The recent CONITEC assessments have led to a revolution in the treatment of MS in Brazil, which is now in the process of being updated.

scholarly journals Announcing the Canadian Journal of Health Technologies — A New Journal From CADTH

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Mittmann
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health System ◽  
Canadian Journal ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Health Care Decision ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Care Decision

The COVID-19 pandemic has put a spotlight on science and reaffirmed the value of evidence in health care decision-making. CADTH is a major Canadian publisher of evidence, advice, and recommendations regarding the assessment and management of health technologies. The Canadian Journal of Health Technologies will publish CADTH work in a single, PubMed-indexed, online location, making it easier for our health system partners to search and find CADTH work. Through the Canadian Journal of Health Technologies, CADTH will expand its reach and its collaborations with producers and users of health technology assessments.

scholarly journals Analysis of the Socio-environmental Management of Covid 19 in Perú

2021 ◽  
Vol 259 ◽  
pp. 03003
Author(s):  
Sandra Cueto ◽  
Jorge Ferrer ◽  
Alvaro Guevara ◽  
Yensy Segovia
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Environmental Management ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Health System ◽  
Initial Phase ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
The Public ◽  
Cultural Heterogeneity ◽  
Scientific Support

The objective of this article is to analyze the management of Covid-19 from a socio-environmental perspective, with a scientific, holistic and adaptive approach. On March 16 of 2020, the Peruvian government began to implement measures to slow the spread of the virus and allow time to strengthen the public health system and after 9 months the results have placed the country among the first places in the mortality rate world level. The basic lines of action of the Peruvian government have been focused on: reducing crowds, stocking up with hospital supplies and detecting infected. However, we identified that the actions corresponding to such basic lines lacked scientific support, were academically biased and inappropriate to the context. Our analysis has been accompanied by proposals that should have been applied in the initial phase of the proliferation of the virus, each of these proposals are designed based on scientific interdisciplinarity and adapted to the geographical and cultural heterogeneity of Peru. It is concluded that decision making must be in accordance with the different realities of the country and that since it is a diverse country, these decisions must be approached seeking the benefit of the entire population.

scholarly journals A Model for Determining the Number of Health Technologies in the Health Systems: An Approach Combining Multiple Attributes Decision Making and Goal Programming

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hosein Arman ◽  
Efat Mohamadi ◽  
Mohammadreza Mobinizadeh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health System ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Technology Policy ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Limited Budget ◽  
Multiple Attributes Decision Making

In recent years, health technology policy-making science has gone beyond just a health technology assessment or systematic review or economic evaluation study and the science of operational research in decision making, i.e. multi-attributes and multi-objective decision-making has been included. Hence, currently, health technology policy-making follows a seven-step process. After a technology undergoes these steps and is proven that it is useful for the health system, it must be determined how many of it is needed in the health system. Determining the required number of health technologies is a challenge that remains to be considered. Therefore, this study  was designed to overcome this problem. The authors intend to introduce a multi-objective decision-making methodology considering the limited budget, to determine the number of technologies required to complete for the health technology policymaking cycle.

scholarly journals Staying afloat: community perspectives on health system resilience in the management of pregnancy and childbirth care during floods in Cambodia

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. e002272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dell D Saulnier ◽  
Hom Hean ◽  
Dawin Thol ◽  
Por Ir ◽  
Claudia Hanson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Health Needs ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
The Public ◽  
Pregnancy And Childbirth ◽  
Childbirth Care

IntroductionResilient health systems have the capacity to continue providing health services to meet the community’s diverse health needs following floods. This capacity is related to how the community manages its own health needs and the community and health system’s joined capacities for resilience. Yet little is known about how community participation influences health systems resilience. The purpose of this study was to understand how community management of pregnancy and childbirth care during floods is contributing to the system’s capacity to absorb, adapt or transform as viewed through a framework on health systems resilience.MethodsEight focus group discussions and 17 semi-structured interviews were conducted with community members and leaders who experienced pregnancy or childbirth during recent flooding in rural Cambodia. The data were analysed by thematic analysis and discussed in relation to the resilience framework.ResultsThe theme ‘Responsible for the status quo’ reflected the community’s responsibility to find ways to manage pregnancy and childbirth care, when neither the expectations of the health system nor the available benefits changed during floods. The theme was informed by notions on: i) developmental changes, the unpredictable nature of floods and limited support for managing care, ii) how information promoted by the public health system led to a limited decision-making space for pregnancy and childbirth care, iii) a desire for security during floods that outweighed mistrust in the public health system and iv) the limits to the coping strategies that the community prepared in case of flooding.ConclusionsThe community mainly employed absorptive strategies to manage their care during floods, relieving the burden on the health system, yet restricted support and decision-making may risk their capacity. Further involvement in decision-making for care could help improve the health system’s resilience by creating room for the community to adapt and transform when experiencing floods.

Fostering healthcare innovation in public hospitals: the Queensland experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 672
Author(s):  
Linda Mundy ◽  
Sarah Howard ◽  
Liam McQueen ◽  
Jacqui Thomson ◽  
Kaye Hewson
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health System ◽  
Real World ◽  
Public Health System ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
The Public ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Healthcare Technologies

Faced with scarce resources and a demand for health care that exceeds supply, health policy makers at all levels of government need to adopt some form of rationing when deciding which health services should be funded in the public health system. With a relatively small investment, programs such as Queensland Health’s New Technology Funding Evaluation Program (NTFEP) fosters innovation by providing funding and pilot studies for new and innovative healthcare technologies. The NTFEP assists policy makers to make informed decisions regarding investments in new safe and effective technologies based on available evidence gathered from real-world settings relevant to Queensland patients and clinicians. In addition, the NTFEP allows appropriate patient access, especially in rural and remote locations, to potentially beneficial technologies and acts a gatekeeper, protecting them from technologies that may be detrimental or harmful. What is known about the topic? Jurisdictions have struggled to identify ways to manage the introduction of new and innovative health technologies into clinical practice. The 2009 review of health technology in Australia recommended better assessment and appraisal by ensuring real-life practices in hospitals and community settings were considered, with a consumer and patient focus. What does this paper add? Queensland Health’s NTFEP provides a robust and transparent mechanism to manage the introduction of innovative healthcare technologies into clinical practice, providing an opportunity to collect real-world data outside of formal clinical trials. These data can not only be used to inform clinical, but also purchasing, decision-making within the public health system. This model of investment and innovation has the potential to be implemented in other jurisdictions and provide opportunities to share learnings. What are the implications for practitioners? Programs such as the NTFEP provide reassurance to practitioners and patients alike that innovative healthcare technologies are adopted in public hospitals using an evidence-based approach after demonstrating that they are not only safe and clinically effective, but represent value for money and improved patient outcomes in a public health system.

Demonstrating the influence of HTA: INAHTA member stories of HTA impact

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Sophie Söderholm Werkö ◽  
Tracy Merlin ◽  
Laurie Jean Lambert ◽  
Paul Fennessy ◽  
Ana Pérez Galán ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health System ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Qualitative Evaluation ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Publicly Funded ◽  
Central Function ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Story Sharing ◽  
Document Review

Abstract A central function of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies is the production of HTA reports to support evidence-informed policy and decision making. HTA agencies are interested in understanding the mechanisms of HTA impact, which can be understood as the influence or impact of HTA report findings on decision making at various levels of the health system. The members of the International Network of Agencies for HTA (INAHTA) meet at their annual Congress where impact story sharing is one important activity. This paper summarizes four stories of HTA impact that were finalists for the David Hailey Award for Best Impact Story. The methods to measure impact include: document review; claims analysis and review of reimbursement status; citation analysis; qualitative evaluation of stakeholders’ views; and review of media response. HTA agency staff also observed changes in government activities and priorities based on the HTA. Impact assessment can provide information to improve the HTA process, for example, the value of patient and clinician engagement in the HTA process to better define the assessment question and literature reviews in a more holistic and balanced way. HTA reports produced by publicly funded HTA agencies are valued by health systems around the globe as they support decision making regarding the appropriate use, pricing, reimbursement, and disinvestment of health technologies. HTAs can also have a positive impact on information sharing between different levels of government and across stakeholder groups. These stories show how HTA can have a significant impact, irrespective of the health system and health technology being assessed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document