scholarly journals Between-module functional connectivity of the salient ventral attention network and dorsal attention network is associated with motor inhibition

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0242985
Author(s):  
Howard Muchen Hsu ◽  
Zai-Fu Yao ◽  
Kai Hwang ◽  
Shulan Hsieh
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Brain Networks ◽  
Network Connectivity ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Motor Inhibition ◽  
Attention Network ◽  
Functional Brain ◽  
Graph Theoretic ◽  
Dorsal Attention Network ◽  
Functional Brain Networks

The ability to inhibit motor response is crucial for daily activities. However, whether brain networks connecting spatially distinct brain regions can explain individual differences in motor inhibition is not known. Therefore, we took a graph-theoretic perspective to examine the relationship between the properties of topological organization in functional brain networks and motor inhibition. We analyzed data from 141 healthy adults aged 20 to 78, who underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and performed a stop-signal task along with neuropsychological assessments outside the scanner. The graph-theoretic properties of 17 functional brain networks were estimated, including within-network connectivity and between-network connectivity. We employed multiple linear regression to examine how these graph-theoretical properties were associated with motor inhibition. The results showed that between-network connectivity of the salient ventral attention network and dorsal attention network explained the highest and second highest variance of individual differences in motor inhibition. In addition, we also found those two networks span over brain regions in the frontal-cingulate-parietal network, suggesting that these network interactions are also important to motor inhibition.

scholarly journals Unifying the Notions of Modularity and Core–Periphery Structure in Functional Brain Networks during Youth

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1087-1102
Author(s):  
Shi Gu ◽  
Cedric Huchuan Xia ◽  
Rastko Ciric ◽  
Tyler M Moore ◽  
Ruben C Gur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Brain Function ◽  
Brain Networks ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
Modular Architecture ◽  
Functional Brain ◽  
Rich Club ◽  
Functional Brain Networks ◽  
Integrative Processing

AbstractAt rest, human brain functional networks display striking modular architecture in which coherent clusters of brain regions are activated. The modular account of brain function is pervasive, reliable, and reproducible. Yet, a complementary perspective posits a core–periphery or rich-club account of brain function, where hubs are densely interconnected with one another, allowing for integrative processing. Unifying these two perspectives has remained difficult due to the fact that the methodological tools to identify modules are entirely distinct from the methodological tools to identify core–periphery structure. Here, we leverage a recently-developed model-based approach—the weighted stochastic block model—that simultaneously uncovers modular and core–periphery structure, and we apply it to functional magnetic resonance imaging data acquired at rest in 872 youth of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. We demonstrate that functional brain networks display rich mesoscale organization beyond that sought by modularity maximization techniques. Moreover, we show that this mesoscale organization changes appreciably over the course of neurodevelopment, and that individual differences in this organization predict individual differences in cognition more accurately than module organization alone. Broadly, our study provides a unified assessment of modular and core–periphery structure in functional brain networks, offering novel insights into their development and implications for behavior.

scholarly journals Brain Resilience: The Effect of White Matter Disease on Brain Networks in Cognitively Normal Older Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 918-918
Author(s):  
Blake Neyland ◽  
Christina Hugenschmidt ◽  
Samuel Lockhart ◽  
Laura Baker ◽  
Suzanne Craft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
White Matter ◽  
White Matter Hyperintensities ◽  
Brain Networks ◽  
Network Connectivity ◽  
Anterior Cingulate ◽  
Functional Brain ◽  
Mobility Function ◽  
Functional Brain Networks ◽  
Brain Resilience

Abstract Brain pathologies are increasingly understood to confer mobility risk, but the malleability of functional brain networks may be a mechanism for mobility reserve. In particular, white matter hyperintensities (WMH) are strongly associated with mobility and alter functional network connectivity. To assess the potential role of brain networks as a mechanism of mobility reserve, 116 participants with MRI from the Brain Networks and Mobility Function (B-NET) were categorized into 4 groups based on median splits of SPPB scores and WMH burden: Expected Healthy (EH: low WMH, SPPB>10, N=45), Expected Impaired (EI: high WMH, SPPB10, N=24), Unexpected Impaired (EI: low WMH, SPPB<10, N=10) and Unexpected Unhealthy (UH: low WMH, SPPB<10, N=37). Functional brain networks were calculated using graph theory methods and white matter hyperintensities were quantified with the Lesion Segmentation Toolbox (LST) in SPM12. Somatomotor cortex community structure (SMC-CS) was similar between UH and EH with both having higher consistency than EI and UI. However, UH displayed a unique increase in second-order connections between the motor cortex and the anterior cingulate. It is possible that this increase in connections is a signal of higher reserve or resilience in UH participants and may indicate a mechanism of compensation in regards to mobility function and advanced WMH burden. These data suggest functional brain networks may be a mechanism for mobility resilience in older adults at mobility risk due to WMH burden.

scholarly journals Identifying reproducible individual differences in childhood functional brain networks: An ABCD study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 100706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Marek ◽  
Brenden Tervo-Clemmens ◽  
Ashley N. Nielsen ◽  
Muriah D. Wheelock ◽  
Ryland L. Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Brain Networks ◽  
Functional Brain ◽  
Functional Brain Networks

scholarly journals Individual differences in intrinsic brain connectivity predict decision strategy

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 1838-1848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Anne Barnes ◽  
Kevin M. Anderson ◽  
Mark Plitt ◽  
Alex Martin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Brain Networks ◽  
Decision Strategy ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Functional Brain ◽  
Spontaneous Brain Activity ◽  
Functional Brain Networks

When humans are provided with ample time to make a decision, individual differences in strategy emerge. Using an adaptation of a well-studied decision making paradigm, motion direction discrimination, we probed the neural basis of individual differences in strategy. We tested whether strategies emerged from moment-to-moment reconfiguration of functional brain networks involved in decision making with task-evoked functional MRI (fMRI) and whether intrinsic properties of functional brain networks, measured at rest with functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI), were associated with strategy use. We found that human participants reliably selected one of two strategies across 2 days of task performance, either continuously accumulating evidence or waiting for task difficulty to decrease. Individual differences in decision strategy were predicted both by the degree of task-evoked activation of decision-related brain regions and by the strength of pretask correlated spontaneous brain activity. These results suggest that spontaneous brain activity constrains strategy selection on perceptual decisions.

scholarly journals GAT-LI: a graph attention network based learning and interpreting method for functional brain network classification

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinlong Hu ◽  
Lijie Cao ◽  
Tenghui Li ◽  
Shoubin Dong ◽  
Ping Li
Keyword(s):  
Brain Networks ◽  
Graph Model ◽  
Brain Network ◽  
Learning Stage ◽  
Attention Network ◽  
Graph Learning ◽  
Functional Brain ◽  
Functional Brain Network ◽  
Feature Importance ◽  
Functional Brain Networks

Abstract Background Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) imply a spectrum of symptoms rather than a single phenotype. ASD could affect brain connectivity at different degree based on the severity of the symptom. Given their excellent learning capability, graph neural networks (GNN) methods have recently been used to uncover functional connectivity patterns and biological mechanisms in neuropsychiatric disorders, such as ASD. However, there remain challenges to develop an accurate GNN learning model and understand how specific decisions of these graph models are made in brain network analysis. Results In this paper, we propose a graph attention network based learning and interpreting method, namely GAT-LI, which learns to classify functional brain networks of ASD individuals versus healthy controls (HC), and interprets the learned graph model with feature importance. Specifically, GAT-LI includes a graph learning stage and an interpreting stage. First, in the graph learning stage, a new graph attention network model, namely GAT2, uses graph attention layers to learn the node representation, and a novel attention pooling layer to obtain the graph representation for functional brain network classification. We experimentally compared GAT2 model’s performance on the ABIDE I database from 1035 subjects against the classification performances of other well-known models, and the results showed that the GAT2 model achieved the best classification performance. We experimentally compared the influence of different construction methods of brain networks in GAT2 model. We also used a larger synthetic graph dataset with 4000 samples to validate the utility and power of GAT2 model. Second, in the interpreting stage, we used GNNExplainer to interpret learned GAT2 model with feature importance. We experimentally compared GNNExplainer with two well-known interpretation methods including Saliency Map and DeepLIFT to interpret the learned model, and the results showed GNNExplainer achieved the best interpretation performance. We further used the interpretation method to identify the features that contributed most in classifying ASD versus HC. Conclusion We propose a two-stage learning and interpreting method GAT-LI to classify functional brain networks and interpret the feature importance in the graph model. The method should also be useful in the classification and interpretation tasks for graph data from other biomedical scenarios.

scholarly journals Synchrony and complexity in state-related EEG networks: an application of spectral graph theory

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Hossein Ghaderi ◽  
Bianca R. Baltaretu ◽  
Masood Nemati Andevari ◽  
Vishal Bharmauria ◽  
Fuat Balci
Keyword(s):  
Graph Theory ◽  
Brain Networks ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Brain Network ◽  
Spectral Graph Theory ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Topological Properties ◽  
Functional Brain ◽  
Spectral Graph ◽  
Functional Brain Networks

AbstractTo characterize differences between different state-related brain networks, statistical graph theory approaches have been employed to identify informative, topological properties. However, dynamical properties have been studied little in this regard. Our goal here was to introduce spectral graph theory as a reliable approach to determine dynamic properties of functional brain networks and to find how topological versus dynamical features differentiate between such networks. To this goal, 45 participants performed no task with eyes open (EO) or closed (EC) while electroencephalography data were recorded. These data were used to create weighted adjacency matrices for each condition (rest state EO and rest state EC). Then, using the spectral graph theory approach and Shannon entropy, we identified dynamical properties for weighted graphs, and we compared these features with topological aspects of graphs. The results showed that spectral graph theory can distinguish different state-dependent neural networks with different synchronies. On the other hand, correlation analysis indicated that although dynamical and topological properties of random networks are completely independent, these network features can be related in the case of brain generated graphs. In conclusion, the spectral graph theory approach can be used to make inferences about various state-related brain networks, for healthy and clinical populations.Author SummeryBy considering functional communications across different brain regions, a complex network is achieved that is known as functional brain network. Topologically, this network is constructed by different nodes (activity of brain regions or signals over recording electrodes) and different edges (similarity, correlation or phase difference between nodes). Paths, clusters, hubs, and centrality of nodes are examples of topological properties of these networks. However, synchrony and stability of functional brain networks can not be revealed by consideration of topological properties. Alternatively, spectral graph theory (SGT) can demonstrate the dynamic, synchrony and stability of graphs. But this approach has been studied little in brain network analysis. Here, we employed SGT, as well as topological methods, to investigate which approaches are more reliable to find differences between distinct state-related brain networks. On the other hand, we investigated correlations between topology and dynamic in different type of networks (brain generated and random networks). We found that SGT measures can clearly distinguish between distinct state-related brain networks and it can reveal synchrony and complexity of these networks. Also, results show that although dynamic and topology of random-generated graph are completely independent, these properties exhibit several correlations in the case of functional brain networks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document