scholarly journals Plasma YKL-40 and Total and Disease-Specific Mortality in the General Population

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1580-1591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia S Johansen ◽  
Stig E Bojesen ◽  
Anne Tybjærg-Hansen ◽  
Anne K Mylin ◽  
Paul A Price ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Increased plasma YKL-40 is associated with short-term survival in patients with cardiovascular disease and cancer. We tested the hypothesis that increased plasma YKL-40 is associated with total and disease-specific mortality in the general population. METHODS We measured plasma YKL-40 in 8899 study participants, aged 20–95 years, in the Copenhagen City Heart Study from the Danish general population who were followed for 16 years: 3059 died, 2158 had ischemic cardiovascular disease, 2271 had cancer, and 2820 had other diseases associated with increased YKL-40. Hazard ratios for early death and absolute 10-year mortality rates were calculated according to plasma YKL-40 percentile groupings computed within sex and age decade: 0%–33%, 34%–66%, 67%–90%, 91%–95%, and 96%–100%. RESULTS Median survival age decreased from 83 years for participants with plasma YKL-40 in category 0%–33% to 69 years in category 96%–100% (trend, P < 0.0001). Risk of early death was increased (multifactorially adjusted hazard ratios) by 10% for YKL-40 category 34%–66%, by 30% for 67%–90%, by 70% for 91%–95%, and by 90% for 96%–100% vs YKL-40 category 0%–33% (trend, P < 0.0001). Corresponding increases in participants with ischemic cardiovascular disease were 10%, 20%, 80%, and 60% (P < 0.0001); in those with cancer were 10%, 20%, 50%, and 70% (P < 0.0001); and in those with other diseases were 10%, 20%, 40%, and 60% (P < 0.0001). Highest absolute 10-year mortality rates were 78% and 90% in women and men, respectively, who were >70 years old, smoked, and were in YKL-40 category 96%–100%. CONCLUSIONS Increased plasma YKL-40 is associated with risk of early death from cardiovascular disease, cancer, and other diseases in the general population.

Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hind A. Beydoun ◽  
Shuyan Huang ◽  
May A. Beydoun ◽  
Sharmin Hossain ◽  
Alan B. Zonderman

This secondary analysis of survey data examined mediating-moderating effects of allostatic load score (calculated using the Rodriquez method) on the association between nutrient-based Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet score (Mellen Index) and the all-cause and cause-specific mortality risks among 11,630 adults ≥ 30 years of age from the 2001–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys with no history of cardiovascular disease or cancer at baseline, and who were followed-up for ~9.35 years. Multivariable models were adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, and health characteristics. All-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer-specific mortality rates were estimated at 6.5%, 1.1%, and 1.9%, respectively. The median DASH total score was 3.0 (range: 1–8) (with 78.3% scoring < 4.5), whereas the median allostatic load score was 3 (range: 0–9). The DASH diet, fiber, and magnesium were negatively correlated with allostatic load, whereas allostatic load predicted higher all-cause mortality, irrespective of the DASH diet. Whereas protein was protective, potassium increased all-cause mortality risk, irrespective of allostatic load. Potassium was protective against cardiovascular disease-specific mortality but was a risk factor for cancer-specific mortality. Although no moderating effects were observed, mediation by the allostatic load on cardiovascular disease-specific mortality was observed for DASH total score and selected component scores. Direct (but not indirect) effects of DASH through the allostatic load were observed for all-cause mortality, and no direct or indirect effects were observed for cancer-specific mortality. From a public health standpoint, the allostatic load may be a surrogate for the preventive effects of the DASH diet and its components on cardiovascular disease-specific mortality risk.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Lagergren ◽  
Matteo Bottai ◽  
Giola Santoni

Abstract Background Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is associated with a substantial risk of life-threatening complications and a limited long-term survival. This study aimed to clarify the controversial questions of how age influences short-term and long-term survival. Methods This population-based cohort study included almost all patients who underwent curatively intended esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in Sweden in 1987–2010, with follow-up through 2016. The exposure was age, analyzed both as a continuous and categorical variable. The probability of mortality was computed using a novel flexible parametric model approach. The reported probabilities are proper measures of the risk of dying, and the related odds ratios (OR) are therefore more suitable measures of association than hazard ratios. The outcomes were 90-day all-cause mortality, 5-year all-cause mortality, and 5-year disease-specific mortality. A novel flexible parametric model was used to derive the instantaneous probability of dying and the related OR along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for sex, education, comorbidity, tumor histology, pathological tumor stage, and resection margin status. Results Among 1737 included patients, the median age was 65.6 years. When analyzed as a continuous variable, older age was associated with slightly higher odds of 90-day all-cause mortality (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.07), 5-year all-cause mortality (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.03), and 5-year disease-specific mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01–1.02). Compared with patients aged < 70 years, those aged 70–74 years had no increased risk of any mortality outcome, while patients aged ≥ 75 years had higher odds of 90-day mortality (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.68–4.84), 5-year all-cause mortality (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.27–1.92), and 5-year disease-specific mortality (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09–1.76). Conclusions Patient age 75 years or older at esophagectomy for esophageal cancer appears to be an independent risk factor for higher short-term mortality and lower long-term survival.


2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
pp. 3011-3020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilad Twig ◽  
Dana Ben-Ami Shor ◽  
Ariel Furer ◽  
Hagai Levine ◽  
Estela Derazne ◽  
...  

Aging ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 6866-6877
Author(s):  
Jing Hu ◽  
Huilin Xu ◽  
Jingjing Zhu ◽  
Jinling Zhang ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. jech-2020-215314
Author(s):  
Lili Yang ◽  
Bo Xi ◽  
Min Zhao ◽  
Costan G Magnussen

BackgroundPrevious studies revealed inconsistent findings regarding the association between sleep duration and all-cause and disease-specific mortality. This study aimed to clarify the association of sleep duration with mortality using a large population-based prospective cohort study from the USA.MethodsWe used data from the National Health Interview Survey (2004–2014) linked to National Death Index records to 31 December 2015. A total of 284 754 participants aged ≥18 years were included. Self-reported sleep duration (average time slept in a 24-hour period) was categorised into seven groups: ≤4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours (reference), 8 hours, 9 hours and ≥10 hours. Study outcomes included all-cause, cardiovascular disease-specific and cancer-specific mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between sleep duration and mortality.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 5.25 years, we identified 20 872 deaths, of which 4 129 were cardiovascular disease-related and 5 217 were cancer-related. Compared with 7 hours/day of sleep, both short and long sleep durations were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (≤4 hours: HR=1.46, 95% CI=1.33–1.61; 5 hours: HR=1.22, 95% CI=1.13–1.32; 6 hours: HR=1.10, 95% CI=1.05–1.17; 8 hours: HR=1.22, 95% CI=1.17–1.28; 9 hours: HR=1.41, 95% CI=1.31–1.51; ≥10 hours: HR=2.00, 95% CI=1.88–2.13). Similar results were observed for cardiovascular disease-specific and cancer-specific mortality.ConclusionsOur study indicates that both short (≤6 hours/day) and long (≥8 hours/day) sleep durations increase the risk of mortality compared with sleep of 7 hours/day. A normal sleep duration (about 7 hours) every day is recommended for health benefits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document