scholarly journals Copeptin Does Not Add Diagnostic Information to High-Sensitivity Troponin T in Low- to Intermediate-Risk Patients with Acute Chest Pain: Results from the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction by Computed Tomography (ROMICAT) Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 1137-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahir Karakas ◽  
James L Januzzi ◽  
Julia Meyer ◽  
Hang Lee ◽  
Christopher L Schlett ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Copeptin, a stable peptide derived from the AVP precursor, has been linked to presence and severity of myocardial ischemia. We sought to evaluate the predictive value of copeptin and its incremental value beyond that of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) in patients with acute chest pain and low to intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS We recruited patients who presented with acute chest pain to the emergency department and had a negative initial conventional troponin T test (<0.03 μg/L). In all patients, hs-cTnT and copeptin measurements were taken. Each patient also underwent cardiac computed tomography (CT) and coronary angiography. RESULTS Baseline copeptin concentrations, in contrast to hs-cTnT, were not significantly higher in patients with ACS than in those without (P = 0.24). hs-cTnT showed an earlier rise in patients with ACS than copeptin, when analyses were stratified by time. A copeptin concentration ≥7.38 pmol/L had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% and a sensitivity of 51%, whereas hs-cTnT (≥13.0 pg/mL) had a NPV of 96% and a sensitivity of 63%. The combination of copeptin and hs-cTnT resulted in a lower diagnostic accuracy than hs-cTnT alone. Finally, on cardiac CT, copeptin concentrations were not associated with coronary artery morphology, although they were related to the presence of left ventricular dysfunction (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with acute chest pain and low to intermediate risk for ACS, copeptin concentrations are not independently predictive of ACS and do not add diagnostic value beyond that of hs-cTnT measurements.

Circulation ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 121 (10) ◽  
pp. 1227-1234 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Januzzi ◽  
Fabian Bamberg ◽  
Hang Lee ◽  
Quynh A. Truong ◽  
John H. Nichols ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T R Johannessen ◽  
D Atar ◽  
S Halvorsen ◽  
A C Larstorp ◽  
I Mdala ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The majority of patients with chest pain in Norway initially present to the primary health care system, which serves to triage them to the specialist health care services including hospitals. In some emergency primary care institutions, patients who are not hospitalised directly undergo further diagnostic testing to rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Purpose Several studies have shown the advantage of using high-sensitivity assays for fast interpretation of cardiac troponins. The majority of these studies included patient populations from hospital emergency departments. In contrast, we aimed to investigate whether the 1-hour algorithm for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) is safe and useful for implementation in a primary care emergency setting where the patients have a much lower pre-test probability for an acute coronary syndrome. Methods In this prospective cohort study, we included 1672 patients with acute non-specific chest pain from November 2016 to October 2018 at a primary care emergency outpatient clinic in Norway. Serial hs-cTnT samples were analysed after 0, 1 and 4 hours on the Cobas 8000 e602 analyzer. We divided the results into one of three groups (rule-out, rule-in, or further observation), according to the 0/1-hour algorithm for hs-cTn from the current ESC guidelines on non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. In the rule-out group, the 0/1-hour results were compared to the standard 4-hour hs-cTnT. Final hospital diagnoses were collected as a gold standard for the patients in the rule-in group. Results A total of 44 (2.6%) of 1672 patients were diagnosed with AMI. By applying the algorithm, 1274 (76.2%) patients were assigned to the rule-out group. One of the rule-out patients had a significant increase in hs-cTnT in the 4-hour sample. This results in a sensitivity for AMI of 97.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.0–99.9) and negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI 99.6–100.0). There were 50 (3.0%) patients in the rule-in group, amongst whom 35 had a verified AMI. This gives a specificity for AMI of 99.1% (95% CI 98.5–99.5) and a positive predictive value at 70.0% (95% CI 55.4–82.1). Among the 348 (20.8%) patients assigned to further observation, eight patients had an AMI. The 15 rule-in patients who did not have an AMI, had other acute illnesses that required further diagnostic work-up at the hospital. Conclusions With a negative predictive value at 99.9%, the 1-hour algorithm for hs-cTnT seems safe and applicable for a faster assessment of patients with non-specific chest pain in a primary care emergency setting. Prehospital implementation of this algorithm may reduce the need for hospitalisation of these patients and hence may probably lower the costs. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02983123 Acknowledgement/Funding Norwegian Research Fund for General Practice, The Norwegian Physicians' Association Fund for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety


2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 1318-1326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willibald Hochholzer ◽  
Tobias Reichlin ◽  
Raphael Twerenbold ◽  
Claudia Stelzig ◽  
Kirsten Hochholzer ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays have better analytical precision and sensitivity than earlier-generation assays when measuring cardiac troponin at low concentrations. We evaluated whether use of a high-sensitivity assay could further improve risk stratification compared with a standard cardiac troponin assay. METHODS We enrolled consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain, 30% of whom were diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome. Blood samples were drawn at the time of presentation. We measured cardiac troponin T with a standard fourth-generation assay (cTnT) and a high-sensitivity assay (hs-cTnT) (both Roche Diagnostics) and followed the patients for 24 months. RESULTS Of the 1159 patients, 76 died and 42 developed an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Prognostic accuracy of hs-cTnT for death was significantly higher [area under ROC curve (AUC) 0.79, 95% CI 0.74–0.84] than that of cTnT (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.62–0.76; P < 0.001). After adjustment for Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score (that included the cTnT assay result), hs-cTnT above the 99th percentile (0.014 μg/L) was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 2.60 (95% CI 1.42–4.74). Addition of hs-cTnT to the risk score improved the reclassification of patients (net reclassification improvement 0.91; 95% CI 0.67–1.14; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that this effect resulted from the better classification of patients without AMI at time of testing. hs-cTnT outperformed cTnT in the prediction of AMI during follow-up (P=0.02), but was not independently predictive for this endpoint. CONCLUSIONS Concentrations of hs-cTnT >0.014 μg/L improve the prediction of death but not subsequent AMI in unselected patients presenting with acute chest pain.


2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 916-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Meune ◽  
Tobias Reichlin ◽  
Affan Irfan ◽  
Nora Schaub ◽  
Raphael Twerenbold ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND The appropriate management of patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) with increased high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) but normal or borderline-high conventional cardiac troponin concentrations is unknown. METHODS We investigated 643 consecutive ED patients with acute chest pain who had been discharged for outpatient management after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) had been ruled out by serial measurements of conventional cardiac troponin. hs-cTnT was measured blindly, and we calculated the rates of all-cause mortality (primary endpoint) and subsequent AMI (secondary endpoint) at 30, 90, and 360 days. RESULTS hs-cTnT concentrations were increased (>14 ng/L) in 114 patients (18%) but <30 ng/L in 95% of these patients. Of those 114 patients, 96 (84%) had an adjudicated noncoronary cause of chest pain. Thirty-day mortality (95% CI) was 0.9% (0.1%–6.1%), 90-day mortality was 2.7% (0.9%–8.1%), and 360-day mortality was 5.2% (2.2%–11.9%) in patients with increased hs-cTnT; respective rates (95% CI) of AMI were 0.0%, 1.9% (0.5%–7.2%), and 7.6% (3.7%–15.3%). Increased hs-cTnT was associated with increased mortality and AMI at 90 days (P = 0.006 and P = 0.081, respectively) and 360 days (P = 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS hs-cTnT is a strong prognosticator of intermediate and long-term mortality and AMI in low-risk patients discharged from the ED after AMI has been ruled out. The relatively low rate of 30-day events may suggest that patients without acute coronary syndrome and small increases in cardiac troponin are in need of further investigations and treatments, but not necessarily immediate hospitalization.


RMD Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e001463
Author(s):  
Per Svensson ◽  
Miriam Bergstrom ◽  
Andrea Discacciati ◽  
Lina Ljung ◽  
Tomas Jernberg ◽  
...  

BackgroundPatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are, on average, at increased risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared to the general population, but it remains unknown whether RA remains an ACS risk factor also in settings where the ACS risk is already high elevated, such as among individuals presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain.Methods and resultsWe included 49 283 individuals (514 (1.0%) had RA) presenting with chest pain at the four hospital EDs in Stockholm, Sweden, 2013–2016 in a cohort study. Information on exposure (RA), outcome (ACS) and comorbidities was provided through national registers. The association between RA and ACS was assessed, overall and by levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and number of ACS risk factors, using logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, hospital, calendar year and cardiovascular risk factors. ACS was more common in patients with (8.2%) than without (4.6%) RA, adjusted OR =1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.0. This association was particularly strong in individuals with initial hs-cTnT levels between 5 and 14 ng/L, or no additional ACS risk factors (adjusted ORs above 2), but no longer detectable in those with hs-cTnT >14 ng/L or with three or more additional ACS risk factors.ConclusionRA is a risk factor for ACS also among patients at the ED with chest pain. This association is not explained by traditional ACS risk factors, and most pronounced in patients with normal hs-cTnT and few other ACS risk factors, prompting particular ACS vigilance in this RA patient group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document