scholarly journals A Novel Lipid Biomarker Panel for the Detection of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Mueller-Hennessen ◽  
Hans-Dirk Düngen ◽  
Matthias Lutz ◽  
Tobias Daniel Trippel ◽  
Michael Kreuter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Biomarker Panel ◽  
Analytical Protocol ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Center Study

Abstract OBJECTIVES In this study we aimed to identify novel metabolomic biomarkers suitable for improved diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS We prospectively recruited 887 individuals consisting of HFrEF patients with either ischemic (ICMP, n = 257) or nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP, n = 269), healthy controls (n = 327), and patients with pulmonary diseases (n = 34). A single-center identification (n = 238) was followed by a multicenter confirmation study (n = 649). Plasma samples from the single-center study were subjected to metabolite profiling analysis to identify metabolomic features with potential as HFrEF biomarkers. A dedicated analytical protocol was developed for the routine analysis of selected metabolic features in the multicenter cohort. RESULTS In the single-center study, 92 of 181 metabolomic features with known chemical identity (51%) were significantly changed in HFrEF patients compared to healthy controls (P <0.05). Three specific metabolomic features belonging to the lipid classes of sphingomyelins, triglycerides, and phosphatidylcholines were selected as the cardiac lipid panel (CLP) and analyzed in the multicenter study using the dedicated analytical protocol. The combination of the CLP with N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) distinguished HFrEF patients from healthy controls with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (sensitivity 80.2%, specificity 97.6%) and was significantly superior compared to NT-proBNP alone (AUC = 0.93, sensitivity 81.7%, specificity 88.1%, P <0.001), even in the subgroups with mildly reduced left ventricular EF (0.94 vs 0.87; P <0.001) and asymptomatic patients (0.95 vs 0.91; P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS The new metabolomic biomarker panel has the potential to improve HFrEF detection, even in mild and asymptomatic stages. The observed changes further indicate lipid alterations in the setting of HFrEF.

P2447Defining the values of left ventricular ejection fraction, volumes and strain by 2-dimensional echocardiography in subjects with normal cardiac geometry - a single center study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Jadav ◽  
L Nhola ◽  
J Thaden ◽  
J Herrmann ◽  
P Pellikka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Cardiac Geometry ◽  
Center Study

Abstract Background Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end diastolic, end systolic volumes (EDV, ESV) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) are very important parameters that are frequently reported in cardiology. Normal cardiac geometry was not considered in articles that published normal values. It is important to know normal parameters for population studies. Our hypothesis is to analyze how EF, volumes and GLS may vary by age groups, gender and BMI in a population with normal cardiac geometry. Purpose To define the values in EF, volumes and GLS measurements in a healthy population with normal cardiac geometry stratified by age groups, gender and body mass index (BMI). Methods This is a single center retrospective study conducted from 2008 to 2018. We selected 4557 subjects (2605 females, 1952 males) >18 years with ≤ mild valvular heart disease, who underwent 2D-echocardiography (2DE) at Mayo clinic, Rochester. All selected subjects had normal LV geometry (i.e., LV mass index≤88g/m2 in females and ≤102g/m2 in males and relative wall thickness ≤0.42 measured by 2DE) and without any cardiovascular risk factors or structural or functional abnormality determined by 2DE. Based on age groups, gender and BMI, we assessed the variability in volumes indexed to body surface area, EF and GLS by Mean ± SD and two sample t-test. Results Mean age was 54±15 years (females = 53±15, males = 56±16), body surface area was 1.9 m2±0.2 (females = 1.8±0.2, males = 2.1±0.2), LV GLS −20.7% ±2 SD (females = −21.2±2, males= −20.2±1.9) ranging −16.1 to −27.6 in both genders (Figure); LVEF by Biplane volume method 62.6% ± 4 SD (females = 63±4.3, males=62±4.5). The end diastolic volume 63.6±11.7 cc/m2 (female = 59.9±10.3, males = 68.1±11.8) and end systolic volume 23.9 cc/m2±5.4 (female = 22.3±4.8, males = 25.9±5.5). LV GLS, Biplane EF values were higher in females and EDV and ESV values were higher in males. LV GLS values decreased with age in females (P<0.0001). While EF increased with age in both genders (P<0.0001), EDV and ESV values decreased with age (P<0.0001). When each gender is sub-divided based on their BMI (<25 and ≥25), GLS, EDV and ESV values were higher in population with BMI <25 (P<0.0001). Normal geometry variables Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the biggest single center study to evaluate LV GLS values, LV EF, ED, ES volumes. These results can be used as reference values in a normal population. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction – A Review

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto A Smiseth ◽  
Anders Opdahl ◽  
Espen Boe ◽  
Helge Skulstad
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Heart Failure ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Filling Pressure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Objective Evidence

Heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HF-PEF), sometimes named diastolic heart failure, is a common condition most frequently seen in the elderly and is associated with arterial hypertension and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. Symptoms are attributed to a stiff left ventricle with compensatory elevation of filling pressure and reduced ability to increase stroke volume by the Frank-Starling mechanism. LV interaction with stiff arteries aggravates these problems. Prognosis is almost as severe as for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF), in part reflecting co-morbidities. Before the diagnosis of HF-PEF is made, non-cardiac etiologies must be excluded. Due to the non-specific nature of heart failure symptoms, it is essential to search for objective evidence of diastolic dysfunction which, in the absence of invasive data, is done by echocardiography and demonstration of signs of elevated LV filling pressure, impaired LV relaxation, or increased LV diastolic stiffness. Antihypertensive treatment can effectively prevent HF-PEF. Treatment of HF-PEF is symptomatic, with similar drugs as in HF-REF.

Prognostic value of global longitudinal layer specific strain for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Johnsen ◽  
M Sengeloev ◽  
P Joergensen ◽  
N Bruun ◽  
D Modin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters

Abstract Background Novel echocardiographic software allows for layer-specific evaluation of myocardial deformation by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Endocardial, epicardial- and whole wall global longitudinal strain (GLS) may be superior to conventional echocardiographic parameters in predicting all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of endocardial-, epicardial- and whole wall GLS in patients with HFrEF in relation to all-cause mortality. Methods We included and analyzed transthoracic echocardiographic examinations from 1,015 patients with HFrEF. The echocardiographic images were analyzed, and conventional and novel echocardiographic parameters were obtained. A p value in a 2-sided test &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed, and both univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated. Results During a median follow-up time of 40 months, 171 patients (16.8%) died. A lower endocardial (HR 1.17; 95% CI (1.11–1.23), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001), epicardial (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.13–1.27), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001), and whole wall (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.14–1.27), per 1% decrease, p&lt;0.001) GLS were all associated with higher risk of death (Figure 1). Both endocardial (HR 1.12; 95% CI (1.01–1.23), p=0.027), epicardial (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.26), p=0.040) and whole wall (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.27), p=0.030) GLS remained independent predictors of mortality in the multivariable models after adjusting for significant clinical parameters (age, sex, total cholesterol, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, ischemic cardiomyopathy, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and diabetes) and conventional echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, LV mass index, left atrial volume index, deceleration time, E/e', E-velocity, E/A ratio and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion). No other echocardiographic parameters remained an independent predictors after adjusting. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS had the highest C-statistics of all the echocardiographic parameters. Conclusion Endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS are independent predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS were superior prognosticators of all-cause mortality compared with all other echocardiographic parameters. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan Combined with Dapagliflozin on Long-Term Cardiac Mortality in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Angiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000331972110473
Author(s):  
Umut Karabulut ◽  
Kudret Keskin ◽  
Dilay Karabulut ◽  
Ece Yiğit ◽  
Zerrin Yiğit
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Neprilysin Inhibitor

The angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor dapagliflozin have been shown to reduce rehospitalization and cardiac mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to compare the long-term cardiac and all-cause mortality of ARNI and dapagliflozin combination therapy against ARNI monotherapy in patients with HFrEF. This retrospective study involved 244 patients with HF with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV symptoms and ejection fraction ≤40%. The patients were divided into 2 groups: ARNI monotherapy and ARNI+dapagliflozin. Median follow-up was 2.5 (.16–3.72) years. One hundred and seventy-five (71.7%) patients were male, and the mean age was 65.9 (SD, 10.2) years. Long-term cardiac mortality rates were significantly lower in the ARNI+dapagliflozin group (7.4%) than in the ARNI monotherapy group (19.5%) ( P = .01). Dapagliflozin [Hazard Ratio (HR) [95% Confidence Interval (CI)] = .29 [.10–.77]; P = .014] and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [HR (95% CI) = .89 (.85–.93); P < .001] were found to be independent predictors of cardiac mortality. Our study showed a significant reduction in cardiac mortality with ARNI and dapagliflozin combination therapy compared with ARNI monotherapy.

Abstract 17470: Racial Disparities in Goal Directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Systolic Heart Failure- A Single Center Study

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayesha Azmeen ◽  
Naga Vaishnavi Gadela ◽  
Vergara Cunegundo
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Racial Disparities ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Clinical Syndrome ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Geographic Variations ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Introduction: Heart failure(HF) is a clinical syndrome that is widely prevalent affecting approximately 6.5 million people in the United States. It accounts for the ever-rising health care costs in the US due to recurrent hospitalizations. Despite advancements in medical management, the mortality and the rate of hospitalizations continues to be high with geographic variations and racial disparities. Through this descriptive study, we sought to analyze the health disparities among Hispanic, African American (AA) and Caucasian population in a single-center. Methods: We identified a total of 178 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction from our outpatient clinic by utilizing the ICD-10 codes. Patients with ejection fraction >50% have been excluded. A retrospective chart review of their ethnic background, medications, and number of heart failure exacerbations per year has been performed. Results: 178 patients (mean age 62 years, 35.56% of females) including Hispanics (n=102), AA(n=44), and Caucasians (n=32) were included in the study. Although all patients were started on Beta-blockers, only 76.4% and 37.2% of Hispanics were started on ACEi/ARBs and spironolactone respectively. Similarly, 72.7% and 45.4% of AA were started on ACEi/ARBs and spironolactone respectively. This is in contrast to Caucasians population, where a majority of patients were on started on GDMT; 90% and 75% were started on ACEi/ARBs and spironolactone respectively. This was also reflected by the number of admissions due to HF exacerbations which ranged from 2-4/year for Hispanics and AA populations and 0-1/year for Caucasians. Conclusions: GDMT for HF is known to reduce heart failure exacerbations, mortality and the ever rising cost of the healthcare system. We have observed that despite recommendations to initiate GDMT in all patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, racial disparities exist. Physicians should be mindful of initiating GDMT in all patients.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia and heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavita B Khaira ◽  
Ellen Brinza ◽  
Gagan D Singh ◽  
Ezra A Amsterdam ◽  
Stephen W Waldo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
History Of

The impact of heart failure (HF) on long-term survival in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) has not been well described. Outcomes stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) are also unknown. A single center retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent treatment for CLI from 2006 to 2013. Baseline demographics, procedural data and outcomes were analyzed. HF diagnosis was based on appropriate signs and symptoms as well as results of non-invasive testing. Among 381 CLI patients, 120 (31%) had a history of HF and 261 (69%) had no history of heart failure (no-HF). Within the HF group, 74 (62%) had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and 46 (38%) had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The average EF for those with no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF were 59±13% vs 56±9% vs 30±9%, respectively. The likelihood of having concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) was lowest in the no-HF group (43%), higher in the HFpEF group (70%) and highest in the HFrEF group (83%) ( p=0.001). Five-year survival was on average twofold higher in the no-HF group (43%) compared to both the HFpEF (19%, p=0.001) and HFrEF groups (24%, p=0.001). Long-term survival rates did not differ between the two HF groups ( p=0.50). There was no difference in 5-year freedom from major amputation or freedom from major adverse limb events between the no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF groups, respectively. Overall, the combination of CLI and HF is associated with poor 5-year survival, independent of the degree of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and different left ventricular ejection fraction: results of the multicenter RIF-CHF register

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 4200
Author(s):  
I. V. Zhirov ◽  
N. V. Safronova ◽  
Yu. F. Osmolovskaya ◽  
S. N. Тereschenko
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are the most common cardiovascular conditions in clinical practice and frequently coexist. The number of patients with HF and AF is increasing every year.Aim. To analyze the effect of clinical course and management of HF and AF on the outcomes.Material and methods. The data of 1,003 patients from the first Russian register of patients with HF and AF (RIF-CHF) were analyzed. The endpoints included hospitalization due to decompensated HF, cardiovascular mortality, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding. Predictors of unfavorable outcomes were analyzed separately for patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (AF+HFpEF), mid-range ejection fraction (AF+HFmrEF), and reduced ejection fraction (AF+HFrEF).Results. Among all patients with HF, 39% had HFpEF, 15% — HFmrEF, and 46% — HFrEF. A total of 57,2% of patients were rehospitalized due to decompensated HF within one year. Hospitalization risk was the highest for HFmrEF patients (66%, p=0,017). Reduced ejection fraction was associated with the increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (15,5% vs 5,4% in other groups, p<0,001) but not ischemic stroke (2,4% vs 3%, p=0,776). Patients with HFpEF had lower risk to achieve the composite endpoint (stroke+MI+cardiovascular death) as compared to patients with HFmrEF and HFrEF (12,7% vs 22% and 25,5%, p<0,001). Regression logistic analysis revealed that factors such as demographic characteristics, disease severity, and selected therapy had different effects on the risk of unfavorable outcomes depending on ejection fraction group.Conclusion. Each group of patients with different ejection fractions is characterized by its own pattern of factors associated with unfavorable outcomes. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with mid-range ejection fraction demonstrate that these patients need to be studied as a separate cohort.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document