Comprehensive Versus Selective Primary Health Care: Lessons For Global Health Policy

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley Magnussen ◽  
John Ehiri ◽  
Pauline Jolly
2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
John Rodwell ◽  
Andre Gulyas

Health policy and practice managers often treat primary practices as being homogenous, despite evidence that these organisations vary along multiple dimensions. This treatment can be a barrier to the development of a strong health care system. Therefore, a more sophisticated taxonomy of organisations could inform management and policy to better cater to the diversity of practice contexts, needs and capabilities. The purpose of this study was to categorise primary practices using practice features and characteristics associated with the job satisfaction of GPs. The current study uses data from 3906 GPs from the 2008 wave of the MABEL survey. Seven configurations of primary health care practices emerged from multivariate cluster analyses. The configurations incorporate, yet move beyond, simplistic categorisations such as geographic location and highlight the complexity facing managers and health policy interventions. The multidimensional configurations in the taxonomy are a mechanism for informing health care management and policy. The process of deriving configurations can be applied in a variety of countries and contexts.


1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penny A. Hatcher ◽  
Walter K. Patrick ◽  
Jan Shoultz

1989 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Hollander ◽  
S. Checkley ◽  
L. Appleby

The Alma Ata Primary Health Care Conference in 1978 marked a watershed in global health care policy and specifically a fundamental milestone for mental health. Not only was mental health defined as a right and an integral part of health generally, but also its promotion was a major recommendation of the conference.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Elvira Pires de Pires ◽  
Lara Vandresen ◽  
Francele Machado ◽  
Rosani Ramos Machado ◽  
Felipa Rafaela Amadigi

ABSTRACT Objective: to identify what is discussed in studies published in Brazilian and international literature in the last ten years on Primary Health Care management. Method: an integrative review with a search carried out from 2006 to 2016, in the SciELO®, LILACS®, Scopus®, PubMed® and CINAHL® databases in the Portuguese, English and Spanish languages. The review followed the steps: formulation of the research question, definition of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, identification and selection of the studies, and summary of the subjects found in the studies. Resources from The Atlas.ti® software was used for data organization and analysis. Results: the corpus include 90 studies which predominantly originated from LILACS® and were performed in Brazil. The themes covered in the publications were: health policy and management in Primary Health Care, material resources management, human resources management, financial management, quality management, planning, characterization of managers, management role/ activities, challenges/difficulties in management, potentialities/facilities in management. There was a prevalence of studies that dealt with Primary Health Care management in the context of reflections on health policies and those dealing with the challenges/difficulties faced in Primary Health Care management. These findings demonstrate that the Primary Health Care model is complex and challenging, both for policymakers and for those managing it. Conclusion: the number of studies on Primary Health Care management is significant in the current literature and the predominance of health policy and difficulties in performing management issues reinforce the recognition of the centrality of the management for effective Primary Health Care.


Ethnicities ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 434-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Came ◽  
D O’Sullivan ◽  
T McCreanor

Background Te Tiriti o Waitangi was negotiated between the British Crown and Indigenous Māori leaders of Aotearoa New Zealand in 1840. Māori understood the agreement as an affirmation of political authority and a guarantee of British protection of their lands and resources. The Crown understood it as a cession of sovereignty. The tension remains, though legal and political developments in the last 35 years, have established that the agreement places a mandatory obligation on the Crown to protect and promote Māori health. It also requires that Māori may exercise rangatiratanga, or responsibility and authority, in relation to health policy development and implementation. Methods Te Tiriti is, then, an instrument against which health policy is justly and efficaciously evaluated. This paper introduces critical Tiriti analysis as such an evaluative method. Critical Tiriti analysis involves reviewing policy documents against the Preamble and the Articles of te Tiriti o Waitangi. The review process has five defined phases: (i) orientation; (ii) close reading; (iii) determination; (iv) strengthening practice and (v) Māori final word. Results We present a working example of critical Tiriti analysis using the New Zealand Government’s Primary Health Care Strategy published in 2001. This policy analysis found poor alignment with te Tiriti overall and the indicators of its implementation that we propose. Conclusion This paper provides direction to policy makers wanting to improve Māori health outcomes and ensure Māori engagement, leadership and substantive authority in the policy process. It offers an approach to analysing policy that is simple to use and, inherently, a tool for advancing social justice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document