COMPARISON OF BRONCHODILATOR RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE AND BRONCHIAL ASTHMA

CHEST Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 248S
Author(s):  
G. Gandev ◽  
K. Gupta ◽  
J. Williams ◽  
K. Kanagarajan
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_E) ◽  
pp. E172-E176
Author(s):  
Paolo Verdecchia ◽  
Claudio Cavallini ◽  
Stefano Coiro ◽  
Clara Riccini ◽  
Fabio Angeli

Abstract For many years, β-blockers have been considered contraindicated in patients with heart failure (HF) and in those with bronchial asthma or even chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) although without clear evidence of asthma. Today, despite overwhelming evidence of the usefulness of β-blockers, especially in HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), and in ischaemic heart disease, some reluctance persists in using these drugs when COPD coexists. Such resistance is due to the fear that a possible worsening of bronchospasm induced by β-blockers could induce negative effects greater than the benefits. The Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology clearly suggest that: (i) implantation of a cardiac defibrillator (ICD) are not contraindicated in COPD without clear evidence of bronchial asthma; (ii) β-blockers are only ‘relatively’ contraindicated when there is certainty of bronchial asthma with a documented bronchodilator response to the β2 stimulant. Therefore, bronchial asthma is not an absolute contraindication to β-blockers. The cardiologist should not limit the diagnosis of COPD to clinical suspicion, but should rely on a spirometry examination associated with any bronchodilation tests. In any case, selective β1 blockers are preferred, starting at a basic dose, which ensure a better dilator response to bronchodilators and in any case cause less bronchospasm than non-selective β-blockers. Unfortunately, there is still some reluctance to the use of β-blockers in patients with COPD associated with HF, which should be eliminated.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 80-86
Author(s):  
V. I. Trofimov ◽  
D. Z. Baranov

BACKGROUND: a comparative analysis of laboratory and instrumental tests at patients with bronchial obstructive diseases seems very actual due to the wide prevalence of these diseases. THE AIM: to evaluate characteristics of spirometry as well as allergic (total IgE, sputum eosinophils) and infectious (blood and sputum leucocytes, ESR, CRP, fibrinogen) inflammation markers at patients with bronchial obstructive diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 104 case histories of patients with bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and overlap were analyzed including age, duration of smoking (pack-years), laboratory (clinical blood test, biochemical blood test, general sputum analysis, sputum culture) and instrumental (spirometry, body plethysmography, echocardiography) tests. Data were processed statistically with non-parametric methods. RESULTS: COPD patients were older than other groups’ patients, had the highest pack-years index. ACO patients were marked with maximal TLC and Raw, minimal FEV1, FEF25-75, FEV1/FVC. Patients with COPD had the highest inflammation markers (leucocyte count, CRP, fibrinogen). CONCLUSION: high active inflammation may cause severe lower airways possibility disorders at patients with COPD. Data related to a possible role of K. pneumoniaе in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic inflammation in lower airways are of significant interest. Patients with ACO occupy an intermediate position between asthma and COPD patients based on clinical and functional features.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document