Sex-Steroid Modulation of Growth Hormone (GH) Secretory Control: Three-Peptide Ensemble Regulation Under Dual Feedback Restraint by GH and IGF-I

Endocrine ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes D. Veldhuis ◽  
Cyril Y. Bowers
JMS SKIMS ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-106
Author(s):  
Javaid Ahmad Bhat ◽  
Moomin Hussain Bhat ◽  
Hilal Bhat ◽  
Mona Sood ◽  
Shariq Rashid Masoodi

Background : Laron & colleagues (1966) reported a rare genetic disorder in Israliei Jewish sublings which was characterized by insensitivity to growth hormone due to abnormality in growth hormone receptor or post receptor signaling pathway.Case Report: We hereby report a case of a 5 year old female child who presented to us with features similar to Laron syndrome. The diagnosis was made & confirmed by various Lab. investigations like low IGF-I levels and managed accordingly. JMS 2017; 20 (2):104-106  


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1231-1245
Author(s):  
Filippo Maffezzoni ◽  
Teresa Porcelli ◽  
Andrea Delbarba ◽  
Letizia Pezzaioli ◽  
Carlo Cappelli ◽  
...  

: Biological markers (biomarkers) play a key role in drug development, regulatory approval and clinical care of patients and are linked to clinical and surrogate outcomes. : Both acromegaly and Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD) are pathological conditions related to important comorbidities that, in addition to having stringent diagnostic criteria, require valid markers for the definition of treatment, treatment monitoring and follow-up. GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) are the main biomarkers of GH action in children and adults while, in acromegaly, both GH and IGF-I are established biomarkers of disease activity. : However, although GH and IGF-I are widely validated biomarkers of GHD and acromegaly, their role is not completely exhaustive or suitable for clinical classification and follow-up. Therefore, new biological markers for acromegaly and GH replacement therapy are strongly needed. : The aim of this paper is to review and summarize the current state in the field pointing out new potential biomarkers for acromegaly and GH use/abuse.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Jan M. Wit ◽  
Sjoerd D. Joustra ◽  
Monique Losekoot ◽  
Hermine A. van Duyvenvoorde ◽  
Christiaan de Bruin

The current differential diagnosis for a short child with low insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and a normal growth hormone (GH) peak in a GH stimulation test (GHST), after exclusion of acquired causes, includes the following disorders: (1) a decreased spontaneous GH secretion in contrast to a normal stimulated GH peak (“GH neurosecretory dysfunction,” GHND) and (2) genetic conditions with a normal GH sensitivity (e.g., pathogenic variants of <i>GH1</i> or <i>GHSR</i>) and (3) GH insensitivity (GHI). We present a critical appraisal of the concept of GHND and the role of 12- or 24-h GH profiles in the selection of children for GH treatment. The mean 24-h GH concentration in healthy children overlaps with that in those with GH deficiency, indicating that the previously proposed cutoff limit (3.0–3.2 μg/L) is too high. The main advantage of performing a GH profile is that it prevents about 20% of false-positive test results of the GHST, while it also detects a low spontaneous GH secretion in children who would be considered GH sufficient based on a stimulation test. However, due to a considerable burden for patients and the health budget, GH profiles are only used in few centres. Regarding genetic causes, there is good evidence of the existence of Kowarski syndrome (due to <i>GH1</i> variants) but less on the role of <i>GHSR</i> variants. Several genetic causes of (partial) GHI are known (<i>GHR</i>, <i>STAT5B</i>, <i>STAT3</i>, <i>IGF1</i>, <i>IGFALS</i> defects, and Noonan and 3M syndromes), some responding positively to GH therapy. In the final section, we speculate on hypothetical causes.


Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1376
Author(s):  
Marina Caputo ◽  
Stella Pigni ◽  
Emanuela Agosti ◽  
Tommaso Daffara ◽  
Alice Ferrero ◽  
...  

Growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I) are pleiotropic hormones with important roles in lifespan. They promote growth, anabolic actions, and body maintenance, and in conditions of energy deprivation, favor catabolic feedback mechanisms switching from carbohydrate oxidation to lipolysis, with the aim to preserve protein storages and survival. IGF-I/insulin signaling was also the first one identified in the regulation of lifespan in relation to the nutrient-sensing. Indeed, nutrients are crucial modifiers of the GH/IGF-I axis, and these hormones also regulate the complex orchestration of utilization of nutrients in cell and tissues. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge on the reciprocal feedback among the GH/IGF-I axis, macro and micronutrients, and dietary regimens, including caloric restriction. Expanding the depth of information on this topic could open perspectives in nutrition management, prevention, and treatment of GH/IGF-I deficiency or excess during life.


Metabolism ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 1162-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Huang ◽  
Marc R. Blackman ◽  
Karen Herreman ◽  
Katharine M. Pabst ◽  
S. Mitchell Harman ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 520-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioulietta Erotokritou-Mulligan ◽  
E. Eryl Bassett ◽  
David A. Cowan ◽  
Christiaan Bartlett ◽  
Polly Milward ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Ranke ◽  
Roland Schweizer ◽  
David D. Martin ◽  
Stefan Ehehalt ◽  
Carl-Philipp Schwarze ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lucia Schena ◽  
Cristina Meazza ◽  
Sara Pagani ◽  
Valeria Paganelli ◽  
Elena Bozzola ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground:In recent years, several studies have been published showing different responses to growth hormone (GH) treatment in idiopathic short stature children. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether non-growth-hormone-deficient (non-GHD) short children could benefit from long-term GH treatment as GHD patients.Methods:We enrolled 22 prepubertal children and 22 age- and sex-matched GHD patients, with comparable height, body mass index (BMI), bone age, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) circulating levels. The patients were treated with recombinant human GH (rhGH) and followed until they reach adult height.Results:During GH treatment, the two groups grew in parallel, reaching the same final height-standard deviation score (SDS) and the same height gain. On the contrary, we found significantly lower IGF-I serum concentrations in non-GHD patients than in GHD ones, at the end of therapy (p=0.0055).Conclusions:In our study, the response to GH treatment in short non-GHD patients proved to be similar to that in GHD ones. However, a careful selection of short non-GHD children to be treated with GH would better justify the cost of long-term GH therapy.


1994 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan J. Hazel ◽  
Callum M. Gillespie ◽  
Rob J. Moore ◽  
Ross G. Clark ◽  
Ken F. Jureidini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document