scholarly journals Lipid profiles in smoking and non-smoking male adolescents

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 232
Author(s):  
Sigit Prastyanto ◽  
Mei Neni Sitaresmi ◽  
Madarina Julia

Background The prevalence of smoking in adolescentstends to increase. Smoking is associated with a higher risk ofdyslipidemia.Objective To compare the lipid profiles of tobacco-smoking andnon-tobacco-smoking male adolescents.Methods We performed a cross- sectional study in three vocationalhigh schools in Yogyakarta from January to April 2011. Dataon smoking status, duration of smoking and number cigarettesconsumed per day were collected by questionnaires. We randomlyselected 50 male smokers and 50 male non-smokers as the studysubjects.Results Mean differences between smokers and non-smokerswere 44.5 (95%CI 28. 7 to 60.1) mg/dL for triglyceride levels; 8.0(95% CI 1.0 to 14.9) mg/dL for low density lipoprotein (LDL)cholesterol; 11.8 (1.1 to 22.4) mg/dL for total cholesterol and -5.7mg/dL (95% CI -8.8 to -2.6) for high density lipoprotein (HDL)cholesterol. Mean differences (95% CI) between smokers whohad engaged in smoking for > 2 years and those who had smokedfor :S:2 years were -18.1 (95% CI -33 .9 to -2.3) mg/dL for totalcholesterol; -49.4 (95% CI -67.2 to -3 1.5) mg/dL for triglycerides.Mean differences between those who smoked > 5 cigarettes/dayand :s:5 cigarettes per day were -18 .4 (95% CI -32.8 to -4.1) mg/dL for total cholesterol and -29.1 (95% CI -53.6 to -4.6) mg/dLfor triglycerides.Conclusion Smoking more than 5 cigarettes/day significantlyincreases total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceridelevels, as well as reduces HDL cholesterol levels; while smokingmore than 2 years significantly increases total cholesterol andtriglyceride levels

Author(s):  
Iman Nazar Talib Al-Ani ◽  
Hadeer Akram AbdulRazzaq Al-Ani ◽  
Hanan Hussein ◽  
Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman ◽  
Aseel Hadi Abdulameer Al-Hashimi ◽  
...  

Objective: is to assess the dyslipidemia control and demographic differences in lipid patterns among dyslipidemic cardiac patients. Method: data based a retrospective analysis of 504 persons (age mean 58.16 ± 11.119 years) was conducted in Malaysia which estimated the lipid abnormalities in statin-treated patients. Demographic data including age, race, alcoholic and smoking status were collected. Lipid profiles including triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were measured. Results: a desirable level of (TC) and (TG) were 62.2% and 54.4% respectively, optimal level of (LDL-C) was 66.5% and the normal level of (HDL-C) was 54.2%. Risk factor analysis of dyslipidemia was done with a primary focus on the possible impact of statin type, gender, race and dyslipidemia type. Atorvastatin was significantly more effective for primary dyslipidemia than simvastatin and lovastatin in HDL cholesterol ( p < 0.002), while in LDL cholesterol (p = 0.001) and total cholesterol (p < 0.03) simvastatin was significantly found more effective for primary dyslipidemia. A significant correlation emerged between gender and statin type in HDL cholesterol (p < 0.02) and total cholesterol TC (p < 0.001), atorvastatin is found more effective to be used by males than females. A correlation was also significant between gender and dyslipidemia type in HDL cholesterol (p < 0.01). Results for triglyceride reported a significant relationship between age, race and statin type (p < 0.001), atorvastatin was found to be more effective among Chinese while lovastatin was more effective among Indians. Finally 18.2% abnormality of HDL was explained by interactions of risk factors: first statin type and dyslipidemia type, second for gender and dyslipidemia type and the third was gender and statin type. Conclusions: more than 50% of cardiac outpatients were in an acceptable range of lipid profile evaluation. This could support the need for increasing attention to basic monitoring of cardiovascular risk factors in these dyslipidemic patients particularly in Asian population.


1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 864-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
S D Kafonek ◽  
C A Derby ◽  
P S Bachorik

Abstract We determined the physiological variability of total cholesterol, high- (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoproteins A-I and B in fasting blood samples from patients referred to the Johns Hopkins Lipid Referral Clinic. Samples were taken on each of three occasions during baseline evaluation visits before the patients were treated. The median physiological coefficients of variation (CVp) were as follows: total cholesterol, 5.0%; triglycerides, 17.8%; HDL cholesterol, 7.1%; LDL cholesterol, calculated from the previous three measurements, 7.8%; and apolipoproteins A-I and B, 7.1% and 6.4%, respectively. There were no significant differences in CVp between children (less than or equal to 18 years) and adults (greater than 18 years) for any of the measurements. On the basis of our findings, single measurements in serial samples taken on three occasions suffice to establish the patients' usual values with the following precisions (+/- 1 CV): total cholesterol, +/- 4%; triglycerides, +/- 11%; HDL cholesterol, +/- 8%; LDL cholesterol, +/- 6%; and apolipoproteins A-I and B, +/- 7%.


2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. 5479-5484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard G. IJzerman ◽  
Coen D. A. Stehouwer ◽  
Mirjam M. van Weissenbruch ◽  
Eco J. de Geus ◽  
Dorret I. Boomsma

Recent studies have demonstrated an association between low weight at birth and an atherogenic lipid profile in later life. To examine the influences of intrauterine and genetic factors, we investigated 53 dizygotic and 61 monozygotic adolescent twin pairs. Regression analysis demonstrated that low birth weight was associated with high levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (−0.17 mmol/liter per kg, P = 0.07; −0.18 mmol/liter per kg, P = 0.04; and− 0.07 g/liter per kg, P = 0.02, respectively) and with low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (+0.04 mmol/liter per kg, P = 0.1), after adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index. Intrapair differences in birth weight were significantly associated with differences in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B in dizygotic twins after adjustment for differences in current body mass index (−0.49 mmol/liter per kg, P = 0.02; −0.51 mmol/liter per kg, P = 0.01; and −0.10 g/liter per kg, P = 0.04, respectively), demonstrating that the larger the difference in birth weight, the higher these risk factors in the twin with the lower birth weight, compared with the cotwin with the higher birth weight. In monozygotic twins, however, the associations between intrapair differences in birth weight and differences in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B were in the opposite direction (+0.32 mmol/liter per kg, P = 0.03; +0.23 mmol/liter per kg, P = 0.08; and +0.06 g/liter per kg, P = 0.04, respectively). The association between intrapair differences in birth weight and differences in HDL cholesterol was not significant in dizygotic twins (+0.04 mmol/liter per kg, P = 0.6) and of borderline significance in monozygotic twins (+0.11 mmol/liter per kg, P = 0.05). These data suggest that genetic factors account for the association of low birth weight with high levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B, whereas intrauterine factors possibly play a role in the association between birth weight and HDL cholesterol.


2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 199-203
Author(s):  
M Saiedullah ◽  
S Begum ◽  
S Hayat ◽  
SM Kamahuddin ◽  
MR Rahman ◽  
...  

Objective: Serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is considered as the primary target of lipid lowering therapy and non-high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is the recommended second target. Recent studies claimed that non-HDL cholesterol is a better predictor of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) than LDL cholesterol. In this study we aimed to compare non-HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol as a CVD risk factor in confirmed diabetic subjects. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, 1042 confirmed diabetic subjects selected randomly were included. HbA1cResults: In the total subjects, 767 (74%) subjects had LDL cholesterol > 100 mg/dL and 822 (79%) subjects had non- HDL cholesterol > 130 mg/dL. HbA1c values were different (p<0.02) in five groups and showed upward trend (p<0.01). All the lipid parameters studied were significantly different in five groups (p<0.0001) and TC, TG and non-HDL cholesterol showed upward trend (p<0.0001), but HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol showed downward trend (p<0.0001). Odds ratio (OR) of likelihood of risk individuals regarding non-HDL cholesterol compared to LDL cholesterol were 0.50 (p<0.001), 1.32 (p>0.05), 2.96 (p<0.001), 6.49 (p<0.001) and 9.37 (p<0.001) for TG concentrations of up to 150 mg/dL, 151-200 mg/dL, 201-250 mg/dL, 251-300 mg/dL and 301-400 mg/dL respectively with relative risk of 0.60, 1.24, 2.43, 4.83, 5.10. Conclusion: LDL cholesterol is a better tool for the detection of high-risk individuals than non-HDL cholesterol at TG concentration up to 150 mg/dL, whereas non-HDL cholesterol is better than LDL cholesterol at TG concentration above 200 mg/dL as a CVD risk factor. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v31i4.21004 J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2013; 31: 199-203


Author(s):  
Nela Maksimovic ◽  
Vanja Vidovic ◽  
Tatjana Damnjanovic ◽  
Biljana Jekic ◽  
Nada Majkic Singh ◽  
...  

IntroductionPositive regulatory domain containing 16 (PRDM16) protein represents the key regulator of brown adipose tissue (BAT) development. It induces brown fat phenotype and represses white adipose tissue specific genes through the association with C-terminal binding co-repressor proteins (CtBP1 and CtBP2). In healthy adults presence of BAT has been associated with lower glucose, total cholesterol and LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol levels. Our aim was to analyze the association of PRDM16 gene (rs12409277) and CtBP2 gene (rs1561589) polymorphisms with body mass index (BMI), fasting glucose level and lipid profile of adolescents.Material and methodsOur study included 295 healthy school children, 145 boys (49.2%) and 150 girls (50.8%), 15 years of age. Genotypes for the selected polymorphisms were detected by the real-time PCR method. Age, gender, height, weight, lipid profile (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides) and fasting glucose levels were recorded.ResultsWe did not find a statistically significant association of rs12409277 and rs1561589 polymorphisms with BMI, fasting glucose and lipid profile of adolescents. We further analyzed the combined effect of the two SNPs and the statistical analysis showed that carriers of CT genotype of rs12409277 polymorphism and GG genotype of rs1561589 polymorphism had significantly lower total cholesterol (p = 0.001) and LDL cholesterol (p = 0.008) levels compared to all other groups of genotypes.ConclusionsOur study suggests that rs12409277 and rs1561589 polymorphism might have an influence on total and LDL cholesterol levels in adolescents. Larger studies should be performed in order to confirm our results.


2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 89-91
Author(s):  
Lucinda M Buys ◽  
Kurt A Rosenkrans

Objective: To evaluate the lipid-lowering effects, particularly changes in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, associated with atorvastatin use in a typical outpatient family medicine practice. Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: A community-based family medicine residency program. Patients: One hundred twenty-three patients with hyperlipidemia. Interventions: Treatment with atorvastatin to meet National Cholesterol Education Program (Adult Treatment Program) II goals. Main Outcome Measures: Fasting lipid profiles, including total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. Results: Atorvastatin lowered total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. HDL cholesterol was essentially unchanged from baseline to follow-up. In a subset of patients (∼50%), HDL cholesterol decreased by 13.1%. In the remainder of patients, HDL cholesterol increased by 10.7%. The decrease of HDL cholesterol was as much as 24 mg/dL. Conclusions: Atorvastatin is an effective agent for lowering total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. In a subset of patients, atorvastatin appeared to lower HDL cholesterol. Close monitoring of HDL cholesterol concentrations while patients are receiving atorvastatin is important.


1981 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. J. Wass ◽  
R. J. Jarrett ◽  
V. Meilton ◽  
M. K. Start ◽  
M. Mattock ◽  
...  

1. Changes in serum total and lipoprotein fraction triglyceride and cholesterol levels were studied in 24 adults on home haemodialysis. Half the patients were randomly allocated to a low cholesterol (mean 200 mg/day), fat-modified diet (mean polyunsaturated/saturated fat ratio of 1.0 with a mean of 43% of the total energy content derived from fat). 2. Before dietary manipulation, triglyceride levels in all lipoprotein fractions were significantly higher (P < 0.02) than in a control group of age and sex matched normal subjects. Total cholesterol, very-low-density-lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were also significantly raised (P < 0.02), but high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was normal. In the patients on a fat-modified diet triglyceride levels did not alter in any of the lipoprotein fractions. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels fell significantly into the normal range (P < 0.002 and < 0.001 respectively) but VLDL and HDL cholesterol levels did not change. 3. Hypertriglyceridaemia is the most common lipid abnormality in patients with renal failure and a long-term fat-modified diet is, therefore, of limited therapeutic importance in these patients unless there is a low HDL/LDL cholesterol ratio.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-406
Author(s):  
Ruolin Li ◽  
Shumin Yang ◽  
Rufei Gao ◽  
Yin Deng ◽  
Jiahuan Liu ◽  
...  

Objective: To investigate whether serum bisphenol A (BPA) concentration is related to the occurrence of dyslipidemia. Methods: A total of 574 adults were enrolled at baseline and followed up for 5 years. Concentrations of serum BPA, triglycerides (TGs), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were measured. Dyslipidemia was defined as the existence of one or more of the following conditions: high-LDL-cholesterolemia (LDL ≥140 mg/dL), hypertriglyceridemia (TGs ≥150 mg/dL), or low-HDL-cholesterolemia (HDL <40 mg/dL). Participants were stratified into tertiles according to low, median, and high baseline serum BPA levels. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used. Data from baseline and follow-up were used for cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, respectively. Results: In the cross-sectional analysis, compared to subjects in the low BPA tertile, those in the high BPA tertile showed a higher level of LDL cholesterol (108.1 ± 24.4 mg/dL versus 119.5 ± 26.9 mg/dL; P<.05) and a lower level of HDL cholesterol (46.2 ± 11.7 mg/dL versus 39.5 ± 7.5 mg/dL; P<.05). In multivariable linear regression models, Z-transformed BPA was positively associated with LDL cholesterol (β= 0.13, P = .002) and negatively associated with HDL cholesterol (β= −0.28; P<.001). After cross-sectionally adjusting for confounders, subjects in higher BPA exposure was associated with a higher prevalence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia. Longitudinally, in subjects without low-HDL-cholesterolemia at baseline, each SD increment in baseline BPA was associated with a higher incidence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio [95% confidence interval; CI] 2.76, 95% CI 1.21, 6.29). Conclusion: Cross-sectionally, higher BPA exposure is associated with a higher prevalence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia. Longitudinally, baseline BPA is an independent predictor of the 5-year incidence of low-HDL-cholesterolemia. Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; BPA = bisphenol A; CI = confidence interval; CVD = cardiovascular disease; EIMDS = environment, inflammation and metabolic diseases study; HDL = high density lipoprotein; LDL = low density lipoprotein; OR = odds ratio; PPAR = peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; SBP = systolic blood pressure; TG = triglyceride; Z-BPA = Z-transformed bisphenol A


2019 ◽  
Vol 77 (12) ◽  
pp. 890-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel T Dibaba

Abstract Context Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent across the world. The existing evidence suggests vitamin D may have beneficial effects on serum lipid profiles and thus cardiovascular health. Objective The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on serum lipid profiles. Data Source Original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of vitamin D supplementation on serum lipid profiles and published before July 2018 were identified by searching online databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect, using a combination of relevant keywords. Data Extraction Data on study characteristics, effect size, measure of variation, type of vitamin D supplementation, and duration of follow-up were extracted by the author. Data Analysis PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed. Random effects (DerSimonian and Laird [D-V)] models were used to pool standardized mean differences in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides between the active and the placebo arms of RCT studies. Between-study heterogeneities were assessed using Cochrane Q and I2, and publication bias was assessed using Begg’s test, Egger’s test, and funnel plot. Results A total of 41 RCTs comprising 3434 participants (n = 1699 in the vitamin D supplementation arm and n = 1735 in the placebo arm) were identified and included in the meta-analysis. Approximately 63.4% of study participants were women, with 14 studies conducted entirely among women. Approximately 24% of the trials had follow-up duration >6 months, whereas the remaining 76% had follow-up duration of <6 months. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for comparing the change from baseline to follow-up between the vitamin D supplementation arm and the placebo (control) arm were as follows: total cholesterol = –0.17 (–0.28 to –0.06); LDL cholesterol = –0.12 (–0.23 to –0.01); triglycerides = –0.12 (–0.25 to 0.01); and HDL cholesterol = –0.19 (–0.44 to 0.06). After removing a trial that was an outlier based on the magnitude of the effect size, the SMD for triglycerides was –0.15 (–0.24 to –0.06) and that for HDL cholesterol was –0.10 (–0.28 to 0.09). The improvements in total cholesterol and triglycerides were more pronounced in participants with baseline vitamin D deficiency. Conclusions Vitamin D supplementation appeared to have a beneficial effect on reducing serum total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels but not HDL cholesterol levels. Vitamin D supplementation may be useful in hypercholesterolemia patients with vitamin D insufficiency who are at high risk of cardiovascular diseases.


Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (suppl_10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enkhmaa Byambaa ◽  
Anuurad Erdembileg ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Lars Berglund

Background: Lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), is a genetically regulated independent cardiovascular risk factor, where levels differ across ethnicity. The relationship between Lp(a) and apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing atherogenic lipoproteins across ethnicity is not well understood. Objective: To investigate the associations of Lp(a) levels with other apoB-containing lipoproteins with a focus on ethnicity. Methods: Plasma lipid and lipoproteins were measured in 336 Caucasians and 224 African Americans undergoing coronary angiography. Lp(a) levels were determined using an apo(a) size insensitive sandwich ELISA. Values for Lp(a) and triglyceride (TG) were square root or logarithmically transformed before analyses. Total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and apoB levels were corrected for contribution of Lp(a) using previously published algorithms. Values are given mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) for normally or non-normally distributed variables, respectively. Results: Levels of total and LDL cholesterol and apoB-100 did not differ between Caucasians and African Americans. As expected, African Americans had significantly higher levels of Lp(a) [110 (60-180) nmol/l vs. 24 (7-79) nmol/l, p<0.001] and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (49±17 mg/dl vs. 41±12 mg/dl, p<0.001), as well as significantly lower levels of TG [106 (80-144) mg/dl vs. 153 (114-222) mg/dl, p<0.001] compared to Caucasians. For both ethnic groups, Lp(a) levels were significantly and positively correlated with total cholesterol (p<0.005 for Caucasians and p<0.001 for African Americans), LDL cholesterol (p<0.001 for both groups), apoB100 (p<0.05 for Caucasians and p<0.001 for African Americans) and apoB/apoA-1 ratio (p<0.05 for Caucasians and p<0.001 for African Americans). However, when adjusted for the corresponding contribution of Lp(a) to the levels of these parameters, the associations remained significant in African Americans (p<0.05 for total cholesterol; p<0.05 for LDL cholesterol; p<0.001 for apoB100, respectively), but not in Caucasians. Conclusion: Although total and LDL cholesterol, and apoB100 levels were comparable in African Americans and Caucasians, the associations of these parameters with Lp(a) levels differed across ethnicity. For African Americans, but not for Caucasians, associations of all three parameters with Lp(a) remained significant after appropriate adjustments. The findings suggest an interethnic difference in the relation between Lp(a) and other plasma apoB-containing lipoprotein levels, with a closer relationship among African Americans.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document