scholarly journals Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as Predictors of Revision Lumbar Decompression Procedures

Neurospine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 863-870
Author(s):  
Michael T. Nolte ◽  
Elliot D.K. Cha ◽  
Conor P. Lynch ◽  
Kevin C. Jacob ◽  
Madhav R. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Physical Component Score ◽  
Lumbar Decompression ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Primary Procedure

Objective: To assess change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) as predictors for revision lumbar decompression (LD).Methods: Patients who underwent primary, single or multilevel LD were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized according to whether or not they underwent revision LD within 2 years of the primary procedure. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item Short Form Health Survey and 12-item Veterans RAND physical component score (SF-12 PCS and VR-12 PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF) were recorded. Delta PROM scores were evaluated for differences between groups and as a risk factor for a revision LD.Results: The study included 135 patients, 91 undergoing a primary procedure only and 44 undergoing a primary and revision procedure. Matched patients did not demonstrate any significant differences in demographics or perioperative characteristics. Patients who underwent a revision had a mean time to revision of 7.4 ± 5.7 months. Primary cohort significantly improved for all PROMs (all p < 0.05), while the primary plus revision cohort significantly improved for VAS back, ODI, and PROMIS-PF (all p < 0.05). However, cohorts differed in VAS back and PROMIS-PF (p < 0.05). Delta PROMs were not a significant risk factor for revision except at 6 months for PROMIS-PF (p = 0.024).Conclusion: LD has been associated with reliable outcomes, but early identification of patients at risk for revision is critical. This study suggests that tools such as PROMIS-PF may serve a role in predicting who is at risk and the 6-month follow-up period may be valuable for counseling patients who are not experiencing improvement.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Colorectal Surgery: Construction of Core Measures Using Open-Source Research Method

2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062199887
Author(s):  
Alaa El-Hussuna ◽  
Ines Rubio-Perez ◽  
Monica Millan ◽  
Gianluca Pellino ◽  
Ionut Negoi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Core Outcome Set ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Purpose. The primary aim of the study was to review the existing literature about patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in colorectal cancer and IBD. The secondary aim was to present a road map to develop a core outcome set via opinion gathering using social media. Method. This study is the first step of a three-step project aimed at constructing simple, applicable PROMs in colorectal surgery. This article was written in a collaborative manner with authors invited both through Twitter via the #OpenSourceResearch hashtag. The 5 most used PROMs were presented and discussed as slides/images on Twitter. Inputs from a wide spectrum of participants including researchers, surgeons, physicians, nurses, patients, and patients’ organizations were collected and analyzed. The final draft was emailed to all contributors and 6 patients’ representatives for proofreading and approval. Results. Five PROM sets were identified and discussed: EORTC QLQ-CR29, IBDQ short health questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30, ED-Q5-5L, and Short Form-36. There were 315 tweets posted by 50 tweeters with 1458 retweets. Awareness about PROMs was generally limited. The general psycho-physical well-being score (GPP) was suggested and discussed, and then a survey was conducted in which more than 2/3 of voters agreed that GPP covers the most important aspects in PROMs. Conclusion. Despite the limitations of this exploratory study, it offered a new method to conduct clinical research with opportunity to engage patients. The general psycho-physical well-being score suggested as simple, applicable PROMs to be eventually combined procedure-specific, disease-specific, or symptom-specific PROMs if needed.

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcome measures in community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review of application and content validity

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Lloyd ◽  
Emily Callander ◽  
Amalia Karahalios ◽  
Lucy Desmond ◽  
Harin Karunajeewa
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Measurement Instruments ◽  
Health Measurement ◽  
Patient Reported

IntroductionPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a vital component of patient-centred care. Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a significant contributor to morbidity, mortality and health service costs globally, but there is a lack of consensus regarding PROMs for this condition.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Collaboration for studies, both interventional and observational, of adult recovery from CAP that applied at least one validated PROM instrument and were published before 31 December 2017. The full text of included studies was examined and data collected on study design, PROM instruments applied, constructs examined and the demographic characteristics of the populations measured. For all CAP-specific PROM instruments identified, content validity was assessed using the COnsensus based Standards for selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines (COSMIN).ResultsForty-two articles met the inclusion criteria and applied a total of 17 different PROM instruments including five (30%) classified as CAP specific, six (35%) as generic and six (35%) that measured functional performance or were specific to another disease. The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) was the most commonly used instrument (15 articles). Only one of 11 (9%) patient cohorts assessed using a CAP-specific instrument had a mean age ≥70 years. The CAP-Sym and CAP-BIQ questionnaires had sufficient content validity, though the quality of evidence for all CAP-specific instruments was rated as very low to low.DiscussionPROM instruments used to measure recovery from CAP are inconsistent in constructs measured and have frequently been developed and validated in highly selective patient samples that are not fully representative of the hospitalised CAP population. The overall content validity of all available CAP-specific instruments is unclear, particularly in the context of elderly hospitalised populations. Based on current evidence, generic health instruments are likely to be of greater value for measuring recovery from CAP in this group.

Assessment of computer adaptive testing version of the Neuro-QOL for people with multiple sclerosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 1791-1799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C Healy ◽  
Jonathan Zurawski ◽  
Cindy T Gonzalez ◽  
Tanuja Chitnis ◽  
Howard L Weiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Computerized Adaptive Testing ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Adaptive Testing ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Longitudinal Change ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: To date, the computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Neuro-quality of life (QOL) has not been assessed in a large sample of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the associations between the CAT version of Neuro-QOL and other clinical and patient-reported outcome measures. Methods: Subjects ( n = 364) enrolled in SysteMS completed the CAT version of the Neuro-QOL and the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) within 4 weeks of a clinical exam that included the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite-4 (MSFC-4). The correlations between the Neuro-QOL domains and the MSFC-4 subscores and the SF-36 scores were calculated. The changes over time in the Neuro-QOL and other measures were also examined. Results: The lower extremity functioning score of the Neuro-QOL showed the highest correlations with MSFC-4 components including Timed 25-Foot Walk, 9-Hole Peg Test, and cognitive score. The expected domains of the Neuro-QOL showed high correlations with the SF-36 subscores, and some Neuro-QOL domains were associated with many SF-36 subscores. There was limited longitudinal change on the Neuro-QOL domains over 12 months, and the change was not associated with change on other measures. Conclusion: The CAT version of the Neuro-QOL shows many of the expected associations with clinical and patient-reported outcome measures.

scholarly journals Time to Complete Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Lumbar Decompression

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliot D. K. Cha ◽  
Conor P. Lynch ◽  
Shruthi Mohan ◽  
Cara E. Geoghegan ◽  
Caroline N. Jadczak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Lumbar Decompression ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Feasibility of Collecting Multiple Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Alongside the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 484-492
Author(s):  
Claire Tilbury ◽  
Claudia S Leichtenberg ◽  
Bart L Kaptein ◽  
Lennard A Koster ◽  
Suzan H M Verdegaal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Participation Rates ◽  
Arthroplasty Register ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

Background: Compliance rates with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected alongside arthroplasty registries vary in the literature. We described the feasibility of a routinely collected set PROMs alongside the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Methods: The longitudinal Leiden Orthopaedics Outcomes of OsteoArthritis Study is a multicenter (7 hospitals), observational study including patients undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). A set of PROMs: Short Form-12, EuroQol 5 Dimensions, Hip/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Oxford Hip/Knee Score was collected preoperatively and at 6, 12, 24 months, and every 2 years thereafter. Participation rates and response rates were recorded. Results: Between June 2012 and December 2014, 1796 THA and 1636 TKA patients were invited, of whom 1043 THA (58%; mean age 68 years [standard deviation, SD: 10]) and 970 TKA patients (59%; mean age 71 years [SD 9.5]) participated in the study. At 6 months, 35 THA/38 TKA patients were lost to follow-up. Response rates were 90% for THA (898/1000) and 89% for TKA (827/932) participants. At 1 and 2 years, 8 and 18 THA and 17 and 11 TKA patients were lost to follow-up, respectively. The response rates among those eligible were 87% (866/992) and 84% (812/972) for THA and 84% (771/917) and 83% (756/906) for TKA patients, respectively. The 2-year questionnaire was completed by 78.5% of the included THA patients and by 77.9% of the included TKA patients. Conclusions: About 60% of patients undergoing THA or TKA complete PROMs preoperatively, with more than 80% returning follow-up PROMs. To increase the participation rates, more efforts concerning the initial recruitment of patients are needed.

scholarly journals Effect of omeprazole on patient-reported outcome measures in uninvestigated heartburn: a multi-country, multi-center observational study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid B. Lazebnik ◽  
Sergey A. Alekseenko ◽  
Sergii M. Tkach ◽  
Yuriy M. Stepanov ◽  
Yury Marakhouski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Total Daily Dose ◽  
Complete Relief ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Clinical Conditions

Background: Heartburn occurs predominantly in the upper gastrointestinal tract and is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and gastritis. Omeprazole is the most prescribed proton pump inhibitor class of medication to treat heartburn related clinical conditions. To compare the efficacy of omeprazole 40 mg (as a total daily dose) and 20 mg using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with heartburn due to various aetiologies like non-erosive reflux disease, GERD, gastritis, dyspepsia, functional heartburn, gastro-duodenal ulcer.Methods: Naïve patients presenting heartburn symptoms were treated with omeprazole. PROMs were assessed based on short-form-leeds dyspepsia questionnaires (SF-LDQ), work productivity activity impairment (WPAI), relief obtained using medication and, treatment satisfactory questionnaires (TSQ).Results: A total of 18,724 patients with heartburn (GERD and gastritis; n=10,509) were treated with omeprazole (Dr. Reddy’s omeprazole [DO]/generic omeprazole [GO]/branded omeprazole [BO]) 40 mg (as a total daily dose) and 20 mg. Statistical comparative analysis showed significant improvement with omeprazole 40 mg (as a total daily dose) compared to omeprazole 20 mg in SF-LDQ, relief obtained using medication among patients with heartburn. DO 20 mg showed a greater improvement under the ‘a lot’ and ‘complete’ relief category.Conclusions: Omeprazole 40 mg (as a total daily dose) presented better efficacy as compared to omeprazole 20 mg in patient reported outcomes. This study highlights omeprazole 40 mg as the preferred intervention for improving PROMs and quality of life in the treatment of heartburn related clinical conditions.

scholarly journals Diabetes is not associated with greater pain and worse patient-reported outcome measures one year after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosei Nagata ◽  
Junya Miyahara ◽  
Hideki Nakamoto ◽  
Naohiro Kawamura ◽  
Yujiro Takeshita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Diabetic Group ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
One Year

Abstract Although patients with diabetes reportedly have more peripheral neuropathy, the impacts of diabetes on postoperative recovery in pain and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is not well characterized. The authors aimed to elucidate the effects of diabetes on neck/arm/hand/leg/foot pain and PROMs after laminoplasty CSM. The authors retrospectively reviewed 339 patients (82 with diabetes and 257 without) who underwent laminoplasty between C3 and C7 in 11 hospitals during April 2017−October 2019. Preoperative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores in all five areas, the Short Form-12 Mental Component Summary, Euro quality of life 5-dimension, Neck Disability Index, and the Core Outcome Measures Index-Neck) were comparable between the groups. The between-group differences were also not significant in NRS scores and PROMs one after surgery. The change score of NRS hand pain was larger in the diabetic group than the nondiabetic group. The diabetic group showed worse preoperative score but greater improvement in the Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary than the nondiabetic group, following comparable score one year after surgery. These data indicated that the preoperative presence of diabetes, at least, did not adversely affect pain or PROMs one year after laminoplasty for CSM.

scholarly journals Varying Association of Extended Hours Dialysis with Quality of Life

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1751-1762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan Smyth ◽  
Oliver van den Broek-Best ◽  
Daqing Hong ◽  
Kirsten Howard ◽  
Kris Rogers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Health Utility ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Baseline Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

Background and objectivesLittle is known about the effect of changes in dialysis hours on patient-reported outcome measures. We report the effect of doubling dialysis hours on a range of patient-reported outcome measures in a randomized trial, overall and separately for important subgroups.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsThe A Clinical Trial of IntensiVE Dialysis trial randomized 200 participants to extended or standard weekly hours hemodialysis for 12 months. Patient-reported outcome measures included two health utility scores (EuroQOL-5 Dimensions-3 Level, Short Form-6 Dimension) and their derived quality-adjusted life year estimates, two generic health scores (Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary, Mental Component Summary), and a disease-specific score (Kidney Disease Component Score). Outcomes were assessed as the mean difference from baseline using linear mixed effects models adjusted for time point and baseline score, with interaction terms added for subgroup analyses. Prespecified subgroups were dialysis location (home- versus institution-based), dialysis vintage (≤6 months versus >6 months), region (China versus Australia, New Zealand, Canada), and baseline score (lowest, middle, highest tertile). Multiplicity-adjusted P values (Holm–Bonferroni) were calculated for the main analyses.ResultsExtended dialysis hours was associated with improvement in Short Form-6 Dimension (mean difference, 0.027; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.00 to 0.05; P=0.03) which was not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (Padjusted=0.05). There were no significant differences in EuroQOL-5 Dimensions-3 Level health utility (mean difference, 0.036; 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.09; P=0.2; Padjusted=0.2) or in quality-adjusted life years. There were small positive differences in generic and disease-specific quality of life: Physical Component Summary (mean difference, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.6 to 4.1; P=0.01; Padjusted=0.04), Mental Component Summary (mean difference, 2.5; 95% CI, 0.5 to 4.6; P=0.02; Padjusted=0.05) and Kidney Disease Component Score (mean difference, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.5; P=0.001; Padjusted=0.005). The results did not differ among predefined subgroups or by baseline score.ConclusionsThe effect of extended hours hemodialysis on patient-reported outcome measures reached statistical significance in some but not all measures. Within each measure the effect was consistent across predefined subgroups. The clinical importance of these differences is unclear.

Relationship of Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to Postoperative Success in End-Stage Ankle Arthritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feras J. Waly ◽  
Eng Meng Nicholas Yeo ◽  
Kevin J. Wing ◽  
Murray J. Penner ◽  
Andrea Veljkovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Ankle Osteoarthritis ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Preoperative Patient

Background: Ankle osteoarthritis is a significant cause of pain and disability. Despite the effectiveness of treatments, a subset of patients remains with persistent pain and functional limitations. The purpose of this study was to use preoperative patient-reported outcome measures to predict which ankle osteoarthritis patients would be most likely to experience postoperative improvements in functional outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was used to evaluate 427 patients with end-stage ankle arthritis with 5-year follow-up. Demographics, comorbidities, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), Ankle Arthritis Score (AAS), and the physical and mental component scores of the Short Form–36 (SF-36 Physical Components Score [PCS] and Mental Components Score [MCS]) were collected. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was then calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to choose the optimal threshold values of preoperative patient-reported outcome measure and assess the prediction performance. Results: Patients who scored worst at preoperative baseline made the greatest gains in function and pain relief, and they had a high chance of achieving MCID following surgical treatment. ROC curves demonstrated that preoperative AOS, AAS, and SF-36 PCS and MCS scores were predictive of postoperative improvements in physical and mental function. Patients with preoperative AOS score above 45.7 had an 83% probability of achieving an MCID (AUC = 0.67). Similarly, patients with a preoperative AAS score above 25.7 had a 78% probability of achieving an MCID (AUC = 0.63). Patients with a preoperative SF-36 PCS score below 31 had a 62% probability of achieving an MCID (AUC = 0.64). Patients with a preoperative SF-36 MCS below 52.7 had a 47% probability of achieving an MCID (AUC = 0.89). MCIDs for AOS, AAS, SF3-36 PCS, and SF-36 MCS score changes were 12.4, 10.0, 6.43, and 8.1, respectively. Conclusion: Preoperative patient-reported outcomes measures could predict postoperative improvement in ankle arthritis patients. The results of this study may be used to facilitate discussion between physicians and patients regarding the expected benefit of surgery. Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic comparative study.

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-217
Author(s):  
Yiou Wang ◽  
Meihua Yin ◽  
Shibai Zhu ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Hongru Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Psychometric Validation ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are being used increasingly in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We conducted a systematic review aimed at identifying psychometrically sound PROMs by appraising their measurement properties. Studies concerning the development and/or evaluation of the measurement properties of PROMs used in a TKA population were systematically retrieved via PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus. Ratings for methodological quality and measurement properties were conducted according to updated COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. Of the 155 articles on 34 instruments included, nine PROMs met the minimum requirements for psychometric validation and can be recommended to use as measures of TKA outcome: Oxford Knee Score (OKS); OKS–Activity and Participation Questionnaire (OKS-APQ); 12-item short form Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS-12); KOOS Physical function Short form (KOOS-PS); Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index-Total Knee Replacement function short form (WOMAC-TKR); Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS); Forgotten Joint Score (FJS); Patient’s Knee Implant Performance (PKIP); and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score. The pain and function subscales in WOMAC, as well as the pain, function, and quality of life subscales in KOOS, were validated psychometrically as standalone subscales instead of as whole instruments. However, none of the included PROMs have been validated for all measurement properties. Thus, further studies are still warranted to evaluate those PROMs. Use of the other 25 scales and subscales should be tempered until further studies validate their measurement properties. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(3):203–217.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document