Development Length of High Strength Reinforcing Bars in Bond

10.14359/7945 ◽  
1962 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa M. Ahlborn ◽  
Timothy C. DenHartigh

Concrete bridge decks in corrosive environments have used several methods to prevent corrosion of the reinforcing steel including the use of alternative steels as reinforcement. While research has been conducted on corrosion resistance, very little information is available about the bond strength of alternative metallic reinforcement such as solid stainless steels and high-strength, high-chromium (HSHC) alloys. Therefore, the tensile bond strengths of three alternative metallic steel reinforcements in concrete are compared with conventional A615 Grade 60 steel reinforcement. Two types of stainless steel were considered, 316LN and 2205 duplex. An HSHC microcomposite bar was also considered. A total of 250 bond tests were performed with beam-end specimens similar to the ASTM A944 specimen. Bonded lengths of 4 to 12 in. were used for No. 4 and No. 6 reinforcing bars. Concrete clear cover for all tests was 1½ in. to produce cracking bond failure. No transverse reinforcement was present. The normal strength concrete was typical of that used in Michigan bridge decks. Statistical comparisons of bond test results with predicted values for bond strength of A615 reinforcement revealed there was no reason to believe the bond strength of the alternative metallic reinforcing bars was less than predicted. The conservatism of the current development-length relationships generally predicted lower bond strengths than were observed. Therefore, no modifications are suggested when estimating the development length of these reinforcements as a one-to-one replacement for A615 Grade 60 reinforcement, No. 4 to No. 6 bars, using standard development-length relationships.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3482
Author(s):  
Seoungho Cho ◽  
Myungkwan Lim ◽  
Changhee Lee

High-strength reinforcing bars have high yield strengths. It is possible to reduce the number of reinforcing bars placed in a building. Accordingly, as the amount of reinforcement decreases, the spacing of reinforcing bars increases, workability improves, and the construction period shortens. To evaluate the structural performance of high-strength reinforcing bars and the joint performance of high-strength threaded reinforcing bars, flexural performance tests were performed in this study on 12 beam members with the compressive strength of concrete, the yield strength of the tensile reinforcing bars, and the tensile reinforcing bar ratio as variables. The yield strengths of the tensile reinforcement and joint methods were used as variables, and joint performance tests were performed for six beam members. Based on this study, the foundation for using high-strength reinforcing bars with a design standard yield strength equal to 600 MPa was established. Accordingly, mechanical joints of high-strength threaded reinforcing bars (600 and 670 MPa) can be used. All six specimens were destroyed under more than the expected nominal strength. Lap splice caused brittle fractures because it was not reinforced in stirrup. Increases of 21% to 47% in the loads of specimens using a coupler and a lock nut were observed. Shape yield represents destruction—a section must ensure sufficient ductility after yielding. Therefore, a coupler and lock nut are effective.


2018 ◽  
Vol 230 ◽  
pp. 02003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taras Bobalo ◽  
Yaroslav Blikharskyy ◽  
Rostyslav Vashkevich ◽  
Myhailo Volynets

Nowadays, reducing the material content of not only buildings and structures in general, but also individual constructions is a topical task that can be realized through the use of high-strength concrete and reinforcement, as well as with the use of external reinforcement. The concentrated location of sheet reinforcement on the external the most tense facets of steel and concrete structures increases the operating height of the cross-section, makes it possible to more effectively use the strength properties of steel in comparison with conventional reinforced concrete, and with the same bearing capacity to economize on expenses. Composite and monolithic reinforced concrete structures with external reinforcement are used in various construction sectors around the world. This contributed to the expansion of the use of reinforced concrete for special buildings of power-engineering and hydrotechnical construction. The technical nd econom efficiency, as well as the possibility of using external rebar as formwork for monolithic concrete construction, have been proved. Therefore, there is a need for the study of structures with combined reinforcement, in which high rigidity of steel and concrete structures is combined with an effective use of high-strength reinforcing bars (rebar) without prior tension


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document