A STUDY ON WELDABILITY OF HIGH STRENGTH REINFORCING BARS (PART 2): EVALUATION BY HEAT-AFFECTED ZONE FRACTURE

2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (776) ◽  
pp. 1245-1253
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka YABE ◽  
Hiroyuki NARIHARA ◽  
Tadao NAKAGOMI
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3482
Author(s):  
Seoungho Cho ◽  
Myungkwan Lim ◽  
Changhee Lee

High-strength reinforcing bars have high yield strengths. It is possible to reduce the number of reinforcing bars placed in a building. Accordingly, as the amount of reinforcement decreases, the spacing of reinforcing bars increases, workability improves, and the construction period shortens. To evaluate the structural performance of high-strength reinforcing bars and the joint performance of high-strength threaded reinforcing bars, flexural performance tests were performed in this study on 12 beam members with the compressive strength of concrete, the yield strength of the tensile reinforcing bars, and the tensile reinforcing bar ratio as variables. The yield strengths of the tensile reinforcement and joint methods were used as variables, and joint performance tests were performed for six beam members. Based on this study, the foundation for using high-strength reinforcing bars with a design standard yield strength equal to 600 MPa was established. Accordingly, mechanical joints of high-strength threaded reinforcing bars (600 and 670 MPa) can be used. All six specimens were destroyed under more than the expected nominal strength. Lap splice caused brittle fractures because it was not reinforced in stirrup. Increases of 21% to 47% in the loads of specimens using a coupler and a lock nut were observed. Shape yield represents destruction—a section must ensure sufficient ductility after yielding. Therefore, a coupler and lock nut are effective.


Metallurgist ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 875-884
Author(s):  
K. G. Vorkachev ◽  
P. P. Stepanov ◽  
L. I. Éfron ◽  
M. M. Kantor ◽  
A. V. Chastukhin ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 581-582 ◽  
pp. 582-585
Author(s):  
Guo Dong Zhang ◽  
Ya Dong Xiao ◽  
Nian Liu ◽  
Min Hong

The welding between Fe-Al intermetallic compound and high-strength steel was done via SPS technology. Microstructure, elements concentration and micro-hardness of welding joint were examined. The results indicated that there was no obvious welding heat-affected zone in both Fe-Al intermetallic compound and high-strength steel. The HAZ microstructures of high-strength steel were mainly martensite. In Fe-Al intermetallic compound, the grain size of heat-affected zone was larger than that of base metal and the density of heat-affected zone was lower than that of base metal. Besides, the grains of base metal had deformation phenomena. The welding joint had steady performance and the connection was reliable. Under the influence of chemical potential differences, unidirectional impulses discharge current and axial pressure, elements diffused perfectly in a short period of time.


2018 ◽  
Vol 937 ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Yu Jie Li ◽  
Jin Wei Lei ◽  
Xuan Wei Lei ◽  
Oleksandr Hress ◽  
Kai Ming Wu

Utilizing submerged arc welding under heat input 50 kJ/cm on 60 mm thick marine engineering structure plate F550, the effect of preheating and post welding heat treatment on the microstructure and impact toughness of coarse-grained heat-affected zone (CGHAZ) has been investigated. The original microstructure of the steel plate is tempered martensite. The yield and tensile strength is 610 and 660 MPa, respectively. The impact absorbed energy at low temperature (-60 °C) at transverse direction reaches about 230~270 J. Welding results show that the preheating at 100 °C did not have obvious influence on the microstructure and toughness; whereas the tempering at 600 °C for 2.5 h after welding could significantly reduce the amount of M-A components in the coarse-grained heat-affected zone and thus improved the low temperature impact toughness.


Author(s):  
K Sefcikova ◽  
T Brtnik ◽  
J Dolejs ◽  
K Keltamaki ◽  
R Topilla

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document