scholarly journals Use of hyaluronic acid preparations in the combination therapy of osteoarthritis

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. A. Olyunin
2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199801
Author(s):  
Michael R. Baria ◽  
W. Kelton Vasileff ◽  
James Borchers ◽  
Alex DiBartola ◽  
David C. Flanigan ◽  
...  

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are injectable treatments for knee osteoarthritis. The focus of previous studies has compared their efficacy against each other as monotherapy. However, a new trend of combining these 2 injections has emerged in an attempt to have a synergistic effect. Purpose: To systematically review the clinical literature examining the combined use of PRP + HA. Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using PubMed and Embase. The following search terms were used: knee osteoarthritis AND platelet rich plasma AND hyaluronic acid. The review was performed by 2 independent reviewers who applied the inclusion/exclusion criteria and independently extracted data, including methodologic scoring, PRP preparation technique, HA composition, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Results: A total of 431 articles were screened, 12 reviewed in full, and 8 included in the final analysis: 2 case series, 3 comparative, and 3 randomized studies. Average follow-up was 9 months. The modified Coleman Methodology Score was 38.13 ± 13.1 (mean ± SD). Combination therapy resulted in improved PROs in all studies. Of the comparative and randomized studies, 2 demonstrated that combination therapy was superior to HA alone. However, when PRP alone was used as the control arm (4 studies), combination therapy was not superior to PRP alone. Conclusion: Combination therapy with PRP + HA improves PROs and is superior to HA alone but is not superior to PRP alone.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 1095-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyu Wang ◽  
Aimin Zang ◽  
Yaning Wei ◽  
Lin An ◽  
Dan Hong ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 63-70
Author(s):  
K. A. Berdyugin ◽  
I. V. Kadyntsev ◽  
O. V. Berdyugina ◽  
E. A. Taskina ◽  
N. G. Kashevarova

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease. Searching for new treatment methods and regimens for OA is relevant.Objective: to evaluate the efficiency and safety of therapy with a symptomatic sustained-release drug (Alflutop) in combination with intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injection versus monotherapy with HA in patients with knee OA in routine clinical practice.Patients and methods. A post-registration open-labeled prospective comparative randomized study was conducted to assess the results of treatment in 76 patients (31 men and 45 women; mean age, 49.3±8.5 years; body mass index, 28.4±0.8 kg/m2 ) in two clinical centers in Yekaterinburg and Perm. The patients were randomized into two equal groups, were homogeneous in terms of gender, the frequency of comorbidities, and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate).Group 1 patients received Alflutop as 1-ml daily intramuscular injections (a total of 20 injections) + 2 ml of 1% intraarticular (IA) HA solution injections three times at 1-week intervals; Group 2 patients were given 2 ml of 1% intraarticular HA solution injections three times at 1-week intervals. As an additional therapy, the use of meloxicam 7.5–15 mg/day was permitted, and, if non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were contraindicated, paracetamol 1–3 g/day might be used.Results and discussion. During treatment, both groups of patients showed improvement (compared to the baseline levels). At the same time, evaluating the intergroup values revealed clear differences: a more pronounced decrease in all WOMAC indicators in Group 1 patients: pain scores, 2 [1; 3] vs. 4 [2; 5] in Group 2 (p<0.001); stiffness, 1 [0; 2] vs. 2 [1; 4] (p<0.001); functional insufficiency, 8 [3; 12] vs. 15.5 [12; 20] (p<0.001); and total WOMAC scores, 12 [7; 13] vs. 21.5 [15; 28] (p<0.001). Pain-intensity assessment using the visual analogue scale also showed the more pronounced positive effect of the combination therapy in Group 1 (p<0.001).Alflutop used in combination with HA was shown to be more preferable than HA monotherapy, which was confirmed by the results achieved for all WOMAC indicators. At 6 months, by the last visit, there were pronounced positive changes in all the analyzed parameters in both groups. At the same time, the most significant changes were recorded in the Alflutop + HA group than in the HA group (p<0.001). Perhaps, the mechanism in exhibiting the found synergistic effect of these drugs lies in their different effect on the pathogenesis of the disease. However, further study of this issue is required in multicenter randomized controlled trials.The good safety of the drugs was confirmed: not a single adverse event was revealed.Conclusion. The patients receiving the combination therapy with Alflutop + HA had the best treatment results in all the parameters assessed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document