scholarly journals Milczenie organów administracji jako instytucja materialnego i procesowego prawa administracyjnego

2019 ◽  
pp. 49-78
Author(s):  
Lucyna Staniszewska
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
General Clause ◽  
Legal Forms ◽  
Substantive Law ◽  
Procedural Rights ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Practical Level

The aim of the article is to examine the institution of “Silent settlement of the matter” regulated in the Code of Administrative Procedure, as well as in the provisions of substantive law. In a number of Polish laws, the inaction of the administration is seen as bound to have certain legal consequences. Such rules cause many doubts both at the theoretical and practical level, and raise questions about the antidote to such unwanted inactivity of administration. The general clause of positive or negative fictitious adjudication in administrative matters is present in many legal systems. However, in the Polish legal system it lacks a legal definition and the silent settlement handling of the case entails problems of its classification as part of the legal forms of administration. The article shows that the mere introduction of procedural regulations will not result in a breakthrough in the institution of silent positive settlement of the matter, if the legislator does not balance the types of cases to which silence can be applied. Undoubtedly, both substantive and procedural law rules for the regulation of silent settlement are necessary and indispensable. As for substantive law, it should be a well thought-out concept in which silence of administrative bodies in handling matters could be applied without affecting the public interest or the interests the applicant, or any other party to the proceedings. On the other hand, procedural regulations are to guarantee the protection of the rights administered against the inactivity or lack of action by administrative bodies, or lengthy and protracting proceedings. Therefore, the legislator should ensure a well-considered qualification of cases to be recognised in a simplified manner, as well as adopt specific provisions that give competence to administrative bodies to settle matters tacitly so that the institution accomplishes the intended objectives of administrative improvement, and at the same time does not violate the procedural rights and guarantees of the parties for whom silence has legal effects.

scholarly journals The Service of Documents in Administrative Procedural Law – A Comparative Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-131
Author(s):  
Ines Golob
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Comparative Research ◽  
Case Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Uniform Manner ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

This article presents a comparative and empirical analysis of the service or the delivery of documents in procedures, as the key procedural action to constitute legal effects in legal relationships. In Slovenia, service is largely defined by the three main procedural laws – the General Administrative Procedure Act, the Criminal Procedure Act, and the Contentious Civil Procedure Act. These relate to different types and specifics of relationships; for instance, in administrative proceedings, the public interest prevails over private ones. The presented research, applying predominantly normative and comparative methods and analysis of case law, aims to show the importance of the specificity of the different areas and of the rules of service in different proceedings. The results of the research suggest that in certain cases service should be regulated in a uniform manner. Yet the specific aims of various legal relations require individual solutions. Thus, the article opens up grounds for future comparative research and practical regulatory improvements.

scholarly journals In the name of the public: Representatives of collective and wider interest of the public in administrative matters in Serbia

Pravni zapisi ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 504-531
Author(s):  
Jelena Jerinić
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Interested Party ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Active Approach ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Direct Indication ◽  
Administrative Procedures

Serbian Law on General Administrative Procedure (LGAP) opened a possibility for broadening the standing in administrative procedures and administrative disputes, by inclusion of subjects representing collective interests and interest of the wider public - primarily, citizen associations and similar organizations. However, by failing to regulate a series of concrete issues, the Law places the administration and the Administrative Court before a challenge, demanding from them an extensive interpretation of not only LGAP's provisions, but other legislation already recognizing such organizations as AIDS in realization of the public interest. The author analyzes relevant legislation, as well as available administrative and court caselaw in search of these answers. The lack of explicit legal provisions could be balanced by a creative approach in practice, especially by the Administrative Court. Having in mind comparative solutions, the question arises whether it is necessary to regulate this category of potential parties separately or to link it more explicitly to the already existing notion of an interested party. Instead, completely new notions have been introduced - collective interests and the wider interests of the public - which are not or not consistently defined in Serbian law. The current, not so voluminous case law, shows that the administrative bodies need a more direct indication of the rules, i.e. a more explicit definitions of these terms. However, despite the restrictive legal framework, administrative bodies should be open to understanding the specific circumstances, i.e. the motivation that an organization has when it seeks standing. In the normative sphere, one of the solutions could be to envisage the analogous application of LGAP's provisions on the interested party. Other solutions could be sought in explicitly mentioning them in the provisions on right to appeal. The current formulations of LGAP do not provide sufficient guidance to the administration and an extensive interpretation would be a great challenge for them. An active approach of the Administrative Court could show the way for the administration toward and effective application of these provisions of LGAP.

Administrative Contracts in Serbian Law – Specificities of the New Statutory Regime

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marija Karanikić Mirić ◽  
Tatjana Jevremović Petrović
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Practical Experience ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Public Purpose ◽  
General Rules ◽  
Rules And Principles ◽  
Private Entity ◽  
Definition Of

The subject of this paper is the special legal regime for administrative contracts under the recently enacted Serbian Law on General Administrative Procedure of 2016. We offer a comprehensive analysis of the new statutory rules, and examine their relationship to the general rules and principles of Serbian contract law. In addition, we identify the main shortcomings of the new regime, especially in the context of the lack of any statutory, scholarly and judicial typology of administrative contracts in Serbia. Furthermore, we highlight the lack of references to the notions of public interest, public purpose or public needs in the statutory definition of administrative contracts. This is cause for concern, since only the need to protect the public interest could justify the new statutory provisions, which significantly improve the contractual position of a public body as a contracting party in relation to the position of a private entity as the other party in administrative contracts. There is as yet no case law pertaining to administrative contracts in Serbia. This is why we turn to practical experience in the Croatian legal system, which is sufficiently similar and historically connected to Serbia via a shared Yugoslav heritage. We also consider German and French legal models, since they traditionally serve as comparative points of reference for Serbian legal scholars, judges and law makers.

Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in China

2021 ◽  
pp. 44-46
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Sun
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Global Market ◽  
The State ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Administrative Litigation ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Direct Applicability

This chapter focuses on administrative procedure and judicial review in China. Despite its willingness to adapt to the rules of the global market, China does not accept the direct applicability of international standards in administrative litigation. Judicial review of administration is based on a set of legislative texts and judicial interpretations by the Supreme People's Court. Among these texts, the Administrative Litigation Law regulates the judicial review of administrative acts. There are two lists in its chapter concerning the scope of judicial review: one includes the administrative acts that are open to judicial review, another the acts that are not reviewable. In any case, it is up to the courts to examine the following two combinations of criteria: the degree of the seriousness of the infringement with the definition of the state interest and that of the public interest; and the degree of procedural breach with the definition of the real impact on the rights of the plaintiff. According to Article 76 of the ALL, in the case of annulment and/or declaration of unlawfulness of an administrative act, a court may order the administration to take measures to compensate the damage inflicted on the plaintiff.

scholarly journals Legislation on Administrative Procedures: The German Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-215
Author(s):  
A. D. Maile
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Public Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
General Order ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
Administrative Act ◽  
The Law

This article provides an overview of the main provisions of German administrative procedural law. It outlines in a systematic way the particularities of administrative procedures and the possibilities for a citizen to seek administrative remedy. The essence of the basic principles of administrative procedural law as well as the particularities of temporary legal protection and the possibilities for an extrajudicial appeal against an administrative act are explained to the reader. The Author points out that administrative proceedings in Germany are, in a broad sense, any decision-making activity of a public administration body. According to the German Administrative Procedure Act, an administrative procedure in the sense of the law is an externally imposed activity of the administrative authorities that is aimed at verifying the conditions, preparing and issuing an administrative act or entering into a public-law contract. At the same time, the activities of a public administration body are not bound by a specific form, unless there are specific rules on the form of procedure. It is stated that current German administrative law distinguishes between an administrative act and a general order. The latter is also an administrative act, the range of addressees, however, is wider. An administrative act according to the law is any order, decision or other authoritative action of an administrative body aimed at regulating a single case in the field of public law and having direct legal consequences of an external nature. A general order is an administrative act, which is addressed to a certain or defined by general features, or which concerns the public-law properties of a thing or the use of it by the public. The author notes that an administrative act must be specific in content, justified and announced to the participants in the proceedings. As long as the act has not been declared, it is invalid. An administrative act is valid from the moment it is announced, unless it itself provides otherwise. It continues in force until it is revoked, cancelled, terminated by a deadline or for any other reason specified in the law. Based on the analysis, it is concluded that the lack of a law on administrative procedures in Russia is a negative indicator of the modern Russian administrative legal system.

scholarly journals ESSENSI GANTI RUGI IMMATERIEL DALAM PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM MENURUT PUTUSAN HAKIM PERDATA INONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Suryoutomo
Keyword(s):  
Social Movements ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Judicial Discretion ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
National Legislation ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

<p>Legal findings by judges in interpreting the meaning of the text of the Act can function to realize and provide protection for the community of justice seekers, National legislation and its conclusions in the form of court decisions are reported to be open to various studies and deconstructive criticism that carried out through various social movements that care about the law, so that national law can function as one of the forces to mobilize the lives of new Indonesian people who are able to act responsively for the public interest. From this definition the obligation of the Judge to uphold justice comes from its authority, namely the Judicial Discretion policy. In the event that the judge grants Maternity compensation to the Law Breaking Lawsuits, insofar as it has fulfilled the Elements of Article 1365 of the Civil Code, which brings the legal consequences the judge can grant Immaterial compensation based on found</p>

scholarly journals Axiology of Judicial Application of Enforcement Law: View on the Bailiff’s Discretion

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Piotr Szczekocki
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Special Role ◽  
Application Process ◽  
Important Place ◽  
The Public ◽  
General Clause ◽  
The Law ◽  
And Function

<p class="Standard">In the article, the author focused on three theoretical and philosophical issues of the judicial enforcement law in Poland, connected with the new enforcement acts which entered into force on 1 January 2019. First, the judicial enforcement proceedings were presented as an element of the law application process. The axiological dimension of this law, the place and function of a court bailiff in the law application process and the introduction of general clauses, combined with the basic values of the court enforcement law in the form of efficiency, effectiveness and reliability, form the new picture of the judicial enforcement law. Secondly, the problem of a general clause as a “carrier” of extralegal criteria was discussed, which takes an important place in the process of enforcement law application in the new bailiff’s law. There is the special role of the “public interest” and the “interest of justice” clauses as normative constructions introduced by the legislator to judicial enforcement. Thirdly, an attempt was made to answer the question about the presence and possible limits of discretion (free decision-making) of a court bailiff in the surrounding of the new axiology of enforcement law, and especially the formulation of this issue in the process of operative interpretation of law by a court bailiff.</p>

scholarly journals THE PRINCIPLE OF EXPEDIENCY OF LAW INTERPRETATION

2020 ◽  
pp. 8-14
Author(s):  
S. V. Pryima
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Positive Result ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Judicial Procedures ◽  
Optimal Set

In the article was investigated the principle of expediency of law interpretation. It is noted that the term “expediency” is close in meaning to the terms “optimality”, “rationality”, “efficiency”. Due to this the principle of expediency is seen in a general way as the principle which requires that the subject should achieve a useful, positive result with applying the optimal set of methods. It is established that the principle of expediency is realized in different branches and institutions of law. Particularly, in the civil procedural law such judicial procedures are based on this principle as examination, storage and provision of evidence, the appointment and realization of expertise, the association and dissociation of claims. It is also noted that the principle of expediency is important in punishing a person, in other words, it is the basis of legal responsibility. In this sphere, it consists in the individualization of punitive measures or punishment depending on the gravity of the offense, taking into account the offender's personality, his welfare and the circumstances of the action. The principle of expediency also means that the chosen measure is relevant to the purposes of responsibility. It is noted that the principle of expediency makes the requirements for conducting different types of legal activity – law-making, law-enforcement, and therefore, it is one of the main principles of law interpretative activity. It is emphasized that the basic idea of this principle is that the act should not be interpreted in the sense which makes it aimless, so, the act cannot be interpreted beyond the purpose for which it was adopted. In the article is also argued that a particular method of setting of a goal of a legal norm is a teleological (purposeful) mean of interpretation. The requirements of the principle of expediency include the aspiration of the public interest and the obligation to apply the verification of interpretative conclusions. The principle of expediency of law interpretation is defined as the interpretative principle, the essence of which is the aspiration of the subject of interpretation to achieve the goal, to obtain a useful, positive result from their activities by using the optimal set of methods for this purpose.

scholarly journals Mediator w postępowaniu administracyjnym

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1 (4)) ◽  
pp. 117-131
Author(s):  
Wiktor Trybka
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Case Files ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
The Right ◽  
Procedural Rights

Amending the Code of Administrative Procedure, the legislator decided to introduce the possibility of conducting mediation proceedings. A mediator may be a natural person who has full legal capacity and exercises full civil rights. The mediator’s role is to ensure the conduct of the mediation process. They have the responsibility to stimulate the initiative of the parties by means of appropriate mediation techniques, as well as to create an appropriate climate of conversation, based on mutual trust and respect. The mediator uses procedural rights, which include: the right to read the case files and the right to remuneration and reimbursement of expenses related to mediation. The Code of Administrative Procedure also imposes procedural obligations on the mediator: it must maintain impartiality in the conduct of mediation and draw up a report on mediation. Participants in the mediation are also parties of the administrative proceedings and a public administration body. The task of the public administration body is to determine whether the arrangements made by the parties with the participation of the mediator fall within the scope of the generally applicable law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document