Using zero moment point preview control formulation to generate nonlinear trajectories of walking patterns on humanoid robots

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 470
Author(s):  
Yunn Lin Hwang ◽  
Thi Na Ta ◽  
Kun Nan Chen
Robotica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 2440-2466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayder F. N. Al-Shuka ◽  
B. Corves ◽  
Wen-Hong Zhu ◽  
B. Vanderborght

SUMMARYResearchers dream of developing autonomous humanoid robots which behave/walk like a human being. Biped robots, although complex, have the greatest potential for use in human-centred environments such as the home or office. Studying biped robots is also important for understanding human locomotion and improving control strategies for prosthetic and orthotic limbs. Control systems of humans walking in cluttered environments are complex, however, and may involve multiple local controllers and commands from the cerebellum. Although biped robots have been of interest over the last four decades, no unified stability/balance criterion adopted for stabilization of miscellaneous walking/running modes of biped robots has so far been available. The literature is scattered and it is difficult to construct a unified background for the balance strategies of biped motion. The zero-moment point (ZMP) criterion, however, is a conservative indicator of stabilized motion for a class of biped robots. Therefore, we offer a systematic presentation of multi-level balance controllers for stabilization and balance recovery of ZMP-based humanoid robots.


Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (19) ◽  
pp. 4194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Min Joe ◽  
Jun-Ho Oh

Research on a terrain-blind walking control that can walk stably on unknown and uneven terrain is an important research field for humanoid robots to achieve human-level walking abilities, and it is still a field that needs much improvement. This paper describes the design, implementation, and experimental results of a robust balance-control framework for the stable walking of a humanoid robot on unknown and uneven terrain. For robust balance-control against disturbances caused by uneven terrain, we propose a framework that combines a capture-point controller that modifies the control reference, and a balance controller that follows its control references in a cascading structure. The capture-point controller adjusts a zero-moment point reference to stabilize the perturbed capture-point from the disturbance, and the adjusted zero-moment point reference is utilized as a control reference for the balance controller, comprised of zero-moment point, leg length, and foot orientation controllers. By adjusting the zero-moment point reference according to the disturbance, our zero-moment point controller guarantees robust zero-moment point control performance in uneven terrain, unlike previous zero-moment point controllers. In addition, for fast posture stabilization in uneven terrain, we applied a proportional-derivative admittance controller to the leg length and foot orientation controllers to rapidly adapt these parts of the robot to uneven terrain without vibration. Furthermore, to activate position or force control depending on the gait phase of a robot, we applied gain scheduling to the leg length and foot orientation controllers, which simplifies their implementation. The effectiveness of the proposed control framework was verified by stable walking performance on various uneven terrains, such as slopes, stone fields, and lawns.


2006 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 153-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
MIOMIR VUKOBRATOVIĆ ◽  
BRANISLAV BOROVAC ◽  
VELJKO POTKONJAK

One of basic characteristics of the regular bipedal walk of humanoid robots is the maintenance of their dynamic balance during the walk, whereby a decisive role is played by the unpowered degrees of freedom arising at the foot–ground contact. Hence, the role of the Zero-Moment Point (ZMP) as an indicator of dynamic balance is indispensable. This paper gives a detailed discussion of some basic theoretical assumptions related to the ZMP in the light of imprecise, and even incorrect, interpretations that have recently appeared, and which have led to some erroneous conclusions. Examples are given to show some erroneous basic attitudes and the genesis of some of them is indicated. It is also pointed out that in the domain of bipedal walk there are still notions that are not clearly defined and their meanings differentiated in some related branches of science and engineering. One of the examples is dynamic balance and stability, which are often used interchangeably.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document