7 Social Justice Feminism and Labor Law Enforcement in Illinois

2021 ◽  
pp. 230-274
Author(s):  
Marcus D. Rushing ◽  
Andre G. Montoya-Barthelemy ◽  
Fozia A. Abrar ◽  
Eduardo M. Medina ◽  
Helen A.O. Popoola-Samuel ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Adiguna Bagas Waskito Aji ◽  
Puji Wiyatno ◽  
Ridwan Arifin ◽  
Ubaidillah Kamal

Kaidah dasar yang melandasi pembangunan dan perlindungan lingkungan hidup Indonesia terdapat dalam pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 pada alinea ke-4 yang pada pokoknya mewajibkan pemerintah untuk mendayagunakan sumber daya alam yang ada untuk sebanyak-banyak kesejahteraan rakyat. Pemikiran tentang kewajiban negara ini secara konstitusional tersebut lebih dijabarkan lagi dalam Pasal 33 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, yaitu prinsip negara, bumi dan segala kekayaan yang terkandung di dalamnya serta menjadi hajat hidup orang banyak dikuasai oleh negara untuk digunakan untuk kehidupan orang banyak atau dengan kata lain negara bertindak sebagai penyelenggara kepentingan umum. Lingkungan hidup yang baik dan sehat meruoakan hak asasi setiap warga negara Indonesia sebagaimana diamantkan dalam Pasal 28H UUD RI 1945.  


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Meruyert MASSALIMKYZY

The article raises the problem of unjustified humanization of criminal legislation and the practice of imposing a punishment. Imposing a punishment as a legal category has been extensively studied in the works of national and foreign scholars specializing in criminal law. However, despite the importance of this institution both for the convict and for the society as a whole, this penal institution remains one of the most problematic ones. The existing conflict between the current criminal policy humanism and the concept of social justice in criminal legislation, the adequacy of a punishment to the social danger of the offense being a part thereof, makes enormous harm to all law enforcement activities. It also causes negative response in the society, thus reasonably attracting a heightened attention of criminologists and experts in criminal law and procedure. The purpose of this work, as the author sees it, is trying to find feasible solutions to one of the most urgent problems of imposing a punishment. Attention is drawn to the fact that the concept of humanism has two aspects and implies, first of all, the protection of interests of law-abiding citizens. The author considers topical issues concerning the observance of the rights of victims through the solution one of the main tasks of criminal law, namely: to restore social justice by imposing a proportionate criminal punishment. Certain provisions of the theory of criminal punishment, as well as the practice of imposing punishment by the court, are studied here. Insufficient development of norms in the current criminal legislation can create problems in law enforcement, which, in turn, can lead to a significant violation of the victims’ rights. The author makes recommendations that can contribute to the improvement of the penal system consistent with the principle of humanism, considering the interests of the victims.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 299
Author(s):  
Mukhlis Abidin

<p><em>Legality is one basic of penal law beside culpability in deciding the punishment. Legality is often perceived similar to law enforcement. According to Article 1 (1) of the Penal Law (KUHP), the law refers to written law. In fact, there is also living law mentioned in the Constitution. This kind of situation often causes the judge decision fails to meet social justice since the decision is merely based on formal law and neglected material law, such as in the case of Minah in Banyumas Court. Thus, progressive approach is necessitated in order to understand legality both in formal and material law in accordance with national legal ideals, Pancasila. </em></p>


2017 ◽  
pp. 109-126
Author(s):  
Siti Merida Hutagalung

AbstractLaw problems are not finished yet until Indonesia entering its reformation era. AlthoughIndonesia actually is the Constitutional State, constitution has failed to provide protectionto the people. Supremacy of Law which is mandated by the Constitution 1945 is failed to beconducted, while law apparatus like public prosecutors, judges, polices and lawyers areinvolved playing the law. And then term as Law Mafia becomes familiar for public. Thegovernment has initiated various efforts to solve the law problems by making the NationalLaw Commission, Corruption Eradication Commission, Judicial Commission, Special TaskForce for Law Mafia, etc but it seems that it’s need a long time to improve the lawenforcement in Indonesia. But, law enforcement is still far from the ideals of rechts idée,and the aim of the State Law (Homeland/NKRI) as contained in the preamble of theConstitution paragraph four: developing the intellectual life of the Indonesian nation;creating more prosperous life or public welfare, and the fourth principle of Pancasila that isrealizing social justice for all the people of Indonesia.Keywords: Rule of law, Law enforcement, Constitution 1945, Law institution


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Siciliya Maridiana Yo'el ◽  
Huzaimah Al Anshori

Author(s):  
Александр Анатольевич Беженцев

Автором исследуется гносеология форм вины в зависимости от степени общественной опасности, делается вывод о том, что признание административным законодательством виновности свойством всех административных правонарушений имеет исключительно важный смысл, так как способствует точному соблюдению принципов социальной справедливости, дальнейшему укреплению законности в стане и отвечает не только требованиям последующего развития административного права, но и нуждам правоприменительной практики административно-юрисдикционной деятельности. Одним из обязательных юридических признаков понятия административного правонарушения является и наказуемость деяния, так как в действующем КоАП РФ применяется как термин «наказание», так и «взыскание». Автор разграничивает данные понятия, делает вывод о том, что наказуемость является одним из необходимых признаков понятия административного проступка, поскольку без административного правонарушения не возможно наказание, точно так же как без причины нет следствия. The author examines the ontology of forms of guilt depending on the degree of public danger, concludes that the recognition by administrative legislation of guilt as a property of all administrative offenses has an extremely important meaning, as it contributes to the exact observance of the principles of social justice, further strengthening the rule of law in the camp and meets not only the requirements the subsequent development of administrative law, but also the needs of law enforcement practice of administrative jurisdictional activity awns. One of the mandatory legal features of the concept of an administrative offense is the punishability of the act, since the term «punishment» and «foreclosure» are used in the current Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, the author delimits these concepts, concludes that punishability is one of the necessary features of the concept of administrative misconduct, since without an administrative offense punishment is not possible, just as without a reason there is no investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document