Reliability of Regulating Artificial Intelligence to Restrain Cartelization: A Libertarian Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matin Pedram
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Building Block ◽  
Common Good ◽  
Market Process ◽  
Executive Order ◽  
The Common Good ◽  
Government Interference ◽  
The Common ◽  
The U.S

Abstract Competition is building block of any successful economy, while a cartelized economy is against the common good of society. Nowadays, developing artificial intelligence (AI) and its plausibility to foster cartels persuade governments to revitalize their interference in the market and implement new regulations to tackle AI implications. In this sense, as pooling of technologies might enable cartels to impose high prices and violate consumers’ rights, it should be restricted. By contrast, in the libertarian approach, cartels’ impacts are defined by government interference in the market. Accordingly, it is irrational to rely on a monopolized power called government to equilibrate a cartelized market. This article discusses that AI is a part of the market process that should be respected, and a restrictive or protective approach such as the U.S. government Executive Order 13859 is not in line with libertarian thought and can be a ladder to escalate the cartelistic behaviors.

Is Capitalism Facing a Philosophical Crisis?

Social Change ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-235
Author(s):  
Manindra Nath Thakur
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Common Good ◽  
Current Crisis ◽  
Founding Fathers ◽  
The Common Good ◽  
Human Labour ◽  
The Future ◽  
Capitalist State ◽  
The Common ◽  
And Robotics

The contemporary crisis of capitalism is more fundamental in the sense that it is indicating an ontic mutation of the system. The resolution of the earlier crisis of capitalism gradually deviated it from the philosophy of its founding fathers. The primary justification of capitalism was its commitment to the ‘common good’, which was replaced by the ‘idea of freedom’ during the resolution of the crisis in the 1970s. The present crisis of capitalism, which started in 2008, is deeper and does not have either the idea of ‘common good’ or the ‘idea of freedom’ as a legitimising philosophy. The resolution of the current crisis is not dependent on human labour as it can be replaced by technology based on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. There is no sign of developing any new philosophical justification for the newly emerging form of capitalism. The article argues that if this does not happen, then the capitalist state in the future will be more exploitative and oppressive.

Speaking for Islam

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 110-127
Author(s):  
Abdoulaye Sounaye
Keyword(s):  
Common Good ◽  
The State ◽  
Institutional Transformation ◽  
The Political ◽  
Religious Authority ◽  
The Common Good ◽  
The Common ◽  
Religion And State ◽  
Islamic Values ◽  
French Model

Unexpectedly, one of the marking features of democratization in Niger has been the rise of a variety of Islamic discourses. They focus on the separation between religion and the state and, more precisely, the way it is manifested through the French model of laïcité, which democratization has adopted in Niger. For many Muslim actors, laïcité amounts to a marginalization of Islamic values and a negation of Islam. This article present three voices: the Collaborators, the Moderates, and the Despisers. Each represents a trend that seeks to influence the state’s political and ideological makeup. Although the ulama in general remain critical vis-à-vis the state’s political and institutional transformation, not all of them reject the principle of the separation between religion and state. The Collaborators suggest cooperation between the religious authority and the political one, the Moderates insist on the necessity for governance to accommodate the people’s will and visions, and the Despisers reject the underpinning liberalism that voids religious authority and demand a total re-Islamization. I argue that what is at stake here is less the separation between state and religion than the modality of this separation and its impact on religious authority. The targets, tones, and justifications of the discourses I explore are evidence of the limitations of a democratization project grounded in laïcité. Thus in place of a secular democratization, they propose a conservative democracy based on Islam and its demands for the realization of the common good.

What Theology Should and Should Not Learn from the Social Sciences About the Common Good

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary L. Hirschfeld
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Common Good ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Social Thought ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Human Flourishing ◽  
Catholic Social Thought ◽  
The Common Good ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Common

There are two ways to answer the question, What can Catholic social thought learn from the social sciences about the common good? A more modern form of Catholic social thought, which primarily thinks of the common good in terms of the equitable distribution of goods like health, education, and opportunity, could benefit from the extensive literature in public policy, economics, and political science, which study the role of institutions and policies in generating desirable social outcomes. A second approach, rooted in pre-Machiavellian Catholic thought, would expand on this modern notion to include concerns about the way the culture shapes our understanding of what genuine human flourishing entails. On that account, the social sciences offer a valuable description of human life; but because they underestimate how human behavior is shaped by institutions, policies, and the discourse of social science itself, their insights need to be treated with caution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document