scholarly journals Are semen quality parameters sufficient for biomonitoring spermatozoa DNA integrity and oxidatively damaged DNA

Biomonitoring ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hueiwang Anna Jeng ◽  
Ruei-Nian Li ◽  
Wen-Yi Lin
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Semen Quality ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Semen Parameters ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Phase System ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Sperm Dna

Abstract:The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between semen quality parameters and DNA integrity, and determine whether semen quality parameters could serve as a reliable biomarker for monitoring sperm DNA damage. Conventional semen parameters from a total of 202 male human subjects were analyzed. DNA fragmentation and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′- deoxyguanosine (8-oxoGuo) were used to assess sperm DNA integrity. DNA fragmentation was analyzed by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay and sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), while 8-oxodGuo was quantified by the liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) coupled with an on-line solid phase system. The levels of 8-oxodGuo levels in sperm were related to the percentages of DNA fragmentation measured by both the TUNEL and SCSA (r = 0.22, p = 0.048; r = 0.12, p = 0.039). Sperm vitality, motility and morphology from all of the participants exhibited a weak correlation with the levels of 8-oxodGuo and the percentages of DNA fragmentation. Semen quality parameters may be independent of the formation of DNA fragmentation and oxidative adducts in sperm. Semen quality parameters may be insufficient to monitor sperm DNA fragmentation and oxidative damage. DNA damage in sperm is recommended to be included in routine measurements.

scholarly journals Sperm DNA Integrity Assessment: A New Tool in Diagnosis and Treatment of Fertility

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Bungum
Keyword(s):  
Semen Quality ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Semen Parameters ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Sperm Dna Integrity ◽  
Sperm Dna

Infertility affects 15% of all couples. Although male infertility factors with reduced semen quality are contributing to about half of all involuntary childlessness, the value of standard semen parameters in prediction of fertilityin vivoand choice of proper method for assisted reproduction is limited. In the search for better markers of male fertility, during the last 10 years, assessment of sperm DNA integrity has emerged as a strong new biomarker of semen quality that may have the potential to discriminate between infertile and fertile men. Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) as assessed by the flow cytometric Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA) can be used for evaluation of sperm chromatin integrity. The biological background for abnormal DFI is not completely known, but clinical data show that DFI above 30% is associated with very low chance for achieving pregnancy in natural way or by insemination, but notin vitro. Already when the DFI is above 20%, the chance of natural pregnancy may be reduced, despite other sperm parameters being normal. Thus this method may explain a significant proportion of cases of unexplained infertility and can be beneficial in counselling involuntary childless couples need ofin vitrofertilisation.

scholarly journals A cost for high levels of sperm competition in rodents: increased sperm DNA fragmentation

2016 ◽  
Vol 283 (1826) ◽  
pp. 20152708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier delBarco-Trillo ◽  
Olga García-Álvarez ◽  
Ana Josefa Soler ◽  
Maximiliano Tourmente ◽  
José Julián Garde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Sperm Dna Damage ◽  
Sperm Dna Integrity ◽  
Sperm Dna ◽  
Physical And Chemical

Sperm competition, a prevalent evolutionary process in which the spermatozoa of two or more males compete for the fertilization of the same ovum, leads to morphological and physiological adaptations, including increases in energetic metabolism that may serve to propel sperm faster but that may have negative effects on DNA integrity. Sperm DNA damage is associated with reduced rates of fertilization, embryo and fetal loss, offspring mortality, and mutations leading to genetic disease. We tested whether high levels of sperm competition affect sperm DNA integrity. We evaluated sperm DNA integrity in 18 species of rodents that differ in their levels of sperm competition using the sperm chromatin structure assay. DNA integrity was assessed upon sperm collection, in response to incubation under capacitating or non-capacitating conditions, and after exposure to physical and chemical stressors. Sperm DNA was very resistant to physical and chemical stressors, whereas incubation in non-capacitating and capacitating conditions resulted in only a small increase in sperm DNA damage. Importantly, levels of sperm competition were positively associated with sperm DNA fragmentation across rodent species. This is the first evidence showing that high levels of sperm competition lead to an important cost in the form of increased sperm DNA damage.

The assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation in the saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus)

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 630 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Johnston ◽  
C. López-Fernández ◽  
F. Arroyo ◽  
J. L. Fernández ◽  
J. Gosálvez
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Fragmented Dna ◽  
Sperm Dna ◽  
Saltwater Crocodile ◽  
Crocodylus Porosus ◽  
Dispersion Test ◽  
Sperm Nuclei

Herein we report a method of assessing DNA fragmentation in the saltwater crocodile using the sperm chromatin dispersion test (SCDt) after including frozen–thawed spermatozoa in a microgel (Halomax; Halotech DNA, Madrid, Spain). Following controlled protein depletion, which included a reducing agent, sperm nuclei with fragmented DNA showed a homogeneous and larger halo of chromatin dispersion with a corresponding reduced nucleoid core compared with sperm with non-fragmented DNA. The presence of DNA damage was confirmed directly by incorporation of modified nucleotides using in situ nick translation (ISNT) and indirectly by studying the correlation of the SCDt with the results of DNA damage visualisation using a two-tailed comet assay (r = 0.90; P = 0.037). Results of the SCDt immediately following thawing and after 5 h incubation at 37°C in order to induce a range of DNA damage revealed individual crocodile differences in both the baseline level of DNA damage and DNA longevity.

scholarly journals DNA Fragmentation in Viable and Non-Viable Spermatozoa Discriminates Fertile and Subfertile Subjects with Similar Accuracy

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1341
Author(s):  
Monica Muratori ◽  
Giulia Pellegrino ◽  
Giusi Mangone ◽  
Chiara Azzari ◽  
Francesco Lotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Semen Quality ◽  
Semen Parameters ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Viable Cells ◽  
Sperm Dna ◽  
Infertile Couples ◽  
Natural Conception ◽  
Similar Accuracy ◽  
Sperm Population

Sperm DNA fragmentation (sDF) negatively affects reproduction and is traditionally detected in total sperm population including viable and non-viable spermatozoa. Here, we aimed at exploring the ability of DNA fragmentation to discriminate fertile and subfertile men when detected in viable (viable sDF), non-viable (non-viable sDF), and total spermatozoa (total sDF). We revealed sDF in 91 male partners of infertile couples and 71 fertile men (max 1 year from natural conception) with LiveTUNEL coupled to flow cytometry, able to reveal simultaneously DNA fragmentation and cell viability. We found that the three sDF parameters discriminated fertile and subfertile men with similar accuracy and independently from age and basal semen parameters: AUCs (area under the curves) (95% CI) were: 0.696 (0.615–0.776), p < 0.001 for total sDF; 0.718 (0.640–0.797), p < 0.001 for viable sDF; 0.760 (0.685–0.835), p < 0.001 for non-viable sDF. We also found that total and non-viable but not viable sDF significantly correlated to age and semen quality. In conclusion, the three sDF parameters similarly discriminated fertile and subfertile men. Viable spermatozoa with DNA fragmentation are likely cells able to fertilize the oocyte but failing to properly support subsequent embryo development. Non-viable sDF could be a sign of a subtler damage extended beyond the non-viable cells.

313 ASSESSMENT OF SPERM DNA FRAGMENTATION IN CANINE EJACULATES USING THE Sperm-Halomax® KIT: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 312 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hidalgo ◽  
M. R. Murabito ◽  
M. J. Gálvez ◽  
S. Demyda ◽  
L. J. De Luca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Sperm Concentration ◽  
Semen Parameters ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Fragmentation Index ◽  
Sperm Dna ◽  
Commercial Kit ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation Index ◽  
Dna Fragmentation Index

Recently, a new procedure for the analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation has been developed for humans and different mammalian species, using a commercial kit based on the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test; however, a descriptive study in canine semen has not been performed. The aim of this work was to assess the sperm DNA fragmentation in canine ejaculates using the SCD test and 2 different staining techniques. For this purpose, ejaculates were collectedby digital manipulation from4 healthy dogs of different breeds (1 German Pointer, 2 Spanish Greyhounds, and 1 Crossbreed). After collection, the sperm-rich fraction of the ejaculates from 3 dogs were pooled each time (n = 4) and then extended in Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline. All the pooled semen samples presented physiological values concerning routine semen parameters (motility, morphology, and sperm concentration). The sperm DNA fragmentation was assessed using the Sperm-Halomax® commercial kit specifically developed for canine semen (Halotech DNA SL, Madrid, Spain). Two semen aliquots of the diluted pooled semen samples were processed on each pre-treated slide provided in the kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. The last step was the staining technique. We stained each slide with 2 different staining procedures. The first half of the slide was stained with propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) mixed in a proportion 1 : 1 with an antifading solution. The second half of the slide was stained for 15 min in Wright solution (1.01383.0500, Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) 1 :1 in Phosphate Buffer pH 6.88 (1.07294.1000, Merck). The stained slides were observed using fluorescence and light microscopy, respectively. Five hundred sperm per slide were counted. Spermatozoa with fragmented DNA showed a large and spotty halo of chromatin dispersion. Unfragmented sperm only showed a small and compact halo. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The sperm DNA fragmentation index was compared between Wright and fluorescence staining methods by ANOVA. Results were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. The first report of the sperm DNA fragmentation index in canine ejaculates was 2.26 ± 0.53% for Wright staining and 1.99 ± 0.10% for fluorescence technique. No differences were found between staining procedures. In conclusion, it was possible to assess the sperm DNA fragmentation of canine ejaculates using 2 different staining procedures, expecting that continuous research could be useful in defining the role of DNA fragmentation SCD test in canine semen evaluation and cryopreservation.

Effect of cooled storage on quality and DNA integrity of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) spermatozoa

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Imrat ◽  
S. Mahasawangkul ◽  
J. Gosálvez ◽  
P. Suthanmapinanth ◽  
P. Sombutputorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Semen Quality ◽  
Storage Conditions ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Dna Stability ◽  
Subjective Impression ◽  
Sperm Dna Damage ◽  
Sperm Dna ◽  
Rate Of Increase

Artificial insemination (AI) is a potentially useful tool for breeding captive elephants because it facilitates efforts to minimise inbreeding. However, cooled storage of elephant semen markedly reduces fertility. This study compared the effects on semen-quality parameters, including sperm DNA fragmentation, of storing elephant semen at 4°C or 15°C in a commonly-used diluent (TEST) or a diluent developed to protect against sperm DNA damage (BullMax). Storing elephant semen for >24 h in either extender at either temperature resulted in decreases in sperm motility, viability, acrosome integrity and DNA integrity (P < 0.05); the decrease in motility was especially rapid. A subjective impression of circular sperm movement in TEST was confirmed by a higher curvilinear velocity and amplitude of lateral head displacement, but lower straight-line velocity and linearity than in BullMax. Initial percentages of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA (%SDF) did not differ between extenders or temperatures, but the rate of increase in %SDF during a 48-h incubation at 37°C was higher in TEST than in BullMax (P < 0.05). In conclusion, BullMax allows more linear movement and better preserves DNA stability of stored elephant spermatozoa than TEST. Sperm DNA stability during incubation at 37°C is a promising, discriminative parameter for selecting semen storage conditions of bulls for elephant AI.

Sperm DNA fragmentation: causes and identification

Zygote ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais Rose dos Santos Hamilton ◽  
Mayra Elena Ortiz D’Ávila Assumpção
Keyword(s):  
Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Semen Analysis ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Functional Capability ◽  
Sperm Dna Integrity ◽  
Sperm Dna ◽  
Fertility Disorders ◽  
Chromatin Integrity

SummarySperm DNA fragmentation is referred to as one of the main causes of male infertility. Failures in the protamination process, apoptosis and action of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are considered the most important causes of DNA fragmentation. Action of ROS or changes in sperm protamination would increase the susceptibility of sperm DNA to fragmentation. Routine semen analysis is unable to estimate sperm chromatin damage. Sperm DNA integrity influences sperm functional capability, therefore tests that measure sperm DNA fragmentation are important to assess fertility disorders. Actually, there is a considerable number of methods for assessing sperm DNA fragmentation and chromatin integrity, sperm chromatin stability assay (SCSA modified), sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD), comet assay, transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL); and protamine evaluation in sperm chromatin assay, such as toluidine blue, CMA3, protamine expression and evaluation of cysteine radicals. This review aims to describe the main causes of sperm DNA fragmentation and the tests commonly used to evaluate sperm DNA fragmentation.

Low-dose Methotrexate Therapy Does Not Affect Semen Parameters and Sperm DNA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Grosen ◽  
Emanuelle Bellaguarda ◽  
Jacob Nersting ◽  
Christian Lodberg Hvas ◽  
Ingela Liljeqvist-Soltic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Methotrexate Therapy ◽  
Semen Parameters ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Fragmentation Index ◽  
Sperm Dna

Abstract Background Methotrexate is widely used in inflammatory diseases during the patients’ reproductive years. The effect on male fertility and sperm DNA integrity is largely unknown. We evaluated sperm DNA integrity and basic semen parameters according to the World Health Organization (WHO) in male patients with inflammatory diseases treated with methotrexate. Methods Semen samples from 14 patients on low-dose maintenance methotrexate were compared with samples from 40 healthy volunteers. Further, 5 patients delivered samples on and off methotrexate therapy for paired comparison. Sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI), concentration, motility, and morphology were evaluated. Blood sex hormones and methotrexate levels were measured in blood and semen. Results DNA fragmentation index in methotrexate-treated patients was comparable with that in healthy volunteers (DFI, 11.5 vs 15.0; P = .06), and DFI did not change significantly on and off methotrexate in the paired samples (DFI, 12.0 vs 14.0; P = 0.35). Sperm concentration, motility, and morphology did not differ between men treated with methotrexate and healthy volunteers. Sperm progressive motility increased off therapy compared with on therapy (65.0% vs 45.0%, P = .04), but all fluctuations in progressive motility were within the WHO reference interval. All methotrexate polyglutamates1-5 were detected in blood, but only methotrexate polyglutamate1 in semen. Serum testosterone was unaffected by methotrexate therapy. Conclusions Patients treated with low-dose methotrexate have a sperm quality comparable with that of healthy volunteers, and methotrexate treatment does not increase sperm DNA fragmentation. This study does not support cryopreservation of semen before treatment initiation nor a 3-month methotrexate-free interval prior to conception.

scholarly journals The aging male: Relationship between male age, sperm quality and sperm DNA damage in an unselected population of 3124 men attending the fertility centre for the first time

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Colasante ◽  
Maria Giulia Minasi ◽  
Filomena Scarselli ◽  
Valentina Casciani ◽  
Vincenzo Zazzaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Sperm Morphology ◽  
Semen Quality ◽  
Sperm Quality ◽  
World Health ◽  
Semen Parameters ◽  
Sperm Dna Fragmentation ◽  
Sperm Dna Damage ◽  
Male Age ◽  
Sperm Dna

Objective: the aim of our study was to put forward insights to treat any possible correlation among sperm quality, sperm DNA damage and male age as they may have fertility implications for men who choose to delay fatherhood. Materials and methods: Our study is a non-interventional retrospective analysis of 3124 semen samples from patients that were investigated for the conventional semen parameters. Tunel test assay was set up for the evaluation of the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI). We applied the Kappa index to compare both the 1999 and the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) reference criteria to evaluate the competence of such semen parameters categorization during the standard routine of our laboratory. Results: With regards to our findings, it is possible to underline a significant relationship between aging and semen volume (p = 0.001), motility (p = 0.009), semen viscosity (p < 0.003) and sperm DNA damage (p < 0.009). We found a trend when focusing on the semen concentration (p = 0.05). The analysis of sperm morphology did not show any influence with advancing age (p = 0.606). When comparing both the 1999 and the 2010 WHO scales we found no accordance in the appraisal of sperm morphology but a very good one in the evaluation of the other parameters. Conclusions: Conventional semen analysis represents the opportunity to draw up a proxy insight on the male fertility status even if semen quality can only indirectly assess the probability of pregnancy. Several studies have verified a decay in the male reproductive system, sperm quality and fertility with advancing age although the reported results are not yet conclusive. Our results substantially agree with those findings outlined in the literature. Moreover we find that the discrepancy between the two WHO reference scales would eventually lead to an improper diagnosis of infertility.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document