Enamel shear bond strength of different primers combined with an orthodontic adhesive paste

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia H. Seeliger ◽  
Ute U. Botzenhart ◽  
Tomasz Gedrange ◽  
Karol Kozak ◽  
Lukas Stepien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Tooth Enamel ◽  
Surface Preparation ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Group A ◽  
Student’S T ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

AbstractAim:The aim of this study was a comparison of shear bond strength (SBS) on tooth enamel of different primers combined with the adhesive paste Transbond XT.Materials and methods:Forty bovine teeth were used in order to create 40 test blocks. The blocks were divided into four groups of 10 blocks each: group A – sample primer (SP); group B – Opal Seal (OS); group C – Transbond Plus SEP (TSEP); group D – Transbond XT Primer (TXT). After surface preparation and application of the primer, respectively, two stainless steel brackets were fixed on each tooth by using Transbond XT. Accordingly, 80 brackets were debonded (n=20). Shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed by using the Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.Results:All tested groups revealed high shear bond strength in a similar size range. There were no significant differences between the groups concerning shear bond strength. The ARI scores of group C showed significantly lower ARI scores (0 and 1) than that of group D. Apart from that there was no statistical difference.Conclusion:In combination with the adhesive paste Transbond XT, all tested primers were suitable for fixing orthodontic brackets. The primers could be changed according to the clinical situation.

scholarly journals Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets with Different Base Designs: An in-vitro Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-24
Author(s):  
Gaurav Chaudhary ◽  
Pawan Kumar Chandra ◽  
Rakesh Sharma ◽  
P Narayana Prasad ◽  
Sonia Gera
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Ceramic Brackets ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D ◽  
Base Group ◽  
Bracket Base ◽  
Base Design

Objective: To evaluate the influence of bracket base designs on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to natural teeth and to determine the common site of bond failure.Materials & Method: 120 therapeutically extracted maxillary first premolars were divided into six groups of 20 samples each and were mounted in resin blocks. Each sample was bonded with bracket of that particular group and subjected to thermocycling. The shear bond strength was measured using Universal Testing Machine. After debonding, the teeth and brackets were examined under stereo-microscope for adhesive remnant index.Result: Ceramic brackets with ball base design (Group A) yielded statistically highest shear bond strength followed by microcrystalline base (Group D), dimple base (Group E), mesh base (Group C) and dove tail base (Group B) design. Ceramic brackets yield higher bond strength than metal brackets (Group F) irrespective of base design. Insignificant difference was seen between Group A and Group D and between Group B and Group C. Bond failure between adhesive and bracket (Type 3) was seen in 80% of the brackets with ball base design and bond failure between adhesive and bracket (Type 1) was seen in 80% of brackets with dove tail base design.Conclusion: Bracket base design is an important consideration for shear bond strength. Base design with more number of undercuts offer higher shear bond strength. Ceramic brackets with more number of mechanical undercuts were less likely to bond failure at adhesive bracket base interface and vice versa

scholarly journals Composite resin shear bond strength on bleached dentin increased by 35% sodium ascorbate application

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Tunjung Nugraheni ◽  
N Nuryono ◽  
Siti Sunarintyas ◽  
Ema Mulyawati
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Sodium Ascorbate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D ◽  
One Way Anova

Background: Restoration of the teeth immediately after bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is contraindicated due to the remnant of free radicals that will stay inside enamel and dentin for 1-3 weeks and reduce the adhesion of composite resin. Sodium ascorbate is an antioxidant substance known to bind free radical residues, thereby shortening the delay in restoration. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the resin bond strength of bleached dentin influenced by the application of 35% sodium ascorbate. Methods: Nine premolars were divided into their crown and root sections, with the crown subsequently being cut into four equal parts to obtain 36 samples. These were then divided into four groups, each containing nine samples. Group A (control): samples were bleached using35% hydrogen peroxide, immersed in an artificial saliva, stored in an incubator at 37°C for seven days and then filled with a composite resin. Group B:samples were also bleached by means of 35% H2O2 followed by one application of 0.025 ml 35% sodium ascorbate for 5 minutes and restored with composite resin. Group C: samples were bleached with 35% H2O2, followed by two applications of 0.025 ml 35% sodium ascorbate for 5 minutes, and restored with a composite resin. Group D: dentin was bleached with 35% H2O2 followed by three applications of 0.025 ml sodium ascorbate 35% for 5 minutes and restored with a composite resin. The shear bond strength of the composite resin was measured by a universal testing instrument (Zwick, USA). Data was analyzed by means of one-way Anova and LSD. Results: The highest mean shear bond strength of composite resin was in group C, while the lowest was in group B. The result of one-way Anova indicated a difference in the shear bond strength of composite resin in the four treatment groups (p < 0.05). An LSD test showed there to be a difference in shear bond strength of composite resin between group A and groups C and D or between group B and groups C and D. There was no difference in shear bond strength of composite resin between group A and group B or between group C and group D. Conclusion: Application frequency of 35% sodium ascorbate affect on shear bond strength of composite resin restoration in bleached dentin by 35% H2O2.

scholarly journals Evaluation of crosshead speed influence on shear bond strength test

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Celina Wanderley de Abreu ◽  
Gilberto Duarte Filho ◽  
Alberto Noriyuki Kojima ◽  
Renato Morales Jóias ◽  
Alfredo Mikail Melo Mesquita
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Font Size ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

<p><span style="font-size: medium;">The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of different speeds using the piston device in the shear bond strength. 48 cylinders of composed resin had been confectioned (Solidex),and were divided randomly in four groups (n=12).</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">The specimens were adapted to the device for the</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">shear bond strenth test and were taken to an universal testing machine with a load cell of 1000Kg. The test were carried through with four different speeds: group A: 0,5; group B: 1,0; group C: 1,5 and group D: 2,0mm/min. The mean and standard deviations, in Kgf, were: A - 66,31(10,24); B - 64,53 (20,40); C - 75,23 (11,84) and D - 66,62 (13,81). The data were submitted to ANOVA (p=0,13). The results indicated that it did not have statistical significant difference between the groups</span><span style="font-size: medium;">   </span><span style="font-size: medium;">A, B, C and D concluding that the speed in this type of test, with this device, can be varied without modify results.</span></p>

scholarly journals Evaluation of the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of non-precious alloy‒ceramic interface: An SEM study

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-207
Author(s):  
Vikram M. Belkhode ◽  
Sharayu V. Nimonkar ◽  
S. R. Godbole ◽  
Pranali Nimonkar ◽  
Seema Sathe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Surface Grinding ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Dental Porcelain ◽  
Surface Irregularities ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Background. Dental porcelain has excellent esthetics in combination with biocompatibility and is one of the most commonly used restorative materials. Its low tensile strength remains a major drawback. The porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations have been introduced to increase the fracture resistance of dental porcelain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of a non-precious alloy to ceramic. Methods. The present cross-sectional observational study was conducted with forty samples of cobalt‒chromium that were fabricated with porcelain interposed between the two metal test pieces. The metal was subjected to combinations of different surface treatments. The samples group A (n=10) were not subjected to any surface treatments. Group B samples underwent sandblasting and surface grinding. Group C samples were subjected to sandblasting, surface grinding and degassing; and group D samples underwent sandblasting, surface grinding, ultrasonic cleaning and degassing. The tensile bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine, and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to obtain images of the samples after surface treatment to determine the surface irregularities and after the debonding of the samples for the type of the bond failure. ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis. Results. The results showed significant variations in the tensile bond strength between the four groups (F=251.05, P=0.000). The SEM images of group A showed no surface irregularities; group C samples exhibited surface irregularities more than those in group B. Group D had the highest surface irregularities. SEM evaluations showed a statistically significant difference in the type of bond failure (P<0.001). Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the surface treatments on the metal increased the bond strength of the metal‒ceramic interface significantly. A combination of sandblasting, surface grinding and ultrasonic cleaning, followed by degassing, resulted in the highest tensile bond strength.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Self-Etching Adhesive and Er:YAG Laser Conditioning on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalía Contreras-Bulnes ◽  
Rogelio J. Scougall-Vilchis ◽  
Laura E. Rodríguez-Vilchis ◽  
Claudia Centeno-Pedraza ◽  
Oscar F. Olea-Mejía ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Surface Preparation ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Laser Conditioning ◽  
Group I ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength, the adhesive remnant index scores, and etch surface of teeth prepared for orthodontic bracket bonding with self-etching primer and Er:YAG laser conditioning. One hundred and twenty bovine incisors were randomly divided into four groups. In Group I (Control), the teeth were conditioned with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. In Group II the teeth were conditioned with Transbond Plus SEP (5 sec); III and IV were irradiated with the Er:YAG 150 mJ (11.0 J/cm2), 150 mJ (19.1 J/cm2), respectively, at 7–12 Hz with water spray. After surface preparation, upper central incisor stainless steel brackets were bonded with Transbond Plus Color Change Adhesive. The teeth were stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours and shear bond strengths were measured, and adhesive remnant index (ARI) was determined. The conditioned surface was observed under a scanning electron microscope. One-way ANOVA and chi-square test were used. Group I showed the significantly highest values of bond strength with a mean value of 8.2 megapascals (MPa). The lesser amount of adhesive remnant was found in Group III. The results of this study suggest that Er:YAG laser irradiation could not be an option for enamel conditioning.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Effect of Different Types of Abrasive Surface Treatment before and after Zirconia Sintering on Its Structural Composition and Bond Strength with Resin Cement

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Skienhe ◽  
Roland Habchi ◽  
Hani Ounsi ◽  
Marco Ferrari ◽  
Ziad Salameh
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transformation ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Monoclinic Phase ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Silica Powder ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

This study evaluated the effect of air abrasion before and after sintering with different particle type, shape, and size on the surface morphology, monoclinic phase transformation, and bond strength between resin cement and zirconia surface using primer containing silane and MDP. Airborne particle abrasion (APA) was performed on zirconia before and after sintering with different particle shape and size (50 μm Al2O3 and 25 μm silica powder). 120 square shaped presintered zirconia samples (Amann Girrbach) were prepared (3 mm height × 10 mm width × 10 mm length) and polished with grit papers #800, 1000, 1200, 1500, and 2000. Samples were divided into 6 groups according to surface treatment—group A: (control) no surface treatment; group B: APA 50 μm Al2O3 before sintering (BS); group C: APA 50 μm Al2O3 after sintering (AS); group D: APA25 μm silica powder (BS); group E: APA25 μm silica powder (AS) at a pressure of 3.5 bar; and group F: APA 25 μm silica powder (AS) at a pressure of 4 bar. Samples were analyzed using XRD, AFM, and SEM. The samples were submitted to shear bond strength (SBS) test. A dual cure resin cement (RelyX Ultimate) and primer (Scotchbond Universal) were used. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey test (α≥0.05). APA in group B significantly increased the surface roughness when compared to all other groups. A significant monoclinic phase transformation (t-m) value was observed in groups C and F and a reverse transformation occurred in presintered groups. The SBS value of group A was 11.58±1.43 and the highest significant shear bond strength value was for groups B (15.86±1.92) and C (17.59±2.21 MPa) with no significant difference between them. Conclusions. The use of APA 50 μm Al2O3 before sintering and the application of primer containing MDP seem to be valuable methods for durable bonding with zirconia. The use of APA 50 μm Al2O3 after sintering induced the highest (t-m) phase transformation.

scholarly journals The difference between porcelain and composite resin shear bond strength in the administration of 4% and 19.81% silane

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Ira Widjiastuti ◽  
Dwina Rahmawati Junaedi ◽  
Ruslan Effendy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Direct Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background: Damage to porcelain restorations such as fractures requires a repair that can be performed either directly or indirectly. Direct repair involves directly performing restoration of fractured porcelain with a composite resin application. This technique has more advantages than indirect repair because it requires no laboratory work and can be completed during a single visit. Silane, on the other hand, has been widely used and is reported to increase porcelain and composite resin attachments during the direct repair process. Purpose: This study aimed to determine the differences in shear bond strength between porcelain and composite resin during the administering of 4% and 19.81% silane. Methods: 27 porcelain samples were divided into three groups, namely: Group A - 4% silane, Group B - 19.81% silane and Group C - no silane, prior to the application of composite resin. Each sample was tested for shear bond strength by means of Autograph and fracture analysis performed through stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope tests. Data analysis was subsequently performed using an ANOVA test. Results: There was a significant difference between the three groups with p=0.000 (p<0.005). The lowest bond strength was found in the group without silane, while the highest was in the group with 4% silane (p<0.005). Conclusion: The use of 4% silane can produce the highest shear bond strength of porcelain and resin composite.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Surface Conditioning of Zirconia and Its Effect on Bonding to Resin-Luting Agent

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Sonu Gargava ◽  
Sabita M Ram
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Silicon Dioxide ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Surface Conditioning ◽  
Luting Agent ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

ABSTRACT Zirconia, a recently introduced ceramic exhibits excellent esthetic qualities and demonstrates outstanding flexural strength but its extensive use, requires a reliable bond of Zirconia with resinluting agent. Resin Zirconia bonding cannot be achieved as the material is resistant to common etching procedures used for other glass containing ceramics. With surface conditioning increased adhesion between Zirconia and resin-luting agent can be successfully achieved. Aim Aim of this study was to evaluate surface conditioning of Zirconia and its effect on bonding to resin-luting agent. Materials and Methods Fifteen blocks of Zirconia (VITA Zirconia) were fabricated in the laboratory according to manufacturer's instructions and embedded in acrylic resin to get 15 Zirconia samples. Fifteen composite resin cylinders were prepared one for each Zirconia sample. All the 15 Zirconia samples were divided into three groups of five samples each. Group A: Was kept as control with no surface conditioning done. Group B: Surface conditioning was done with 30 µ silicon dioxide. Group C: Surface conditioning was done with 110 µ aluminum oxide. Composite resin cylinders were cemented on the Zirconia samples using a resin-luting agent (Panavia F). The samples were subjected to universal testing machine to evaluate shear bond strength and the data was statistically analyzed by oneway ANOVA. Results Group A showed least shear bond strength. Shear bond strength of group C was greater than group A while group B showed highest shear bond strength. Conclusion Surface conditioning results in significant increase bond strength between Zirconia and resin-luting agent. Among the two methods surface conditioning with 30 µ silicon dioxide is much better and efficient method. How to cite this article Gargava S, Ram SM. Evaluation of Surface Conditioning of Zirconia and Its Effect on Bonding to Resin-Luting Agent. J Contemp Dent 2013;3(1):7-10.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength between Ridge Lap Surface of Acrylic Teeth and Denture Base Resin: An In Vitro Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 012-018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eeshita Sharma ◽  
Manjit Kumar ◽  
Rohit Sharma ◽  
Ajay Bansal ◽  
Sumit Katoch
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Aluminum Oxide ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Denture Teeth ◽  
Base Resin ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Abstract Statement of Problem Acrylic teeth are preferred to porcelain teeth in dentures as they unite chemically with denture base resin, but their fracture from denture is common. Purpose The purpose of this study was to improve the bond strength of denture teeth to acrylic resin denture base by chemical or mechanical modification of the ridge lap surface of denture teeth. Materials and Methods Total 100 artificial cross-linked acrylic resin central incisors were divided into five groups: group A, 20 samples without modification (control group); group B, 20 samples (ridge lap surface of teeth treated with monomer); group C, 20 samples (ridge lap surface of teeth treated with monomer and the glaze layer removed with aluminum oxide abrasive stone); group D, 20 samples (ridge lap surface of teeth treated with dichloromethane); and group E, 20 samples (dichloromethane application followed by abrasion with aluminum oxide stone on ridge lap surface of teeth). They were mounted on wax blocks, and the blocks were acrylized. The bond strength values were obtained by subjecting the samples to shear compressive load under universal testing machine. Result The results were subjected to statistical analysis by applying analysis of variance and Bonferroni test for multiple group comparisons, and graphs were plotted. The mean value of bond strength was highest for group E (modified by aluminum oxide abrasion prior to dichloromethane application), followed by group C (modified by aluminum oxide abrasion prior to monomer application), group D (modified by dichloromethane application), group B (modified by monomer application), and lastly group A (control group). Significantly improved bond strength values were obtained in modified groups as compared with the control group. Conclusion Dichloromethane application followed by aluminum oxide abrasion provided the highest bond strength and is recommended to prevent debonding of the teeth from the denture base.

scholarly journals Ceramometal Bond Strength Analysis using New and Recast Nonprecious Alloys with Three Different Ceramics

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Sulekha Gosavi ◽  
Arti Wadkar ◽  
Siddharth Y Gosavi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Ceramic Material ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Alloy System ◽  
Ceramic Materials ◽  
Strength Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

ABSTRACT Objectives This study is undertaken to evaluate the dependence of bond strength of 100% fresh nonprecious alloy and the combination of 50% recast (used) alloy and 50% fresh alloy with three different veneering ceramic material. Materials and methods To evaluate the shear bond strength between new and recast alloy nonprecious Ni-Cr alloy (System KN®, Adentatec, Germany) was used with three different commercially available ceramics. A total of 60 samples were prepared and divided in two groups depending on the new or recast alloy. The 30 specimens of new alloy (group A) and 30 specimens of recast alloy (group B) were fabricated. Each group was again divided into three subgroups of 10 specimens for ceramic veneering Vita VMK-95 [V], IPS Classic [I] and Noritake [N] as veneering ceramic materials. Thus, six subgroups were formed as groups AV, AI, AN, BV, BI and BN. Groups AV and BV were veneered with Vita Ceramics, Groups AI and BI were veneered with IPS Classic (Ivoclar) and Groups AN and BN were veneered with Noritake. Then, shear bond strength between new and recast alloy was analyzed for each type of ceramics using MTS machine. Results The bond strength between new [group A] and recast alloy [group B] using three different veneering ceramics were evaluated. It was found that the new or the fresh alloy had highest shear bond strength than the recast alloy. Statistically, it was found that there was significant difference in bond strength between the new and recast alloys, when same type of ceramics was compared. When comparing ceramics, the Noritake group had highest bond strength, while other groups, that is, Vita and Ivoclar had comparatively low bond strength. Conclusion From this study, conclusion can be drawn that the use of 50% recast alloy shows reduction in bond strength values. Therefore, the use of recast alloy should not exceed more than 50%, as it would compromise the properties of alloy and the efficacy of bond strength between ceramic and alloy. How to cite this article Gosavi S, Wadkar A, Gosavi SY. Ceramometal Bond Strength Analysis using New and Recast Nonprecious Alloys with Three Different Ceramics. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2013;3(1):14-20.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document