The multi-cancer marker, rs6983267, located at region 3 of chromosome 8q24, is associated with prostate cancer in Greek patients but does not contribute to the aggressiveness of the disease

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amalia Papanikolopoulou ◽  
Olfert Landt ◽  
Konstantinos Ntoumas ◽  
Stefanos Bolomitis ◽  
Stavros I. Tyritzis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Greek Population ◽  
Cancer Case ◽  
P Value ◽  
Total Blood ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Chromosome 8Q24

AbstractRecently, several polymorphisms located on human chromosome 8q24 were found to be associated with prostate cancer risk with different frequency and incidence among the investigated populations. The authors conducted a prostate cancer case-control study in the Greek population to evaluate the association of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs6983267, located at region 3 of chromosome 8q24, with this type of cancer.Samples of total blood from 86 patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer and 99 healthy individuals were genotyped using real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, Gleason score and levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis were included in the analysis.A highly significant association (odds ratio=2.84 and p-value=0.002) was found between rs6983267 and prostate cancer in the Greek population. The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of the presence of G allele for the discrimination between patients and controls were 81.40%, 39.4%, 53.9% and 70.9%, respectively. A lower proportion of homozygotes was found in patients with PSA level <4 ng/mL compared to those with PSA level more than 4 ng/mL (p=0.019). None of the other clinical factors nor the aggressiveness of the disease were found to be significantly associated with rs6983267 genotype.The SNP rs6983267 is an established marker for a range of cancers. In prostate cancer, it indicates an enhanced risk for carriers to develop the disease in general. In our study it showed no association with aggressive forms or familial and early-onset prostate cancer families.

scholarly journals Prostate cancer screening: A survey of medical students’ knowledge in Lome, Togo, and associated determinants in a resource-limited African context

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 205031212110328
Author(s):  
Tchin Darré ◽  
Toukilnan Djiwa ◽  
Tchilabalo Matchonna Kpatcha ◽  
Albadia Sidibé ◽  
Edoé Sewa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
P Value ◽  
Theoretical Knowledge ◽  
Practical Level

Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess the knowledge of medical students in Lomé about these means of screening for prostate cancer in a context of limited resources and controversy about prostate cancer screening, and to identify the determinants associated with these results. Methods: This was a prospective descriptive and cross-sectional study conducted in the form of a survey of medical students regularly enrolled at the Faculty of Health Sciences of the University of Lomé for the 2019–2020 academic years. Results: Of the 1635 eligible students, 1017 correctly completed the form, corresponding to a rate of 62.20%. The average age was 22 ± 3.35 years. The sex ratio (M/F) was 2.5. Undergraduate students were the most represented (53.69%). Students who had not received any training on prostate cancer were the most represented (57.13%). Only 12.88% of the students had completed a training course in urology. Concerning the prostate-specific antigen blood test, there was a statistically significant relationship between the students’ knowledge and some of their socio-demographic characteristics, namely age (p value = 0.0037; 95% confidence interval (0.50–1.77)); gender (p value = 0.0034; 95% confidence interval (1.43–2.38)); study cycle (p value ˂ 0.0001; 95% confidence interval (0.56–5.13)) and whether or not they had completed a placement in a urology department (p value ˂ 0.0001; 95% confidence interval (0.49–1.55)). On the contrary, there was no statistically significant relationship between students’ knowledge of the digital rectal examination and their study cycle (p value = 0.082; 95% confidence interval (0.18–3.44)). Conclusion: Medical students in Lomé have a good theoretical knowledge and a fair practical level of the digital rectal examination clinical examination and an average theoretical knowledge and a below average practical level of prostate-specific antigen, increasing however along the curriculum in the context of prostate cancer screening.

scholarly journals Computer-Aided Diagnosis Improves the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric-MRI: A Multi-Observer Performance Study Involving Inexperienced Readers

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 973
Author(s):  
Valentina Giannini ◽  
Simone Mazzetti ◽  
Giovanni Cappello ◽  
Valeria Maria Doronzio ◽  
Lorenzo Vassallo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Multiparametric Mri ◽  
Performance Study ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Cad System ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

Recently, Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems have been proposed to help radiologists in detecting and characterizing Prostate Cancer (PCa). However, few studies evaluated the performances of these systems in a clinical setting, especially when used by non-experienced readers. The main aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of non-experienced readers when reporting assisted by the likelihood map generated by a CAD system, and to compare the results with the unassisted interpretation. Three resident radiologists were asked to review multiparametric-MRI of patients with and without PCa, both unassisted and assisted by a CAD system. In both reading sessions, residents recorded all positive cases, and sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were computed and compared. The dataset comprised 90 patients (45 with at least one clinically significant biopsy-confirmed PCa). Sensitivity significantly increased in the CAD assisted mode for patients with at least one clinically significant lesion (GS > 6) (68.7% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.018). Overall specificity was not statistically different between unassisted and assisted sessions (94.8% vs. 89.6, p = 0.072). The use of the CAD system significantly increases the per-patient sensitivity of inexperienced readers in the detection of clinically significant PCa, without negatively affecting specificity, while significantly reducing overall reporting time.

Cumulative Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment with the Aid of the Free-to-Total Prostate Specific Antigen Ratio

2004 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Aus ◽  
Charlotte Becker ◽  
Stefan Franzén ◽  
Hans Lilja ◽  
Pär Lodding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk Assessment ◽  
Total Prostate Specific Antigen

scholarly journals Pre-treatment risk stratification of prostate cancer patients:A critical review

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
George Rodrigues ◽  
Padraig Warde ◽  
Tom Pickles ◽  
Juanita Crook ◽  
Michael Brundage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Critical Review ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Pre Treatment

Introduction:  The use of accepted prostate cancer risk stratification groups based on prostate-specific antigen, T stage and Gleason score assists in therapeutic treatment decision-making, clinical trial design and outcome reporting. The utility of integrating novel prognostic factors into an updated risk stratification schema is an area of current debate. The purpose of this work is to critically review the available literature on novel pre-treatment prognostic factors and alternative prostate cancer risk stratification schema to assess the feasibility and need for changes to existing risk stratification systems. Methods:  A systematic literature search was conducted to identify original research publications and review articles on prognostic factors and risk stratification in prostate cancer. Search terms included risk stratification, risk assessment, prostate cancer or neoplasms, and prognostic factors. Abstracted information was assessed to draw conclusions regarding the potential utility of changes to existing risk stratification schema. Results:  The critical review identified three specific clinically relevant potential changes to the most commonly used three-group risk stratification system: (1) the creation of a very-low risk category; (2) the splitting of intermediate-risk into a low- and highintermediate risk groups; and (3) the clarification of the interface between intermediate- and high-risk disease. Novel pathological factors regarding high-grade cancer, subtypes of Gleason score 7 and percentage biopsy cores positive were also identified as potentially important risk-stratification factors. Conclusions:  Multiple studies of prognostic factors have been performed to create currently utilized prostate cancer risk stratification systems. We propose potential changes to existing systems.

Comparing Two Modalities of Screening for Prostate Cancer: Digital Rectal Examination + Transrectal Ultrasonography Vs. Prostate-Specific Antigen

1995 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Ciatto ◽  
Rita Bonardi ◽  
Antonia Mazzotta ◽  
Claudio Lombardi ◽  
Roberto Santoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasonography ◽  
Attendance Rate ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Biopsy Rate

Aims and background To evaluate the performance and feasibility of screening for prostate cancer by comparing screening modalities. Methods Prospective study of two comparable cohorts of healthy resident males aged 60 to 75 years. Screening attenders in the two invited cohorts were screened either by digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), or by serum prostate-specific antigen determination (PSA: cutoff 4 ng/ml). Attendance and biopsy rates, predictive values, prevalence of screen-detected cancers, as well as screening costs were determined, and the efficiency of the two screening modalities was compared. Results 1425 subjects were screened by DRE + TRUS. Attendance rate was 33.7%, the biopsy rate was 2.7%, and the prevalence of detected cancers was 1.82%. A total of 1315 subjects was screened by PSA. Attendance rate was 66.9%, the biopsy rate was 2.8%, and the prevalence of detected cancers was 1.67%. Screen-detected cancer stage was more favorable than observed in clinical practice, and early detection was evident, with the prevalence/incidence ratio higher than 10:1 in both programs. The cost per subject screened was about 34,000 Lire for DRE + TRSU and about 30,000 Lire for PSA program. Conclusions The study confirms that early detection of prostate cancer is possible and that screening is practically feasible. Both screening modalities achieved comparable results as regards early detection, but screening by PSA had a higher compliance and lower costs. PSA seems the ideal test to be used in prospective controlled studies aimed at demonstrating screening efficacy.

scholarly journals Screening for Prostate Cancer: To Screen or Not To Screen? A Review of The State-of-The Art

2019 ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Lajos Döbrőssy
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Prostate cancer is a major public health concern, particularly in the welfare countries, for this reason, screening should be considered to reduce the number of deaths. Screening tests are available, i.e. digital rectal examination; trans-rectal ultrasonography and prostate specific antigen, nevertheless their sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value are far from being perfect. Evidences from randomized screening trials are still indebted for conclusive evidence. The screening might cause more harm than good due to over diagnosis and over-treatment as a result of limited specificity of the screening tests. According to our point a view, opportunistic screening as part of diagnostics of patients having suspicion for uncertain symptoms of prostatic disorder is fully justified but mass screening of the population of average risk should not be introduced until supportive evidence from randomized controlled trials would be available.

Polymorphisms in the androgen receptor and the prostate-specific antigen genes and prostate cancer risk

The Prostate ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia A. Salinas ◽  
Melissa A. Austin ◽  
Elaine O. Ostrander ◽  
Janet L. Stanford
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk

Development of a Semiautomated Search Tool to Identify Grading From Pathology Reports for Tumors of the CNS and Prostate Cancers

2021 ◽  
pp. 1189-1196
Author(s):  
Diana Echeverria ◽  
Kristen R. Rossi ◽  
Anna Carroll ◽  
Tina Luse ◽  
Christopher Rennix
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Cns Tumors ◽  
Quality Initiatives ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Military Health ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Diagnostic Codes ◽  
Pathology Reports ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

PURPOSE This study demonstrates the functionality of semiautomated algorithms to classify cancer-specific grading from electronic pathology reports generated from military treatment facilities. Two Perl-based algorithms are validated to classify WHO grade for tumors of the CNS and Gleason grades for prostate cancer. METHODS Case-finding cohorts were developed using diagnostic codes and matched by unique identifiers to obtain pathology records generated in the Military Health System for active duty service members from 2013 to 2018. Perl-based algorithms were applied to classify document-based pathology reports to identify malignant CNS tumors and prostate cancer, followed by a hand-review process to determine accuracy of the algorithm classifications. Inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values were computed following abstractor adjudication. RESULTS The high PPV for the Perl-based algorithms to classify CNS tumors (PPV > 98%) and prostate cancer (PPV > 99%) supports this approach to classify malignancies for cancer surveillance operations, mediated by a hand-reviewed semiautomated process to increase sensitivity by capturing ungraded cancers. Early detection was pronounced where 33.6% and 50.7% of malignant records retained a CNS WHO grade of II or a Gleason score of 6, respectively. Sensitivity metrics met criteria (> 75%) for brain (79.9%, 95% CI, 73.0 to 85.7) and prostate (96.7%, 95% CI, 94.9 to 98.0) cancers. CONCLUSION Semiautomated, document-based text classification using Perl coding successfully leveraged identification of WHO and Gleason grades to classify pathology records for CNS tumors and prostate cancer. The process is recommended for data quality initiatives to support cancer reporting functions, epidemiology, and research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document