The Implications of Brexit for Financial Markets: Towards a Network of EU Financial Centres

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Wuermeling

Abstract The departure of the global financial centre in London from the EU raises fundamental questions about the future of the European financial market. But we should refrain from discussing which European financial centre will get which part of the London pie. Instead, we ought to be asking: How can we develop a European financial system that spreads investment and risk among many strong shoulders?

Author(s):  
Arner Douglas W ◽  
Hsu Berry FC ◽  
Goo Say H ◽  
Johnstone Syren ◽  
Lejot Paul ◽  
...  

This chapter summarizes the main arguments and discussions of the book and presents an overview of major concerns for the future of Hong Kong’s financial markets. In addition to describing financial market law and practice in Hong Kong, this book has sought to point out related major issues, whether legal, economic, or cultural. Each chapter has concluded with an evaluation of Hong Kong’s financial markets, identifying weaknesses and where reform is most needed. This final chapter takes the analysis further, presenting an overview of major concerns for the future of Hong Kong’s financial markets and their legal and regulatory systems. These arise in two main respects: first, risks to be addressed out of concern for financial stability and the continued economic development of Hong Kong; and second, opportunities to enhance Hong Kong’s competitiveness as a financial centre, especially in the context of prospects for China and East Asia.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 67-78
Author(s):  
Anna Krawczyk-Sawicka

The EU integration and the creation of the so-called European single financial market requires creation of institutional solutions corresponding to the integrated structure. At the moment, we are dealing with globalisation of financial markets, and thus with a growth in their integration. However, full integration of the financial system, or the lack thereof, will be only achieved when European states overcome the still lasting financial crisis and its effects in the form of recession in most EU countries. The purpose of this article is to present the situation concerning the integration of financial markets, as illustrated with the example of countries belonging to the EU, with emphasis on the situation on the Polish financial market after the deepest and the most severe financial crisis for the world economies, namely after 2008–2009 as compared with the period preceding the financial crisis.


This book aims to analyse and discuss the main changes and new provisions introduced by MiFID II/MiFIR. The book chapters are grouped in a thematic way, covering the following areas: (i) investment firms and investment services, (ii) trading, (iii) supervision and enforcement, (iv) the broader view and the future of MiFID II/MiFIR.


2017 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-290
Author(s):  
Valentino Cattelan

Abstract This article deals with the nature of Islamic economics as a scientific paradigm which claims to be alternative to conventional economic thinking. To critically evaluate this claim, the work investigates the peculiar religious and moral principles that shape the idea of social justice in Islam. Subsequently, it outlines how Islamic economics derives from these principles a specific conceptualization of property rights and commercial relations that embraces parameters of (1) primacy of real economy; (2) transactional equilibrium; (3) and profit- and risk-sharing. By endorsing the conceptual autonomy of Islamic economics from conventional capitalism, the article also refers to the current emergence of the Islamic financial market at a global stage, and the possible implications for a plural financial system in the future.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 592-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rustam A. Kasyanov

Five countries became members of the Eurasian Economic Union – an international organization of regional economic integration. The Republic of Kazakhstan, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of Belarus signed the international Treaty in the city of Astana, Kazakhstan on May 29, 2014. The Republic of Armenia and the Kyrgyz Republic acceded to the Treaty later. Harmonized regulation of financial markets should be one of the initial areas of cooperation, with the aims of creating a single financial services market within the EAEU and ensuring non-discriminatory access to the national financial markets of each of the member states. The EAEU member states have already entered into the initial stage of developing the Eurasian common market in financial services. A considerable part of the work should be carried out by a supranational financial market regulation body, which is to be established by 2025 according to the EAEU Treaty. Such financial integration in the EAEU has only been in progress for a limited time period and many of the key steps are yet to be done. The existing national-markets development level is highly non-homogeneous and is in need of further development. In such circumstances, a relevant question related to the study of foreign experience arises. European Union started to form its single financial services market in 1973, and since then it has gained certain experience in financial markets integration. This research paper is dedicated to the issue of necessity and possibility of using the EU experience in the course of the EAEU Single market development. The issue will be addressed in terms of political, legal, academic, and practical aspects. The article is of a general, theoretical legal character, which is why emphasis will be placed on legal and doctrinal questions. Special attention will be paid to an analysis of the Eurasian Economic Union Treaty and its Protocols. The work will be based on the academic research and opinions of Russian and foreign authors.


Author(s):  
Richard Deeg ◽  
Walter James

The regulation of finance is central to the growth and development of every economy. Financial regulation determines the overall character of the financial system, the relationship between borrowers and savers, the allocation of capital, and the macroeconomic performance of the economy. Financial market regulation is distinct from regulation of other sectors of the economy because of the essential infrastructural role of finance—all other sectors of advanced economies depend on the financial system. Despite its enormous importance, financial regulation normally has low political salience. Except in times of crisis, most voters—and therefore politicians—have relatively little interest in the matter. This can be attributed in part to the complex and technical nature of financial markets and regulation, which relatively few people understand well. Low political salience facilitates a regulatory process that is very heavily shaped by regulators (technocrats) and the industry they regulate, with only minor direction from elected political leaders. In the long history of capitalism, bank and financial system crises have been regular occurrences. Regulation, or regulatory failure, is often seen as a cause of crises, but regulatory change is also the response. Thus any given financial regulatory regime is never settled for long. After the Great Depression, advanced capitalist economies introduced highly restrictive financial regulatory regimes designed to minimize systemic risk from bank failures. In the postwar period, restrictive regulatory regimes were combined with capital controls that limited international movements of capital. The postwar Bretton Woods international monetary regime stabilized fixed exchange rates through such controls and, when necessary, lending by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to countries that could not pay for their external debts. Starting with the collapse of the Bretton Woods regime in the early 1970s, all the advanced economies started liberalizing financial market regulation and removing capital controls as part of a broader shift toward a neoliberal economic philosophy. These deregulatory measures brought about a dramatic transformation of domestic financial systems and the reemergence of a dynamic and rapidly growing international financial market. Such dynamic and internationalized financial market was, in large part, the root cause of the early-21st-century financial crisis. The Great Financial Crisis of 2008 precipitated widespread review and revision of financial market regulations at both the domestic and international levels. These revisions include a shift from private self-regulation to state-driven regulation of financial markets, the centralization of regulation at the level of the European Union, and a closer cooperation between states in forging international regulatory standards. Nonetheless, despite the dramatic growth of the international financial market and transnational efforts to coordinate regulation, financial regulation remains overwhelmingly a domestic affair.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-135
Author(s):  
Natalia Sirenko ◽  
◽  
Olena Bodnar ◽  
Nataliia Shyshpanova ◽  
◽  
...  

Annotation. Introduction. The relevance of the study is conditioned to the significant influence of modern financial markets on the real economy and social development as a whole. Purpose. The purpose of the article is to generalize the theoretical provisions for determining the model of the financial market, highlighting the elements of the financial market infrastructure, analysis of the development of the domestic financial market. Results. We have done the characteristic of the current stage of the financial system’s and financial market’s development. Denotes the inhomogeneity of the existing theoretical approaches to the definition of a financial market and its structural classification, with emphasis on the importance of the institutional component. We have done the analysis of the different models (types) of the financial system and financial markets and the factors determining the use of these models in different countries. Background of selection of so-called mixed model of the financial system in Ukraine are systematized, when equal opportunities and rights, with no serious legislative restrictions and financial transactions are carried out banking and non-banking financial institutions. The current stage of development of the domestic financial market is characterized by a dominant share of universal banks, but the industry non-bank financial institutions has also received its development, which generally creates a competitive environment for all market participants. At the same time, certain non-bank credit institutions, recently appeared on the market and very dynamic, require special attention from the mega-regulator. Conclusions. In this regard, we have done the conclusion about the need to improve legislation in the field of financial markets and to ensure an acceptable level of control. Keywords: financial market; financial system; banking and non-banking financial institutions.


Author(s):  
Martin Diehl

Like a human being's backbone, well-functioning financial market infrastructures contribute to the stability of the financial system. They enable fast and smooth movements, channel relevant information, protect the channels for transmission and reduce risk. Problems in financial market infrastructures may lead to dysfunctions of financial markets, a lack of options for transaction and, therefore, to limited movability, misleading information or disturbed information channels and in the worst case to systemic risk. The chapter explains the role of financial market infrastructure within the wider definition of a financial system. Based on the historical emergence of payment systems, central clearing and central securities depositories, the special advantage of financial market infrastructures for the productivity of intermediaries, for the efficiency of financial markets and for the welfare of an economy is explained. The chapter shows the economic and analytical importance and specificity of financial market infrastructures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-143
Author(s):  
E. A. Zvonova

The subject of the research is the state of interrelationship between the Russian and European financial markets in the context of the economic and financial sanctions imposed on Russia by the European Union. The relevance of the research stems from the strategic goal set by the President of the Russian Federation — to ensure the “breakthrough” of the Russian economy in order to enter the top five world’s developed economies by 2024–2025.The purpose of the paper was to develop a roadmap for the implementation of the mobilization model of cross-border flows of the Russian capital in the context of modern transformations of the global monetary and financial system. Based on the revealed and analyzed mainstream trends in the interaction of the Russian and European financial markets, a mobilization model of cross-border flows of the Russian capital under the modern conditions has been developed. The asymmetry in mutual exchanges between the Russian and European financial markets is revealed and the risks of all identified forms of asymmetry are defined. The reference structure of foreign assets of the Russian financial market is determined, priority directions for the correction of the structure of external assets and liabilities have been established, and the institutional structure of the monetary and financial regulation of the Russian financial market are specified.It is concluded that based on the roadmap for the model of cross-border flows of the Russian capital under conditions of modern transformations of the global monetary and financial system developed for the period 2019–2025, the Russian financial market is expected to be fairly stable over the next three years, which should be taken into account by the Bank of Russia in making decisions on the monetary policy and accumulation of international currency reserves.


Author(s):  
Ferrarini Guido ◽  
Saguato Paolo

This chapter shows that MiFID II brings modest changes to trading venues in the EU: newly introduced Organized Trading Facilities (OTFs) will be the reference venues for a significant portion of derivatives trading; and regulated markets (RMs) and Multilateral Trading Facilities (MTFs) regimes have been aligned, with specific provisions to strengthen the governance of venues and operators. However, trading venues which have developed into Financial Markets Infrastructures (FMI) groups providing trading and post-trading services test the capacity of the current regime—and MiFID II itself—to oversee their activities and guarantee competition and stability. MiFID II does not explicitly take FMI groups into account; only three sets of rules address some of their potential risks. The authors conclude that this regulatory gap might threaten financial market stability, and regulators should consider a regulatory intervention, such as the experience of the regulatory and supervisory colleges of CCPs under EMIR and the regulatory framework of the financial conglomerates directive.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document