scholarly journals Localised gastrointestinal diffuse large B cell lymphomas; Does surgical approach still exist?

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-17
Author(s):  
Abeer Ibrahim ◽  
Ali Zedan ◽  
Alia M. A. Attia
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Gastric Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Anatomical Site ◽  
Intestinal Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the commonest pathological type of gastrointestinal lymphoma and its management was changed from surgery to combined chemoimmunotherapy in the last decade; however, this strategy is questionable, especially if rituximab is not available. Methods: Seventy-nine files were reviewed retrospectively. We divided the patients into two groups; group 1 included 37 patients who underwent surgery followed by chemotherapy and group 2 included 42 patients who received chemotherapy. The indication of surgery was mainly due to obstruction/perforation. We compared the outcomes of PFS and OS between the two groups and according to primary anatomical site. Results: We found that the outcomes for the surgery group before chemotherapy was superior to chemotherapy alone in terms of DFS, p = 0.012 and OS p = 0.037. But in the anatomical subgroups analysis, it did not show any significant difference in primary gastric lymphoma (PGL) regarding DFS and OS, p = 0.706, p = 0.858, respectively; On the contrary, we found significant improvement in PFS and OS, p = 0.032, p = 0.025, respectively, in primary intestinal lymphoma (PIL) favouring the use of the surgical approach. Conclusion Surgery is still an important strategy in the case of DLBCL in PIL intestinal lymphoma; however, in the case of PGL, the use of chemotherapy even without rituximab achieves similar results. Our conclusions are limited by the small numbers of the study

scholarly journals EZH2 Upregulation Is Associated with Unfavorable Prognosis in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma through Potential RUNX3 Downregulation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5301-5301
Author(s):  
Denise Peker ◽  
Samara Roman-Holba ◽  
Yuri Kwon ◽  
Jennifer Gordetsky ◽  
Amitkumar Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Rna Expression ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Introduction: The runt-related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) is a downstream effector of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling pathway, and has critical roles in apoptosis, angiogenesis, cell migration and invasion. Putative tumor suppressor activity of RUNX3 has been presented extensively in the literature, particularly in solid epithelial tumors and recently in lymphoma with loss of expression favoring tumorigenesis and/or prognosis, but its role in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has not been studied. Enhancer of zeste homolog-2 (EZH2), a histone methyltransferase, has been shown to mediate silencing of RUNX3. RUNX3 downregulation due to EZH2 upregulation has been shown in various solid tumors. In the present study, we investigated the EZH2 and RUNX3 RNA expression status in DLBCL and its impact on clinical outcome. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed and 169 cases of DLBCL treated with chemoimmunotherapy between 2003 and 2013 were included. Immunodeficiency- or EBV-associated and MYC+ LBCL were excluded. Archived formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tissue samples were retrieved and RNA was extracted using commercially available kits. We correlated the RNA expression levels for EZH2 and RUNX3 in various sites using quantitative real-time PCR (Taqman assay) and custom designed primers for each gene. Control samples included three benign lymph nodes free of a neoplastic process. Results: We identified 66 cases of DLBCL, including25 nodal DLBCL and 41 extranodal DLBCL, with sufficient RNA extracted. Extranodal locations included testis (n=12), orbit (n=6), primary central nervous system (n=5), bone (n=3), breast (n=2) and viscera (n=13). The median age was 64 years (range 29- 81 years) with a female to male ratio of 0.4 (F=20 and M=46). Median overall survival (OS) was 28 months (1-156 months). Immunophenotypic subtype based on cell-of-origin using Hans algorithm was available in 63 cases; 34 cases were germinal center B-cell (GCB) type while 29 were non-GCB type. Treatment data was available in 63 cases and all patients received R-CHOP as initial therapy except three patients who died shortly after diagnosis. Forty-four cases showed higher expression of EZH2 and RUNX3 when compared to normal lymph nodes (p < 0.05). Nineteen out of 44 cases showed increased EZH2 and decreased RUNX3 expression (Group 1) while EZH2 expression was lower than RUNX3 in the remaining cases (Group 2). The remaining 22 DLBCL cases did not show significant correlation for expression (Group 3). Overall survival was significantly low in Group 1 compared to Group 2 and Group 3 (p =0.030 and p=0.026, respectively). There was no difference for OS between Groups 2 and 3 (p>0.05) (Figure 1). Conclusions: Our results showed that decreased RUNX3 RNA expression is associated with EZH2 overexpression and poses an adverse prognostic factor in DLBCL. Larger studies are needed to establish the prognostic and therapeutic utility of EZH2 and/or RUNX3. Disclosures Mehta: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Roche Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Forero:University of Alabama at Birmingham: Research Funding. Costa:Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Bone Marrow Molecular Markers Associated with Relapsed/Refractory Activated B-Cell-Like Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Di Wang ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Hui-Ying Liu ◽  
Di Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Molecular Markers ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Bone Marrow Aspirate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Finding ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Large B Cell

Activated B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (ABC-DLBCL) is a common subtype of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and is very likely to infiltrate the bone marrow. Over 30% of patients are converted to relapsed/refractory DLBCL after first-line rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone therapy, with a poor prognosis. Our aim was to identify molecular markers that might be utilized to predict relapsed/refractory ABC-DLBCL patients. Hence, we collected bone marrow aspirate smears from 202 patients with ABC-DLBCL and detected expression of bone marrow molecular marker proteins by immunocytochemistry. Signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat)3, nuclear factor (NF)-κB p65, Syk, Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), and Bcl2 proteins were strongly expressed in bone marrow aspirate smears of ABC-DLBCL patients. The same smear could present positive expression of multiple proteins simultaneously. Positive combinations of protein expression were associated with resistance. The most significant finding was that the Stat3+NF-κB+ group developed resistance, which was significantly higher than that of the Stat3-NF-κB-group (80 vs. 14%). There was a significant difference in two-year relapse-free survival between protein-positive and protein-negative combinations of Stat3-NF-κB (P = 0.005), Bcl2-Stat3 (P = 0.009), Bcl2-Pax5 (P = 0.003), and BTK-Syk (P < 0.001). Thus, we detected key molecules in multiple signaling pathways in bone marrow aspirate smears. At the same time, the results provide further clinical evidence of ABC-DLBCL drug-resistant molecules and provide a theoretical basis for rational second-line treatment after drug resistance.

Outcome of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with First-line Chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (01) ◽  
pp. 03-09
Author(s):  
Zulfia Zinat Chowdhury ◽  
Tamanna Bahar ◽  
Shaila Rahman ◽  
Salina Haque ◽  
A K M Mynul Islam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Retrospective Data Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Large B Cell

Background: Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), most common Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) variety, is an aggressive, fast-growing form comprising up to 40% of all cases globally. Objective: To observe the treatment outcome of different subtypes of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) after first-line chemotherapy and also the association with IHC, presenting age, sex, and IPI score with outcome. Methodology: This is a retrospective data analysis included all DLBCL patients registered in the department of Haematology of National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital (NICRH) between July 2016 to June 2019. Results: Total 188 cases were included in this study and mean age was 48 years with a Standard deviation of 15 years with Male (69.1%) predominance. We divide the cases into three different entities of DLBCL [Germinal Centre B-cell like (GCB), Non-GCB and others (NOS) among them Non-GCB variety was the prevalent (47.3%) one. After first line   chemotherapy 52.1% complete remission with 7% death was observed in overall outcome. There was no significant difference in outcome among different types of DLBCL after chemotherapy based on Han’s algorithm. Rituximab with CHOP has significantly better outcome than CHOP alone arm (p: 0.021). Conclusion: This limited database study of NICRH will help to ascertain the outcome of DLBCL after first-line chemotherapy in Bangladesh.

Clinical Significance of Immunohistochemical Markers of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma In the Rituximab Era.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1800-1800
Author(s):  
Miyuki Hayama ◽  
Masataka Okamoto ◽  
Yuki Hagiwara ◽  
Ken Tanae ◽  
Mika Kohri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Survival Ratio ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Abstract 1800 Rituximab combination chemotherapy has significantly improved the treatment outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Therefore, the prognostic factors of DLBCL in the rituximab era are different from previously reported prognostic factors. Biological prognostic markers have been analyzed to help understand the biologic basis of treatment outcome. Hans, et al. reported that patients with non-germinal center B-cell like (GCB)-type DLBCL had a significantly poorer prognosis than those with GCB-type DLBCL in the pre-rituximab era. In patients who received rituximab combination chemotherapy, there is a report that did not find a difference in survival ratio between those with GCB DLBCL or non-GCB DLBCL. On the other hand, there was a report that found a difference in survival ratio between patients with GCB DLBCL and those with non-GCB DLBCL. In the present study, we compared the prognostic factors of DLBCL between patients who received CHOP-like chemotherapy and those who received rituximab combined with CHOP-like therapy. The subjects were 204 DLBCL patients who underwent rituximab + CHOP-like therapy and in whom markers could be analyzed. We evaluated CD5, CD10, BCL2, BCL6, and MUM1 expression by immunohistochemistry. One hundred forty-six DLBCL patients who underwent CHOP-like therapy were assumed as historical controls. The median age was 52 years in both groups. In the R-CHOP-like and CHOP-like groups, patients with stage III or IV disease comprised 75% and 67%, respectively, patients with performance status3a2 comprised 28% and 20%, respectively, and patients with serum LDH >normal comprised 60% and 77%, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the CHOP-like group and R-CHOP-like group. BCL2 was positive in 85(63%) of the 134 patients who received the R-CHOP-like regimen and in 66 (46%) of the 142 patients who received the CHOP-like regimen. When the 202 patients who received the R-CHOP-like regimen were divided into the GCB group and the non-GCB group, the GCB group consisted of 92 patients (46%) and the non-GCB group consisted of 110 patients. The relationships between immunohistological markers and outcome among the patients with DLBCL who received CHOP-like therapy were studied. CD5, CD10, and BCL6 had no prognostic impact on 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. When the patients were divided into the GCB DLBCL and non-GCB DLBCL groups, the 5-year OS of the GCB group was 78% and that of the non-GCB group was 57% (p<0.05). The 5-year PFS of the GCB group was 73% and that of the non-GCB group was 52% (p<0.05). The 5-year OS rate of the BCL2-positive and -negative groups was 61% and 74%, respectively (p<0.05). The 5-year PFS rate of the BCL2-positive and -negative groups was 55% and 70%, respectively (p<0.05). Thus, among patients who received the CHOP-like regimen, the BCL2-positive group showed significantly poorer prognosis than the BCL2-negative group. Next, the effect of rituximab with chemotherapy was examined. CD5, CD10, BCL2, BCL6, and MUM-1 had no prognostic impact on 5-year OS and PFS rates. When the patients were divided into the GCB DLBCL (n=92) and non-GCB DLBCL (n=110) groups, the 5-year OS of the GCB group was 74% and that of the non-GCB group was 75%, showing no significant difference. The 5-year PFS of the GCB group was 71% and the 5-year PFS of the non-GCB group was 69%, showing no significant difference. In the rituximab era, BCL2, MUM1 and non-GCB were not prognostic factors. As to reports on patients with DLBCL who received rituximab combination chemotherapy, there was a report in which the cases were separated into the GCB-type DLBCL and non-GCB-type DLBCL groups and compared. Fu, et al. reported that the survival of patients with GCB-type DLBCL was still superior to that of patients with non-GCB-type DLBCL in the rituximab era. However, other reports did not find a difference in survival ratio between those with GCB-type DLBCL or non-GCB-type DLBCL. In conclusion, the finding of improved OS and PFS with the addition of rituximab indicates that new biomarkers should be studied. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Comparison Between CD20-Negative and CD20-Positive Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma; Characteristics and Clinical Outcome

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4891-4891
Author(s):  
Jungmin Jo ◽  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Yongchel Ahn ◽  
Seong Joon Park ◽  
Shin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Abstract 4891 Background CD20 is a non-glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed on the surface of all mature B-cells. CD20 is expressed on all stages of B cell development except the first and last. However, complete lack of CD20 expression occurred in a few cases without previous rituximab (R-) treatment. The immunohistochemostry (IHC) studies which we used were not perfect for confirmation of expression. However, we intended to investigate characteristics and clinical outcome of CD20-negative diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not detected with usual method, and to compare with CD20-positive. Methods The records of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma patient registry were reviewed in Asan Medical Center. Between September 2003 and February 2009, a total of 407 patients were diagnosed DLBCL and 16 patients (3.9%) out of 407 confirmed CD20-negative DLBCL by IHC. The rest of patients (n=391) were CD20-positive and unconfirmed cases were excluded. Retrospective analysis of complete response (CR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) was performed. Results The median age was 60.5 years old (range 31–81) in CD20-negative patients. Ten patients were males. The Ann Arbor stage was I in 3 patients, II in 3 patients, and III or IV in 10. Six patients were low risk group, 7 patients in intermediate, and 3 in high risk group according to international prognostic index (IPI). Most of patients (62.5%) received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristin, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy in CD20-negative and 295 patients (75.4%) with R-CHOP in CD20-positive DLBCL. The Baseline characteristics was not different in both groups except Hans classifier (p=0.02). With a median follow-up time of 32.3 months (range 0.5–83.4), the CR rate was 73.5%, the 3-year OS was 69.5%, and 3-year DFS 74.2% in all patients. CD20-positive and CD20 negative groups had a CR rate of 73.7%, 68.8% (p=0.146), respectively, a 3-year OS of 70.7%, 40.0% (p=0.003), a 3-year DFS of 75.4%, 44.6% (p< 0.001), respectively. The 3-year OS and DFS also had significant difference with adjusted IPI (p<0.001, respectively). Conclusions CD20-negaive DLBLC was not infrequently with usual IHC method (around 4%). The survival outcome was poor compared with CD20-positive DLBLC because of high relapse rate. It was caused without rituximab treatment in CD20-negative. Development of novel target agents like rituximab should be explored to improve outcome and maintain the CR status of CD20-negative DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of Dose-Adjusted R-EPOCH Vs R-CHOP in Treatment of Diffuse Large B- Cell Lymphoma with High Risk Features

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4790-4790
Author(s):  
Bhagirathbhai Dholaria ◽  
Prakash Vishnu ◽  
Yenni Alejandro Moreno-Vanegas ◽  
Aaron C. Spaulding ◽  
Nancy N. Diehl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Red Cell ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with high-risk features carries a poor prognosis despite treatment with immunochemotherapy regimen incorporating rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP). Hence, dose adjusted rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (DA.R-EPOCH), a higher intensity regimen, is suggested as an upfront treatment of high-risk DLBCL. In our study, we analyzed the outcomes in a prospectively followed cohort of patients with de novo high-risk DLBCL who received DA.R-EPOCH, and compared them to the patients who received R-CHOP. Furthermore, we conducted a cost analysis to determine which of the two treatments produces a larger financial burden. Method Patients diagnosed with DLBCL who received chemo-immunotherapy at our center between January 2011 to December 2016 were included in the analysis. High-risk DLBCL was defined by the presence of any of the following features at diagnosis: NCCN- IPI score ≥4, tumor measuring ≥5 cm, MYC ± BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangement by FISH or MYC overexpression (>40% by immunohistochemistry [IHC]), Ki-67 index ≥80% and non-GCB immunophenotype by Hans algorithm. Responses were evaluated at middle and end of chemotherapy. Overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated. For the cost analysis, standardized costs were obtained from Mayo Clinic Florida cost data warehouse based upon patient encounters and treatments. Report cost-to-charge ratios were multiplied by the charges for all hospital billed services, and all resulting costs were adjusted to 2016 dollars with the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Implicit Price Deflator. Patients who did not receive their complete planned treatment at our facility were excluded from the cost analysis. Results Of 80 patients with high-risk DLBCL, 52 (65%) patients were treated with R-CHOP and 28 (35%) with DA.R-EPOCH. The median follow-up was 11.2 months (range: 0.7- 151.3 months). The planned treatment completion rate and complete remission rate at the end of treatment were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in OS and PFS among the patients treated with DA.R-EPOCH compared to R-CHOP. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.79 (95% CI- 0.28-2.29, P=0.67) and OS was 0.86 (95% CI- 0.26-2.78, P=0.80) (Figure 1). In Cox-regression analysis, low baseline albumin, ECOG performance status ≥2, above-normal LDH, high NCCN- IPI and low cumulative chemotherapy doses were associated with poor OS and PFS. Overall incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, neuropathy, and unplanned hospitalizations were similar between the two treatment groups. Patients treated with DA.R-EPOCH required more red cell transfusions during the treatment (P=0.004). The total mean cost associated with DA.R-EPOCH and R-CHOP regimens was $106,940 ± $39,351 and $58,509 ± 24,588, respectively (P<0.001). The cost associated with hospital services, laboratory testing and evaluation and management were higher in DA.R-EPCOH group compared to R-CHOP group (P<0.001) (Table 2). Conclusion Our study showed that there was no significant difference in PFS and OS of patients with DLBCL with high-risk features when treated with R-CHOP compared to DA.R-EPOCH. DA.R-EPOCH was associated with higher red cell transfusion requirement and treatment related expenses. A prospective randomized comparison is warranted between these two regimens specifically for patients with high-risk DLBCL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Genetic polymorphism and transcriptional regulation of CREBBP gene in patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haifeng Zhao ◽  
Yutian Kan ◽  
Xinyuan Wang ◽  
Leiyuan Chen ◽  
Peng Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphism ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Mrna Level ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Crebbp Gene ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract In the present study, we aim to examine the relationship between genetic polymorphism and transcriptional expression of cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREBBP) and the risk of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Two hundred and fifty healthy individuals and 248 DLBCL patients participated in the present study. The CREBBP rs3025684 polymorphism was detected by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). The mRNA expression of CREBBP was tested by the real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The allele A frequency of CREBBP rs3025684 in DLBCL patients was obviously higher than that of controls (P=0.01). No significant difference was detected between CREBBP rs3025684 polymorphism and clinical characteristics of DLBCL patients when subgrouped according to different parameters. The results demonstrated that the allele A of CREBBP rs3025684 increased the susceptibility to DLBCL (P=0.004), with a worse overall survival (OS) rate (P=0.002), a worse progression-free survival (PFS) rate (P=0.033) and poor prognosis (P=0.003) in DLCBL patients. Furthermore, the expression of CREBBP mRNA was considerably decreased in DLBCL patients as compared with controls (P<0.001), and the expression in patients with GG genotype was up-regulated in comparison with patients with GA and AA genotype (P=0.016 and P=0.001, respectively). However, no statistical differences were found in OS (P=0.201) and PFS (P=0.353) between the lower CREBBP mRNA level subgroup and higher CREBBP mRNA level subgroup. These data suggested that the CREBBP gene may be an important prognostic factor in DLBCL patients and perform an essential function in the development of DLBCL.

scholarly journals Correlation of Gut Microbiota with Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li YUAN ◽  
Yan ZHANG ◽  
Wei ZHANG ◽  
Chong WEI ◽  
Wei WANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lactobacillus Fermentum ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract The composition and diversity of gut microbiota (GMB) have been reported to be associated with the occurrence and progression as well as treatment outcome in many diseases. Our previous study demonstrated that the GMB was changed significantly and Proteobacteria phylum was the dominant microbiota in untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients compared with healthy controls. This study aims to investigate the association of GMB with treatment outcomes in patients with DLBCL. 17 Patients with DLBCL and 18 healthy volunteers were recruited at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The GMB of fecal samples was analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. We examined GMB compositions in 3 contexts: DLBCL patients (17) compared with healthy controls (18), DLBCL patients pretreatment (17) compared with posttreatment (17), and the association of GMB with chemotherapy treatment outcomes (10 complete remissions, 7 non-complete remisisons). We found that the GMB was changed considerably in posttreatment DLBCL patients. More specifically, the abundance of Proteobacteria phylum decreased significantly in patients following 4 courses of chemotherapy, although no significant difference from healthy comtrols(CG). In addition, the abundance of Lactobacillaceae, Lactobacillus, Lactobacillus fermentum were significantly higher and became dominant gut microbiota in DLBCL patients with complete remission, ,which may be associated with chemotherapy intervention and tumor extinction. Lactobacillus fermentum may have an inhibitory effect on DLBCL contributing to the disease remisison. The composition of gut microbiota in DLBCL patients changed from the healthy condition to the pretreatment condition, and then turned to the posttreatment condition after chemotherapy, which echoed the pathological succession of gut microbiota in DLBCL patients. Results from our current study together with previous research will provide a rational foundation for further investigation on the pathogenesis of gut microbiota in DLBCL to facilitate drug development and foster novel strategy for the better management of patients with DLBCL.

Clinical significance of nuclear kappa B and chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18533-e18533
Author(s):  
Byung Woog Kang ◽  
Jong Gwang Kim ◽  
Yee Soo Chae ◽  
Soo Jung Lee ◽  
Sang Kyun Sohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Chemokine Receptor ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cxcr4 Expression ◽  
Chemokine Receptor Cxcr4 ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Large B Cell

e18533 Background: This study investigated the activation of nuclear factor kB (NFkB) and the chemokine receptor CXCR4 co-expression in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received rituximab-based therapy. Methods: Seventy patients with DLBCL and treated with rituximab-CHOP (RCHOP) were included. Tissue microarray blocks were created from 70 cases of DLBCL. Sections were stained with antibodies to IKKα, p-IkB, p50, p52, and CXCR4. To classify cases of DLBCL into GCB (germinal center B-cell-like) and non-GCB, additional immunohistochemical expression of CD10, bcl-6, or MUM1 has been used in this study. A numeric intensity score of 0-3 was assigned each case. Negative was scored if 0/+1 and positive was scored if 2+/3+. Results: The median age was 66.5 years (range, 17-87) and 58.6% were male. Twenty-seven patients (38.6%) had stage III and IV at diagnosis. Twenty-three patients (32.9%) were categorized as high or high-intermediate risk according to their IPI. The overall incidence of BM involvement was 5.7%. Positive expression for NFkB and CXCR4 were more than 80%. In NFkB and CXCR4 status, there are no significant difference between GCB and non-GCB. High NFkB expression is associated with CXCR4 expression and they are co-expressed in about two thirds of patients. With a median follow-up duration of 28.7 months (range, 0.1-76.1), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rate was 67.4% and 79.8%, respectively. Neither NFkB nor CXCR4 were associated with DLBCL outcomes. Conclusions: In concolusion, none of the NFkB and CXCR4 expression profiles investigated in this study was found to be an independent prognostic marker for Korean patients with DLBCL. However, further studies on a larger scale are warranted to clarify the role of NFkB and CXCR4 as a prognostic marker.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document