scholarly journals Flubendiamide induces transgenerational compound eye alterations in Drosophila melanogaster

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 142-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saurabh Sarkar ◽  
Sumedha Roy
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Compound Eye ◽  
Compound Eyes ◽  
Environmental Toxicity ◽  
Induced Changes ◽  
Bristle Pattern

Abstract Pesticides are one of the major sources of environmental toxicity and contamination. This study reports potential of lepidopteran insecticide formulation, named Flubendiamide, in altering compound eye architecture and bristle pattern orientation for four consecutive generations (P, F1, F2 and F3) in a non-target diptera, Drosophila melanogaster Meigen (Diptera: Drosophilidae). The concentrations of the insecticide formulation selected for treatment of Drosophila (50 and 100 μg/mL) were in accordance with practiced Indian field doses (50 μg/mL for rice and 100 μg/mL for cotton). This study showed trans-generational insecticide-induced changes in the morphology of the compound eyes of the non-target insect D. melanogaster.

scholarly journals Homothorax controls a binary Rhodopsin switch in Drosophila ocelli

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. e1009460
Author(s):  
Abhishek Kumar Mishra ◽  
Cornelia Fritsch ◽  
Roumen Voutev ◽  
Richard S. Mann ◽  
Simon G. Sprecher
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Visual Perception ◽  
Compound Eye ◽  
Polarized Light ◽  
Fruit Fly ◽  
Compound Eyes ◽  
Ancestral Gene ◽  
Evolutionary Diversification ◽  
Opsin Genes ◽  
A Cell

Visual perception of the environment is mediated by specialized photoreceptor (PR) neurons of the eye. Each PR expresses photosensitive opsins, which are activated by a particular wavelength of light. In most insects, the visual system comprises a pair of compound eyes that are mainly associated with motion, color or polarized light detection, and a triplet of ocelli that are thought to be critical during flight to detect horizon and movements. It is widely believed that the evolutionary diversification of compound eye and ocelli in insects occurred from an ancestral visual organ around 500 million years ago. Concurrently, opsin genes were also duplicated to provide distinct spectral sensitivities to different PRs of compound eye and ocelli. In the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, Rhodopsin1 (Rh1) and Rh2 are closely related opsins that originated from the duplication of a single ancestral gene. However, in the visual organs, Rh2 is uniquely expressed in ocelli whereas Rh1 is uniquely expressed in outer PRs of the compound eye. It is currently unknown how this differential expression of Rh1 and Rh2 in the two visual organs is controlled to provide unique spectral sensitivities to ocelli and compound eyes. Here, we show that Homothorax (Hth) is expressed in ocelli and confers proper rhodopsin expression. We find that Hth controls a binary Rhodopsin switch in ocelli to promote Rh2 expression and repress Rh1 expression. Genetic and molecular analysis of rh1 and rh2 supports that Hth acts through their promoters to regulate Rhodopsin expression in the ocelli. Finally, we also show that when ectopically expressed in the retina, hth is sufficient to induce Rh2 expression only at the outer PRs in a cell autonomous manner. We therefore propose that the diversification of rhodpsins in the ocelli and retinal outer PRs occurred by duplication of an ancestral gene, which is under the control of Homothorax.

Spreading of hemiretinal projections in the ipsilateral tectum following unilateral enucleation: a study of optic nerve regeneration in Xenopus with one compound eye

Development ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-276
Author(s):  
Charles Straznicky ◽  
David Tay
Keyword(s):  
Optic Nerve ◽  
Nerve Regeneration ◽  
Compound Eye ◽  
Rapid Expansion ◽  
Compound Eyes ◽  
Optic Nerve Regeneration ◽  
Xenopus Embryos ◽  
Retinotectal Projections ◽  
Optic Fibre

Right compound eyes were formed in Xenopus embryos at stages 32–33 by the fusion of two nasal (NN), two ventral (VV) or two temporal (TT) halves. Shortly after metamorphosis the optic nerve from the compound eye was sectioned and the left intact eye removed. The retinotectal projections from the compound eye to the contralateral and ipsilateral tecta were studied by [3H]proline autoradiography and electrophysiological mapping between 6 weeks and 5 months after the postmetamorphic surgery. The results showed that NN and VV eyes projected to the entire extent of both tecta. In contrast, optic fibre projection from TT eyes, although more extensive than the normal temporal hemiretinal projection, failed to cover the caudomedial portion of the tecta. The visuotectal projections in all three combinations corresponded to typical reduplicated maps to be expected from such compound eyes, where each of the hemiretinae projected across the contralateral and ipsilateral tecta in an overlapping fashion. The rapid expansion of the hemiretinal projections of the compound eyes in the ipsilateral tectum following the removal of the resident optic fibre projection suggests that tectal markers may be carried and deployed by the incoming optic fibres themselves.

The transmembrane protein, Tincar, is involved in the development of the compound eye in Drosophila melanogaster

2005 ◽  
Vol 215 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Hirota ◽  
Kazunobu Sawamoto ◽  
Kuniaki Takahashi ◽  
Ryu Ueda ◽  
Hideyuki Okano
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Compound Eye ◽  
Transmembrane Protein

scholarly journals Differences in orthodenticle expression promote ommatidial size variation between Drosophila species

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Montserrat Torres-Oliva ◽  
Elisa Buchberger ◽  
Alexandra D. Buffry ◽  
Maike Kittelmann ◽  
Lauren Sumner-Rooney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural Variation ◽  
Gene Expression Analysis ◽  
Compound Eye ◽  
Chromosomal Region ◽  
Size Variation ◽  
Compound Eyes ◽  
Positional Candidate ◽  
Eye Size ◽  
Drosophila Mauritiana ◽  
Differential Timing

The compound eyes of insects exhibit extensive variation in ommatidia number and size, which affects how they see and underlies adaptations in their vision to different environments and lifestyles. However, very little is known about the genetic and developmental bases underlying differences in compound eye size. We previously showed that the larger eyes of Drosophila mauritiana compared to D. simulans is caused by differences in ommatidia size rather than number. Furthermore, we identified an X-linked chromosomal region in D. mauritiana that results in larger eyes when introgressed into D. simulans. Here, we used a combination of fine-scale mapping and gene expression analysis to further investigate positional candidate genes on the X chromosome. We found that orthodenticle is expressed earlier in D. mauritiana than in D. simulans during ommatidial maturation in third instar larvae, and we further show that this gene is required for the correct organisation and size of ommatidia in D. melanogaster. Using ATAC-seq, we have identified several candidate eye enhancers of otd as well as potential direct targets of this transcription factor that are differentially expressed between D. mauritiana and D. simulans. Taken together, our results suggest that differential timing of otd expression contributes to natural variation in ommatidia size between D. mauritiana and D. simulans, which provides new insights into the mechanisms underlying the regulation and evolution of compound eye size in insects.

The development of the retinotectal projection in Xenopus with one compound eye

Development ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 775-787
Author(s):  
Joan D. Feldman ◽  
R. M. Gaze
Keyword(s):  
Compound Eye ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Compound Eyes ◽  
Stages Of Development ◽  
Ipsilateral Side ◽  
Retinotectal Projection ◽  
Xenopus Embryos ◽  
Donor Embryo

Double-nasal and double-temporal compound eyes were constructed in Xenopus embryos at stages 32 and 37/38. A particular half was removed from the host eye anlage and replaced with the opposite half-eye from the contralateral side of a donor embryo. Control operations consisted of removing a half-eye and replacing it with a similar half from the ipsilateral side of the donor embryo. Whereas in control animals, each half-eye projected its fibres to the appropriate half-tectum, in operated animals each half of the compound eye spread its optic teiminals across the entire rostrocaudal extent of the dorsal tectal surface. The area of tectal surface covered by ganglion fibre terminals was similar in operated animals mapped at successive stages of development to that previously observed in normal animals at equivalent stages. Therefore the factors responsible for the extended distribution of fibre terminals from each half of a compound eye must exist at least from mid-tadpole life, and thereafter be continuously present throughout development.

The spatial organization of epidermal structures: hairy establishes the geometrical pattern of Drosophila leg bristles by delimiting the domains of achaete expression

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.V. Orenic ◽  
L.I. Held ◽  
S.W. Paddock ◽  
S.B. Carroll
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Precursor Cells ◽  
Geometrical Pattern ◽  
Leg Development ◽  
Puparium Formation ◽  
Late Expression ◽  
Bristle Pattern

The spatial organization of Drosophila melanogaster epidermal structures in embryos and adults constitutes a classic model system for understanding how the two dimensional arrangement of particular cell types is generated. For example, the legs of the Drosophila melanogaster adult are covered with bristles, which in most segments are arranged in longitudinal rows. Here we elucidate the key roles of two regulatory genes, hairy and achaete, in setting up this periodic bristle pattern. We show that achaete is expressed during pupal leg development in a dynamic pattern which changes, by approximately 6 hours after puparium formation, into narrow longitudinal stripes of 3–4 cells in width, each of which represents a field of cells (proneural field) from which bristle precursor cells are selected. This pattern of gene expression foreshadows the adult bristle pattern and is established in part through the function of the hairy gene, which also functions in patterning other adult sense organs. In pupal legs, hairy is expressed in four longitudinal stripes, located between every other pair of achaete stripes. We show that in the absence of hairy function achaete expression expands into the interstripe regions that normally express hairy, fusing the two achaete stripes and resulting in extra-wide stripes of achaete expression. This misexpression of achaete, in turn, alters the fields of potential bristle precursor cells which leads to the misalignment of bristle rows in the adult. This function of hairy in patterning achaete expression is distinct from that in the wing in which hairy suppresses late expression of achaete but has no effect on the initial patterning of achaete expression. Thus, the leg bristle pattern is apparently regulated at two levels: a global regulation of the hairy and achaete expression patterns which partitions the leg epidermis into striped zones (this study) and a local regulation (inferred from other studies on the selection of neural precursor cells) that involves refinement steps which may control the alignment and spacing of bristle cells within these zones.

Interactions between compound and normal eye projections in dually innervated tectum: a study of optic nerve regeneration in Xenopus

Development ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-174
Author(s):  
Charles Straznicky ◽  
David Tay
Keyword(s):  
Optic Nerve ◽  
Nerve Regeneration ◽  
Compound Eye ◽  
Compound Eyes ◽  
Lateral Region ◽  
Optic Nerve Regeneration ◽  
Xenopus Embryos ◽  
Retinotectal Projections ◽  
Two Populations

Right compound eyes were formed in Xenopus embryos at tailbud stages by the fusion of two nasal (NN), two temporal (TT) or two ventral (VV) halves. The left eye was kept intact. Two to four weeks after metamorphosis the optic nerve from the intact eye was severed to induce bilateral optic nerve regeneration. The contralateral retinotectal projections from the compound eye and the induced ipsilateral projections from the intact eye to the same (dually innervated) tectum were studied by [3H]proline autoradiography and visuotectal mapping from 3 to 6 months after the postmetamorphic surgery. The results showed that the NN, TT and VV projections, in the presence of optic fibres from the intact eye failed to spread across the whole extent of the dually innervated tectum. Unexpectedly the bulk of the regenerating projection from the intact eye was confined to the previously uninnervated parts of the dually innervated tecta, the caudomedial region in TT, the rostrolateral region in NN and the lateral region in VV eye animals. The partial segregation of the two populations of optic fibres in the dually innervated tectum has been taken as a further indication of the role of fibre-fibre and fibre-tectum interactions in retinotectal map formation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document