Improvement in glycaemic parameters using SGLT-2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist in combination in an adolescent with diabetes mellitus and Prader-Willi syndrome: a case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 951-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toby Candler ◽  
David McGregor ◽  
Kruthika Narayan ◽  
Chris Moudiotis ◽  
Christine P. Burren

AbstractObjectivesPrader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) is characterised by hyperphagia often leading to obesity; a known risk factor for insulin resistance and type 2 (T2) diabetes. We present a prepubertal girl with PWS who developed diabetes.Case presentationOur case was diagnosed with PWS in infancy following investigation for profound central hypotonia and feeding difficulties. She commenced growth hormone (GH) aged 8 years for short stature and treatment improved linear growth. At age 12 years, she presented with polydipsia, polyuria and vulvovaginitis. She was overweight (BMI SDS +1.43). Diabetes was diagnosed (Blood glucose = 24.2 mmol/L, HbA1c = 121 mmol/mol or 13.2%). She was not acidotic and had negative blood ketones. Autoantibodies typical of type 1 diabetes were negative. She was initially treated with basal bolus insulin regime. GH was discontinued 3 months later due to concerns regarding GH-induced insulin resistance. Off GH, insulin requirements reduced to zero, allowing Metformin monotherapy. However off GH, she reported significant lethargy with static growth and increased weight. Combinations of Metformin with differing insulin regimes did not improve glucose levels. Liraglutide (GLP-1 agonist) and Metformin did not improve glucose levels nor her weight. Liraglutide and Empaglifozin (SGLT-2 inhibitor) therapy used in combination were well tolerated and demonstrated rapid normalisation of blood glucose and improvement in her HbA1c to within target (48 mmol/mol) which was sustained after 6 months of treatment.ConclusionsNewer treatments for type 2 diabetes (e. g. GLP-1 agonists or SGLT-2 inhibitors) offer potential treatment options for those with diabetes and PWS when conventional treatments are ineffective.

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 3699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norikiyo Honzawa ◽  
Kei Fujimoto ◽  
Tadahiro Kitamura

To date, type 2 diabetes is considered to be a “bi-hormonal disorder” rather than an “insulin-centric disorder,” suggesting that glucagon is as important as insulin. Although glucagon increases hepatic glucose production and blood glucose levels, paradoxical glucagon hypersecretion is observed in diabetes. Recently, insulin resistance in pancreatic α cells has been proposed to be associated with glucagon dysregulation. Moreover, cell autonomous dysfunction of α cells is involved in the etiology of diabetes. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the physiological and pathological roles of glucagon.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 66-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadim V. Klimontov ◽  
Natalia E. Myakina

Aim. To assess the relationship of glucose variability (GV) and renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes on basal-bolus insulin therapy.Materials and methods. We observed 101 females with type 2 diabetes, aged 47–79 years, with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Insulin was combined with metformin in 45 of these women. The mean glucose and standard deviation, continuous overlapping net glucose action, lability index, J-index, low blood glucose index (LBGI), high blood glucose index (HBGI), M-value and mean absolute glucose (MAG) were calculated based on the results of blinded continuous glucose monitoring. The prevalence of episodes of low interstitial glucose (3.9 and 2.8 mmol/L) of at least 20-min duration was estimated.Results. Patients with a GFR of 30–44 mL/min/1.73 m2 had significantly lower HBGI, J-index, MAG and M-value compared with those with better filtration (all p 0.05); LBGI was not dependent on GFR. The GFR values were weakly and positively correlated with HBGI, J-index, M-value and MAG. Multiple regression analysis showed that GFR is an independent predictor of MAG (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found in the prevalence of episodes of low interstitial glucose between patients with different GFR ranges.Conclusions. GV parameters are related to renal function in type 2 diabetic women on basal-bolus insulin therapy. Patients with stage 3b chronic kidney disease have reduced GV, predominantly in the hyperglycaemic band, compared with those with better filtration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. e242960
Author(s):  
Aaisha Saqib ◽  
Yik Man ◽  
Rayan Ismail ◽  
Dulmini Kariyawasam

A 42 year-old Caribbean woman with, known type 2 diabetes, was admitted with worsening fatigue, arthritis and rashes. She was diagnosed with multisystem systemic lupus erythematosus and was initially treated with systemic steroids. During this admission, she had persistently elevated capillary glucose levels with insulin requirements over 8 U/kg/day that still did not control her blood glucose levels. Due to her profound hyperglycaemia, serum samples of fasting insulin, C-peptide, paired with blood glucose were analysed, which confirmed significant hyperinsulinaemia. Further analysis confirmed the presence of insulin receptor antibodies consistent with type B insulin resistance.She was started on intravenous cyclophosphamide (Euro-Lupus regimen) along with continuous glucose monitoring system. After completing her six cycles of cyclophosphamide, she no longer required insulin treatment. The goal of therapy for our patient with confirmed type B insulin resistance was to manage hyperglycaemia with high doses of insulin until autoantibodies were eliminated with immunosuppressive therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 722-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Lorenzo-González ◽  
Elena Atienza-Sánchez ◽  
David Reyes-Umpierrez ◽  
Priyathama Vellanki ◽  
Georgia M. Davis ◽  
...  

Objective: DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) have been shown to be effective for the management of inpatient diabetes. We report pooled data from 3 prospective studies using DPP-4i in general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We combined data from 3 randomized studies comparing DPP-4i alone or in combination with basal insulin or a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Medicine (n = 266) and surgery (n = 319) patients admitted with a blood glucose (BG) between 140 and 400 mg/dL, treated with diet, oral agents, or low-dose insulin therapy were included. Patients received DPP-4i alone (n = 144), DPP-4i plus basal insulin (n = 158) or basal-bolus regimen (n = 283). All groups received correctional doses with rapid-acting insulin for BG >140 mg/dL. The primary endpoint was differences in mean daily BG between groups. Secondary endpoints included differences in hypoglycemia and hospital complications. Results: There were no differences in mean hospital daily BG among patients treated with DPP-4i alone (170 ± 37 mg/dL), DPP-4i plus basal (172 ± 42 mg/dL), or basalbolus (172 ± 43 mg/dL), P = .94; or in the percentage of BG readings within target of 70 to 180 mg/dL (63 ± 32%, 60 ± 31%, and 64 ± 28%, respectively; P = .42). There were no differences in length of stay or complications, but hypoglycemia was less common with DPP-4i alone (2%) compared to DPP-4i plus basal (9%) and basal-bolus (10%); P = .004. Conclusion: Treatment with DPP-4i alone or in combination with basal insulin is effective and results in a lower incidence of hypoglycemia compared to a basal-bolus insulin regimen in general medicine and surgery patients with T2D. Abbreviations: BG = blood glucose; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; DPP-4i = dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; OR = odds ratio; T2D = type 2 diabetes


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3540
Author(s):  
Luis M. Pérez-Belmonte ◽  
Michele Ricci ◽  
Jaime Sanz-Cánovas ◽  
Mercedes Millán-Gómez ◽  
Julio Osuna-Sánchez ◽  
...  

There is little evidence on the use of sodium−glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in hospitalised patients. This work aims to analyse the glycaemic and clinical efficacy and safety of empagliflozin continuation in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalised for acute decompensated heart failure. This real-world observational study includes patients treated using our in-hospital antihyperglycaemic regimens (basal-bolus insulin vs. empagliflozin-basal insulin) between 2017 and 2020. A propensity matching analysis was used to match a patient on one regimen with a patient on the other regimen. Our primary endpoints were the differences in glycaemic control, as measured via mean daily blood glucose levels, and differences in the visual analogue scale dyspnoea score, NT-proBNP levels, diuretic response, and cumulative urine output. Safety endpoints were also analysed. After a propensity matching analysis, 91 patients were included in each group. There were no differences in mean blood glucose levels (152.1 ± 17.8 vs. 155.2 ± 19.7 mg/dL, p = 0.289). At discharge, NT-proBNP levels were lower and cumulative urine output greater in the empagliflozin group versus the basal-bolus insulin group (1652 ± 501 vs. 2101 ± 522 pg/mL, p = 0.032 and 16,100 ± 1510 vs. 13,900 ± 1220 mL, p = 0.037, respectively). Patients who continued empagliflozin had a lower total number of hypoglycaemic episodes (36 vs. 64, p < 0.001). No differences were observed in adverse events, length of hospital stay, or in-hospital deaths. For patients with acute heart failure, an in-hospital antihyperglycaemic regimen that includes continuation of empagliflozin achieved effective glycaemic control, lower NT-proBNP, and greater urine output. It was also safer, as it reduced hypoglycaemic episodes without increasing other safety endpoints.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Pérez-Belmonte ◽  
Juan Gómez-Doblas ◽  
Mercedes Millán-Gómez ◽  
María López-Carmona ◽  
Ricardo Guijarro-Merino ◽  
...  

The use of noninsulin antihyperglycaemic drugs in the hospital setting has not yet been fully described. This observational study compared the efficacy and safety of the standard basal-bolus insulin regimen versus a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (linagliptin) plus basal insulin in medicine department inpatients in real-world clinical practice. We retrospectively enrolled non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia and no injectable treatments at home who were treated with a hospital antihyperglycaemic regimen (basal-bolus insulin, or linagliptin-basal insulin) between January 2016 and December 2017. Propensity score was used to match patients in both treatment groups and a comparative analysis was conducted to test the significance of differences between groups. After matched-pair analysis, 227 patients were included per group. No differences were shown between basal-bolus versus linagliptin-basal regimens for the mean daily blood glucose concentration after admission (standardized difference = 0.011), number of blood glucose readings between 100–140 mg/dL (standardized difference = 0.017) and >200 mg/dL (standardized difference = 0.021), or treatment failures (standardized difference = 0.011). Patients on basal-bolus insulin received higher total insulin doses and a higher daily number of injections (standardized differences = 0.298 and 0.301, respectively). Basal and supplemental rapid-acting insulin doses were similar (standardized differences = 0.003 and 0.012, respectively). There were no differences in hospital stay length (standardized difference = 0.003), hypoglycaemic events (standardized difference = 0.018), or hospital complications (standardized difference = 0.010) between groups. This study shows that in real-world clinical practice, the linagliptin-basal insulin regimen was as effective and safe as the standard basal-bolus regimen in non-critical patients with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia treated at home without injectable therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document