scholarly journals Greenfield and Brownfield Investments and Economic Growth: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Union Countries

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yilmaz Bayar

AbstractGlobal foreign direct investment flows in terms of greenfield and brownfield investments have increased during the recent three decades resulting from the accelerating globalization. The considerable increases in the flows of foreign direct investment have many eventualities for the national economies. This study investigates the mutual effects among greenfield and brownfield (mergers and acquisitions) investments and economic growth in Central and Eastern European Union countries during the 2003–2015 period employing panel data analysis. The findings revealed that both greenfield and brownfield investments had positive influence on the economic growth, but the influence of greenfield investments was found to be relatively higher. Furthermore, one-way causality was discovered from both greenfield and brownfield investments to the economic growth.

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 10013
Author(s):  
Suryahani Irma ◽  
Susilowati Indah ◽  
S. B. M. Nugroho

Income inequality is an important issue in Indonesia. Currently the income inequality in Indonesia is worse than in Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, although it is better than the Philippines and China. This study aimed to analyze the influence of economic growth per capita and foreign direct investment on income inequality in Indonesia.The study period was from 2007 to 2016. This study used a multiple linear regression. The results showed that economic growth per capita and foreign direct investmenthad positive influence onincome inequality. Therefore, the role of economic growth per capita and foreign direct investment will remain high in the future.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 5421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ștefan Cristian Gherghina ◽  
Liliana Nicoleta Simionescu ◽  
Oana Simona Hudea

This study aims to examine the link between foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and economic growth, also considering several institutional quality variables, as well as sustainable development goals (SDGs) set in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. By estimating panel data regression models for a sample of 11 Central and Eastern European countries, from 2003 to 2016, the empirical outcomes provide support for a non-linear relationship between FDI and gross domestic product per capita. Regarding institutional quality, it is found that control of corruption, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and voice and accountability positively influence growth, while political stability and absence of violence/terrorism is not statistically significant. Moreover, SDGs such as poverty, income distribution, education, innovation, transport infrastructure, and information technology are noteworthy drivers of growth. The outcomes of panel fully modified and dynamic ordinary least squares partly confirm the findings. The panel vector error-correction model Granger causalities provide support for a short-run one-way causal association running from FDI to growth and a long-run two-way causal connection among FDI and growth. Furthermore, in the long run, unidirectional causal relationships running from each institutional quality indicator to economic growth and FDI are set out.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daehee Bak ◽  
Chungshik Moon

AbstractThe positive influence of foreign direct investment (FDI) on host countries' economic growth has been widely debated. Given the mixed empirical evidence, scholars have sought to find the economic preconditions under which FDI spillovers are likely to occur and facilitate economic growth in the host countries. Those preconditions are not exogenously dictated but largely shaped by governments' policy preferences. Particularly in autocracies, an autocrat's policy preferences are the driving force that determines whether a host country is likely to be equipped with growth-friendly institutions and policies. We argue that such economic institutions and policies are dependent on the time horizons of autocrats in power. Our empirical analysis covering 64 autocratic countries from 1970 to 2005 supports our main argument that FDI has a positive effect on growth when autocratic time horizons are sufficiently long, and positive FDI spillovers mainly occur through the protection of property right institutions.


Media Ekonomi ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Desyana Eka Pramasty ◽  
Lydia Rosintan

<p><em>Economic growth is also one of the most important indicators</em><em> </em><em>in determining the standard of living of people in a country, because of an increase in the production capacity of an economy that is manifested in the form of national income. Economic growth is an indication of the success of economic development, measured by comparing, for example, for domestic size, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the current year with the previous year. This study aimed to analyze the factors that affect economic growth in seven ASEAN countries period from 1996-2013. This study use panel data analysis. The factors that affect economic growth in seven ASEAN countries, namely foreign debt, foreign direct investment, and the rate of inflation. Based on panel data analysis of the results showed that the foreign debt has negative effect and significant on economic growth, foreign direct investment has positive effect and significant on economic growth and inflation rate has negative effect and significant on economic growth in seven ASEAN countries period from 1996-2013.</em></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document