Experimental investigations on compressive, impact and prediction of stress-strain of fly ash-geopolymer and portland cement concrete

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 583-590
Author(s):  
Nagajothi S ◽  
Elavenil S
Keyword(s):  
Portland Cement ◽  
Ordinary Portland Cement ◽  
Impact Resistance ◽  
Geopolymer Concrete ◽  
Portland Cement Concrete ◽  
Cement Concrete ◽  
Stress Strain ◽  
River Sand ◽  
Conventional Concrete ◽  
Strain Behaviour

AbstractThe recent technology of geopolymer concrete is a substitute material for ordinary portland cement concrete which is produced from the polycondensation reaction of aluminosilicate materials with alkaline activator solutions. The cost of river sand is high since the demand for the same is also high. Manufactured sand is used as a replacement material for river sand in geopolymer concrete. This paper mainly focuses to find the properties of fly ash (FA) – based geopolymer concrete under ambient cured temperature like compressive strength, stress strain behaviour, modulus of elasticity, Poission’s ratio and impact resistance. The result of geopolymer concrete is compared with ordinary portland cement concrete. The elasticity modulus and Poission’s ratio of geopolymer concrete are lower than conventional concrete. The Stress-strain behaviour of geopolymer concrete is similar to conventional concrete. The impact resistance of geopolymer concrete is very good when compared with conventional concrete.

scholarly journals Durability Study on High Calcium Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ganesan Lavanya ◽  
Josephraj Jegan
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Portland Cement ◽  
Sodium Hydroxide ◽  
Ordinary Portland Cement ◽  
Geopolymer Concrete ◽  
Portland Cement Concrete ◽  
Cement Concrete ◽  
High Calcium ◽  
High Calcium Fly Ash ◽  
Ordinary Portland Cement Concrete

This study presents an investigation into the durability of geopolymer concrete prepared using high calcium fly ash along with alkaline activators when exposed to 2% solution of sulfuric acid and 5% magnesium sulphate for up to 45 days. The durability was also assessed by measuring water absorption and sorptivity. Ordinary Portland cement concrete was also prepared as control concrete. The grades chosen for the investigation were M20, M40, and M60. The alkaline solution used for present study is the combination of sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide solution with the ratio of 2.50. The molarity of sodium hydroxide was fixed as 12. The test specimens were150×150×150 mm cubes,100×200 mm cylinders, and100×50 mm discs cured at ambient temperature. Surface deterioration, density, and strength over a period of 14, 28, and 45 days were observed. The results of geopolymer and ordinary Portland cement concrete were compared and discussed. After 45 days of exposure to the magnesium sulfate solution, the reduction in strength was up to 12% for geopolymer concrete and up to 25% for ordinary Portland cement concrete. After the same period of exposure to the sulphuric acid solution, the compressive strength decrease was up to 20% for geopolymer concrete and up to 28% for ordinary Portland cement concrete.

scholarly journals Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Confined by Circular Hoops

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 01018
Author(s):  
Muslikh ◽  
N. K. Anggraini ◽  
D. Hardjito ◽  
Antonius
Keyword(s):  
Portland Cement ◽  
Concrete Cover ◽  
Geopolymer Concrete ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Portland Cement Concrete ◽  
Reinforcing Bars ◽  
Cement Concrete ◽  
Conventional Concrete ◽  
K Value ◽  
Steel Bar

This paper discusses the behavior of geopolymer concrete subjected to passive confinement under compression loads. The confinement is induced by the use of lateral hoops, assembled from un-deformed reinforcing bars. To compare the effect of confinement, identical specimens were produced using conventional concrete with the similar concrete compressive strength. The cylinder specimens were 100 mm in diameter and 200 mm in height, and the hoops were placed on the outer most fibers of the cylinders, perpendicular to the line of loading, with no concrete cover. The parameters analyzed in this study were the steel bar to concrete volumetric ratio, the hoop spacings and the steel yield stresses. The experimental results show that unconfined geopolymer concrete were very brittle compared to the unconfined Portland cement concrete. The strength enhancement (K value) of the confined geopolymer concrete was higher than K value of Portland cement concrete. Confined geopolymer concrete also has better deformability compared to the confined Portland cement concrete. The average confinement effectiveness of geopolymer concrete also has a higher value than that commonly used in the Indonesian Concrete Standard (SNI), that is 4.1. The results were further assessed to the most recent experimental test results conducted in this area.

Compressive stress-strain model for low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer and heat-cured Portland cement concrete

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 136-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Noushini ◽  
Farhad Aslani ◽  
Arnaud Castel ◽  
Raymond Ian Gilbert ◽  
Brian Uy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Portland Cement ◽  
Compressive Stress ◽  
Portland Cement Concrete ◽  
Cement Concrete ◽  
Stress Strain ◽  
Low Calcium ◽  
Strain Model

EXPLORATORY STUDY ON THE MECHANICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE CONTAINING SULFUR

2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (32) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Yeoh ◽  
Koh Heng Boon ◽  
Norwati Jamaluddin
Keyword(s):  
Portland Cement ◽  
Physical Properties ◽  
Ordinary Portland Cement ◽  
Cement Content ◽  
Drying Shrinkage ◽  
Portland Cement Concrete ◽  
Cement Concrete ◽  
Complete Replacement ◽  
Mechanical And Physical Properties ◽  
Ordinary Portland Cement Concrete

This research is an exploratory experiment into sulfur concrete used not as a complete replacement of cement but as an additional material in percentage of the cement content. The aim of this research was to explore the possible appreciation of mechanical and physical properties of concrete containing sulfur with percentages of 1%, 5% and 10% of the cement content. The sulfur used here was not heat-activated, hence the binding effect in sulfur was absent. The experimental results revealed that concrete containing sulfur did not perform better in their strength properties, both compressive strength and flexural strength. The physical properties such as water penetration and water absorption for concrete containing sulfur also showed poor performance in comparison to ordinary Portland cement concrete. Such phenomena are very likely due to the sulfur not being activated by heat. Carbonation test did not show good results as a longer term of testing is required. Drying shrinkage property was found to be encouraging in that concrete containing 10% sulfur had quite significant reduction in drying shrinkage as opposed to ordinary Portland cement concrete. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document