scholarly journals Lorentz Transformation of Electromagnetic Systems and the 4/3 Problem

1991 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 377-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Comay

AbstractLorentz transformations of two macroscopic devices are discussed. In each case, the overall momentum flux into every static element of matter vanishes. It is shown that a Lorentz transformation of the energy-momentum 4-vector of each system agrees with special relativity. In particular, using the ordinary definition of 4-momentum of electromagnetic fields, it is proved by means of a particular form of Poincare's stress tensor, that there is no 4/3 factor in the transformation of the entire momentum of a uniformly charged spherical shell

Author(s):  
Muhammad Ardhi Khalif

<p style="text-align: justify;">The ellips space <em>E </em>has been constructed as cartesian product R+ <em>× </em>R+ <em>× </em>[ <em>π </em>2 <em>, </em><em>π </em>2 ]. Its elements, (<em>a, b, θ</em>), is called as an ellipse with eccentricity is <em> </em>= p1 <em>− </em><em>b</em>2<em>/a</em>2 if <em>b &lt; a </em>and is <em> </em>= p1 <em>− </em><em>a</em>2<em>/b</em>2 if <em>a &gt; b</em>. The points (<em>a, b, π/</em>2) is equal to (<em>b, a, </em>0). The action of subgrup <em>SO</em><em>oz</em>(3<em>, </em>1) of Lorentz group <em>SO</em><em>o</em>(3<em>, </em>1), containing Lorentz transformations on <em>x</em><em>−</em><em>y </em>plane and rotations about <em>z </em>axes, on <em>E </em>is defined as Lorentz transformation or rotation transformation of points in an ellipse. The action is effective since there are no rigid points in <em>E</em>. The action is also not free and transitive. These properties means that Lorentz transformations change any ellips into another ellips. Although mathematically we can move from an ellipse to another one with the bigger eccentrity but it is imposible physically. This is occured because we donot include the speed parameter into the definition of an ellipse in <em>E</em>.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-171
Author(s):  
A. R. Baizid

Lorentz transformation is the relation of space and time coordinates of one inertial frame relative to another inertial frame in special relativity. In this paper we have studied the volume charge density in most general and quaternion Lorentz transformations for different angles with different velocities of the moving frame.  We have also used numerical data to see the comparative situation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 485 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-433
Author(s):  
V. G. Baydulov ◽  
P. A. Lesovskiy

For the symmetry group of internal-wave equations, the mechanical content of invariants and symmetry transformations is determined. The performed comparison makes it possible to construct expressions for analogs of momentum, angular momentum, energy, Lorentz transformations, and other characteristics of special relativity and electro-dynamics. The expressions for the Lagrange function are defined, and the conservation laws are derived. An analogy is drawn both in the case of the absence of sources and currents in the Maxwell equations and in their presence.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Eyal Brodet

In this paper we reconsider the conventional expressions given by special relativity to the energy and momentum of a particle. In the current framework, the particle's energy and momentum are computed using the particle's rest mass, M and rest mass time, t_m=h/M c^2  where t_m has the same time unit as conventionally used for the light velocity c. Therefore it is currently assumed that this definition of time describes the total kinetic and mass energy of a particle as given by special relativity. In this paper we will reexamine the above assumption and suggest describing the particle's energy as a function of its own particular decay time and not with respect to its rest mass time unit. Moreover we will argue that this rest mass time unit currently used is in fact the minimum time unit defined for a particle and that the particle may have more energy stored with in it. Experimental ways to search for this extra energy stored in particles such as electrons and photons are presented.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastin Patrick Asokan

Abstract This paper shows that from the fact that the same Reality is perceived differently by the observers in different inertial frames, we can draw a simple and straightforward explanation for the constancy of light's speed in all inertial frames without any need for bringing in paradoxical Lorentz Transformation. This paper also proves that Lorentz Transformation has failed in its attempt to do the impossible task of establishing t' ≠ t to explain the constancy of the speed of light in all inertial frames without contradicting the interchangeability of frames demanded by the First Postulate of the Special Theory of Relativity. This paper also points out the misconceptions regarding the claimed experimental verifications of Lorentz Transformation's predictions in the Hafele–Keating experiment and μ meson experiment. This paper concludes that Einstein's Special Theory Relativity can stand on its own merits without Lorentz Transformation.


Author(s):  
Hanoch Gutfreund ◽  
Jürgen Renn

This chapter shows how the principle of special relativity and the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light uniquely determine the Lorentz transformation. Unlike in pre-relativity physics, space and time are not separate entities. They are combined into a four-dimensional spacetime continuum, which is most clearly demonstrated in the formulation of the theory of special relativity due to Hermann Minkowski. The chapter then defines vectors and tensors with respect to the Lorentz transformation, leading to a tensor formulation of Maxwell's equations, of the electromagnetic force acting on charges and currents, and of the energy-momentum of the electromagnetic field and its conservation law. It also introduces the energy-momentum tensor of matter and discusses the basic equations of the hydrodynamics of perfect fluids (the Euler equations).


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 1398-1410
Author(s):  
Matias Slavov

AbstractEternalism is the view that all times are equally real. The relativity of simultaneity in special relativity backs this up. There is no cosmically extended, self-existing ‘now.’ This leads to a tricky problem. What makes statements about the present true? I shall approach the problem along the lines of perspectival realism and argue that the choice of the perspective does. To corroborate this point, the Lorentz transformations of special relativity are compared to the structurally similar equations of the Doppler effect. The ‘now’ is perspectivally real in the same way as a particular electromagnetic spectrum frequency. I also argue that the ontology of time licensed by perspectival realism is more credible in this context than its current alternative, the fragmentalist interpretation of special relativity.


Author(s):  
Ji Rigelesaiyin ◽  
Adrian Diaz ◽  
Weixuan Li ◽  
Liming Xiong ◽  
Youping Chen

The stress tensor is described as a symmetric tensor in all classical continuum mechanics theories and in most existing statistical mechanics formulations. In this work, we examine the theoretical origins of the symmetry of the stress tensor and identify the assumptions and misinterpretations that lead to its symmetric property. We then make a direct measurement of the stress tensor in molecular dynamics simulations of four different material systems using the physical definition of stress as force per unit area acting on surface elements. Simulation results demonstrate that the stress tensor is asymmetric near dislocation cores, phase boundaries, holes and even in homogeneous material under a shear loading. In addition, the atomic virial stress and Hardy stress formulae are shown to significantly underestimate the stress tensor in regions of stress concentration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document