Economic assessment of methanol production by coal gasification Ocena ekonomiczna wytwarzania metanolu przez zgazowanie węgla

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-139
Author(s):  
Michał Kopacz
2022 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 101852
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Gentile ◽  
Davide Bonalumi ◽  
Johannis A.Z. Pieterse ◽  
Francesco Sebastiani ◽  
Leonie Lucking ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 5074
Author(s):  
Radosław Kaplan ◽  
Michał Kopacz

This study documents the results of economic assessment concerning four variants of coal gasification to hydrogen in a shell reactor. That assessment has been made using discounting methods (NPV: net present value, IRR: internal rate of return), as well as indicators based on a free cash flow to firm (FCFF) approach. Additionally, sensitivity analysis has been carried out, along with scenario analysis in current market conditions concerning prices of hard coal, lignite, hydrogen and CO2 allowances, as well as capital expenditures and costs related to carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems. Based on NPV results, a negative economic assessment has been obtained for all the analyzed variants varying within the range of EUR −903 to −142 million, although the variants based on hard coal achieved a positive IRR (5.1–5.7%) but lower than the assumed discount rates. In Polish conditions, the gasification of lignite seems to be unprofitable, in the assumed scale of total investment outlays and the current price of coal feedstock. The sensitivity analyses indicate that at least a 20% increase of hydrogen price would be required, or a similar reduction of capital expenditures (CAPEX) and costs of operation, for the best variant to make NPV positive. Analyses have also indicated that on the economic basis, only the prices of CO2 allowances exceeding EUR 40/Mg (EUR 52/Mg for lignite) would generate savings due to the availability of CCS systems.


Methanol ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 613-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamran Ghasemzadeh ◽  
Seyyed M. Sadati Tilebon ◽  
Mojtaba Nasirinezhad ◽  
Angelo Basile

2018 ◽  
Vol 225 ◽  
pp. 570-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara Carvalho ◽  
Joakim Lundgren ◽  
Elisabeth Wetterlund ◽  
Jens Wolf ◽  
Erik Furusjö

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2826
Author(s):  
Piotr W. Saługa ◽  
Paweł Grzesiak ◽  
Jacek Kamiński

Coal gasification has been promoted as a sophisticated clean energy technology alternative to coal burning these days. Aside from the usual technical difficulties, economic issues of such projects—especially valuation challenges—are important problems that practitioners usually struggle with. This is because of the major extent of managerial flexibility linked with specific characteristics of coal gasification projects, in particular, possibilities to mothball/restart manufacturing lines, or change between different outputs. The value of such flexibilities may be well assessed by real options valuations. The aim of this paper is to show that for the coal gasification technologies the real options valuation is more suitable than traditional discounted cash flow technique. This approach was applied to calculate an integrated plant that can produce either electricity or methanol. As the valuation approach the multiplicative stochastic process was used. As a consequence, binomial lattices of end-product (electricity and methanol) were developed. Then, in regard to them (reference instruments), two corresponding lattices of net cash flows (consecutive instruments) were created. In the end, two trees of switching option value were developed—one for electricity production as an initial mode, and the second for methanol production, delivering expanded net present (strategic) value.


Author(s):  
Tuantuan Xin ◽  
Cheng Xu ◽  
Gang Xu ◽  
Wenyi Liu ◽  
Yongping Yang

To advance the utilization of the solar energy and coal resources as well as improve the flexibility of coal-based power plant, an improved solar-coal hybrid system for methanol production and power generation is proposed and thermodynamically analyzed. In the proposed system, the concentrated solar energy at high-temperature is used for heating the coal gasification to produce syngas for methanol synthesis; the waste material and heat from coal-to-methanol process are efficiently recovered in the conjunct power generation system; and the surplus electric power is optionally used for methanol synthesis by electrolysis process during the off-peak period. Through employing the proposed system, the solar energy and electricity (optional) could be effectively converted into methanol as stable chemical energy together with a preferable overall system thermal efficiency. The thermodynamic analysis results showed that, the overall energy and exergy efficiencies reaches 48.6 and 47.3%, respectively; the equivalent solar-to-methanol conversion efficiency can soar to 66.2%; and the net electricity-to-methanol efficiency reaches 61.6% with the power load reducing from 48.7% to 31.0%.


2017 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 167-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara Carvalho ◽  
Erik Furusjö ◽  
Kawnish Kirtania ◽  
Elisabeth Wetterlund ◽  
Joakim Lundgren ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 4519-4524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Bassani ◽  
Giulia Bozzano ◽  
Carlo Pirola ◽  
Eliseo Ranzi ◽  
Sauro Pierucci ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document