CASE STUDY: Use of dried distillers grains for calves grazing tall fescue

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-233
Author(s):  
J.E. Williams ◽  
B.J. Corners ◽  
M.H. Ramos ◽  
M.R. Ellersieck
2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 161-162
Author(s):  
Joshua M Zeltwanger ◽  
Allison M Meyer ◽  
Eric Bailey ◽  
Abe Scheaffer ◽  
Kevin Meng ◽  
...  

Abstract Various anecdotes suggest the combination of supplemental protein and yeast improve utilization of low-quality forage. Two studies were conducted to evaluate effects of a commercially available supplement containing protein and yeast on fermentation in single-flow continuous culture fermenters. In Exp. 1, Bermuda grass with no supplement (NCON1), dried distillers grains (PCON1), and two commercially available supplements Diamond V XP (DV1) or SweetPro 16 (SP1) were compared. In Exp. 2, K31 tall fescue with no supplement (NCON2), supplemental dried distillers grains (PCON2), and two commercially available supplements Diamond V XP (DV2) or SweetPro 16 (SP2) were compared. Twenty-four single flow fermenters (1470mL) were randomly assigned to treatments and fed twice daily for 8 d, 5 d of adaptation and 3 d of collection. In both experiments, digestibility of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF were not influenced by supplementation regardless of source (P > 0.10). In Exp. 1, NH3-N concentration increased (P < 0.01) for DV1 over both NCON1 and PCON1 and was greatest for SP1 (P < 0.01). Greater amounts of NH3-N and microbial N were recovered from fermenter overflow when SP1 was supplemented (P < 0.01). Crude protein (CP) degradation was also greatest for SP1; however, when supplement was included, regardless of source, CP degradation was increased over NCON1. Acetate, propionate, butyrate, and total VFA levels were similar (P > 0.10) amongst NCON1, PCON1, and DV1 and greatest when SP1 was supplemented. In Exp. 2, fermenter NH3-N concentration was greatest for SP2 (P < 0.01) and similar amongst NCON2, PCON2, and DV2 (P > 0.01). No differences were detected (P > 0.10) between treatments with respects to CP degradation. Total VFA concentrations increased over time regardless of treatment during the second study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 12-13
Author(s):  
Jordan Adams ◽  
Rodney Farris ◽  
Scott Clawson ◽  
Earl Ward ◽  
Paul Beck

Abstract We evaluated the effects of supplementing dried distillers’ grains cubes (DDGS) and re-implantation of steers (n = 149; BW = 238 ± 13.8 kg) grazing tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea)/bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) pastures (n = 9 pastures, 7.2 ± 2.90 ha) from 14 April to 17 September 2020 (n = 155 d) in a split-plot design on steer performance and forage production. Main plot supplemental treatments (n = 3 pastures/treatment) included 1) Fertilized Control (FC), no supplementation on fertilized pastures (112 kg N/ha); 2) Fertilized Supplement (FS), supplemental DDGS fed at 2.9 kg 3-d/wk on fertilized pastures; and 3) Supplement (S), supplemented DDGS at 0.75% BW/d on unfertilized pastures prorated for 5-d/wk feeding. Steers were previously implanted during receiving with 40 mg trenbolone acetate and 8 mg estradiol (REV-G; Revalor G, Merck Animal Health). On July 7, steers in each pasture were randomly assigned to one of three re-implant treatments: 1) no re-implant; 2) REV-G; or 3) 200 mg progesterone and 20 mg estradiol (Synovex S, Zoetis Animal Health). Steers in FS and S gained more (P < 0.01) than FC throughout the trial and final BW was greater (P < 0.01) for FS and S compared with FC. Unexpectedly, re-implanting had no effect on ADG (P = 0.57) or BW (P = 0.34), but statistical power may be lacking. Supplemental efficiency was greater in the late summer for FS (P = 0.05) compared to S. Fertilizing pastures in FS and FC did not affect biomass (P = 0.39), however, CP was increased (P = 0.01) and acid and neutral detergent fibers tended to decrease (P = 0.06) relative to S in the early summer (April, May, June, and July), but did not differ in late summer (August and September). Based upon our analysis, DDGS is a suitable supplement and can replace N fertilizer for steers grazing introduced pastures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 128-128
Author(s):  
Hannah Speer ◽  
Hannah Riley ◽  
Robert Cushman ◽  
Harvey Freetly ◽  
Mary Drewnoski

Abstract Spring-born heifers (n = 1,012) weaned at 148 ± 17 d were used in a 3-yr study to evaluate performance in winter development systems which utilized cover crop and corn residue grazing. Heifers were assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: grazing corn residue with dried distillers grains (CD) or wheat midds (CW) supplementation, or grazing late summer planted oat-brassica cover crop followed by corn residue supplemented dried distillers grains (CC). Grazing of corn residue (CD and CW) and cover crop (CC) began in early November. Supplementation during the corn residue phase was adjusted to target ~55% of mature BW (338 kg) at breeding. After 63 d, CC were moved to corn residue; on d 77 CD and CW began receiving grower ration. In mid-February (d 98), heifers were comingled and managed in a single group. Breeding season began in June and lasted for 29 d. Prior to corn residue grazing, ADG of CC was greater (0.76 kg/d; P< 0.01) than CD or CW (0.58 kg/d and 0.49 kg/d, respectively). Gain during the last 35 d of the winter period for CC was 0.13 kg/d less than CW (P< 0.01) but not different from CD. Overall winter ADG was greater (P< 0.05) for CC (0.62 kg/d) than CD (0.53 kg/d) or CW (0.50 kg/d). Percent of mature BW prior to breeding was 52% for CC and 50% for CD and CW. May reproductive tract scores did not differ (P=0.26) between CC and CW but were greater (P< 0.05) in CC than CD. Pregnancy rates were affected by treatment (P< 0.01), with CC (76%) being greater than CD (68%) and CW (64%). Utilizing oat-brassica cover crops early in the winter followed by a lower rate of gain while grazing corn residue appear to be effective for developing beef heifers. USDA is an equal opportunity employer and provider.


2012 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 811-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina V Semenčenko ◽  
Ljiljana V Mojović ◽  
Aleksandra P Đukić-Vuković ◽  
Milica M Radosavljević ◽  
Dušanka R Terzić ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document