Conclusion

Author(s):  
Sarah Bronwen Horton

What public policy reforms can help prevent heat-related syndemics in California’s fields—the intertwined epidemics of heat illness and cardiovascular disease that often lead to work mortality? This chapter reviews several important reforms to our immigration, labor, health care, and food safety policies that could help ensure the safety and health of those who harvest our food. It concludes with a discussion of acts of “pragmatic solidarity” in which we can all engage—that is, how the lay public and engaged and applied anthropologists can intervene to protect the health of some of the nation’s most “exceptional” workers.

Author(s):  
Sarah Bronwen Horton

This chapter explains how migrant men’s longstanding exclusion from subsidized health care, such as Medicaid, allows their chronic illnesses to remain undiagnosed. Even as the Affordable Care Act made childless adult migrants eligible for Medicaid in 2014, men’s longstanding exclusion continues to discourage them from seeking care. Meanwhile, when migrant men enter the fields, hypertension and heart disease place them at higher risk of a heart attack. Thus men’s undiagnosed ailments and heat illness form a syndemic—a cluster of conditions that interact at the physiological level and exacerbate the damage caused by each alone. Meanwhile the produce industry’s concern to maintain consumer confidence through new food safety audits only exacerbates workers’ hypertension and encourages heat illness. Attention to the synergistic interaction between chronic disease and heat illness thus raises provocative questions about how to accurately count heat deaths in California’s fields while shedding new light on farmwork’s death toll.


2020 ◽  
pp. 146801812096185
Author(s):  
Nicola Yeates ◽  
Rebecca Surender

This article presents key results from a comparative qualitative Social Policy study of nine African regional economic communities’ (RECs) regional health policies. The article asks to what extent has health been incorporated into RECs’ public policy functions and actions, and what similarities and differences are evident among the RECs. Utilising a World Health Organization (WHO) framework for conceptualising health systems, the research evidence routes the article’s arguments towards the following principal conclusions. First, the health sector is a key component of the public policy functions of most of the RECs. In these RECs, innovations in health sector organisation are notable; there is considerable regulatory, organisational, resourcing and programmatic diversity among the RECs alongside under-resourcing and fragmentation within each of them. Second, there are indications of important tangible benefits of regional cooperation and coordination in health, and growing interest by international donors in regional mechanisms through which to disburse health and -related Official Development Assistance (ODA). Third, content analysis of RECs’ regional health strategies suggests fairly minimal strategic ambitions as well as significant limitations of current approaches to advancing effective and progressive health reform. The lack of emphasis on universal health care and reliance on piecemeal donor funding are out of step with approaches and recommendations increasingly emphasising health systems development, sector-wide approaches (SWAPs) and primary health care as the bedrock of health services expansion. Overall, the health component of RECs’ development priorities is consistent with an instrumentalist social policy approach. The development of a more comprehensive sustainable world-regional health policy is unlikely to come from the African Continental Free-Trade Area, which lacks requisite social and health clauses to underpin ‘positive’ forms of regional integration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document