scholarly journals The revolution of reconstructive microsurgery: Dr. Fu Chan Wei and the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Man-Ger Sun ◽  
Jason G Williams

.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5492-5492
Author(s):  
Chia-Chen Hsu ◽  
Chih-Cheng Chen ◽  
Jyh-Pyng Gau ◽  
Cih-En Huang ◽  
Jie-Yu You ◽  
...  

Abstract High mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2) is an architectural transcriptional factor that is negatively regulated by Let-7 microRNA. Dysregulated HMGA2 has been shown to exhibit a myeloproliferative phenotype in engineered mice. To decipher the Let-7-HMGA2 axis in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), we studied a cohort of 151 MPN patients. Overexpressed HMGA2 was detected in about one-fifth of the cases, and it was more commonly seen in ET (26.9%, vs. 12.7% in PV, p=0.044). Compared to their counterparts, HMGA2-overexpressing patients had higher platelet counts, increased thromboembolic risk, and inferior thrombosis-free survival. Fluorescence in situ hybridizationanalysis showed that chromosomal translocation was not a major cause of HMGA2 overexpression in MPN patients, yet there was an inverse correlation between the expression levels of let-7a and HMGA2. Furthermore, up-regulation of HMGA2 was significantly associated with MPN patients carrying JAK2V617F mutation. In vitro studies showed that Ba/F3 cells carried JAK2V617F (Ba/F3-JAK2V617F) had decreased let-7a and up-regulated HMGA2. Silencing of HMGA2 in Ba/F3-JAK2V617F cells resulted in growth inhibition coupled with a significant increase in apoptosis. Our findings suggest that, in a subset of JAK2-mutated MPN patients, Let-7-HMGA2 axis plays a prominent role in the pathogenesis of the disease that leads to unique clinical phenotypes. Disclosures Hsu: Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan): Research Funding; Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital: Employment, Research Funding. Chen:Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan): Research Funding; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi branch: Research Funding. Gau:Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan: Employment. Huang:Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital: Employment, Research Funding. You:Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan: Employment. Lung:Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital: Employment, Research Funding. Chen:Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital: Employment. Ho:Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital: Employment, Research Funding. Li:Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital: Employment, Research Funding. Lu:Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan: Employment. Lee:Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital: Employment, Research Funding.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-Chung Chu ◽  
Hsin-Ke Lu ◽  
Ming-Chun Huang ◽  
Shr-Jie Lin ◽  
Wen-I Liu ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a neurobehavioral disorder, display behaviors of inattention, hyperactivity, or impulsivity, which can affect their ability to learn and establish proper family and social relationships. Various tools are currently used by child and adolescent psychiatric clinics to diagnose, evaluate, and collect information and data. The tools allow professional physicians to assess if patients need further treatment, following a thorough and careful clinical diagnosis process. OBJECTIVE We aim to determine potential indicators extracted from a mobile electroencephalography (EEG) device (Mindset; NeuroSky) and an actigraph (MotionWatch 8; CamNtech) and to validate them for diagnosis of ADHD. The 3 indicators are (1) attention, measured by the EEG; (2) meditation, measured by the EEG; and (3) activity, measured by the actigraph. METHODS A total of 63 participants were recruited. The case group comprised 40 boys and 9 girls, while the control group comprised 5 boys and 9 girls. The groups were age matched. The test was divided into 3 stages—pretest, in-test, and posttest—with a testing duration of 20 minutes each. We used correlation analysis, repeated measures analysis of variance, and regression analysis to investigate which indicators can be used for ADHD diagnosis. RESULTS With the EEG indicators, the analysis results show a significant correlation of attention with both hit reaction time (RT) interstimulus interval (ISI) change (<i>r</i>=–0.368; <i>P</i>=.003) and hit standard error (SE) ISI change (<i>r</i>=–0.336; <i>P</i>=.007). This indicates that the higher the attention of the participants, the smaller both the hit RT change and the hit SE ISI change. With the actigraph indicator, confidence index (<i>r</i>=0.352; <i>P</i>=.005), omissions (<i>r</i>=0.322; <i>P</i>=.01), hit RT SE (<i>r</i>=0.393; <i>P</i>=.001), and variability (<i>r</i>=0.351; <i>P</i>=.005) were significant. This indicates that the higher the activity amounts, the higher the impulsive behavior of the participants and the more target omissions in the continuous performance test (CPT). The results show that the participants with ADHD present a significant difference in activity amounts (<i>P</i>&lt;0.001). The actigraph outperforms the EEG in screening ADHD. CONCLUSIONS When the participants with ADHD are stimulated under restricted conditions, they will present different amounts of activity than in unrestricted conditions due to participants’ inability to exercise control over their concentration. This finding could be a new electronic physiological biomarker of ADHD. An actigraph can be used to detect the amount of activity exhibited and to help physicians diagnose the disorder in order to develop more objective, rapid auxiliary diagnostic tools. CLINICALTRIAL This research was supported by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CMRPG 3F1581 and CORPG 3F0751) and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (No. 104-5397B) on October 01, 2015.


2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (02) ◽  
pp. 144-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Chwei-Chin Chuang

ABSTRACTSignificant progress has been achieved in the science and management of peripheral nerve injuries over the past 40 years. Yet there are many questions and few answers. The author, with 30 years of experience in treating them at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, addresses debates on various issues with personal conclusions. These include: (1) Degree of peripheral nerve injury, (2) Timing of nerve repair, (3)Technique of nerve repair, (4) Level of brachial plexus injury,(5) Level of radialnerve injury,(6) Traction avulsion amputation of major limb, (7) Proximal Vs distal nerve transfers in brachial plexus injuries and (8) Post paralysis facial synkinesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document