The Enforcement and Characteristics of the Registration System of Korea’s Real Estate in the Early Japanese Rule

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Won-Kyu Choe
Author(s):  
P. Savkov ◽  
N. Levinskova ◽  
Yu. Kryth

The article focuses on the main legal aspects of the land registry system in Ukraine. Research allowed to identify theshortcomings of the existent, inefficient land registry system, which significantly increase the conflict potential of land matters.The article also covers the preconditions needed for the establishment of an ef ficient land registry system based on the lessonslearned from land surveying activities of the Ministry of Defense. Moreover, it provides a comprehensive description of thecurrent state of the national land registry system of Ukraine. The paper highlights factors enabling the development of a cohesivesystem of measures, that would allow to significantly improve management of the land registry system of Ukraine. A list ofreasons has been provided, justifying a lack of an all-encompassing registration of the military land parcels of the Ministry ofDefense of Ukraine. Besides, many other topical issues related to the military land were identified, including systematicshortcomings that intervene with the comprehensive and legal usage of real estate assets of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Inorder to ensure that the real estate and land parcel management system conforms to the law, preconditions for the establishmentof a computerized military land and real estate registration system were identified. Research findings included suggestionsrelated to the establishment of land management, registry and land registration center in the structure of MOD, which would dealwith issues related land management, registry and land registration. To ensure direct control and timely response such centerwould have subordinated detachments. The article provides a list of suggestions for the establishment of an efficient controlover the land fund of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which will not only simplify the process of stock taking, but also will speed upthe process of land parcel transfer to the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Wang ◽  
Shuyan Wei ◽  
Bo-sin Tang ◽  
Junhua Chen ◽  
Wenbin Li

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review land/real estate registration practice in Hong Kong, and make an in-depth comparison with Mainland China and finally provide helpful suggestions for the government. Design/methodology/approach Research methods including document analysis/review and comparative study are used in this paper. Findings The main findings focus on the problems existing in the mainland, including narrow query subject, single way of query, limited query time, and lacking of incentive mechanism. Helpful suggestions for real estate registration system in Mainland China are offered based on the comparative study. Practical implications The unified registration system can improve the efficiency of administrative institutions to ensure an open and transparent environment of property right registration, which helps prevent the relevant departments from abusing administrative power and harming the interests of obligees. The findings of this research can serve as a useful reference for policy makers to improve the unified registration system in China. Originality/value The registration system/mechanism determines the efficiency and effectiveness of real estate/land market. However, land registration and query in some countries such as Mainland China have institutional problems which hinder the sustained and healthy development of the real estate industry. The value of this paper is to propose constructive suggestions for such countries/regions by comparing and learning from a good model.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamshid Mehrasa ◽  
Mohammad Kainiya

Cadaster refers to a system involving comprehensive geometric data on real estate across a country along with full details of properties, owners and respective rights. It can provide a dynamic administration of real estate datasets so that tasks are carried out at maximum efficiency and quality. From the legal point of view, a cadaster survey seeks to specify 4 essential characteristics concerning immovable property, including owner, ownership transfer practices, geographic location, dimensions (area) based on primary and secondary registration numbers, quality and quantity of properties. By determining these parameters and registering them in single-sheet cadastral deeds as well as an online database, a great step can be taken to mitigate the rate of violations and crimes related to property registration, and subsequently reduce the lawsuits. Nowadays, it is critical to implement a land and real estate registration system in any country, since it can facilitate the sustainable development of the central government, provide security of tenure and property ownership rights, facilitate investment in the real estate market and the transactions, guarantee a transparent, efficient property evaluation and ultimately set the groundwork for planning and utilizing lands and achieving sustainable development. It is crucial to emphasize the fact that the Iranian economic and industrial development has posed numerous new obstacles against authorities in charge of the cadaster survey and registration of land ownership, since they have to take caution about the potential demand and dynamism of the cadaster expansion in the future. As a result, the cadaster expansion should be constantly monitored to ensure its compliance and support for adopting appropriate decisions, optimally managing the lands, minimizing the detrimental consequences of environmental changes and their consistency with the current and upcoming requirements. The continuous development of cadaster systems and their capability to cooperate with other national databases is vital for ensuring all needs are met in various economic sectors and providing reliable data update on real estate.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zonghie Han

Purpose – This paper aims to show the practical conditions of the unification of real estate register system in Korea. Design/methodology/approach – Literature research. Findings – Although some information improvements and benefits in transaction can be expected through the elimination of discordances between dualized registry/registration books, the unification process should consider some legal and institutional factors which have been stabilized in the Korean society. Research limitations/implications – The socioeconomic effect of unification of real estate register system, such as cost-benefit consideration, is not included in this study. As for methodology, the conceptional framework is not based on an established theory, but on the simple thumb rule. Practical implications – The unification of registry and registration system of real estate in Korea could be implemented in a way of mild delegation of tasks, without a radical restructuring of the system. The practical guideline could be found in the system of family registry. Originality/value – The possibility of implementation of unification of the real estate register system is analyzed in aspects of social institutions and legal considerations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Cláudio Grande Júnior

RESUMO:O artigo aborda falhas da Lei de Terras do Império, de 1850, e de seu Regulamento, de 1854, que concorreram decisivamente para a formação do atual quadro fundiário brasileiro, de ocultação de considerável parte das terras devolutas por registros imobiliários de conteúdo inverídico, porque certificam propriedades privadas sem origem válida. Falhas relacionadas ao reconhecimento jurídico do domínio privado absoluto sobre terras no Brasil, mais exatamente a forma como ele teve início, sem compromisso com a segurança jurídica mínima necessária para uma adequada efetivação do contemporâneo direito abstrato de propriedade sobre a terra. São analisadas principalmente as implicações dos arts. 22 ao 27 do Regulamento da Lei de Terras do Império (Decreto n.º 1.318, de 1854), associadas à demora do Poder Público em fazer cumprir outras determinações da legislação de terras. Por fim, demonstra-se a perpetuação desses problemas, mesmo após a tardia organização de um sistema registral imobiliário obrigatório. ABSTRACT:The article deals with failures of the Land Law of the Empire, of 1850, and of its Regulation, of 1854, which contributed decisively to the formation of the current Brazilian land framework, concealing considerable part of untitled public lands by records of real estate registries of untrue content, because certify private properties without valid source. Failures related to the legal recognition of the absolute private domain over lands in Brazil, more exactly the way it began, uncommitted with the necessary minimum legal security for an adequate execution of the contemporary abstract law of ownership over the land. The implications of arts. 22 to 27 of the Regulation of the Land Law of the Empire (Decree no. 1,318, of 1854) are primarily analyzed, in association with the delay of Public Power to enforce other determinations of the land legislation. Finally, it demonstrates the perpetuation of these problems, even after the late organization of a mandatory real estate registration system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document