scholarly journals Five-Year Profiles of Prostate Cancer Patients in A Tertiary Hospital in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferry Safriadi ◽  
Aidil Rahman Novesar
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Carcinoma ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Urogenital System ◽  
Male Population ◽  
History Of ◽  
Hard Consistency

Prostate cancer is a malignant disease of the urogenital system, which is the second most common cancer in men and one of the leading causes of death in male population. In Bandung City, Indonesia, no data are available regarding the profile of prostate cancer patients. This study aimed to determine the profile of prostate cancer patients treated at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung, Indonesia, which is the tertiary hospital in the most populated province in Indonesia, during the period of 2015-2019. This was a a retrospective descriptive study on secondary data from medical records. Results showed that most prostate carcinoma patients were was 67.95 ± 8.946 years old with most of them (n=92, 81.4%) had a history of hypertension and 62 patients (54.9%) did not have any history of smoking. Most patients had 20-40 cc prostate volume with hard consistency and without nodules; a PSA level of > 20 ng/ml; and a gleason score of 8-10 or poorly differentitated. Age affected increased incidence of prostate carcinoma with the highes prostate volume (20-40cc). The average PSA was 504.66 ± 10.26 and the median gleason score was 8 (6-10). The highest prostate volume is 20-40cc with hard consistency without nodule and the highest PSA value is > 20 ng/ml with a Gleason score of 8-10, showing a poorly differentiated condition.

scholarly journals Profil penderita kanker prostat di RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Manado periode tahun 2013–2015

e-CliniC ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valdo R. Solang ◽  
Alwin Monoarfa ◽  
Ferdinand Tjandra
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Malignant Disease ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Common Type ◽  
Urogenital System ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Male Population ◽  
Keywords Prostate Cancer ◽  
Keywords Prostate

Abstract: Prostate cancer is a malignant disease of urogenital system which is the second most common type of cancer in men after lung cancer. Prostate cancer is also one of the most common cause of death in male population. There is no database regarding profiles of prostate cancer in Manado. This study was aimed to determine the profile of prostate cancer patients treated at Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital Manado in the period 2013 to 2015. This was a descriptive retrospective study in October to November 2016. Samples were taken based on secondary data of the medical record. The results showed that there were 54 patients with prostate cancer, most were found in 2015 (38.9%), age group 61-70 years old (37.0%), lived in Manado (33.3%), graduated Senior High School (64.8%), retirees (50.0%), difficult urination (44.4%), PSA levels >100 ng/ml (50.0%), histopathological of adenocarcinoma (100.0%), and Gleason score ranging from 8-10 (46.7%). Based on metastasis, 14 patients had metastasis (25.9%).Keywords: prostate cancer, profile, PSA, histopatology, Gleason score Abstrak: Kanker prostat ialah penyakit keganasan sistem urogenital yang merupakan kanker kedua terbanyak pada pria setelah kanker paru. Kanker prostat juga merupakan salah satu penyebab terbanyak kematian pada populasi pria. Belum ditemukan data tentang profil kanker prostat di Manado. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui profil penderita kanker prostat yang dirawat di RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou pada periode 2013–2015. Jenis penelitian ialah deskriptif retrospektif yang dilakukan pada bulan Oktober sampai November 2016. Sampel diambil berdasarkan data sekunder dari catatan rekam medik. Hasil penelitian mendapatkan 54 penderita kanker prostat, paling banyak ditemukan pada tahun 2015 (38,9%), kelompok usia 61-70 tahun (37,0%), berdiam di Kota Manado (33,3%), tamat SMA (64,8%), pensiunan (50,0%), keluhan utama sulit buang air kecil (44,4%), kadar PSA >100 ng/ml (50,0%), jenis adenokarsinoma (100,0%), dan skor Gleason 8-10 (46,7%). Berdasarkan metastasis, sebanyak 14 penderita (25,9%) mengalami metastasis. Kata kunci: kanker prostat, profil, psa, histopatologi, skor gleason

Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (E-NPP) and adenosine deaminase (ADA) activities in prostate cancer patients: Influence of Gleason score, treatment and bone metastasis

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Battisti ◽  
Liési D.K. Maders ◽  
Margarete D. Bagatini ◽  
Iara E. Battisti ◽  
Luziane P. Bellé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Adenosine Deaminase ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gleason Score

Neutrophil, Platelets, and Eosinophil to Lymphocyte Ratios Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Ferro ◽  
Gennaro Musi ◽  
Alessandro Serino ◽  
Gabriele Cozzi ◽  
Francesco Alessandro Mistretta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Risk Prostate Cancer

Herbal Supplement PC-Spes for Prostate Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 921-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mário L de Lemos
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Estrogenic Activity ◽  
Estrogen Therapy ◽  
Herbal Supplement ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
History Of ◽  
Abnormal Bleeding ◽  
Androgen Suppression ◽  
American Society

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of the herbal supplement PC-Spes in prostate cancer patients. METHODS: Literature search through MEDLINE (1966–October 2001), PubMed, and abstracts from the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (1995–2001). RESULTS: PC-Spes was associated with biochemical and clinical response in some prostate cancer patients. The mechanisms of action of PC-Spes appeared to be related to its estrogenic activity. CONCLUSIONS: PC-Spes is associated with some efficacy in prostate cancer patients. Due to the limited data available, it should not be used to replace standard androgen suppression therapy in androgen-dependent patients. PC-Spes may have a role for patients who have failed standard treatments for androgen-independent disease and have no history of thromboembolism or abnormal bleeding. PC-Spes has a toxicity profile similar to those of androgen suppression and estrogen therapy.

scholarly journals Stromal Expression of MiR-21 Predicts Biochemical Failure in Prostate Cancer Patients with Gleason Score 6

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e113039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Melbø-Jørgensen ◽  
Nora Ness ◽  
Sigve Andersen ◽  
Andrej Valkov ◽  
Tom Dønnem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Biochemical Failure

scholarly journals Clinical and pathological variables that predict changes in tumour grade after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros Sfoungaristos ◽  
Petros Perimenis
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Psa Density ◽  
Group 2

Introduction: Preoperative Gleason score is crucial, in combination with other preoperative parameters, in selecting the appropriate treatment for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. The aim of the present study is to determine the clinical and pathological variables that can predict differences in Gleason score between biopsy and radical prostatectomy.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 302 patients who had a radical prostatectomy between January 2005 and September 2010. The association between grade changes and preoperative Gleason score, age, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, number of biopsy cores, presence of prostatitis and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was analyzed. We also conducted a secondary analysis of the factors that influence upgrading in patients with preoperative Gleason score ≤6 (group 1) and downgrading in patients with Gleason score ≤7 (group 2).Results: No difference in Gleason score was noted in 44.3% of patients, while a downgrade was noted in 13.7% and upgrade in 42.1%. About 2/3 of patients with a Gleason score of ≤6 upgraded after radical prostatectomy. PSA density (p = 0.008) and prostate volume (p = 0.032) were significantly correlated with upgrade. No significant predictors were found for patients with Gleason score ≤7 who downgraded postoperatively.Conclusion: Smaller prostate volume and higher values of PSA density are predictors for upgrade in patients with biopsy Gleason score ≤6 and this should be considered when deferred treatment modalities are planned.

scholarly journals Does Gleason score of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence and oncological outcomes? Protocol for systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e034612
Author(s):  
Athul John ◽  
Michael O'Callaghan ◽  
Rick Catterwell ◽  
Luke A Selth
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Surgical Margins ◽  
Secondary Treatment ◽  
Oncological Outcomes

IntroductionPositive surgical margins (PSM) in cancer patients are commonly associated with worse prognosis and a higher risk of secondary treatment. However, the relevance of this parameter in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial, given the inconsistencies in its ability to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) and oncological outcomes. Hence, further assessment of the utility of surgical margins for prostate cancer prognosis is required to predict these outcomes more accurately. Over the last decade, studies have used the Gleason score (GS) of positive margins to predict outcomes. Herein, the authors aim to conduct a systematic review investigating the role of GS of PSM after radical prostatectomy in predicting BCR and oncological outcomes.Methods and analysisWe will perform a search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and COCHRANE databases. The review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We will screen titles and abstracts to select articles appropriate for full-text review. Studies discussing GS of PSM after RP will be included. Given the change in reporting of GS, only articles from 2005 to 2019 will be included. The quality of the studies chosen will be assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa tool for non-randomised and Cochrane risk of bias for randomised control studies. We will adopt the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation framework to comment on quality of cumulative evidence. The primary outcome measure will be time to BCR. Secondary outcome measures include secondary treatment, disease-specific survival, disease progression-free and overall mortality at follow-up period. We aim to perform a meta-analysis if the level of heterogeneity is acceptable (I2<50%).Ethics and disseminationThe review does not require ethics approval as it is a review of published literature. The findings of the review will be submitted for peer-reviewed publications and presented at scientific meetings.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019131800.

scholarly journals Essential Updates in Grading, Morphotyping, Reporting, and Staging of Prostate Carcinoma for General Surgical Pathologists

2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (5) ◽  
pp. 550-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gladell P. Paner ◽  
Jatin Gandhi ◽  
Bonnie Choy ◽  
Mahul B. Amin
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Carcinoma ◽  
Multidisciplinary Care ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Gleason Pattern ◽  
Consensus Conferences ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Context.— Within this decade, several important updates in prostate cancer have been presented through expert international consensus conferences and influential publications of tumor classification and staging. Objective.— To present key updates in prostate carcinoma. Data Sources.— The study comprised a review of literature and our experience from routine and consultation practices. Conclusions.— Grade groups, a compression of the Gleason system into clinically meaningful groups relevant in this era of active surveillance and multidisciplinary care management for prostate cancer, have been introduced. Refinements in the Gleason patterns notably result in the contemporarily defined Gleason score 6 cancers having a virtually indolent behavior. Grading of tertiary and minor higher-grade patterns in radical prostatectomy has been clarified. A new classification for prostatic neuroendocrine tumors has been promulgated, and intraductal, microcystic, and pleomorphic giant cell carcinomas have been officially recognized. Reporting the percentage of Gleason pattern 4 in Gleason score 7 cancers has been recommended, and data on the enhanced risk for worse prognosis of cribriform pattern are emerging. In reporting biopsies for active surveillance criteria–based protocols, we outline approaches in special situations, including variances in sampling or submission. The 8th American Joint Commission on Cancer TNM staging for prostate cancer has eliminated pT2 subcategorization and stresses the importance of nonanatomic factors in stage groupings and outcome prediction. As the clinical and pathology practices for prostate cancer continue to evolve, it is of utmost importance that surgical pathologists become fully aware of the new changes and challenges that impact their evaluation of prostatic specimens.

scholarly journals Is there a correlation between the aggressiveness of chronic asymptomatic prostatitis NIH category IV and the Gleason score in patients with prostate cancer?

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdogan Aglamis ◽  
Cavit Ceylan ◽  
Mustafa Akin
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Prostate Needle Biopsy ◽  
Retrospective Design ◽  
Biopsy Specimens ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Prostatic Inflammation

Introduction: We evaluated the correlation between the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grades and the aggressiveness grades of prostate inflammation in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients with chronic asymptomatic prostatitis National Institiutes of Health (NIH) category IV (CAPNIHIV). Methods: The study comprised 357 consecutive patients with prostate cancer in whom a cancer diagnosis had been made via a prostate needle biopsy. Histological sections of the prostate biopsy specimens of the patients were reviewed and scored. Prostatic inflammation was scored using the aggressiveness grade of inflammation. The associations between the ISUP grades and the aggressiveness grades of inflammation were analyzed using logistic regression. The limitations of the study were its retrospective design and the limited number of cases. Results: In 110 (31%) patients, CAPNIHIV was detected: 56 (51%) patients had a grade 0 aggressiveness score, 34 (31%) patients had a grade 1 aggressiveness score, and 20 (18%) patients had a grade 2 aggressiveness score. The patients who had prostatic inflammation had a 1.65 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–2.61) greater likelihood of a high ISUP grade (grade ≥3) compared with the patients who did not have prostatic inflammation. The association between the ISUP grade and the aggressiveness grade of inflammation was more pronounced for a grade 2 aggressiveness score (n= 20; odds ratio 2.97; 95% CI 1.14–7.71). Conclusions: In prostate cancer patients with CAPNIHIV, there was a positive correlation between the inflammation aggressiveness grade and the ISUP grade. The aggressiveness of intraprostatic inflammation may be an important morphological factor affecting the Gleason score.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document