scholarly journals Treatment Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Status in Daily Practice

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa E.H. Römkens ◽  
Kim Gijsbers ◽  
Wietske Kievit ◽  
Frank Hoentjen ◽  
Joost P.H. Drenth

Background & Aims: Recently, treatment goals in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in clinical trials have shifted from mainly symptom-based to more mucosa-driven. Real world data on treatment priorities are lacking. We aimed to investigate the current practice and most commonly used definitions of IBD treatment targets among Dutch gastroenterologists. Methods: Dutch gastroenterologists were asked to participate in a computer-based nation-wide survey. We asked questions on demographics, opinion and current practice regarding IBD treatment targets. Results: Twenty-four percent (134/556) of the respondents completed the survey. For both Crohn’s disease (CD) (47.3%, 61/129) and ulcerative colitis (UC)(45%, 58/129) the main treatment goal was to achieve and maintain deep remission, defined as clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission. Seventy-six percent of the participants use mucosal healing (MH) as a potential treatment target for IBD, whereas 22.6% use histological remission. There is no single definition for MH in IBD. The majority use Mayo score ≤ 1 in UC (52%) and ‘macroscopic normal mucosa’ in CD (66%). Conclusion: More stringent and mucosa-driven treatment targets as ‘deep remission’ and ‘mucosal healing’ have found traction in clinical practice. The most commonly used definition for MH in routine practice is endoscopic MAYO score ≤ 1 in UC and ‘macroscopic normal mucosa’ in CD. Abbreviations: CD: Crohn’s disease; CDEIS: Crohn‘s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity; IBD: Inflammatory Bowel Disease; IBDU: IBD unclassified; IOIBD: International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; MH: Mucosal healing; MMH: Microscopic mucosal healing; PROMS: Patient reported outcome measures; SES-CD: Simple endoscopic score for Crohn’s disease; UC: ulcerative colitis; UCEIS: Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity.

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1111-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Plevris ◽  
C S Chuah ◽  
R M Allen ◽  
I D Arnott ◽  
P N Brennan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background & Aims Vedolizumab is an anti-a4b7 monoclonal antibody that is licensed for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. The aims of this study were to establish the real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Methods This was a retrospective study involving seven NHS health boards in Scotland between June 2015 and November 2017. Inclusion criteria included: a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease with objective evidence of active inflammation at baseline (Harvey–Bradshaw Index[HBI] ≥5/Partial Mayo ≥2 plus C-reactive protein [CRP] >5 mg/L or faecal calprotectin ≥250 µg/g or inflammation on endoscopy/magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]); completion of induction; and at least one clinical follow-up by 12 months. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to establish 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission [clinical remission plus mucosal healing]. Rates of serious adverse events were described quantitatively. Results Our cohort consisted of 180 patients with ulcerative colitis and 260 with Crohn’s disease. Combined median follow-up was 52 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 26–52 weeks). In ulcerative colitis, 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission were 57.4%, 47.3%, and 38.5%, respectively. In Crohn’s disease, 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission were 58.4%, 38.9%, and 28.3% respectively. The serious adverse event rate was 15.6 per 100 patient-years of follow-up. Conclusions Vedolizumab is a safe and effective treatment for achieving both clinical remission and mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2203
Author(s):  
Mariusz A. Bromke ◽  
Katarzyna Neubauer ◽  
Radosław Kempiński ◽  
Małgorzata Krzystek-Korpacka

Achieving mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease is related to a higher incidence of sustained clinical remission and it translates to lower rates of hospitalisation and surgery. The assessment methods of disease activity and response to therapy are limited and mainly rely on colonoscopy. This meta-analysis reviews the effectiveness of using faecal calprotectin as a marker for mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease. Two meta-analyses were conducted in parallel. The analysis on the use of faecal calprotectin in monitoring mucosal healing in colonic Crohn’s disease is based on 16 publications (17 studies). The data set for diagnostic values of faecal calprotectin in ulcerative colitis is composed of 35 original publications (total 49 studies). The DOR for the use of faecal calprotectin in Crohn’s disease is estimated to be 11.20 and the area under the sROCis 0.829. In cases of ulcerative colitis, the DOR is 14.48, while the AUC sROC is 0.858. Heterogeneity of the studies was moderatetosubstantial. Collected data show overall good sensitivity and specificity of the faecal calprotectin test, as well as a good DOR. Thus, monitoring of mucosal healing with a non-invasive faecal calprotectin test may represent an attractive option for physicians and patients with inflammatory bowel disease.


1997 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Dwarakanath ◽  
I. A. Finnie ◽  
C. M. Beesley ◽  
G. M. O'Dowd ◽  
J. Nash ◽  
...  

1. Faecal excretion of the leucocyte primary granule component, myeloperoxidase, and of the secondary granule component, lactoferrín, were compared in inflammatory bowel disease and infective diarrhoea. 2. Faecal lactoferrín correlated with faecal myeloperoxidase in both inflammatory bowel disease (P = 0.0018; n = 32) and infective diarrhoea (P = 0.00013; n = 37), but inflammatory bowel disease was associated with a much higher faecal excretion of lactoferrín but lower excretion of myeloperoxidase than infective diarrhoea. As a consequence, the median ratio of lactoferrin/myeloperoxidase excretion (both expressed as ng/mg of protein) for inflammatory bowel disease was 7.5 (range 3.5–21.3) with similar values for ulcerative colitis (n = 18) and Crohn's disease (n = 14) compared with only 0.9 (range 0.4–2.3; P < 0.0001) for infective diarrhoea. In inflammatory bowel disease faecal lactoferrín and myeloperoxidase excretion remained increased even in clinical remission. 3. In subsequent immunohistochemical studies to assess the possible explanation for these findings, lactoferrín and myeloperoxidase were demonstrated within crypt abscesses and surface mucus, both in inflammatory bowel and in infective diarrhoea mucosal samples. There was a slight increase in the number of lactoferrin-containing cells in the mucosal samples from ulcerative colitis and in the submucosa of samples from Crohn's disease compared with infective diarrhoea, but these changes were not sufficient to account for the marked increase in faecal lactoferrín excretion in inflammatory bowel disease. 4. In all mucosal samples, including those from normal mucosa, lactoferrín was also shown to be contained within mast cells. 5. These results could best be explained by a different mechanism for leucocyte activation in inflammatory bowel disease compared with infective diarrhoea, and are compatible with selective secretion of secondary granule components, which include lactoferrín but not myeloperoxidase, as a result of leucocyte activation by N-formylated bacterial peptides in inflammatory bowel disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maliha Naseer ◽  
Shiva Poola ◽  
Syed Ali ◽  
Sami Samiullah ◽  
Veysel Tahan

The incidence, prevalence, and cost of care associated with diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease are on the rise. The role of gut microbiota in the causation of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis has not been established yet. Nevertheless, several animal models and human studies point towards the association. Targeting intestinal dysbiosis for remission induction, maintenance, and relapse prevention is an attractive treatment approach with minimal adverse effects. However, the data is still conflicting. The purpose of this article is to provide the most comprehensive and updated review on the utility of prebiotics and probiotics in the management of active Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis/pouchitis and their role in the remission induction, maintenance, and relapse prevention. A thorough literature review was performed on PubMed, Ovid Medline, and EMBASE using the terms “prebiotics AND ulcerative colitis”, “probiotics AND ulcerative colitis”, “prebiotics AND Crohn's disease”, “probiotics AND Crohn's disease”, “probiotics AND acute pouchitis”, “probiotics AND chronic pouchitis” and “prebiotics AND pouchitis”. Observational studies and clinical trials conducted on humans and published in the English language were included. A total of 71 clinical trials evaluating the utility of prebiotics and probiotics in the management of inflammatory bowel disease were reviewed and the findings were summarized. Most of these studies on probiotics evaluated lactobacillus, De Simone Formulation or Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and there is some evidence supporting these agents for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis and prevention of pouchitis relapse with minimal adverse effects. The efficacy of prebiotics such as fructooligosaccharides and Plantago ovata seeds in ulcerative colitis are inconclusive and the data regarding the utility of prebiotics in pouchitis is limited. The results of the clinical trials for remission induction and maintenance in active Crohn's disease or post-operative relapse with probiotics and prebiotics are inadequate and not very convincing. Prebiotics and probiotics are safe, effective and have great therapeutic potential. However, better designed clinical trials in the multicenter setting with a large sample and long duration of intervention are needed to identify the specific strain or combination of probiotics and prebiotics which will be more beneficial and effective in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burton I Korelitz ◽  
Judy Schneider

Abstract We present a bird’s eye view of the prognosis for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease as contained in the database of an Inflammatory Bowel Disease gastroenterologist covering the period from 1950 until the present utilizing the variables of medical therapy, surgical intervention, complications and deaths by decades.


2005 ◽  
Vol 288 (2) ◽  
pp. G169-G174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gert Van Assche ◽  
Paul Rutgeerts

Adhesion molecules regulate the influx of leukocytes in normal and inflamed gut. They are also involved in local lymphocyte stimulation and antigen presentation within the intestinal mucosa. In intestinal inflammation, many adhesion molecules are upregulated, but α4-integrins most likely hold a key position in directing leukocytes into the inflamed bowel wall. Therapeutic compounds directed against trafficking of leukocytes have been designed and are being developed as a novel class of drugs in the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. This review deals with the immunological aspects of leukocyte trafficking focused on gut homing of T cells. Second, the changes in adhesion molecules and T cell trafficking during intestinal inflammation are discussed. Finally, we review the clinical data that have been gathered with respect to the therapeutic potential and the safety of antiadhesion molecule treatment. Antegren, or natalizumab, a humanized anti-α4 integrin IgG4 antibody, has been most extensively evaluated and may be close to registration. A more specific humanized α4β7-integrin MLN-02 has shown preliminary clinical efficacy in ulcerative colitis, and both antergren and MLN-02 appear to be very safe. Trials with the anti-ICAM-1 antisense oligonucleotide ISIS-2302 in steroid refractory Crohn's disease have provided conflicting efficacy data. In the near future, some of these novel biological agents may prove valuable therapeutic tools in the management of refractory inflammatory bowel disease, although it is too early to define the patient population that will benefit most from these agents.


2011 ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Dawn Farrell

Imagine having to empty your bowel eight or ten times a day and experiencing constant panic and fear about the location of toilet facilities. Imagine experiencing constant tiredness that impacts on all aspects of your life including work, family and social life. These are just two examples of experiences commonly suffered by individuals with a condition called inflammatory bowel disease. These people are burdened with symptoms which impact on their daily lives. This research aims to provide healthcare professionals with an understanding of the extent to which individuals with inflammatory bowel disease experience symptom burden and to identify what symptoms are most problematic. Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis collectively termed as inflammatory bowel disease are complex disorders. In the United Kingdom, collectively Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis affects approximately one person in every 250 of the population. Ulcerative colitis affects up to 120,000 people in the UK, or every 1 ...


Medicina ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurgita Šventoraitytė ◽  
Aida Žvirblienė ◽  
Gediminas Kiudelis ◽  
Rimantas Žalinkevičius ◽  
Aurelija Žvirblienė ◽  
...  

Objective. Perturbed immune homeostasis elicited by misbalanced production of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines is characteristic of inflammatory bowel disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate cytokine profile in patients with different forms of inflammatory bowel disease – ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease – during clinical remission phase. Material and methods. Production of proinflammatory Th1 cytokines (tumor necrosis factoralpha (TNF-a), interferon-gamma (IFN-g)) and anti-inflammatory Th2 cytokines (interleukin- 10 (IL-10) and interleukin-13 (IL-13)) was analyzed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (9 with ulcerative colitis and 9 with Crohn’s disease) and control subjects (n=11) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (two-site ELISA). Results. The results of the study revealed that the level of TNF-a after stimulation with phytohemagglutinin in patients with Crohn’s disease was significantly higher in comparison to both patients with ulcerative colitis and controls (P<0.001 and P<0.01, respectively). The secretion of IFN-g both in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis was lower than that in controls (P=0.05 and P<0.01, respectively), but it normalized after stimulation with phytohemagglutinin. The levels of IL-10 and IL-13 were significantly (P<0.01) higher in patients with Crohn’s disease than in patients with ulcerative colitis and control group before and after stimulation with phytohemagglutinin. Conclusions. The results of our study provide evidence that in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, the imbalance between production of proinflammatory Th1 and anti-inflammatory Th2 cytokines persists even during remission of the disease, and disturbances of immune homeostasis are significantly more expressed in patients with Crohn’s disease than in patients with ulcerative colitis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1267-1275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Hüppe ◽  
Jana Langbrandtner ◽  
Winfried Häuser ◽  
Heiner Raspe ◽  
Bernd Bokemeyer

Abstract Introduction Assessment of disease activity in Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is usually based on the physician’s evaluation of clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and biomarker analysis. The German Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity Index for CD (GIBDICD) and UC (GIBDIUC) uses data from patient-reported questionnaires. It is unclear to what extent the GIBDI agrees with the physicians’ documented activity indices. Methods Data from 2 studies were reanalyzed. In both, gastroenterologists had documented disease activity in UC with the partial Mayo Score (pMS) and in CD with the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI). Patient-completed GIBDI questionnaires had also been assessed. The analysis sample consisted of 151 UC and 150 CD patients. Kappa coefficients were determined as agreement measurements. Results Rank correlations were 0.56 (pMS, GIBDIUC) and 0.57 (HBI, GIBDICD), with p < 0.001. The absolute agreement for 2 categories of disease activity (remission yes/no) was 74.2 % (UC) and 76.6 % (CD), and for 4 categories (none/mild/moderate/severe) 60.3 % (UC) and 61.9 % (CD). The kappa values ranged between 0.47 for UC (2 categories) and 0.58 for CD (4 categories). Discussion There is satisfactory agreement of GIBDI with the physician-documented disease activity indices. GIBDI can be used in health care research without access to assessments of medical practitioners. In clinical practice, the index offers a supplementary source of information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document